I continually see memes quoting statistics that claim to show the ineffectiveness of vaccines.
Anybody with even middle school level math competency should be able to see through the misrepresentation of these statistics.
A recent example stated that 85.7% of deaths over a particular week in Scotland were vaccinated people. The conclusion drawn was that the vaccines don't work because the vast majority of people dying were vaccinated.
What was left out in the post was that 94% of Scotland has received at least 1 dose and 74% has received 3 doses. That leaves only less than 6% of the population unvaxxed accounting for 12% of the deaths. This data suggests (suggests, doesn't prove anything), just the opposite of the conclusion drawn.
Misuse of statistics makes people look either stupid or dishonest. If you see something posted like this, you should immediately question your source. Anybody passing off this kind of stuff isn't vetting their sources or their numbers either through actual intent to mislead or sheer stupidity. Either way, the source cannot be trusted. Trusting such a source is just allowing yourself to be duped (which makes you a dupe) or a liar yourself.
Hold yourself to higher standards of integrity, please, everybody. It doesn't help anybody to lie about facts or pass on lies about facts.
You still can't get the thing that make all your appeal to math completely void.
Vaccine is a special treatment that have to induce immunity to the disease. Immunity to the disease means you can't get that disease because your immune system is already know how to properly defeat pathogen due to vaccine or previous disease caused by same pathogen.
To talk about vaccine you need to have very close to zero disease cases in vaccinated. At the level of errror noise. If you have significant number of vaccinated in totals of disease - THIS IS FUCKING NOT A VACCINE! It does not provide immunity to the disease. It can't be named a vaccine at all.
So, we observe something, that is in no way could be named a vaccine but have severe side effects. According to the discussed data it can't be even named a some kind of "preventive treatment", since there are even no any solid correlation with not-a-vaccination and cases. That "vaccine" show the same result as "snake oil". Moreover, it is even worse than "snake oil", because even "snake oil" should show placebo effect, that will show more positive results for more doses. This not-a-vaccine shows completely opposite. That means that even retards who jabbed themselves with that shit multiple times do not really believe in that shit and think that it is harmful whatever they declare in public. That thing is named nocebo effect. Or it is a result of not-a-vaccine harm to the immune system.
And all that is even without mentioning that the "fact" of disease is determined with a PCR technology that in no way could be used to determine the fact of disease. Also, we still did not know, does SARS-CoV-2 exists at all, we still don't know does COVID-19 a real disease or just other regular diseases disguised to it, and what is the real reason of disease named COVID-19 if it exists. So, it is completely impossible to create a vaccine or treatment to the disease we know absolutely nothing about, especially if it does not exists at all.
So, we see here results of mass application of some unknown shit with severe side effects at least on blood and cardiac systems that show nocebo effect on the preventing questionable disease this substance had been declared to prevent.