So it is just about Google/Apple slaves. For normal people nothing changed.
In 90s there was no omnipotent search engines. AltaVista was not much better than someones self-hosted htdig. People exchanged interesting links on forums, by mail, NNTP and IRC channels.
In 00s there began inflow of sheeples who was too dumb to find anything by themselves so BigTech gladly rush to satisfy that herd with "more comfortable" tools. Because normal tools was "too complex" for that dumbfucks who want to use a thing without knowing anything about it. They didn't care about those who used to find info by 90s methods.
In 10s BigTech swim in a flood of sheeple to internet, carefully creating a "comfortable internet" for them, with bells and whistles, alongside with selling their data left and right. But the point is that 90s internet didn't go anywhere. It was still here, with all tools it had in 90s.
In 20s BigTech itself fall into an illusion that "internet" is only all that web2.0 crap they pushed and there are no anyything else at all. Fucking Google/Bing/Ynadex/whatever even don't bother to index IRC channels or even FTP servers. So now we are back to 90s state of internet. Just along with that old thing, BigTech build an "internet for idiots".
I don't care about the future of "internet for idiots" at all. And I don't care about idiots who don't want to know how the things they use actually work. They definitely deserve what BigTech build for them. Those who have some brains will find a way to find anything. Those who don't could eat shit as long as they want.
I'm definitely crazy from the point of view of sheeple, as most sane persons here. :)
To remove somebody from power, you have to kidnap or kill him. Killing Soros is unwise, because you could forever lose a possibility to find out who is really behind him. So, how do you propose f.e. to catch Soros?
We don't even have a publicly accessible tool where volunteers could track Soros movements around the world in realtime, at least using public sources.
Your anger is perfectly justified, but unfortunately is not backed by anything. And doing things without proper backing and a plan is a direct way to the failure.
How do you know that they faked a person that talk to that Ex French President, and not Ex French President himself? If they are able to do the former, they obviously could do the latter.
Critical thinking, remember?
It could be known for shure only if pranked person himself will acknowledge that he was tricked to disclose his secrets, but something tell me he never will do it, even if this was true.
I would not recommend blindly use that pranks as a proof of anything. At least if you have no other confirmations.
Ruse of using Minsk Accords as a distraction is confirmed by other sources, but other things may need confirmations too.
I accept that explanation. Looks logical.
I have a spring floods here, when snow thaw, not heavy, but noticeable. I just made a monolite steel reinforced concrete basement, with addition of hydrophobic and sealing additives to concrete. No problems with leaks and no any mold at all. I got it flooded inside once when water pipe cracked. Was filled with water by one third. Just pumped out all water and dried it. That's all. No mold whatsoever. Basement is heated so no difference due to climate. Mold is not a rare thing outside. Stones and concrete things outside that are in shadows on the ground are covered by mold every summer, so mold spores are present everywhere.
So differences I see are salted water and may be different kind of mold. Interesting, how mold could destroy concrete in warm climate. "Black mold" that exists here could destroying concrete, making it more soaking, but you need water and freeze-unfreese cycles to really finish the job. Without freezing black mold itself can't significantly damage concrete. And it does not survive on concrete with sealing additives.
Meanwhile I can't say basement was much more expensive than regular ribbon concrete foundation. Basically it is the same thing, just with soil dugged out and a floor. IDK, may be ~30% more expensive, mostly because of more concrete and reinforcements that are relatively cheap.
most people who own homes in these areas, it's not their primary home either. Usually it's their vacation home.
This could be the simplest explanation. It's just "dachas" (summer cottage communities) that is being destroyed and then shown in news. People use them only once or twice a year and they are in no way a permanent residences.
Got it! Engineering questions are anti-american. And math is racist. OK :) :) :)
Hurricane damage is pretty low risk, despite how its covered.
I understand that ratio of destroyed houses to the total number of houses in region could be low.
