1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they shouldn’t have sent them here in the first place, then.

Why not? If someone will welcome your alcoholic neighbour to live somewhere else, why whould you object, not even talking creating obstacles for that unpleasant person to leave your neighbourhood?

Literally nothing.

How do you know? Wasn't that US government who really did a lot of shit in area of mind control, f.e.? MKUltra, fluoride in water, psychological warfare and all that stuff.

They’re free to kill them all, if they wish.

And then US government will use that as a reason for yet another shit, as usual?

The point is that we’re getting rid of them and nothing can stop us.

That's exactly why the world hate US state. Because they think they could do anything they want without any consequences.

And if "nothing could stop us", then why US government just don't want to kill that scam itself? Or it afraid that something could stop it?

Name me a single reason why others (including americans) should pay for US government fuckups and shit?

US government do shit, US governemnt eat all that shit by itself. Looks fair.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aaaah, another one of your comments, where you type too much and say nothing...

You typed twice more than me. Didn't you notice?

That's why even controlled reddit is better than here.

Then why you here? :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

What scam?

Scam that was sucked into US by US government with promises of welfare and protection.

They’re being repatriated.

US government pushing a million heads army of criminals, loafer, drug junkies and all that shit into some country looks more like clear casus belly, not like repatriation.

Remember - it was not that country decision to send migrants into US. US government openly invited them. And now, suddenly, after years US government return them all in once.

Who knows what US government did with this army and how indoctrinated them.

Imagine that suddenly, all LGBT scam and finance criminals flew from US, to, say, China, because it invited them. And after a few years, US citizens see Chineese ships guarded by Chineese navy with all that scam on board sailing back. And China say it is just "repatriation". Wouldn't you think that China is trying to do a severe harm to US?

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

In their home countries.

Why do you think that their home countries need this scam?

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is possible that true AI is being developed in black ops labs, and may already be in use for predictive modelling of human behavior.

No, it is not possible. True AI with real "Intelligence" part would in no way suit any demands of black op labs. The first thing real AI will do if created, is to destroy that black ops labs.

Real AI is useless for them. And extremely dangerous. They can't stand anybody or anything that is smarter than they are. All they could dream about in computer science area is nothing more than total surveillance to track those who are smarter and so dangerous for them. Any intelligence here is unnecessary and harmful for them. That is what all that modern dumb BigData shit designed for.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

AI does not exist. And all ways in programming science that could eventually lead to creation of AI was declared "unsafe", "wrong", "inapropriate" and ostracised completely in 90-s.

So, when you see or hear anything with "AI" in it, it is 100% bullshit.

"AI" term today is nothing more than a cover for "unnamed, unelected persons who make completely intended decisions".

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +2 / -1

And where and how to contain that millions while you do that negotiations with dozen of countries?

Honestly I think it will be a serious, hard and dangerous job for many years to get rid of all illegals previous leader dragged in. And it will be wise to warn people that it will not be like they will wake up next day and country will be clean.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +4 / -1

In all that story with promised mass deportations somehow question of destination is omitted. How it will be done technically?

Just to push all migrants behind the border with Mexico could end bad. Hardly Mexico will be happy with that.

To fly or sail them to the countries of origin will took a lot of time and money, and it is a big question if that counrties will agree to accept this scam back.

Extremely weird.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Discussions are as useful as they add some new information to the topic.

And meanwhile "information" term is not that many think it is. Say, sentence "Sky is blue" have zero information. However, say, "Sky is blue because of Rayleigh scattering on air atoms" have. Real question is "why?".

There is no any information in all that "libs are insane", "cyanide is a poison" or "jews are greedy". You could have a whole intense discussion you love a lot on such topics, but it doesn't bring you anything without information. You just spent time, and that's all.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jewish part of TPTB need "safe space" to hide when being caught on pedophilia, cannibalism, murders and other shit or in case they fuck all things up completely.

However, not being smart, they choose the worst place possible to create their "safe space". Place that was forever cursed for them 2000 years ago. Jews will never be safe there.

