What does this "seed oil" means? Sunflower and olive oil used for millenia in different cuisines, and nobody ever accounted it as harmful.
Here we use sunflower oil, olive oil, butter and animal fat (pork or mutton one, mostly) for cooking.
Butter is preferrable for frying (on frying pan - fried eggs, pancakes, etc). Pork fat often used for fried eggs or potato. Sunflower oil used for frying and salads. Olive oil used only as salad dressing.
Some dishes, mostly of central asia origin, like pilaf or cheburek, made in deep frying pan filled with the animal fat melted from fat parts of pork or mutton (suet?).
Also, there is a cheaper butter replacement - margarine (butter diluted with sunflower oil suspension), but it is not very popular and used only in baking mostly as a separation grease, not as real ingridient. Most prefer pure butter or sunflower oil for baking even as grease for baking mold.
All that oils are used for millenia in cuisines popular in Russia, and there is no any signs that they are somehow harmful.
We have many different oils made from seeds in groceries, from flax oil to buckweet one, but it is mostly spice for dishes, not cooking oils/fats.
Are there some other oils popular in US/EU now? I don't remember any significant differences in assortment of EU groceries - butter, sunflower and olive oil, margarine. Don't remember pork fat as separate product, but fatty bacon was in quantities on the shelves and was pretty decent for fried eggs in the morning.
Also, use of oils/fats for frying is dropped, because of all that modern frying pan coatings, from PTFE to ceramic, so you don't need as much oil/fat as for cast iron frying pan if you just want to fry potatoes or vegetables.
Where this modern narrative about "seed oils" come from?
Thank you for yout reply, I really appreciate it.
If money is energy,
Honestly I think that energy could be perfect money. Unlike gold, or other surrogates, it could be directly used by owner for any necessary purpose.
However, to make energy a currency, we need much better (in terms energy density) energy storage than that modern shitty batteries or fuels.
After all, you could measure any goods with amount of energy needed to produce them. And it will be inflation free, sound currency.
I began to thought about energy as a perfect currency, as means of exchange long ago, but it will need huge scientific breakthroughs in the areas that ostracised by official science.
From Bernays onwards, a method of selling low quality goods that people don't really need was worked out.
Exactly. And it is not clear how could we get rid of that shit now.
The Amish are against technology and they are arbitrary stuck at a fixed time in the 19th century as if that reflects Christian historic tradition in some way.
Yep. That's not the solution.
There is nothing wrong with technology or manufacturing of goods as long as the principles governing them are sound.
Exactly. But most technology, and especially means of production of tech now in the hands of coproeconomists. To create Amish-like community but with acceptance of technological progress, we will have to create nearly all industries almost from the ground. I think it is possible, but it will be extremely hard, and then community have to somehow defend it from profit-driven sharks, especially if it will become more succesfull than coproeconomy.
Hunting food returns the profit of meat;
Today's "profit" is only money. You will not be able to explain any investor or businessman the original meaning.
I'll work for a company with 1,000 employees if it's privately owned by the person who started it.
Good decision. I'll add to that "no loans" condition. But it become extremely hard to find such configuration.
All companies use the same "marketing" strategies
Exactly. This comes to the single pattern, so it is perfectly valid to suppose conspiracy.
Then it got sold to someone who didn't understand the business and now it's floundering.
That means that previous owner either prefer money, either was put in situation without much choice. This always happen with more or less successful, let's name it "traditional" company, owned by old-style enterpreneur who have something more than profits behind.
You have to constantly pay for maintenance of equipment no matter what, either to the original manufacturer, a service tech, or your own time.
First, many things today just poorly engineered, in most cases intentionally, to need service. Second, even most good old things could be fixed forever, just by making more durable part. Industrial equipment could be fixed by local service team, every more or less decent manufacturing have a service team regardless. And in most cases service team is not very busy, especially if business have sane administration. But vendors do not allow that, sometimes right in the equipment delivery contract. They want their profits.
But, again, this comes down to personal psychology; people don't want to fix their own stuff, they want someone else to do it, preferrably for free, and they don't care if that means they'll get screwed down the line. No amount of government will fix that.
Governement usually in charge of education. If children was not teached that everything could be disassembled and assembled back, and so repaired, will never think about fixing anything by themselves. So they will not be able to fight for right for repair or against "intellectual property" scam you mentioned earlier.
Like it or not, our system is sustainable.
That's what I'm in doubt with. "planned obsolescence" become widespread not long ago, but we already eat consequences with a table spoon.