But, IDK, If I would know that for years one or another village in region hit with hurricane, I will still build a home that meant to sustain hurricane, even if it eventually never will hit my home. Home is something that have to be reliable, it is not some temporary shelter when you could disregard such probabilities.
For me your logic is fine only for rented house. Then, yes, I will not care much about such probability, because even this happen, I'll just rent another house.
when there's damage, it's usually from flooding, not from wind, and it that case, whatever you build with, your going to have issues.
I've seen homes that were designed to withstand get condemned just because they couldn't mitigate the flooding issues after the disaster.
Because of salted sea water destroys foundation? Or what is the reason of condemning?
Of course I understand news bias and intention to show the worst, and as I mentioned, even in such biased news I still see untouched normal buildings surrounded by devastation.
But it is still unclear for me why in such hurricane rich places still exist any areas that continue to give that devastation footage for the news.
IDK, say nobody build houses in the Northen regions without good thermal insulation. So even if you need a fearmongering picture of hundreds of frozen out houses with freezing families in trouble from yearly disaster named winter, you will not be able to find anything.
But somehow, in the abovementioned Florida, there are still plenty of places where news could easily get nasty pictures of devastation every year.
Plenty of builders do exactly as you mention.
I understand that. I don't understand why there still exists districts or counties that get destroyed every year.
There are no districts or counties that massively freeze out to death every year in nothern regions f.e. But in much more pleasant (and so more expensive) places to live, somehow such districts exists.
Sorry to interrupt the anti-america circle jerk.
Funny, I mentioned f,e. Montana where, suddenly, people never build houses that are not suitable for local weather conditions. You hardly find a a single house with thin walls and without insulation that will not withstand cold weather in winter. Somehow Montana is not a part of US now?
If you want to stick a label to me, choose something else. Say something about "anti-southern coastal circle-jerk" or whatever term you have for that hurricane prone regions.
If you are heavily abused by comparison of something american with something from other country and feel raped or offended like LGBTXYZ+ whiners, then tell me please, why in Montana US people always build houses appropriate for local regular cold winters, but in Florida US people are not always build houses appropriate for regular hurricanes. Both states I compare here are in US, so you should not be offended.
Most people on the earth are retarded.
But that is not insurance companies who force people to build weak houses. And even with insurance - it will be at least few weeks to build a new house, and even with insurance it will not be an easy walk for the family who lost everything. I can't believe that even most retarded person will accept that as a norm and will not at least thinking about resolving it once and forever.
My assumptions was that may be it is mostly a rented houses and owner don't care about problems of clients and don't want to spend more money to build normal houses and perfectly fine with such state of affairs especially if his tenants have to pay insurance premiums. Or that is a kind of communities with some stupid "rules" where land owners are not allowed to build anything that is different from community approved projects. Or some other kind of legislation rules or whatever.
So you live in Russia?
Yes.
Nobody wants yout shitty currency in America or anywhere else for that matter.
It's perfectly fine if a country don't want to use other country currency. Other countries don't need USA shitty currency too. And looking at the growing gold prices seems even Americans don't like USA shitty currency too.
Don't be afraid, your beloved USD (in some form, CBDC f.e.) will survive. Sort of. You just will not be able to buy real things around the world for USD you print endlessly, so you will have to return to manufacturing of something useful in USA to exchange on the world market.
I'll be waiting for Snap-On tools and Wrangler jeans made in USA by hands of qualified American guys f.e..
Some moneychangers who even afraid to send roubles to anybody or anything to Russia like fucking cowards, put some random rate on their site and you believe in that shit?
I can just go to nearest bank office and freely exchange roubles to dollars or dollars to roubles in cash, or do it from home in case of bank account.
Can you? Obviously not. Because you have "freedom and democracy" instead of right to sell and buy any currency. And you somehow think that you could tell me something about USD/RUR exchange rate.
Fascinating. Tell me moar! :)
Russian government allowed larger limits for the tax free cash and bank transfers for the private persons who want to move USD to USA and Europe. So they buy remnants of dollars here to bring them to US and Europe.
