Hardly. Coal mines are very old and mostly empty, It is same coal layers as in Rostov-Don region of Russia. That mines are done long ago. Gas/oil fields are weak and tricky. That resources are negligible comparing to known Russian resources. It is much cheaper and easier just to drill one well in any rich place to get the output more than all potential wells in Black Sea region could ever produce. People live in that place many thousand years, so everything that was accessible now is mostly extracted. That could not be a real reson for the war.
Of course all other shitty officially declared reasons, like all that crap about "denazification" or "forcing neutrality" also not real.
The real reason for that war is still unknown. I bet it is just a way to make an excuse for artificial faminehoax elites try to establish on the West on their way to NWO.
There are also some other theories circulating, f.e. war started for whatever is under Azovstal factory in Mariupol. Nobody knows what it is, but there a lot of theories, including interesting ones. F.e. there is cyborgs created by NATO scientists from Ukrainians in Azovstal underground, that is why those encircled at the plant cant't put weapons down and surrender, weapons are part of their bodies, they can't put them down just physically. :)
I bet it is just a way to make an excuse for artificial faminehoax elites try to establish on the West on their way to NWO.
I think that's a major part, yes. To my understanding, most of the iconic farmland of Ukraine lies east of the Dneper river. If Russia gains permanent control of the area, and then shuts down grain exports to the west, the stage would be set for the great "famine"... which will be about as authentic as tits on a frog, but that's another matter.
Afterward, my bet is that western economies will start focusing more on agriculture, utilizing the throngs of migrants already present. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess at this point. I suspect a missing piece of the puzzle will be found in technology - some new type of power plant or some such. Something to reduce western dependence on Russian-enriched nuclear isotopes (which is rarely if ever mentioned alongside gas concerns, for some reason). But right now, that's just a hunch I have, nothing more substantial.
Something to reduce western dependence on Russian-enriched nuclear isotopes (which is rarely if ever mentioned alongside gas concerns, for some reason).
That is a strangest thing too.
AFAIK, in Europe, only France is relatively independent on nuclear fuel, waste and have its own nuclear technologies. Britain seem to abandon most of their nuclear tech and had abroad fuel processing. Most other European nuclear plants depends on Russian tech or processing in one way or another, even USA made ones. Interesting, that Germany still want to close last 3 working nuclear reactors to the end of 2022. For the sake of ecology, of course. Theoretically, Europe could switch to French nuclear fuel, but France, being one of the largest nuclear fuel supplier have large internal consumption and low reserves for additional fuel production. As for tech, all Eastern Europe nusclear plants use Russian tech. USA buying Russian fuel. So, France and Canada could become alternatives for Eastern Europe, but hardly they could quickly enhance supply for all Eastern Europe plants. And there is silence in MSM about all that.
Hardly. Coal mines are very old and mostly empty, It is same coal layers as in Rostov-Don region of Russia. That mines are done long ago. Gas/oil fields are weak and tricky. That resources are negligible comparing to known Russian resources. It is much cheaper and easier just to drill one well in any rich place to get the output more than all potential wells in Black Sea region could ever produce. People live in that place many thousand years, so everything that was accessible now is mostly extracted. That could not be a real reson for the war.
Of course all other shitty officially declared reasons, like all that crap about "denazification" or "forcing neutrality" also not real.
The real reason for that war is still unknown. I bet it is just a way to make an excuse for artificial faminehoax elites try to establish on the West on their way to NWO.
There are also some other theories circulating, f.e. war started for whatever is under Azovstal factory in Mariupol. Nobody knows what it is, but there a lot of theories, including interesting ones. F.e. there is cyborgs created by NATO scientists from Ukrainians in Azovstal underground, that is why those encircled at the plant cant't put weapons down and surrender, weapons are part of their bodies, they can't put them down just physically. :)
I think that's a major part, yes. To my understanding, most of the iconic farmland of Ukraine lies east of the Dneper river. If Russia gains permanent control of the area, and then shuts down grain exports to the west, the stage would be set for the great "famine"... which will be about as authentic as tits on a frog, but that's another matter.
Afterward, my bet is that western economies will start focusing more on agriculture, utilizing the throngs of migrants already present. Beyond that, it's anyone's guess at this point. I suspect a missing piece of the puzzle will be found in technology - some new type of power plant or some such. Something to reduce western dependence on Russian-enriched nuclear isotopes (which is rarely if ever mentioned alongside gas concerns, for some reason). But right now, that's just a hunch I have, nothing more substantial.
That is a strangest thing too.
AFAIK, in Europe, only France is relatively independent on nuclear fuel, waste and have its own nuclear technologies. Britain seem to abandon most of their nuclear tech and had abroad fuel processing. Most other European nuclear plants depends on Russian tech or processing in one way or another, even USA made ones. Interesting, that Germany still want to close last 3 working nuclear reactors to the end of 2022. For the sake of ecology, of course. Theoretically, Europe could switch to French nuclear fuel, but France, being one of the largest nuclear fuel supplier have large internal consumption and low reserves for additional fuel production. As for tech, all Eastern Europe nusclear plants use Russian tech. USA buying Russian fuel. So, France and Canada could become alternatives for Eastern Europe, but hardly they could quickly enhance supply for all Eastern Europe plants. And there is silence in MSM about all that.