Coproeconomy will eventually turn everything into the shit. Very profitable, but absolutely unreliable and in case of food directly harmful.
It's going to stabilize
When you fall to the bottom, it is not stabilisation, it is living on the bottom.
And again, I think that profit-driven coproeconomy will eventually destroy everything, including means of production. If your machine will be in service constantly, it will not be able to produce even shit you producing to make profits. Means of production already infected heavily, and things only become worse with time. F.e. some small measurement and control equipment manufacturers are bought by holdings that don't care about reliability, precision and other important stuff. And if you can't measure your process with same precision, you just unable to produce same quality stuff you produced earlier. Many times I met with situaltion, when some expensive old, but excellent measuring equipment had to be repleced just because old computer that run equipment software lecensed only to this exact computer hardware, (cpuid, f.e. hdd serial number and so on) just broke due to its age. And when business asked for a new license for new computer, measurement equipment manufacturer just told that this model is not supported anymore, so no new key will be provided, just buy new, worse and more expensive model.
Do you trust government?
No.
What you're proposing is to transition power from the free-market to government to reign in the free market and end the 'profit-driven' economy.
There is no any free-market in the world. Market is severely regulated by tandem of governements and corporations. You could easily check this in nearby grocery just looking on any product where you will find a lot of mandatory markings and data. Same thing is in any other area, from home appliances to cars. Rare things are not regulated by governement, really.
And even with all that regulations profit-driven coproeconomy thrive and destroy any remnants of nice things on the market.
Free-market in profit-driven economy (and society that measure success in money) will end with absolute coproeconomy disaster even faster.
If you have free-market, there is no any, even tiny limits where businessman obsessed with profit will stop. And he will have advantage over other, non so profit-driven businesses because he will have maximum profits and so more money to buy, destroy, cheat over competitors. There are no any limiters for such behaviour in utopic free-market.
Free-market could have some sense only if you remove modern concept of money/currency from equation. Only then, it could be really free, from the specific properties of money/currency that destroys this infantile dream of free-market. Money can't be good/bad f.e. So, in free market with money, one who will have more money, will always prevail. As soon as you began to speak about ethics and virtues, you inevitably come to some sort of external regulation of your free market. Unless you get rid of neutral money/currency concept.
Religion and homogeneous states that share common values and philosophies.
So you need a government (or other third-party with same purpose) that will overlook over this state market, ban those who do not share common values from market, check philosophies of market participants and so on.
You just can't rely on the assumption that all market participants will be honest and will never lie. If everybody in community are honest and good people, there are abviously no need for any market at all, be it free or controlled. Such community will easily exist with pure barter. If you think that such communities does not exist, you are mistaken. They are. One of examples of such community where is no any need for any market is a traditional family. And it is working, effective and successfull community. Unfortunately, it does not scale well.
Really it is not even about all that virtues. Even regular customer still trying to choose better thing even in exchange for higher price, if he is not severely limited by need and available finances.
And that customer available financed is constantly cut by the same profit-driven economy, because worker salaries are losses for business owner, and being profit-driven he try to cut them just like he trying to cut the spending on components and other stuff to maximize his profits.
Profit-driven economy devouring itself in a dangerous loop with positive feedback. Manufacturer produce shittier product, including using cheaper workforce or cutting salaries (directly or through inflation) or redicing workforce, workers being customers for other manufacturers look for lower prices and to keep profits they lower quality and workforce salaries even more, and so on.
This could easily run into death spiral, where poor people will produce and consume absolute shit, while elites will still get their profits. And even people virtues and consumerism denial will not be able to do anything with that.
Without destruction of that profit-drive that rule over economy, even good, God-following people, will not be able to compete or get rid of corporations that will suck them dry eventually. In the best case you could build something like Amish community, but that's not really human development, it is degradation or at least stagnation, with all my respect to Amishes.
Humans are innately driben to seek profit
People driven to seek the best for them. And best is not always profit. Normally human being will buy better quality thing, even if it cost more than bad quality thing.
our systems of government exist to make the best use of that drive.
Government allowed corporations to influence people's understanding of "the best" so, that they will buy anything corporations made. Even complete shit if been told that it is "better" for them.
Look at modern marketing, it's absolutely clear that it is pure manipulation. Ads and packages created to make people forget about real properties of the goods, that matter and look at things that don't have any sense for making reasonable decision. At the same time manufacturers care only about profits, not about quality, usefulness and other important stuff.
If you take any literature about marketing and read it without any bias, as side observer, you will see that it is all about manipulating people's understanding of "good".