Question: What usually happens when amount of free USD owned by private persons on the West rises?
Also, it is 80RUR/$ today, not 82. http://cbr.ru/eng/
In Russia, MP could propose laws, if Parliament vote for proposal it becomes law and President have to sign it or propose changes, that could be rejected or accepted by Parliament. If President didn't sign a law after three cycles Parliament could vote for impichement. Theoretically. :)
Really everything depends on vote by majority which is United Russia Party (liberal cleptocrats). They are rarely vote for proposals of Communist Party (conservative cleptocrats), but this happens sometime. Sometimes liberal cleptocrats reject proposals of conservative cleptocrats and then propose same thing and vote for it if it is profitable in terms of money or populism.
I think there is a ~25% chance this proposal will pass, because from one side Assange published papers with liberal cleptocrats names inside, but since they already lost their wealth that paper mentioned they could do it as a revenge against those who steal their wealth stolen from Russian people. Also, it is a popular idea among Russians, so liberal cleptocrats could use it for populism.
If US would not had sanctioned liberal cleptocrats of Russian Federation, probability of passing such propose would have been 0%.
You operate with addresses, when transferring crypto, not wallets of something with your name on it.
You could have as many addresses as you wish and nobody will know that they are yours without your consent. You could toss money between your addresses as you wish.
It is recommended from the beginning of bitcoin, that if you want to receive money from somebody and care about privacy, you better create a new address for that purpose. There is no ways to prove that new address that have no previous transactions belongs to you as a physical person without access to your wallet. Then, you could transfer money from that address to your main address or even do a chain of transfers to new addresses. Since nobody except you know that all that addresses belongs to you, it is not possible to prove that it is you, who received malicious money.
There is no way sender could send money to you if you didn't somehow give him an address.
Of course you could receive all crypto on a single address made public, but how is it differ from published bank account or whatever?
BTC as a first crytpocurrency have a lot of drawbacks, but ones you mentioned are at the bottom of the list.
If you are concerned about anonimity of BTC transactions and don't want to bother with making addresses and all that stuff, you could use Monero.
Thing with irreversibility of transactions is a feature, not a bug. Nobody could take the money you received without your consent, regardless of circumstances. I think it is one of the greatest features of cryptocurrency.
It is a clown, not a scientist. If you are a scientist and suspect that something you found somehow interacts with radiofrequences you obviously will use RF signal generators, oscilloscope, RF spectrum analyser, different microwave antennas to transmit and receive radiowaves to and from sample, RF mixers, demodulators, attuneators, and all that RF stuff to study how supposed nanotechnology interact with radio frequences. Not just microscope and web-camera.
And you definitely don't make stupid photos of drying solution of something doing nothing with it.
Also, as a scientist you would also know that Raman spectroscopy shows prescense of specific bonds, not substances. F.e. you could detect that there is a C-O bond in sample, C-H, C-C, C=C, C-N and so on, not like "it is C12H22O11". Raman spectroscopy that this clown shows means that there is probably rings of carbon with C=C bonds in a sample, that's all. Like in flakes of regular graphite, f.e. or graphene, or graphene oxide, or whatever carbon containing dust that will have sp2 and sp3 C=C bonds. That clown uses exactly same logic that was used by bastards who used PCR technology as a test for virus. "It shows that there is CGAAGT sequence! SARS-CoV-2 have same CGAAGT among its 30k nucleotides sequence! It is definitely SARS-CoV-2!!!"
I don't know how to make it more understandable for you. If Shakespeare used a word "fire" in his poetry, that does not mean that if there is a word "fire" in some poem, than it was certainly written by Shalespeare.
Seriously, you even don't make an attempts to understand that if a cat have a tail, that in no way means that everything with a tail is a cat. Something square in drying solution des not mean that it is WiFi chip because WiFi chips are square too. Carbon you find in sample does not mean that it is absolutely "GrAPhenE OxiDe!!!!!".
