OK, no problem, I'll send them to some neutral country so you could recieve them from good guys and avoid any problems you could have due to direct contacts with bad Russian. :)
I could provide some cheap gas and oil. :)
The same terms is completely applicable to the using of PCR technology that can't be used for testing due to its working principle. But I don't see you insisting on rejecting all PCR "tests" results. Or rejecting all papers about not-a-vaccine "efficiency". They should be rejected for the exactly same reason you reject VAERS data - there is no any solid scientific proof of the link between the cause and result.
Either you completely throw out all PCR "tests" data along with all VAERS data and not-a-vaccine "efficiency" data according to your "logic", either you are just cheap low IQ hypocrite propagandist. :)
VAERS data is exactly same kind of data you suddenly praise for promoting coronahoax and not-a-vaccine "efficiency". If you accept latter, you shoud accept former. If you deny former, you should deny latter. Only if you are honest man, of course.
Sorry, but you fucked yourself up. Again.
In Russia you more likely will find something like t-shirts or stickers "Za НаVального". It is "For Navalny" (jailed by Putin pro-west opposition leader) with Z and V letters used by Russian military units in Ukraine. US equivalent could be something like "Biden is Qool!". Advertising sarcastic absurdism and political nihilism in full scale.
What were the funding sources of each study?
You didn't read your own "arguments"?
Replications aren't necessarily published
Of course. :) Who need independent replications? Only insane conspiracy theorists need them. Every good science believer will be satisfied with study about BigPharma shit done for BigPharma money by BigPharma "scientists".
Yes, I do. I have experienced peer review. Have you?
Multiple times. But for real science, not for pseudosciences like medicine or sociology. Had successful replications too.
It's an important check on validating a study.
It have absolutely nothing to do with validation of a study. For obvious reasons. Validation of the study could be only in a form of independently replicated experiment.
You don't understand science.
I don't even want to understand all that garbage you name "science".
Physics scientists would say they aren't qualified to peer review a paper on epidemiology or virology.
You have no idea what real peer review is, how it is done and why it does not matter what speciality reviewer have. The purpose of peer review is to check for obvious errors and for compiance to scientific method. There can't be any difference in medicine math and physics math. So with scientific methods. If you insist that physicist can't peer review medical studies it just mean that your medical studies is not scientific.
But you don't believe any scientists are actually independent because they might be financed by the state. I'll let the "non-scientist" thing slide, but what you said was non-scientists.
There are no any World Physics Organisation whose authoritarian orders are absolutely obligatory to all states. Suddenly.
It's pretty clear that you are not an engineer and you are not a scientist.
Of course, you have no any sane counter-arguments, only can go personal. :) Perfect. :)
You don't understand even the difference between hypothesis and theory.
LOL. If a thought about looking for differences between hypothesis and theory come to your interear ganglion, you are as retarded, as a person who decided to find differences between engines and cars. :)
You find a wrong forum for your meaningless propaganda. Try some mainstream social networks and similar shit.
Something to reduce western dependence on Russian-enriched nuclear isotopes (which is rarely if ever mentioned alongside gas concerns, for some reason).
That is a strangest thing too.
AFAIK, in Europe, only France is relatively independent on nuclear fuel, waste and have its own nuclear technologies. Britain seem to abandon most of their nuclear tech and had abroad fuel processing. Most other European nuclear plants depends on Russian tech or processing in one way or another, even USA made ones. Interesting, that Germany still want to close last 3 working nuclear reactors to the end of 2022. For the sake of ecology, of course. Theoretically, Europe could switch to French nuclear fuel, but France, being one of the largest nuclear fuel supplier have large internal consumption and low reserves for additional fuel production. As for tech, all Eastern Europe nusclear plants use Russian tech. USA buying Russian fuel. So, France and Canada could become alternatives for Eastern Europe, but hardly they could quickly enhance supply for all Eastern Europe plants. And there is silence in MSM about all that.