One of such manipulations is to force customer to think that personal profit is at the top of things that make customer "good". To save 10% from the price is better than lose 20% of reliability or quality.
Our current system does not because, while companies usually start this way if they're successful, they'll inebitably be bought out by (((capitalists))) who have no idea how anything works but still consider themselves the boss because money.
Exactly. And this big bosses will always have money and tools to buy or destroy ones that stand for "good reputation". It is the point of their survival. If there is nothing to compare with profit-driven corporation products, then there is no choice for the customer, and corporations will sell as shitty products as possible.
Take a look at Phoebus conspiracy, that still exist today with LED bulbs. You can't buy LED lamp that last nearly forever (at least to the point of phosphor/diode natural degradation). But it is very simple to make one. You could even make one from shitty LED bulb by yourself, if you are into electronics and could hold a soldering iron in your hand, by replacing a current setting resistor. Buy LED bulb twice brighter than you need, then lower LEDs current by sqrt(2). You will get bulb of necessary brightness with LEDs running at lower current and so they will last much longer.
Obviously, people, even brainwashed will prefer normal LED bulbs, even if they will have higher price. Becaule it is their good - to have reliable bulb that will never need to be replaced. It is a profit-driven system that doesn't allow to produce eternal LED bulbs.
That's why I always try to work for small business, even though they pay lousy and expect a lot compared to big organisations.
Unfortunately, not all things we need today could be manufactured by small businesses. And this things eventually drag down even small businesses. If a small business that use some machine produced by big corporation have to spend money for constant service and repair, than that costs have to be included in the final price, or profits should be cut to the unsustainable level. Both will put that good small business in unfair conditions.
Just recall that JohnDeer tractors or modern baking ovens. Manufacturer make shitty stuff and force customer to pay constantly for the things that could be made reliable and easily serviceable by customer without any additional payments by customer. But they don't and it is purely intended.
So you want the government to have total control of the economy and hope that they will act in the interest of the public?
Government already have total control of the economy. Also government should act in the interest of the people. It is government force food manufacturers at least print ingridients on the packing.
If government exist, why shouldn't it work in the interests of the people?
That has worked out so well in the past whenever it was tried, right?
If something didn't work for you as you expected, there is a possibility you used it wrong.
On the other hand - what's your proposal? How to stop manufacturing and selling shit in modern profit-driven coproeconomy?
What mechanism could force manufacturers prefer reputation or quality over profits?
Chesterton's localism does exist as local farmers and bakers f.e. But we need big companies to make things like cars or planes or even microwave owens and computers.
And even farmers and bakers need industry to do their job. And when industry make shitty tractors and owens that have to be replaced or serviced often, farmers and bakers have to find this additional money somewhere. This way big companies force small businesses into profit-driven economy.
Stock market is just a part of the problem.
Small company could for some time work for reputation. But as soon as it gain reputation and grow, here comes crowd of managers who care only about profits. In almost all literature about management, the efficiency of management accounted in profits. Even if owner still truly care about reputation, managers will do shit, like, say, manger ordered to find best deal for some component, will find cheapest component, because he sincerely believe he saving a tons of money for company, will get bonus for that, and he know nothing about real tech and why quality or reputation is important.
There is no any educational institutions for managers that are not fully in profit-driven economy swamp.
Also, even if company somehow value reputation, it would not be able to compete with other companies who care only about profits. They will fill the market with cheaper products with ads indoctrinating customers that they are best and coolest.
It's not that complex to exterminate CEOs and owners of hated corporations. Even for amateurs. So, especially if that shooter was independent from state, state will have to show how they are working. If real shooter was smart enough to not to leave tracks, then state have no any option other that arrest some patsy as scrapegoat. If they would not do that, then elites will feel themselves unprotected and betrayed by state. And it could end with corporate armies, punishment of state bureaucrats and other corporate dystopia things.
May be this was even just first false flag on the road to corporate dictatorship. Watch for elites whining about "state can't protect important people who drive country economy", "corporations have right to defend themselves" and other stuff.
Also I recall a very interesting incident that looks completely unrelated, but who knows...
Some time ago, Iran shelled and possibly invaded Pakistan territory occupied by some rebels, and Pakistan shelled and possibly invaded coupled Iranian territory occupied by same rebels. There was huge celebration in Israel and Western media about start of Iran-Pakistan war, but it was quickly memoryholed when this eventually ended with shaking hands between Iran and Pakistan government officials and end of that rebels who annoy both Pakistan and Iran.