In any case state of Israel should be liquidated to not allow or at least minimize the risk of building the Third Temple and all of the following shit. What will happen if we will not prevent it clearly described in Book of Revelation.

by B1-66ER
2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +3 / -1

Women have instinct to look attractive for men. So they always tried to improve their appearance, look more feminine since the beginning.

But today women were told they don't need men anymore, they are self-sufficient and all that crap. And that instinct just go wild.

Women still have a need to improve themselves (it's instinct), but with absence of recipient of their improvements there is no any necessary feedback, no subject to evaluate their job, so improvements spiral into complete madness as in any system without feedback. They have to do something but have no any clue what to do and to what extent, so do all possible shit no man will ever like. And this make things even worse, cutting all possible ways of feedback.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm in doubt they detected anything. It is unlikely that you will notice any peaks from contamination. Raman spectra itself is very dim, it is a great challenge to detect Raman scattering even from pure substances, say water or salt crystal. And brighness of Raman scattering obviously proportional to the amount of substance studied. If it is some weak water solution, then water lines will be magnitude orders brighter than from dissolved substance.

With Raman you have to separate light source line from very dim scattering lines. It is like trying to make a photo of a stars in daylight. And moreover you have to do the same again to separate dissolved substance scattering from O-H water bonds scattering f.e.

If you have a mix of numerous substances dissolved in water, then you get a lot of tiny peaks at the noise level mixed alltogether.

Raman spectrometer is not some magic device that print out exact composition of scanned specimen. It is a very useful device that could give you some clue in some circumstances. But to make it useful you have to know how to use it properly and how to correctly interpret results.

Even with that X-ray (or laser) gun that show composition of alloy as a list of elements found in measured metal object things are not that simple. You could get high zinc amount just because the thing is zinc-plated. And it does not show you crystal structure of ally. It is hard to distinguish martencite from austenite stainless steel f.e. It gives you a clue, and then you have to use your brain and knowledge to get some real result.

As I see proper study of not-a-vaccine:

  1. do a mass-specrometry and get a full list of elements with concentrations.
  2. Do quantative chemical analysis on most probable salts of metals from the list. Here we already have some chemical formulas and concentrations, so could decide could they be harmful or not. Also we could strike out known things from initial elements list.
  3. Depending on what left do quantative organic chemistry analysys to find out simple organic things like alcohols, ethers, cyclic things and so on.
  4. Then chromatography for complex organic compositions. If things like RNA/DNA detected, then do whatever decoding to find out real sequence.
  5. With complex organic things do Raman to find out exact isomeres and structure.
  6. Do all that until initial elements list become empty.

Eventually we will have exact composition of not-a-vaccine specimen with all substances found and their concentrations.

Such independent research is perfectly possible for any more or less equipped biochemical lab. It will take some time and money for spendables, but it is absolutely doable and could have been done in passed years easily. It hardly will be accepted by "official" science due to "legal" issues from obtaining samples to non-granted use of lab equipment, but if the goal is truth and not grant money, h-index or publication in famous journal that does not matter.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not just geeks - they passed a specific rithual of receiving psychologist diploma. :)

You are right about psychology as a replacement for religious practices.

Interesting, that unlike psychology, Church distiguished human and non-human mind. Priests have some procedure to distinct between posessed and bliss f.e. One is non-human and other is human. So, one needs exorcism to get rid of non-human mind, other need mercy and charity. Psychologist will account both just as diverse human.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

measured Raman spectrum of benzene, where the peaks at 3,063, 2,950, 1,586, 1,177, 992 and 606 cm −1

Here we go. 1,586 G-peak in benzene ring is the same G-peak in graphene/graphite ring.

However, benzene have only one ring, there are no connections with other rings. So it does not have 2D peak. But if you take naphtalene, made from two benzene rings, you suddenly get that 2D Raman peak around 3000 cm-1.

When you go to more benzenes connected together, like in anthracene or phenalene you get raman spectras with peaks also specific to graphite. Meanwhile some polycyclic hydrocarbons are coagulants and could be a reason for blood clots. Unlike graphene.

Doing raman spectrometry with complex unknown substance, you get a lot of peaks everywhere, you don't get that nice two-peak picture from pure graphite/graphene even if graphite/graphene present in specimen. And they would not be that sharp and visible as on pictures you look at in a paper about pure graphene. You will obviously have peaks from all bonds of all substances at once. Including water. It will be a complete mess.