Hardly. Coal mines are very old and mostly empty, It is same coal layers as in Rostov-Don region of Russia. That mines are done long ago. Gas/oil fields are weak and tricky. That resources are negligible comparing to known Russian resources. It is much cheaper and easier just to drill one well in any rich place to get the output more than all potential wells in Black Sea region could ever produce. People live in that place many thousand years, so everything that was accessible now is mostly extracted. That could not be a real reson for the war.
Of course all other shitty officially declared reasons, like all that crap about "denazification" or "forcing neutrality" also not real.
The real reason for that war is still unknown. I bet it is just a way to make an excuse for artificial faminehoax elites try to establish on the West on their way to NWO.
There are also some other theories circulating, f.e. war started for whatever is under Azovstal factory in Mariupol. Nobody knows what it is, but there a lot of theories, including interesting ones. F.e. there is cyborgs created by NATO scientists from Ukrainians in Azovstal underground, that is why those encircled at the plant cant't put weapons down and surrender, weapons are part of their bodies, they can't put them down just physically. :)
I've cited dozens of papers in this thread. Why don't you go through and list the funding sources for each of them.
I checked. Found none independent researches. At all.
bla-bla-bla
And no any replications. Zero. Nobody checked researches published by BigPharma/state researchers.
Papers published in prestigious research journals undergo peer review.
Do you know what is "peer review"? Peer review does not mean that research is valid. It does not even mean that it is really done. It just a check that there is no any obvious mistakes, and that's all. Peer rewievers do not replicate experiments, so they just can't confirm paper at all.
Moreover, none of that paper will pass a peer review of, say, physics scientists. The first their question to the paper will be - "how did you isolate effect of vaccine from other effects like natural immunity, medication, other substances in the vaccine and other stuff? You did not demonstrate that declared effect if exactly from vaccine active component only and not from other possible variables". Next will be - "how do you infect your test subjects with virus to enshure that it is really declared disease vaccine have to prevent". And so on.
Theories are not "declared" correct. That's not how science works.
Exactly. If a theory have no repeateable experimental confirmation, it is probably bad, wrong theory thinked out by some swindlers.
How do you know that? Do you think all replicative studies are also published?
If you don't have any clue about the deep black ass medicine drowned to, try to read something about replication crisis in medicine. Medicine is the worst among all other sciences. Somwhere near sociology and psychology.
So you only accept replication of studies done by independent groups of non-scientists?
Of course. That is the point. If you declare in your research that some treatment works, then this should be checked by an independent researches, that in no way have any connections to those who connected with you and those who interested in confirmation.
Not true. You have made this up. But papers do have to be replicable.
Person who create sentences where every part contradicts all other either insane, either propagandist.
I'll take his word over the word of dozens of scientists publishing in the most prestigious medical journals in the world.
I don't care what is your religious beliefs at all.
No independent replication of experiments - nothing to discuss.
Why don't you start a "science-y" journal and publish your debunks of all these, hundreds and thousands of papers published in prestigious medical journals?
"Why don't you create your own Twitter (i.e. state, banks, money, networks, powerplants, etc.)?" :)
You see, people? That's all you need to know about propagandists. Final argument always fall to some kind of monopoly or "consensus". :)
You clearly know more about science than all of these scientists who actually have science jobs.
Yes. Because I'm a scientist and engineer and doing science and engineering job nearly everyday. That thing, that is happening in medicine is not a science at all. "We made some device, we absolutely have no clue how it really works, but we give 100 devices to 100 people and ask them to shake device. Then we found that women have 20% more green LED activated than men. Few people died for unknown reasons. So this device could be used to safely and effectively detect women.". Every single paper you posted looks like that. That is how medical science look like today. That is why medical science is complete bullshit and garbage. That is why it should be deeply reformed and forcefully returned to the strict scientific methods.
Show me a single paper that is done by an entlty that is not financed, connected, or dependend on BigPharma or state Health institutions. Show me a replication of a single paper that is done by an entlty that is not financed, connected, or dependend on BigPharma or state Health institutions
You don't understand, that everything you linked here is a solid proof that all that vaccinehoax is not a science at all.
