Do your searches in Russian. :) Western media covered only tiny part of Navalny adventures that was suitable for the Western narratives.
Navalny was a murky businessman of kind, participated in money laundering with government owned businesses, like in that Kirovles case. It was regular practice at the time, when product of some state owned company (woddland plots and sawmill in that case) bought for the very low price and then reselled with market price. From the external point of view, there was nothing criminal - buy low, sell high, unless you know how that really work here. This state company sell wood only to Navalny company, because state bureaucrat who was in charge of that state company received huge part of Navalny company profits. Plain and simple corruption and state money laundering. When such schemes began to be criminalized, Navalny jump off and moved to some other less risky businesses. Nobody come after him, just because much larger fish was hunted at the time. But, probably, this ability to run away at the correct time attracted attention of some liberal politicians.
There was few other business adventures, also murky, when Navalny company again did absolutely nothing just being a money proxy.
Eventually, Navalny ended with owning some tiny business of making some wicker-work like chairs or something IIRC. Of course he didn't participate in any work, just was co-owner getting some small profit. And at that stage he decided to move into politics with agenda of fighting against corruption.
Pretty strange for the man who personally make all his weath on corruption.
Initially Navalny played liberal politician, but at the time it was already pretty obvious that liberal ideology is heavily anticipated by Russia population after the years of liberal reforms. You could easily find numerous Navalny meetings with all top liberal politicians of Russia. He often participated in round tables and whatever liberal meetings.
As I understand, Navalny turn to nationalism (fake turn, of course) happened after a group of nationalists disrupted one of liberal meetings where Navalny presented. He got that he will not acheve anything playing liberal, and even single nationalist have much more public support than all liberals together.
He began to participate in Russian marches and other nationalist events. and I suppose that was the moment when he was taken into hand by Western agencies.
West often used nationalism for intervention, but in case of real Russian nationalism that didn't work, really. Either Russian nationalist leaders deny any contacts with Western agencies agents, either such contacts ended with punched faces of western negotiators. One MI6 agent even ended in ICU, with accident filmed and shared over social media at the time, with few nationalist ended in jail for severe harm to health of victim.
But Navalny, being filthy liberal was completely another story. And what's most important, unlike any other nationalist leaders he had murky corrupt past that gives his curators good lever over him.
So, Navalny got financing and press and started his political campaign on the terms of nationalism, antiimmigration and anticorruption - highly popular things among people. But there was one thing people remembered well - he was the one who filed the case against nationalists who once disrupted his liberal meeting and that ended in jail time for one of nationalists for the "spreading of ethnic hatred". Such things are not welcomed in Russia.
Under the guise of that attractive slogans Navalny and his team pushed purely liberal narratives. Navalny once had some peak of popularity, but as more liberal crap like LGBTXYZ+ support began to appear in his agenda, his popularity significantly dropped. But Navalny and team had that finance flow from their Western partners and they started different election companies aiming at some not very high positions like majors of small towns and regional councils.
Nobody really would have been bothered with that attempts, if not the ties of Navalny organisation with Western agencies. Dropped popularity of Navalny do not allow him to achieve anything, but that "Western hand" always make Russian authorities angry. Many different small candidates without chances for win participate in elections, from radical communists to open nationalists and nobody gives a fuck.
As soon as Navalny sensed attention of Russian three-letter services he immidiately began to play a victim. Familiar behaviour, isn't it? This reduced his popularity even more. People still was interested in some dirty underwear Navalny with help of his Beliingcat(MI6) friends dug out on some Russian bureaucrats and oligarchs, but his game was already finished.
The rest of story was more or less represented in Western media from the necessary for the Western narrative angle.
Interesting that in the end, Navalny western masters just throw him under the bus, and then with their stupid sanctions helped Putin to do nearly everything that was in the most popular Navalny points. Seized Russia oligarchs foreing property, rised Russian nationalism to state ideology, clearly show horrors of uncontrolled migration and along with that made any western influence over Russia's wanna-be-politicians highly improbable.
Does Putin heard about Navalny at all? Of course he did. At the level somewhere between that black basketball junky caught with the stuff on the border and some governor from middle of nowhere who tried to swallow too much.
Merry Cristmas for all those who celebrate it today!
I just try to provide some context mostly unknown for Western people who have information about Russian history only from the worst enemies of Russia. Not that I insist on or push Russian version of history as the only true one, just knowing different point of view is always useful, regardless of its acceptance in whole.
As for Fomenko-Nosovsky books, I read them all. Initially, those guys brought to surface a tons of very uncomfortable for official history out-of-time facts and artifacts and it was an absolutely great job. But then, when their first book become a bestseller, at least in Russia, they fall to stretching everything to questionable narrative for profit and that completely ruined their initial work. Instead of further developing and research of found inconsistencies and pusing official historians to admit and accept them, they become no different from official historians, just with different narrative. They began to ignore facts that contradict their version of history, just like official historians.