IDK, if you accept that bullshit you pushing, then you have to accept all bullshit about "PCR tests detect virus", "masks work", "SARS-CoV-2 is a cause of COVID-19", "vaccines safe and effective" and so on, because all that bullshit based on exactly same "logic" you completely accept in what you are pushig here.
it's just many people have found graphene oxide in vials of the vaccines as well as other nano computer tech, and others have linked the studies/patents showing how thinktanks and the like proved you can severely affect cellular tissue, brain tissue, etc by energizing the GO with EMF radiation.
Do a search here, there are a lot of that bullshit. All that look exactly like some actors who never had any expirience in natural sciences and have a purely humanitarian education in the best case was paid to play role of scientists. They tried to mimic bad scientific papers, but couldn't do even that, because they absolutely do not understand what is really important in scientific paper, and that is is not a random collection of random unconnected statements with scientific words. Even bad scientific paper made by a real scientist is completely different from what that cowns produce.
"There is 5G powered nanomachines in not-a-vaccines!!!111" And that dumbfucks don't even try to activate them with RF or sniff the trafic, measure RF spectra, find out what they made for or whatever thing a real scientist will immidiately do in the first place if he have a tiny suspicion that something he discover could interact somehow with radio frequences. It is absolutely ridiculous! People who fabricate that bullshit imitations of scientific papers absolutely can't be a scientists. Even schoolchildren are magnitude orders more curious than that clowns.
One of the closest examples:
https://conspiracies.win/p/16ZqwIAqM2/x/c/
or
https://conspiracies.win/p/16aA958pGT/x/c/4Tq1NqiDE3j
I have a bad news for you. If you are really a critical thinker, you have to critically analyse everything, not only things you don't like. I would say especially things that looks like they specifically made to support and enhance ypur suspicions. If you don't do that, you are not looking for the truth. You doing something else.
Why do you continue to push obvious bullshit?
Fuckchecker is a diagnosis. Irreversible, I think. Regardless of narrative.
How transmission electron microscopy of proteine molecules is connected with production of something even not containing that molecules?
Usually Cryo-EM is done on the copper/silver mesh coated with carbon film. It is just a kind of sieve where holes in mesh covered with very thin film of something conductive. Then big molecules of interest placed on that thin film, freezed and mesh is put into elecron microscope. Ice preserves molecule structure, thin film of carbon hold them in place during freezing. Microscope sends elecrons through mesh, they interact with molecules sticked to film in random orientations and by analysing shadows behind samles in different orientation one could restore molecules structure.
There is no way protein molecules after freezing to cryogenic temperatures, exposing to vacuum and radiating by strong electron beam could be somehow unfreezed, scraped from carbon film and then used in any product. Samples goes to garbage bin after electron microscopy.
You could use any metal mesh and any films of conductive material that are thin enough to not disturb passing electrons. Gold and graphene oxide will work too. Platinum mesh with holes covered by silver film too. As copper with carbon film.
And mRNA vaccines do not contain spike protein at all. They contain RNA molecules instead with instructions for human cells about how to create that spike protein.
The only thing you could deduce from that paper is that Pfizer managers who choose and order materials and tools for the lab succesfully fall into all that "graphene" marketing and ordered "graphene oxide coated gold meshes" instead of "carbon coated copper meshes". Or they just lined their pockets with company money buying overpriced stuff. And have their backs perfectly protected by magic words. "Why you ordered that meshes?", "Don't you see? They are GOLD and coated with GRAPHENE oxide! Don't you want Pfizer buy some cheap carbon coated copper ones like beggars? What our investors or rivals will say if they find out that we buy cheap stuff?"
Even if suppose that Pfizer just made their not-a-vaccines just from synthesized spike proteine and lied about using mRNA technology, even then, there is no chance this paper is a proof of graphene oxide in not-a-vaccines. Because nobody will scrape that few molecules from electron microscoped sample to put them back into production with residues graphene oxide. Even Pfizer.
Hype words. They perfectly works in any way, but always for the same purpose. Fascinating.