Scientific papers are published to present some research to other scientists. Presenting your research to other scientists is necessary for independent replication of researsch. If you have no independent replication of your research, publication of your research says absolutely nothing about validity of your research. Only when other scientists repeat your experiments and get exactly same results, your research could be named valid and your theory could be accounted as correct.
Science is not about publishing papers. It is about repeateability of experiment that prove or disprove some theory. Repeateability of experiment is the only proof that your research is valid. If nobody independently replicated your research and get the same results - it is unscientific to declare that your theory is correct.
There are no any single independent replication of any paper somehow connected with coronahoax at all. Medical "science" have lowest replication rate of published papers among all other areas. Moreover, even if rare medical papers replicated even by not-so-independent, but just another group of scientists, their results in most cases contradictes with initial paper. That is named "replication crisis", many sane people tried to point on this greatest problem in medicine, but was shut down by medical establishment. But with coronahoax we see a total zero of independent replications.
So, if you want to talk about science, you choose completely wrong area. Medicine is not a science for a long time already. There is only theories that is not supported by independent replication of experiments.
Published papers prove absolutely nothing if described experiments was not replicated by independent researchers with same result.
There is nothing to discuss at all. You have no any clue what science is and how it works. It is funny to see how you try to replace science with some kind of stupid religion with "published papers" as sacred writings and people financed by BigPharma and state health institutions as "priests", having no any idea what is all that really about.
Alexei Navalny is the Russian version of Hillary Clinton, another liar trying to slander the peoples choice.....
So then why the elites didn't help him with most popular among Russians sanctions, but instead used them to help Putin?
Lukashenko denied coronahoax openly. IMF even tried to bribe him with $1.5b to implement lockdowns and mask mandates, but he refused. Belarus was completely free from all that shit just because its leader just said no.
Yes, there was consequences in the form of protests, but I think the absurdity of the opposition demands who literally do rallies for Lukashenko resign and implementing immediate lockdowns including prohibition of rallies turned away a lot of people from opposition. People could want Lukashenko go away, but no sane human will support that if lockdowns and other crap also comes in that package.
So, it was completely possible to not shill for NWO with coronahoax even for small Belarus. For the Putin that was much simplier to do, but....
Putin was the last hope of someone to avert the coming future of the worlds people.
It is not Putin who is the hope. It is Russians who are able to not give a fuck to the NWO authorities could be a hope.
The only way to have a hope, is do not comply. That is not rallies and protests that could change something. It is "not giving a fuck" to authorities pushing NWO agenda that everybody could effictevily use against NWO.
The whole NWO thing is based on the compliance of people to the NWO agenda. That thing will not work at all if even part of people will silently sabotage it.
Navalny was a western plant
Of course. But he selected a very good main topic of his political program. Most Russians support that.
It is highly suspect to claim he was poisoned by fsb
FSB(former KGB) did and do a lot of disgusting things in Russia, it is very probable scenario.
I am also not clear on what powers to manage oligarchs the west gave to Putin that you are eluding to.
West finally arrested/confiscated western assets of "Russian" oligarchs. It is West who did the only thing, that every Russian approve. And it was Putin whose actions was used as a reason for that.
Putin has been hard at work on the opfor oligarchs since he took his seat.
If he did, nobody will rememnber now about different Usmanovs, Abramoviches and other greedy criminal bastads. But Putin did absolutely nothing. He only geting rid of his political rivals, and don't care about thieves that aligned with his politics. So, Putin did nothing to get rid of oligarchs for being thieves.
The amount of cleanup required in Russia after the corrupt leaders of the past was non trivial.
Putin itself is a completely corrupt leader, since the story with "Oil for food" hoax in early 1990s where Klaus Schwab was his curator. Putin was presented to Yeltsin by Berezovsky, another jewish thief who stole all his wealth from Russian people. Putin get rid of Berezovsky and Khodorkovsky not because they stole from Russians, but because they have different political views. All other oligarchs who do not have political contradictions with Putin still robbing and stealing from Russians without any problems.
Putin is totally corrupted and is devoted NWO shill, his full support of coronahoax is more than enough to have undeniable proof of that.
Stalin, born Besarionis dze Jughashvili... was a jew.