However, I highly recommend their first book as a source of legitimate questions to the official history that have to be rised and answered.
If a state does not provide useable cash in necessary amount, people easily find their own means of exchange.
Been there, done that.
Khazarian Kaganate was multinational state with totally Jewish authorities down to last clerk. Lower classes was mostly Middle-Asian and Caucasus tribes. Official state religion was Judaism, but there no any clear evidence that lower non-Jewish classes ever practicised Judaism. AFAIK, Thalmud prohibits spreading Judaism among non-Jews, not shure if that rabbic rule was in force at the time of Kaganate, but it is very probable. Otherwise, there had to exist some non-Jewish tribes with Judaism as religion as Khazarian Kaganate debris. AFAIK, only Madagaskar niggers practicise Jewdaism, but in no way they have anything to do with Khazarian Kaganate.
Really, there couldn't be any "Khazarian etnicity", just like there could not be "American etnicity". Ashkenazi, whose ancestors live and rule in Khazaria, are pretty Jewish with all necessary markers in genome. They are different from modern Sefard Jews, who originate from European region of Spain, but have much more common with Sefards than with any other etnicity. Even most specific Jewish genetic ilnesses are common to Sefards and Ashkenazi.
This narrative about "all that shit that attributed to the Jews is really done by bad Khazars who are not Jews" is so glowing, that it is amasing how somebody could fall into that crap.
And David Duke is right. It always were Jews, are Jews and will be Jews who do all their Jewish shit. No any "Khazarian" narrative will change that.
That's what we had in early 90s after USSR fall. Enterprises paid salaries in whatever they produce or have in stock if emproyees do not want to wait for cash. This was ended by Yeltsin government very quickly, since there was no way to tax that salaries and profits paid in goods and also tax following barter deals among people. They thought it will quickly destroy industry in Russia, but discovered themselves at the edge of bankruptcy, with industry, suddenly enhancing assortment to produce valuable things people need and agree to barter. Yeltsin government quickly fill market with cash and switched to another method of destroying industry.
By itself barter could be pretty cool, especially with modern IT. But I don't see a way Milley will get any money soon to support Israel if Argentina will turn into barter economy country. :)
Sign say "Putin - madman and murderer. No to war"
There are also many Ukrainians fighting with the Israelis
That's hardly. Those Ukraine citizens who fleed to Israel fleed from conscription on Ukraine. So, even being Jews, they hardly ready to be conscripted by Israel.
Also, no man could leave Ukraine unless he is Jewish.
There is also a possibility that it is some Zelensky order to send some Ukraine troops to Israel, but that would heavily worsen Zelensky position on Ukraine. May be there is some secret agreements between Ukraine and Israel, because Mossad and IDF personnel sometimes occured among deceased AFU, so it is possible that some SBU and AFU members is on duty in Israel.
Traditionally, ethnically Russian and Polish Ukrainians hate Jews since the times of Pale of Settlement. It is hard to imagine that any non-Jewish Ukrainian who succeded to break out of Ukraine will ever fight on the side of Israelis.
Not that I deny possibility or shure that they are there, just some points for the context.
If you count Jewish casualities from videos of destroying Jewish tanks and armored vehicles and small arms shooting for one day and compare this count with official Israeli statements, then it is around 7-12 times difference.
Telegram channels are full with battles footage, so everybody could make his own conclusions if interested.
From the other side, I found that Israel war reporting is amasingly similar to the Ukrainian one. Like they use the same textbook. This also could give some clue.
optimal exclusively in terms of energy production per unit mass.
It have relatively low energy per unit mass because windings are heavy.
You also don't need copper, two dissimilar metals will do.
Yes, but it could be even more expensive and there will be more losses, because only aluminium have similar to copper conductivity, but have little difference in potential with iron. So, you will need some other metal instead of iron and it will be more expensive than copper. Just check electrochemical potential of different metals.
The large surface area of the wire allows for a lot of galvanic action to happen all at once,
Surface area in modern batteries is orders of magnitude larger, because of using porous materials for electrodes. So, again, this battery is much worse than modern ones.
Surface of electrodes determine maximum possible current battery could give out. Really it is not directly connected with total energy stored a battery.
Not really. There was some period in mid 2000s, when it was really cheap to start a business or buy a property there, but this ended around 2010, and it was one of the reasons why pro-Russian Yanukovich won elections. After the coup, Ukraine turned to Western-like tax system so things went even worse. There was some attractable tax extempts for some areas of business, mostly for IT, but this also ended shortly, as post-coup Ukraine government began to drawn in Western loans.