Yes, there is a theories circulating in Russian conspiracist circles about Chabad Lubavich sect. They are definiteyl on the side of "democratic" NWO.
Interesting, there exists a Jew, Eduard Khodos head of Kharkov religious Jewish community, who strongly opposes that Chabad sect and share some interesting things that are completely unknown for non-Jewish public. He is accounted by antisemite by conventional Jewish MSM. :)
F.e. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eth_sA6lSGw - a long video uncovering Chabad activity in Ukraine and in the whole world. In Russian, but you could turn on subtitles and choose autotranslate to your language. I'm shure you never imagined most of the things he uncover for broad public. You will see Zelenskiy playing Noa role in comedy sketches, politicians covering Chabad, direct speeches of rabbies on topic, operations to hide Chabad significance among Jews, who is really control Ukrainian government and how Chabad participated in creation of Ukrainians as not-a-Russians in post-USSR Ukraine and so on.
Don't get it as a final truth, of course, take it with grain of salt, but there is many things you will find interesting.
how about the Taliban?
Good take. But same Taliban once closely cooperated with US Jews who provided them weapons against past Afganistan government and USSR military. Also, all that things about opium for CIA and so on. And why US Jews leave all weapons to Taliban last time for free?
North Korea government could be an example too, but really they have no what we mean under the term "politics". NK is more like a corporation, than a state, I think.
May be, IDK.
There are no any clear goals in that kind of military activity. It is not a real war, not a real antiterrorist operation, it looks like a mess designed mostly to destroy European economy.
From the khazarian theory view, most Jews with their sacred places on Ukraine is concentrated in Dnepropetrovsk and Odessa. I see nothing specific about that places really.
From the other side, huge efforts to spent as much non-Jews by Western side of conflict as possible could look like cleaning the Ukraine from unneeded non-Jews, but decline of Jewish population of Ukraine is worse because Jews are the only etnicity that allowed to leave Ukraine freely.
So there could be only assumptions about building khazarian state theory. Possible, but still there are no any clear signs that it could really be a case.
From the side of khazarians, I would estimate that building Third Temple for Antichrist in Jerusalem is much more important for them, than getting back some lands where khazarians had their kaganate for not so long time in historical perspective. And, meanwhile, center of Khazarian kaganate was closer to Astrakhan, and region where the war going now was outskirts of kaganate and had no important significance for the khazarian state.
Perverted revenge for the complete defeat of Khazarian kaganate on the descendants of those who defeat it, tricking them to kill each other could be the case, but it looks too weak in comparison with vaccinehoax f.e. with same puppet masters behind curtain. And at the same time Khazarians destroying their stronghold in Europe with that revenge? Weird.
I have no exact explanation or solid theory of what is really behind the conflict. It is too weird thing to guess anything about it.
The best theory I have is that is a kind of clash between NWO "democrats" and NWO "conservatives" for the domination in coming NWO.
But there is nothing to discuss about Jewish control over politicians. It is a fact. Just like Jewish control over MSM or financial system.
There is no any information in posting that random politician have ties to Jews, like there are no information in message that sky is blue.
But post about active politician that have the least ties to Jews could contain useful information.
And what's the point? You for some weird reason think that you could change that shills minds with such posts?
Meanwhile, if you think that this place full of Russian shills, you certainly have a long list of them. So share this list with the class.
You view at situation from the wrong point.
China have something others really need.
What self-declared "leaders of the civilized world" have others really need?
Name something if you can. And no, nobody really need "financial services", "consulting", "insurance" and other useless virtual crap.
Meanwhile France is not as useless as others among "civilized world", f.e. At least they have working and mostly domestic nuclear tech, kind of own space and avia manufacturing, they made vine and cognac, which for unknown for me reasons valued in the world. Their cheese is nice. They even still have some small, but domestic semiconductor manufacturing. At least they have something to sell to others. If they throw out their NWO puppets like Macron, and get rid of all that immigrants that flooding France now, they could have a chance.