Completely possible. I don't have a clue if his mother was jewish. Among jews etnicity is accounted by female line, unlike among europeans or others. "Jugashvili" is from the father, it means "son of Juga" in Georgian language. However, in Georgian jew will be "Hebraeli".
Hitler also could had some jewish ancestors.
But this does not matter. That all story is about declining jewish mainstream agenda. It means that Jewish cabal goals are much more important than even jews who could go against agenda. Agenda uber alles.
Design of that wall with regular pattern of crystals sticking out immidiately associated in my mind with robot vac chargers and Borg charging stations from Star Trek. What is inside that wall?
Is it jsut a kind of cargo-cult derived from technologies of jewish masters (aliens?) or something really functional?
Dude, USSR was turbo ZOG.
Until Stalin in 30s killed or gulaged most of the jews in power.
Check Germany-USSR parade in Brest in 1939 on the event of gifting Brest to USSR after Germany took over Poland, f.e., and other numerious examples of fast growing Germany-USSR cooperation, from military pilots expirience exchange to technological and science cooperation.
Cooperation of Stalin's USSR and Hitler's Germany was extremely dangerous for all that Rothshilds/Rockfellers/Morgans and other parasites. That is why they did everything to set on fight two big empires that did not fall to their satanic plans. Both systems, being different have one thing in common - denial of shitty economic and political system that ZOG tried to establish all over the world. Both, Germany and Russia was an example that dropping ZOG narratives is a way to fast recovery from severe damage ZOG did for that countries. Both Germany and Russia was ruined by ZOG in the beginning of XX century, and become high-tech industrialized powers to the 1940s as soon as they get rid of ZOG agents in power. This was an undeniable proof that country development does not depend on political system or anything else, only presence or absence of Jews in power does matter,
Definitely.
Germany and USSR had to unite and help Americans and Brits to defeat UK/USA Zionist Occupation Governments.
You still can't get the thing that make all your appeal to math completely void.
Vaccine is a special treatment that have to induce immunity to the disease. Immunity to the disease means you can't get that disease because your immune system is already know how to properly defeat pathogen due to vaccine or previous disease caused by same pathogen.
To talk about vaccine you need to have very close to zero disease cases in vaccinated. At the level of errror noise. If you have significant number of vaccinated in totals of disease - THIS IS FUCKING NOT A VACCINE! It does not provide immunity to the disease. It can't be named a vaccine at all.
So, we observe something, that is in no way could be named a vaccine but have severe side effects. According to the discussed data it can't be even named a some kind of "preventive treatment", since there are even no any solid correlation with not-a-vaccination and cases. That "vaccine" show the same result as "snake oil". Moreover, it is even worse than "snake oil", because even "snake oil" should show placebo effect, that will show more positive results for more doses. This not-a-vaccine shows completely opposite. That means that even retards who jabbed themselves with that shit multiple times do not really believe in that shit and think that it is harmful whatever they declare in public. That thing is named nocebo effect. Or it is a result of not-a-vaccine harm to the immune system.
And all that is even without mentioning that the "fact" of disease is determined with a PCR technology that in no way could be used to determine the fact of disease. Also, we still did not know, does SARS-CoV-2 exists at all, we still don't know does COVID-19 a real disease or just other regular diseases disguised to it, and what is the real reason of disease named COVID-19 if it exists. So, it is completely impossible to create a vaccine or treatment to the disease we know absolutely nothing about, especially if it does not exists at all.
So, we see here results of mass application of some unknown shit with severe side effects at least on blood and cardiac systems that show nocebo effect on the preventing questionable disease this substance had been declared to prevent.
Had. Fortunately, lockdowns was mostly ignored, and QR-codes with vaccination status existed for only few weeks in some regions. There also was mask mandates and social distancing. Now government officials prefer to not to mention that coronahoax shit anymore.
Recently, IceAgeFarmer was declared Russian agent by facebook for talking about it. :)
Check out r/iamverysmart.
No, thanks, I'm not a coprophage, so not gonna dive into such cesspit as reddit. Leaving that "pleasure" for you.
