If you take a random sample from the closest puddle and add some random spice from kitchen along with pinch of dust and bit of table salt, you will get something similar from the drying drop on the glass plate under microscope.
Study is flawed. They didn't even tried figure out exact chemical composition of vaccine to begin with. Then, it is hugely seasoned with statements about some RF stuff while they don't even bother to expose their samples to RF to find out what will happen. It is the same grade of bullshit as studies that showed "efficience" of not-a-vaccines. Both are disgusting mockery of real science.
Maybe yes,maybe not. Assuming however it might be real we shall be ready for worst possibility. And worst possibility is "zombie outbreak"/"the cell" scenario.
Sooner or later those thing with "intra body nanonetworks" or other shit will be applied.Biological robots.It is all about control of "workforce". Meaning us. It is all real research, all what contradicts its usage is information about "state of art" level of this technologies. The fact is however that that could be "black projects".
Consider reading story "Influx" by Daniel Suarez. Fabularized version of reality we live ?
Didn't you notice something around? We already have "zombie outbreak", fortunately, zombies prefer junk food over brains. Supposedly except some with highest rank of them. And there was no need of any visrus or nanotech, I mean directly.
Sooner or later those thing with "intra body nanonetworks" or other shit will be applied.
So, we will have completely new source of energy, some kind of fundamentally new way of data transmission without any wires, RF or light and possibly few more new technologies, potentially closing ones. Taking in account that development of fundamentally new tech is strictly prohibited by NWO, I will assume the probability of developing working "intra body nanonetworks" is somewhere around zero.
The fact is however that that could be "black projects".
Projects could be completely black, but every single time basic technology used in such projects leaked quickly. I doubt they would risk with that.
If you take a random sample from the closest puddle and add some random spice from kitchen along with pinch of dust and bit of table salt, you will get something similar from the drying drop on the glass plate under microscope.
Study is flawed. They didn't even tried figure out exact chemical composition of vaccine to begin with. Then, it is hugely seasoned with statements about some RF stuff while they don't even bother to expose their samples to RF to find out what will happen. It is the same grade of bullshit as studies that showed "efficience" of not-a-vaccines. Both are disgusting mockery of real science.
Maybe yes,maybe not. Assuming however it might be real we shall be ready for worst possibility. And worst possibility is "zombie outbreak"/"the cell" scenario.
Sooner or later those thing with "intra body nanonetworks" or other shit will be applied.Biological robots.It is all about control of "workforce". Meaning us. It is all real research, all what contradicts its usage is information about "state of art" level of this technologies. The fact is however that that could be "black projects".
Consider reading story "Influx" by Daniel Suarez. Fabularized version of reality we live ?
Didn't you notice something around? We already have "zombie outbreak", fortunately, zombies prefer junk food over brains. Supposedly except some with highest rank of them. And there was no need of any visrus or nanotech, I mean directly.
So, we will have completely new source of energy, some kind of fundamentally new way of data transmission without any wires, RF or light and possibly few more new technologies, potentially closing ones. Taking in account that development of fundamentally new tech is strictly prohibited by NWO, I will assume the probability of developing working "intra body nanonetworks" is somewhere around zero.
Projects could be completely black, but every single time basic technology used in such projects leaked quickly. I doubt they would risk with that.
Not if those technology serves them.
What fundamentally new tech never existed before was developed since 1970?