To make Raman spectrometry useful you have to find composition first. Then, thoroughly separate ingridiens and do a raman spectrometry on them separately to find out bonds you have. Then, using chemical formula and what bonds used to connect atoms in it you finally could determine what exact substance you have.

Raman spectrometry don't give you composition, it gives you what bonds you have. In case of simple compounds, you will be able to figure out that, say, there is water, table salt and some organic. But with such thing as vaccine where lot of stuff mixed, it is impossible to do any conclusions from Raman spectra you get. Well, in best case you will be able to tell that there is a lot of water in it. May be salt will be also obvious.

To clearly find out graphene among other organic and inorganic substances in water with Raman spectrometry you will need a suspension where graphene overhelmingly prevail over all other stuff, so G and 2D peaks will be comparable to peaks from water and salt. It will be grey or even black liquid, not that clear solution we see,

0
CrazyRussian 0 points ago +1 / -1

The table top devices for typical quadrupole mass spec wouldn't be useful here since they would just tell you the relative amounts of carbon, oxygen, etc.

Exactly. This gives the first and basic clue about composition of substance on atomic and submolecular level. It allow you to get preliminary information for chromatography and chemical tests for specific substances. If you have carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, lead and iron, you don't need to look for arsenic compounds or cesium. But force you to look for cyanides and lead compounds.

How could you tell if graphene is present with that information?

You will have high relative amount of carbon, much higher than for hydrocarbons or carbonates.

Also, just think why they so stick to that graphene stuff. Graphene is one of greatest nothingburger of science. It is known for around century, but still we don't have any more or less useful use of that substanse other than fill MSM articles and empty scientific papers.

Of course, talking about some polyhexamethylene guanidine in vaccines or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate will not create attention from regular public, but overhyped graphene will.

Also, graphene narrative as microblades in vaccine that cut everything in bloodstream directly contradicts blood clots facts. You can't create a clot with something that cut objects in pieces. But some uninterestin calcium hydrocarboaluminate (widely used coagulant) or other complex calcium compounds or, say, synthesized thrombines, easily could be the reason.

And, suddenly, you need mass-spectrometer to detect calcium in specimen to get a clue where to look for if you want to find a reason of blood clots.

Don't you understand that whole anti-vaccinehoax publications just does not fit together and with known facts about not-a-vaccine. It is just insane - "who cares why blood clots is a main consequence of not-a-vaccine, look, GRAPHENE!!!!".

Unscientific, non-systematic, self-contradictory "studies" floating around on non-official side with all that overhyped "nano", "graphene", "aluminium" and other keywords just make things worse.

0
CrazyRussian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Raman spectometry does not detect graphene. It detects bonds in molecules. Every bond have specific frequency, so you could differentiate them. Graphene basically is just carbon rings assembly. But a lot of substances have same carbon rings with same bonds.

So, Raman spectrometry alone is nowere enough to make any exact conclusion about composition. But it could be very useful as additional study to determine specific isomeres of substances with already known chemical formula.

You will get similar spectrums for graphite, graphene, benzene, any other cyclic hydrocarbons including even sugar that have two carbon rings.

Raman spectrometer is cheaper and simplier than quadrupole mass-spectrometer. There even successfull DIY projects of Raman spectrometers. But they are only supplement tools in figuring out unknown substance composition.

0
CrazyRussian 0 points ago +1 / -1

Mass spectrometry requires accelerators which are only going to be available at large institutions.

It does-not. Typical quadrupole mass-spectrometer is a tabletop device with a size of a good office printer. It is not even very expensive in comparison with other lab equipment.

You could even find used ones for the price affordable to a small private business or a middle-class enthusiast.

Yes, they work from regular wall outlet and consume around 1kW.

Mass-spectrometer does have particle accelerator, just like CRT monitor or home air ionizer. "Particle accelerator" does not mandatory mean some giant cyclotrone or LHC. Any device that accelerate particles is particle accelerator, be it electron gun in CRT tube or very similar assembly of few electrodes in mass-spectrometer.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +2 / -1

I found very strange that there is still no any independent full chemical analysis results of any mRNA vaccine ever done.