Pakistan and Iran, at first look, do exactly what that rebels was created for, but it is obvious now that it was joint Iran-Pakistan joint operation of mopping up some Western-backed point of irritation. And West could not have any say in that, because their foreve narrative of "Evil aothoritarian government kill their owns citizens for their love for freedom" and similar shit could not be aplied. Because from their point of view, "one authoritarian government attacked territory of other authoritarian government", and when they finally got what happened and how they were cheated it was too late, especially after their celebrations of a new war beginning.
A have to admit that this tiny joint Iran-Pakistan operation was very clever and wise. They outsmarted Western cabal completely and undoubtedly and even whitout any chance for Western cabal to somehow benefit from it.
Pure speculation - imagine that Turkey in the past years got full control over that Western terrorists in Syria. As "NATO member", "Assad enemy", "US ally", whatever. Also, some time ago Iran destroyed Mossad HQ in Iraq's Kurdish territory coupled with Kurdis territory in Syria, possibly cutting Israel influence on Kurds. There was also intense contacts between Turkey, Iran, Syria and other regional forces on the different questions from Palestine support to common economic questions. What if current situation is another use of aforementioned strategy used by Iran and Pakistan?
While West and Israel celebrate their "great victory" in "Assad must go" spectacle, things are go in completely another direction.
And I also noticed that Jewish Russian-speaking political bloggers was first to push narrative in Russian segment of internet that Assad is a traitor who betrayed Syrian people and Russia and all that stuff. Normal people in that sphere mostly scratching head and admit that things looks extremely weird.
In the speculation above, Assad doesn't look like traitor. On the opposite, he looks like leader who agreed to step down and abdicate peacefully for the greater good or goal or whatever.
Also, here circulating info that almost all Syrian government officials up to and including minister deputies and all stuff continue to work as Syrian governemnt and do their daily jobs as usual. Even ministers who supposedly will be replaced by Western terrorists by announced list of persons (one is ex-minister of past Assad government, meanwhile), are still mostly in place.
In any case, things are becoming more and more interesting in ME.
I have a feeling it was a background deal, hence the complete collapse of resistance,
It was definitely a deal, just it is not clear what this deal was about.
- Western terrorists allow Assad to flee to Russia without any problems. That's not what Western terrorists usually do with hated leaders - recall Gaddafi, Hussein and others.
- There was no resistance to collapse. Only few accidents and clashes in such situation. Syrian army just lay down guns and turned into civilians. Syria is relatively large country, 500x500km approx, it would be at least months of battles if any, even tiny unorganized resistance would have taken place.
- There is no much cleansing ongoing, at least for now.
- Crucial information in Syrian Intelligence Agency, Internal Affairs Agency and other Agencies was immidiately destroyed by Israel. That's not what you do with most critical information storages of your rival. Especially if you can fabricate anything about your rival if you get your hands over all that special agencies archives. Now there is no archives that could be used in anti-Assad propaganda, and it was Israel who destroyed them.
- EU countries immidiately stopped giving out refugee statuses to syrian immigrants.
- Russian bases in Tartus, Khmeim and even Rojava in Kurd region was never attacked and Western terrorists never even approached them, also Russians freely move aroud Syria controlled by Western terrorists posting photos of abandoned Syrian Army weapons and uniforms. Russian troops decided to abandon only Rojava base for now, nobody stop or oppose them. In Telegram rumors circulating that only minor injury among Russian troops through all this thing was some Russian officer who was punched into face by his colleagues when he began to panic watching TV news and agressively demanded urgent evacuation.
- Russian embassy was unusially too calm about situation and don't issue any warnngs to Russian citizens in Syria. Only few personnel was moved out, and without any hurry.
- Russia immidiately gave Assad asylum, that means all paperwork was ready before. Russia is very bureaucratic, it would take at least week to officially give an asylum even for Assad.
And so on. If it was Israel/US/UK deal with Russia, then Assad participated too, hence no any Syrian Army resistance.
Also interesting that it was Assad who previously didn't allow Russian forces in Syria to shoot down Israel planes bombing Damask. Our guys was ready to do it without any problems, you might recall loud Israel whinning about Russian AD locks on their planes, and it surfaced finally that it was Assad who didn't gave his mandatory green light for that.
If, and it is big IF, that it was kind of attempt to pull Syria from under the US sanctions pressure and make US/Israel rethoric about Syria completely void, then it could have some sense.