I wonder which came first, conservative retards trying to stop women's bodily autonomy, or covid 19 vaccines.
You absolutely can't be for "body autonomy" and anyhow welcome "mandatory vaccinations" simultaneously. If some person is, than that person does not have any consciousness at all. So this person can't have any opinion at all, due to the lack of consciousness.
Also, you just forgot that there are no any "covid 19 vaccines". That shit is not a vaccines at all, by definition of a term "vaccine" and you can't create a vaccine against disease without isolating virus and proving that this and only this virus is a cause of disease. Nobody did that in over 2 years.
And as any other mind, "collective mind" AKA "egregor" is vulnerable to manipulation by malicious entity. Since "collective mind" have no any noticeable ability for critical thinking (if not thinling in whole, I suppose "egregor" IQ/ability of logical thinking equal or even significantly lower than of dumbest member) things become much worse, because "collective mind" don't have even rudimentary protection from manipulation.
Those who crying "my body my choice" about abortions are exaclty the same ones who agressively shilled for mandatory vaccinations and other medical crap. So, their "opinion" on that matter should not be taken into account at all, because they are fucking hypocrytes that dont'really have any real opinion at all.
All that shit with "crime rates" and other stuff have absolutely nothing to do with legality of abortions at all. It is about a system where rising sane child in love and care is overpriced luxury for the most people. It is about a system where fucking job is more important than family. Is it about a system where it could be preferrable to be a welfare drug addict than to build your life.
So, tell me what do you think is being discussed?
LOL. since when "disclaimer" become something scientific? If I measure voltage across the resistor with different currents, store that data into database and write a "disclaimer" that "it can't be used" will it make Ohm's law non-existent or will it make that data unuseable to check that law? No. Science don't give a fuck to any "disclaimers". You have no any idea, what science is.
Where is the evidence of casual association between result of PCR test and cause of disease? Where is the evidence of casual association between the jab and occasional immunity? Where is at least the evidence of casual association between presumed virus and disease?
To prove casual association scientist throughly isolate the potential cause from all other potential causes of effect. To be shure, that the cause he study and only the cause he study is the real cause of observed result. This is what real scientist do. Real scientists spend years and a lot of money to isolate the object of study from anything else. Buld filters, shields, even whole underground facilities to get that probable cause as pure as possible. This was never done in any paper you praise and in none of other papers your praised papers link to. Your medical cheaters even never get a presumed virus particles in pure form, without any contaminants to study them. Only as a soup of dead cells, medications, solvents and hell knows what else. And used only PCR tech, absolutely not suitable for that, to "prove" that there is some "virus" in that dirty soup. They did not bother to do even the most basic part of any scientific research. :) Swindlers.
You could get all your coronahoax shit and try to sell it to instagram dumbfucks. You have absolutely zero chances to do it here.
PS: You also gave a perfect proof that you absolutely can't do your own research, even simpliest possible one, and using stupid assumtions backed with literally nothing. I never mentioned VAERS data for anything. In Russia there are no VAERS or anything comparable at all, so I just don't care.
In Russia, if you are interested, here exists one interesting official paper, that was and is actual even right now - "Methodics of determining epidemic thresholds for virus respiratory diseases". It is officially signed and accepted paper with epidemic thresholds (number of cases per 10000 above which authorities could declare epidemic) calculated for every single region and each week of year. None of that thresolds was ever exceeded during all that coronahoax in any region at any week. There was no any epidemic in Russia at all. None of all that shitty illegal orders and laws, federal and local issued during coronahoax have any mention of epidemic. They all use only WHO orders as reason. None of local health entities give positive official answer to the requests like "do we have epidemic now?". There are tons of that official papers where clearly stated by official entities, that there are no any exceed of thresholds, so no any epidemic of virus respiratory disease observed. Link to the official "Methodics" - https://docs.cntd.ru/document/555652160 You will not find any proof that there was any real epidemic, even with all that fake PCR "tests". So there was no any need for any immediate vaccine at all. Case closed. Take your coronahoax to the instagrammers.
You are the most miserable propagandist I ever saw here. :)