" they figured out how to put these on satellites."
Maybe not. HAARP took megawatts to run, also needed to turn that into RF and pump it out through large arrays not just one antenna. To put that into a satellite you would have to put a multimegawatt nuclear generator on a satellite. That is physically a stiff project. If you left off all the shielding you could lighten it, but still.
Second the antennas would have to be physically quite large. It would be difficult to have such a large array and not be visible. Do we have one, painted black, up there?
A reason for the large antenna array is to be able to beam-steer. You need multiple antennas to do that. This might be overcomeable in a satellite where you can use the satellite orbital travel to act as one dimension in steering, and a linear array of antennas instead of a 2D grid. This is called synthetic aperture and used in the radar domain.
I have conclusive evidence that burning solar panels to produce power releases carbon dioxide and stinky smoke. But in scientific tests, burning spotted owls only releases a little CO2. I encourage the EPA to ban plastic forks and straws and replace them with titanium-lithium-plutonium which can be reused for generations.
I want to thank the Liberal Science Institute for inviting me to come here to Arkham Asylum to give this speech.
Well, no. The Tesla turbine design had a number of flaws.
- It only operated well at high speeds. This eventually causes the discs to warp.
- For any reasonable power level production, the turbine has to use discs of 2 to 3 feet diameter. However, when those spin at Tesla speeds the material shatters from powerful forces.
- Tesla operating speed is not compatible with things like generators. To power those one has to have 50K to 3K RPM gear step downs. The gears wear out super fast.
These are lab curiousities but not actually practical.
While they do have better AI, there is a fundamental limitation for AI which actually is physics. Due to quantum uncertainty neither humans nor AIs can predict far ahead; they can only give an opinion but not a certainty. No AI can predict the next spin of the roulette wheel, or the exact weather a year from now, or whether the sun will go nova in 2025.
Indeed it is utter bullshit, and stupid roleplay. NSA my ass.
Chatbot AIs can't predict the future with any certainty. Test: Chatbot, will it rain here on September 14? Now do March 29, 2036. Will an asteroid strike Detroit in 2029? If Biden eats stool softener, will his head collapse?
and so on. AIs aren't magical, and the hyped claims are just junk.
You Mellicans so picky. In China we superior we shit in sink not wash hands to make you takeout food faster we punch holes in walls more fficient for hose. Without us you no have dollar tree walmart. we throw dead covid mice in garbage bin for pickup.
You have a nice lawn, gotta protect it and the Torino. I do not discount the idea of sabotage and after seeing the news about delberate arson in Greece, caught on drone, and all the simultaneous Canada fires, I see how much the left is out to disrupt societies, and is lawless and criminal. Contaminating the food supply could be a part of strategy, so are train derails and fires. We are very vulnerable.
Not exactly but I understand your concern. The thing with HAARP is it works on large masses but not directly on small masses like humans. HAARP is more geo-large and acts through manipulation of the atmosphere. There are several ways it can be used. One is to heat the ionosphere and that creates air pressure which can move the Jet Stream affecting weather. Another it is may be able to apply force through electromagnetic means to underground water, deep beneath the surface. That can apply force to the earth around it.
He already owes on that, but he's related to Pelosi so I expect there will be a long trail on that going forward, plus he's a Getty (like in Getty Oil). The Dems elite have already promised to him that he will get support as a candidate.
Another angle is that he is a candidate picked by the WEF - he was annointed a 'Young Global Leader' some years ago, which means he sucks Schwab's ass and takes orders, which is why old Gavin has banned gas cars, gas stoves, and gas generators, and diesel trucks in California which will royally screw over Chinese goods transportion from Long Beach. But since Biden is owned by China, we will have to see how the collision between WEF and Chinese interests works out. My guess is Biden's side will lose.
You can tell I'm not going to have a 'Newsom for President' sign on the lawn when he runs. In fact I am building a database in anticipation of constantly attacking his politics later.
Yes. The Masons must have some kind of off the books evaluation process for member rank elevation. There's a brotherhood within the brotherhood. There was a TV movie with Glenn Ford including some of this. It was called 'The Brotherhood of the Bell', with the Bell a thinly disguised version of the freemasons. Ford rebels and in the end gets f'ed over.
Whatever the chef walked in on must have been so significant it needed murder to keep it quiet. So what is at that level? Or was he going to publish a tell-all, and someone on the editorial staff leaked it to Obama and he and the CIA decided to halt the book.
The concept is highly flawed, but today's 'social scientists' are often idiots.
Why do I say flawed? Let's examine the tool and the approach.
A chatbot is trained from a mass of diverse sources. That means that the data comes from a mass of different people. Sane people, weird people, abnormal people, even bots in the many internet sources. For example, Reddit is hardly wholly sane and reliable or even human in the posts.
Would one seriously want to prepare a formal research paper based on inputs from possibly fake people? Given a conclusion based on data from sources you cannot be certain were actual people? Of course not. Using chatbots as stand-ins for real people is a big stupid approach.
It is like doing a poll of political preferences and accepting some results like 75% of responders favored Hillary Clinton for POTUS, but not allowing that half of them might be bots run by the DNC.
So when I say flawed I mean flawed.
More information.
- dicyanin A is not the same molecule as dicyanin.
- dicyanin is not illegal, it is just hard to find a manufacturer. https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/fact-check/united-states-makes-dicyanin-dye-illegal-because-supernatural-properties/
"Do you have a problem with respecting and valuing people" Do I respect and value people who kill Palestinian children and steal their land? lolol hell no.
The mayor's issue and complaint was specifically about a White Pride banner. So she believes it's okay to be Black Pride and that's not racist but White Pride is racist.
Nice deflection. BLM has the freedom to burn down buildings and try to kill cops, but a bunch of white guys using freedom of speech to hang a banner equates to gassing jews, eh? Oh, those funny Khazars, always kidding us in between stealing money and land.
You gotta hand it to the small caps, they haz chutzpah.