Also, interesting that Syria don't have an IMF debt at all. It was paid out with some help of Russia from inside IMF few years ago. It will be interesting to see if Syria will loan money from IMF soon.
And many other things, that just don't fit into any more or less solid theory.
just keep watching the actions. Don't mind what they say. They will all lie - constantly. Incl. Russia.
Exactly. Something strange happening, and it is still completely unclear is it for bad or for good or who win or lose.
Will see, how things turn out, and who will benefit eventually.
You could patent anything you want. No patent office in the world demand the thing described in patent application to be real. Only things that matters for patent - there is no patent on the described thing yet, properly done paperwork and paid fee. That's all.
Patent does not mean the thing would work as described or possible at all. It just mean that nobody filed patent with such thing earlier.
Free energy = suicide. stay away youre not ready
Bullshit.
No complete disclosure for easy DIY replication in garage/shed of your "greatest invention" = suicide.
Obviously so named "closing inventions" is a greatest threat to corporations and elites. And the threat is not an invention itself, but possibility that everyone will be able to replicate it. As soon as inventor keep some secrets that not allow third-party replication, inventor is a primary threat source, because he could leak this important information to the public. If information is already leaked, inventor is not a threat anymore and elites have much greater problems already.
This pattern of "Inventor made a great invention, inventor kept it in secret in the hope to sell it or find investors and became new billionaire, Inventor died in accident" is either complete stupidity of inventor, either just another scam.
This started when PayPall was sold for money it never cost. Elon get $180M from that sale.
After that Musk rushed to Russia in attempt to buy refurbished ICBMs and failed. Three times. He plainly can't get that rocket is not only rocket itself, but also a huge launch complex with all the stuff, that makes it useful.
Looks like somebody give a boy some money and send him to buy a beer. Seller refused to sell beer to a kid, but kid tried again and again.
You could try to look who send a boy for beer among owners of eBay at the time, I suppose.
Adoption is free in Russia. So there are can't be any "selling".
Cry harder, faggot, this kids now out of reach for you and your kind. Ukrainian organ harvesting factory and child traffiking hub is closing. And there is zero chance a kid will be "adopted" by a "family" of two faggots. Bad news for you, isn't it? :)
UK Telegraph faggots and their faggot masters are furious they would not get adrenochrome, organs and sex toys from that saved children who will be adopted by traditional Russian families (straight one, of man and woman, real ones) and will never be teached precious religion of LGBTXYZ+ evolution garbage. :) And in Russia adoption by foreigners is prohibited after huge investigation of 2000s that uncovered western NGOs massive orphans traffiking operation under guise of adoption in the West. So, UK faggots have no any chance to get their hands on that children anymore. :)
Very nice. :) Every Pizzagater will celebrate this.
Meanwhile adoption in Russia is free. Money thing in adoption is that family have to prove they are wealthy enough to rise a child without problems. Telegraph faggots lied even in this small detail.
About same as extraction of many pretty legal substances from plants for pharma and cosmetic industry. Just with bare hands (feet) instead of industry machinery.
Looks like Columbia just have enough poor people ready (or forced) to participate in illegal production.
That's not how things really are.
We have many muslim minorities in Russia. Shia, sunni, some other lines. None of them have anything against Christmas trees. Taking in account that Jesus is one of greatest prophets (Isa) in Islam, there ar no any background for any muslim to hate or be offended by Christmas celebration. Also, there is no any aversion of celebrations of Ressurection or other Christian holidays. It's not a rare thing to hear "Christ has arisen!" on Ressurection holiday from muslim sellers on city markets and trade fairs, muslim colleagues or neighbours.
It is not hard to find something like this photo https://www.alamy.com/181231-damascus-dec-31-2018-syrians-celebrate-on-the-new-year-s-eve-in-damascus-syria-on-dec-31-2018-syria-damascus-new-year-celebration-ammarxsafarjalani-publicationxnotxinxchn-image564388845.html to figure out what Syrians think about Christams trees. There is no any reasons for Syrians to be offended by Christmas trees at all.
However, there is one tribe that hate Christ and everything connected sincerely and thoroughly. Cristmas trees too. And, suddenly it is not muslims. Again, suddenly, exactly that tribe is behind bringing muslims in enormous amounts into Christian countries. And, again, by completely occasional cohencidence they are referring muslim minorities they bring into country as an excuse to get rid of Cristmas trees and anything christian.
They could plant opium in a number of areas.
May be some fashion thing or specific variety of poppies? Like coke grow anywhere, but somehow Columbia prevail.