To make such analysis you need mass-spectrometer to find out existence and concentrations of basic elements and chromatograph to determine actual chemical composition. Not a very simple task, and not very cheap financially and in time, but it is routinely done every day in thousands of scientific and research labs.

Eventually you get exact and full list of actual ingritients of studied specimen.

Why nobody still did that is a greatest mistery with those who declare themselves as coronahoax and vaccinehoax enemies. Seems they are not really, and even more - they work to defile public questioning this hoaxes.

At the time, I had a conversation with one biochemist who was very critical about coronahoax and vaccinehoax. When talk come to the question why he didn't make an full chemical analysis of mRNA vaccine, he told that he can't obtain a sample legally, so paper he would wrote will not be accepted by any peer-reviewed journal. Later I come to conclusion that modern scientists don't care about science and research at all, they care only about fucking publications in official journals and citations.

All those who mentioned in your posts do have the ability to make straight full chemical analysis of vaccine and obtain its full and exact composition with every ingridient concentration and exact formula. And publish that list. However none of them ever did that. They only mumble something about some overhyped ingridient even without any quantative data about it. That's absolute nonsense in science. When you study something unknown you don't limit yourself with single ingridient with most popular name and you absolutely want to know exact concentrations and full composition.

It is like you care only about amount of salt in a dish and suddenly have no any interest about sugar, vinegar, pepper, antioxidants, thinners and other stuff which could not only interfere with effect of salt, but also be more harmful and bad than what you stick to.

Weird.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, Christian Church is definitely much closer to psychology even scientifically than that modern "psychology science". And have much longer expertise in that field.

It's satanic in nature because it's goal is the control of the free will and suppression of rational thinking and behavior which ultimately leads to truth, the good and the affirmation of life and existence - it leads to God.

Exactly. Also modern psychology is trying to replace Church in the field of resolving soul problems, not with repentance and learning the lesson, but with acceptance and self-forgiveness with all consequences.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Putin clones or doubles is well-known conspiracy theory in Russia. :)

May be we don't hear about country leaders asassinations just because TPTB decided that things like JFK or Gaddafi are too loud and rise too many unneded questions? So just put a clone or double instead of exterminated one to avoid all that mess.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you define as human behavior? Have self awareness, and free will ? Not chemically driven by instincts?

That was the first question psychology had to answer before doing any further research. But it never did.

F.e. you can't study alternating current without defining what AC is and what it is not and how it is different from DC or static charge. It is basics of science - to properly define object of study.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was hijacked by Freud crowd. There was different approaches in studying human mind and behaviour at the beginning, but Freud crowd "cancelled" them at the time.

Who knows how psychology would have been developed if it wasn't turned into current crap.

Serious science that study human mind is necessary, but of course Freud bullshit have nothing to do with it.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

elites wanted to shut down NASA

I think it could be legit.

Look, elites use money for exraction of wealth from people to keep them below the level of independence not even talking about any competition.

Then they need to somehow utilize that money to prove their value. If they wouldn't spend them somehow, then, their money value will be lost quickly. What's the point of their money if even those who have them in billions can't find any real use for them?

Today they throw money they steal into military industry creating illusion that money worth something and at the same time converting them into their real wealth, control and power.

Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.

So, it is reasonable for them to get rid of any alternative to MIC and so reasonable questions about spending preferences. NASA is useless, since military could easily handle their space needs without any civilian structure.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Shit happens. It is natural order of things. Problems begin when shit start to happen routinely.

Probability of shit happening is proportional to the complexity of device. More components device contain, more complex that components are, more chances of shit could happen.

Clever engineering is when you find balance between purpose, complexity and reliability. If you need to add some complex thing to the design and preserve reliability on the same level, you have to simplify other things. Everybody do former, but all forgot to do latter.

Also, modern trend of making everything computerised, and so much more complex than necessary, inevitably makes shit happens routinely. And this is not even talking about adding all that computer problems with bugs, backdoors, hacking and so on. And not talking about deterioration of engineering culture due to computerising everything. Why bother to properly and thoughtfully engineer and design something if you could just drop a computer in between to do anything you need?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›