They will not be owners, that's the point. All in all, it was them who brought Ukraine to its end. Look at what happened with their property in LPR/DPR.
In the distant past, elites used art objects and precious metals and gems as their internal currency. Sometimes all aforementioned things was combined in a single object. At least, that objects was really nice and pleasant to look at. All that crowns, bowls, scepters, etc.
But with that art pieces elites was limited with supply of that objects. Elites depend on the genius artists, and have no any lever on the artist inspiration. This become unacceptable for elites in time. They want total control over currency.
So, in the not so distand past, elites decided to switch to so called "modern art" as their internal currency. You know, all that daub and fecalous figurines sourced by declared "great modern artists" with million $ price tags. Now, they could easily control currency supply, just by declaring some daubers as greatest artists and force them to produce necessary amount of "art".
But there still was a problem with physical objects - they could be stolen, lost, damaged and so on. It is also not very easy to transfer them quetly when they declared by MSM as precious objects of art and have a million price tag.
So, they are experimenting in attempts to find better replacement for their internal currency. Since they are not as smart as many think, we observe all that stupid shit.
Why you are so wondered by NFT, when you have an example of different Malevichs, Giacometties and Banksies for a long time? This NFT shit is no different from "modern art" shit in core.
what you are doing is actually getting everything the chemistry produces in an optimal set-up
This setup is far from optimal, because of drawbacks with fast wearing of wires and stuff in electrolyte.
IDK, if there was some attempts to develop this device further and get rid of that drawbacks, but modern electronics make this senseless. Why bother with large quantities of expensive copper, when you could do the same thing with few cents of modern electronic components?
I admit that idea of this invention is pretty cool by itself, but I do not agree this invention could be somehow actual today.
This 50 Jewish families mostly live in EU, have realty in EU, keep their wealth in EU and so on, not on Ukraine.
They are like external vacuum pumps sucking out of Ukraine any wealth they could reach.
Obviously, if they had any plans to build Jewish state on Ukraine, they would have been building something there, develop their possible future "Holy Land" and so on.
Also, all their assets resided on Ukraine they use to suck it dry, will obviously change owners after this regions will eventually join Russia, Poland, Hungary or Romania, depending on respective population. All businesses in Zaporozhie, Kherson, Donetsk, Lugansk and Crimea that belonged to that Jewish families do not belong to them anymore.
Russian authorities playing by juridical textbooks, and looks like they are pretty good at that, so you will not find any proclamations and moves that will sound like "whatever oligarch property was nationalized!!!", it all covered by some law tricks and papers, so it just happen like something routine.
AFAIK, there are no any loud calls and cries about "illegal property seizure" nor about property of hostile Western corporations here, nor about property of hostile oligarchs. Everything made in the pretty juridical way, f.e. so corporations/oligarhs could not fulfill some obligations or contracts and pay fines, prolong license, present some papers in person to tax service in time or whatever bureaucracy. So, they lose property like by their own fault, due to unwilling to follow the Russian laws.
From the other side, again, AFAIK, Western corporations who are not hostile and ready to circumvent Western sanctions and continue to work here even recieve wide support from Russian authorities in establishing schemes of sanction circumvention here.
Since Ukrainian Jewish families are pretty hostile toward Russia, that thing with "self-inducted" property loss will happen with that Jewish families to. You might be aware of beta version of such method was used against Khodorkovskiy and his Yukos corporation, when Khodorkovskiy began actively participate on the Western side of political games against Russia. It was succesfull try, but due to some drawbacks it rised some noise on the West. Today method is polished to perfection and works without all that unnecessary noise.
To fulfill the prophecy of Armageddon in particular and Apocalypsis in whole (Return of Mashiah and acquiring total control of the World in Jewish religion) Jews need to build Third Temple in Jerusalem.
Also, Jews hate and afraid all slavic countries, and nobody will pay them welfare there, so no, if, hopefully, Israel will be destroyed, Jews will flee to the Western countries with the highest welfare rates.
Khazarian Kaganate was completely destroyed by slavic people, if you are not aware. It will never exist anymore.
Also, centers of Jewish attraction on Ukraine are Dnepropetrovsk and Uman. They are on Eastern Ukraine and will be eventually under control of Russia. But Russia already have Jewish Autonomous Region on Southern Far East (closer to Japan), so even if there will be influx of Jewish refugees into Russia (which is highly inprobable due to aforementioned reasons), they will be offered to settle in their Autonomous Region if they want to acquire Russian citizenship, not into returned Russian regions.
And the territory, where Khazarian Kaganate once resided already deep in Russia. It is barely touched Donetsk region and extended to the East, up to Volga mouth and Caspian Sea. there are no any signs that any Jewish refugees have any pretension to settle or perpetuate any activity on that territory at all.
