The only solution to fix this world's problems are with peaceful noncompliance and new innovations that are done outside of their systems.
No bank loans, no private funding from BlackRock like companies for one. Start new private credit unions and drain mney from the big banks.
Insurance....same deal. Avoid it, and get it privately through independent unions. Start up insurance unions where members are owners.
Farmers markets....but avoid the fake stalls which are just fronts for the big growers. Local butchers and if you know someone who hunts, ask to perhaps buy some meat from them.
Mechanics needs to start open sourcing their distribution channels and getting after market parts more easily manufactured by independent third parties. Avoid dealership locks and get away from smart systems that are not open source.
Manufacturing and trades need to be setup, so that requires logistics. Truckers are valuable for this while larger infrastructure can be developed in partnership with different regions on a system.
The goal should be to innovate beyond this world as it is. We need to establish better standards of living, improved culture, better technology, and entertainment needs to be highly available and quality. We need to have systems of cohesive character yet distinct and celebrate the worlds difference.
Ultimately we should all want to have a better world for ourselves and the world at large. It is never a zero sum game and anyone who thinks so doesn't appear to understand what that phrase means since it clearly has shown throughout history however flawed it is, that we have anything but a zero sum game....
I'm sick of doubters everywhere, and I am sick of people looking to try and manipulate people for their selfish aims. I am looking for the <1% of people who are visionaries and executive champions. I am calling on 1/20 of the 1/20 people who are out there....0.25%
The only ones who make the decisions that change the world.....be the tide not the wave
Good post.
Most people even can't imagine how little independence they have and how important it is.
But even more so I feel that people forget the power that they do possess. No point in thinking about things we cannot affect, but locally our power is immense.
I like this, this is a great start.
Noncompliance by the common man coupled with a small percentage of agitators to actively tear down the institution seems to be the ticket. A pretty small group of maybe 50-100 agitators would easily overwhelm LE anywhere but the largest of cities. Especially if they didn't do gay shit like hold signs and "peacefully protest" in one small location and instead did stuff that makes a difference across the cities.
Wrong.
I only read parts of that, so sorry if you already covered anything I say.
You kind of touched on it though with "We have no organizations. We have no institutions. They are raided and shut down or infiltrated from the start.". This is a part of why violence could not ever work: it could never be organized, but even beyond that, you cannot defeat the most powerful violent organization in history by beating them directly at their own game.
Voting, obviously, we don't need to rehash why that can't work.
So, yes, the options are lay down and die, or mass noncompliance (coupled with creating parallel structures to allow survival without compliance).
Mass noncompliance (and parallel structures) requires no large scale organization, only very loose coupling between groups, regions, etc. for trade, protection, etc., and building relationships and networks with those near you.
It does require a critical mass, large enough and distributed enough and low profile enough that they cannot stamp it out easily.
The three potential outcomes are:
not enough participation leads to their ability to shut it down and hunt noncompliers down
a good enough parallel society is permitted to exist long term, outside of the mainstream, or on the fringes
the movement is able to influence and move the mainstream enough for it to be considered tenable long term
It's not sexy, but I don't see how any other path could ever work, and I do see ways this path can work, and there are plenty of historical affirmations. It's sort of like the old stand alone together. Very difficult to break up if the participants are motivated enough.
You don’t seem to understand violence. You’re treating it like nonviolence. I have no idea why you’re doing this.
No one said anything about lining up and shooting muskets at one another.
But does require violence, otherwise it doesn’t work.
You could not ever organize any kind of revolt. As you said yourself, it would be infiltrated.
The only violence required in mass noncompliance is defense if and when they unjustly come to take anything that is rightfully yours. Life if violent, there is no escaping that, but any kind of offensive violence when you are outgunned and do not control the propaganda machine is DOA. You will lose and public opinion would be turned further against you.
Agree. We don't use violence as a tool of manipulation, but it is always used in defense against those who would wield violence to manipulate others. Violence is only justified when done to defend against an unjust violence.
So don’t. There’s plenty that can be done which doesn’t require organization.
Translation: “Never actually do anything and instantaneously lose because you acted like a ✡libertarian✡ and refused to fight back until ten thousand of them were outside your personal home.”
So control it.
You're (seemingly intentionally) missing my point. If 10,000 are at your door you've done it wrong, and you've lost. Band together and protect what is rightfully yours, always, but offensive action will generally bring a bigger response than you are capable of handling. There are ways to do it, sure, and models like the Taliban to follow, but it is not something to just jump into.
Gaining actual control of the propaganda machine is an effort that would take decades, and incredible organization, which again, would be infiltrated and steered off course.
Largely, the way you get your messaging across is by not playing into their narratives and finding ways outside the mainstream channels to deliver the message.
In asymmetric war, as with life in general, you win not by beating the more powerful opponent at their own game but by getting them to play where you have strengths.
Whites can do anything we put our minds to. Never forget that.
It takes decades to destroy broadcast towers, power transmission lines, and satellite dishes?
Ahh, mostly fair
...says person who has apparently never had to register a car in most U.S. states.
anybody who has space and any sort of technical ability should be getting "desktop" milling equipment and/or 3D printers. that stuff has gotten cheaper and cheaper. making one-off copies of small parts is getting easier and easier. even Harbor Freight tier equipment is better than no equipment at all. when the supply chain, or the economy, collapses, locals with manufacturing capability will be extremely valuable.
ummm, the current situation isn't going to end peacefully. should any of the ideas you suggest for a "peaceful resolution" become a threat to (((their))) profits and control, the parasites-with-the-character-of-traitors called "law enforcement" will be tasked with stomping those ideas and those ideas' prosyletizers out of existence.
Sounds a lot like socialism...
a) Fluid solution (inception towards death) generates solid problems (life).
b) Problem aka PRO (forward) BALLEIN (to throw)...living implies a proposition, something put forth; exposed to view etc.
c) Others suggest seeking solutions to problems as to tempt one to go with the flow instead of building resistance within self.
d) To fix aka to hold onto implies ones denial of being within motion.
a) Peace implies versus war; full implies versus empty...conflicts of reason.
b) Suggested peaceful tempts one to ignore being PIECE (partial) within FULL (whole) aka PACE (rate of motion).
Compliance implies ones yielding to the suggestions by others...NON (not; nothing; nihilo) implies ones consent to suggested nihilism and ones denial of perceivable for suggested.
a) IN (within) NOVA (new) TION (action)
b) Being implies reaction within "now" of action.
c) Suggested new (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable now (within everything).
Money implies a suggested currency within a perceivable current (inception towards death). Those who consent to hold onto suggested currency ignore/deny that perceivable current cannot be held onto.
Holding onto something (currency) while drowning (current) reduces ones resistance while permitting others to put extra burden (debt) on.
Being implies in-between (life) filling (inception) and draining (death).