Looks like they are attempting a bigger ISIS 2.0 but it's one of those things that are still brewing.
When you make v2.0 things you usually try to make them better than v1.0. This v2.0 looks like awfully designed and awry manufactured replica made in a hurry just in attempt to prove mostly to themselves they still could make such things.
Opium/heroin?
Obviously, US will not have any chance to somehow revive opium manufacturing in Afganistan if it will not present in Afganistan. So, if military presence failed, they will try investment one or whatever.
As for all that ISIS and other stuff, just recall that Taliban was 100% founded and financed by US to oppose USSR military on the side of Afganistan government. But eventually, Taliban, when they grow up and acquire self-conscioness and their own interests turned into US enemy. So to keep ISIS shit running, US+Israel either have to hire extremely dumb locals, either face the same result as with Taliban.
Meddling into exUSSR Middle Asia countries is senseless, because it will only add more disgust and hate toward US+Israel among whole region.
Methods of interfering in regions, where US/UK/Israel can't have any business at all, become more and more dumb and so more obvious and insolent, that even goat herders could now clearly see them immidiately. Total bankruptcy of the West in terms of real things needed by countries in region make things worse.
So, looking at China/Russia success in investing real into Middle Asia, US tries to jump on that train to keep some influence in region. However, US have nothing except green paper, but at the same time think they could demand different shit incompatible with Middle Asia mentality. This makes prospects of US investments doomed.
If only US could restore its manufacturing and engineering schools along with return to traditional society values that made US great in the past and invest with real things...
Scriptures and agrees they are a testimony of the many faithful covenant people over the millennia, which includes many of the Jews (which Paul says were enlightened ahead of the Gentiles for a time).
And even with that huge advantage (at the time), Jews don't become honest and nice tribe. And they didn't go that path consciously. Even lasy Greeks with all their old pagan shit was able to become leading Christian nation at some moment.
So despite the many infiltrations, our covenant runs right through Israel before it gets to all the nations.
It exactly "runs through" Israel, leaving no single drop in it, like water through PTFE tube.
Who knows, may be Jews was a God's test if He really give humans free will. If even God can't convince some tribe to behave one way or another, then they really have free will. The problem is that we now have to deal with the consequences of this God's experiment. And it is up to us completely.
The implication is that Jesus says true Ioudaious is a good thing.
Fulfilling promises is a good thing. Jews had to eternally obey commandments (be Judaists) in exchange for their salvation, but they didn't. They broke the deal and betrayed God. That was a bad thing. Following terms of deal, doing what you promised to do is a good thing.
why do you assume they are ethnic Jews?
Only etnic Jews made a deal with God and so was obliged to be Judaists who they wasn't. No other etnicity had this obligation.
"Ioudaious" would be Judeans, not Judaists
No. "Judeans" as "inhabitants of place named Judea" just have no any sense in this context.
I don't see how you're getting the meaning out of it that you do.
Just read original text as it is, without any replacements.
This insane attempts of last years to whitewash fucking Jews, all that "its Khazars, not real Jews", "Israelis are not real Jews", "Nuland,Rotshild,Pritzker,etc are not real Jews", "all that Jewish bastards are not real Jews" is just stupid. Jews are Jews - the exact same tribe that God tried to save from Satan worshipping for millenia without any result. Just read Old Testament - it is a good history of Jewish crimes against humanity. Even during the most imortant for all Jewish history and unique event when Moses had negotiations with God, Jews was busy with what? Buiding their Golden Calf idol.
Fuck this. Jews are the synagogue of Satan. Ethnic implementation of Devil's servants on Earth. If they want to change this, they could try start from sincere and tribe-wide repentance for all their crimes against humanity starting from genocides and usury, including killing Jesus and renunciation of their "choosen" status. But I'm in serious doubt anybody will ever believe them. This train departed long ago. And they will be inevitably defeated as stated in Revelations.
What could be Marxist in putting quality and reliability over profit? Profit is not moral or immoral by itself. Immoral and evil is to put profit over everything else, including moral and other stuff.
There is no problem in making most things lasting forever today. We walk a long way since Marx times. His shit is irrelevant now. Well, if this is Marxist, then I'll prefer to be named Marxist, than to support coproeconomy.
Of course it should. With important and meaningful information about a product. Not with feelings and subliminal stuff. But I'm afraid there is no any person in the world left who could even think about making such advertising.
Yes.
Unfortunately the science of making good and honest ads is already lost.
We have it prohibited in Russia, but that does not make other advertising any better. And many people have a mind of infant even being in their mid age.