Good post.
Most people even can't imagine how little independence they have and how important it is.
justification for Russia's imperialism.
The point is that Russians don't need any "justification" for Russian imperialism. We are proud of it. If somebody interested - we have explanation for one or another move. Not "justification". It is West elites who constantly needs "justification" for fucking up whole world, not us.
You don't need to post these wall of text.
I'm currently doing very boring work of reverse engineering and fixing bugs in one stupid firmware written by low-wage outsource slaves of one Western corporation, so I just use you as a kind of relaxation from this boring work. And thank you for supporting this conversation. :)
Are you still pretending that you don't care about my opinion?
Yep. You are not my relative or whatever. How your opinion could influence me? I just find it funny to study the abyss of western arrogance and ignorance.
Russia conquered anc colonized all of Sibera and plenty of -stan nations.
You found it in some Western textbooks written by worst enemies of Russia, aren't you?
All nations of Siberia and -stans are perfectly fine as part of Russia. They have their own governments and are full Russian citizens. We don't have some reservations or colonies.
what happened to the Crimean Tatars?
First, this Tatars are "Crimean" not because they are native to crimea. They was nomad tribes, tiny fragment of Khazarian Kaganate. Just part of them settled there. In times of WWII Stalin saved them from total annihilation. Crimean Tatars desided to take side of Germany in WWII. If they was not removed from fronlines, they all would have been join Germany troops and evetually killed as enemy, along with Germans. Now they are perfectly fine, have representation in Crimea government, their language is one of official languages of Crimea and they have full rights as any Russian citizen.
Same thing happened with Chechens. Take a look at modern Grozny city and find out what side they fight on today.
Such policy have its benefits and drawbacks, but looking from the point of Russia as historical entity, benefits oviously overweight any drawbacks.
How come that Crimea is full of Russians?
Crimea is full of Russians because Russia defeated Ottoman Empire and included Crimea in Russia.
In the distant past, Crimea was inhabited by Greeks they build towns and had their lifes there for a long time. Crimean Greeks was totally exterminated by Turks at some point, Turks didn't even develop anything in Crimea, never settled there, never build a single village and used it just as a military base to attack Russia, Bulgaria and other countries around. Then Turks was defeated by Russia, Crimea become part of Russia, so it was inhabited with Russians.
Then was British "Crimean war" against Russia in attempt to colonize Crimea and build naval base. For whatever reason arrogant and stupid Brits thought that they are rulers of all seas. Their asses was heavily kicked in that humiliating for Brits war but British elite still can't forget about Crimea and their stupid idea that they are some sea Empire and have rights for every sea in the world.
Then Germans tried to conquer Crimea, and also failed.
Strange that arrogant idiots in Western elites, after numerous defeats still suppose that they could somehow take Crimea. Even their shennigans with so called "Ukraine" failed miserably. They are welcome if they don't care about lives of their military.
Russians never deny that Russia is empire. But our empire don't need colonies, and never had them. We use different approach. This seems could not be understand by West who could not imagine any apporoach to building empire other then their.
Thanks for conversation. Meanwhile, it's morning here. :)
You'd ask the head of your church.
He told me that this verse is not about persons, but about principles of authority and power that corrupt people. Something close to what I wrote in my first reply in previous discussion.
Not about some angels, fallen or not.
And, meanwhile, angels have blood and flesh, and verse directly states that it is not about flesh and blood, so any angels with gang names are obviously excluded.
Again, don't expect that all people have your background and cultural references. Things that important for you could be completely unimportant for others.
THE FALLEN ANGELS TOOK DAUGHTERS OF MEN AS WIFE'S, AND GAVE BIRTH TO THE NEPHILIM. Aka Giants. Men of reknown. Heroes.
Whatever. Nephilim, Giants, Bigfoot. Not my things, honestly. Entertaining, of course, but completely useless in practical sense.
Still don't see any connections between your narrative and my post. Why don't you make your own post with your theory and have a nice discussion relevant to your beliefs with people who interested in it?
Interesting, will there be numerologists who will calculate something from "ἐξουσία" and will push their story, trying to convince me that this word means Stalink satellites as "math show"?
You write those walls of text to justify Russia's imperialism because you don't care about my opinion.
I found it kind of entertaining to study levels of arrogance and ignorance among some conspiracies.win visitors. If you would have been more thorough, you had checked my comments history. :)
And funny fact - you started with Russian colonialism, but now it is already Russian imperialism. :) Seems you have no any opinion at al. Isn't it entertaining?
I don't think such video exists. Just like no video exists where he names that black basketball junky. But that does not mean he didn't know about them.