How do you know that they faked a person that talk to that Ex French President, and not Ex French President himself? If they are able to do the former, they obviously could do the latter.
Critical thinking, remember?
It could be known for shure only if pranked person himself will acknowledge that he was tricked to disclose his secrets, but something tell me he never will do it, even if this was true.
I would not recommend blindly use that pranks as a proof of anything. At least if you have no other confirmations.
Ruse of using Minsk Accords as a distraction is confirmed by other sources, but other things may need confirmations too.
How do you know that they faked a person that talk to that Ex French President, and not Ex French President himself? If they are able to do the former, they obviously could do the latter.
Critical thinking, remember?
It could be known for shure only if pranked person himself will acknowledge that he was tricked to disclose his secrets, but something tell me he never will do it, even if this was true.
I would not recommend blindly use that pranks as a proof of anything. At least if you have no other confirmations.
Ruse of using Minsk Accords as a distraction is confirmed by other sources, but other things may need confirmations too.