IDK, but in Russia nuclear power plants are more than profitable, even with our relatively low electricity prices. Pure total profit of Rosatom from its NPPs electricity is around $10B a year. There even new reactors and power plants rising here, and there are plans to reach 25% of nuclear power in all electricity to 2035. On average, NPP full investments return period is 25 years with investor profit at 10% per year on top (I mean investor will receive 10% of profit a year in addition to investments return during that time). On average, 1kW of nuclear power electricity in Russia cost ~$3K. Yes, it is not a cheapest energy source possible, but perfectly affordable, accounting power stability and no need for permanent fuel supply lines as for combustion power plants or specific landscape as for hydropower. You will pay around same $3k per 1kW if you want a reliable diesel or natural gas backup generator that could run for a week non-stop. Even shitty home grade Generac backup generators cost ~$1k per 1kW and they can't run for weeks. I will instantly pay $3k/kW for personal backup generator that will have reliability and stability of NPP, and need for refueling once in 5 years of runtime.
May be there is something wrong with France and its politics of maintaining and supervising NPPs, and not with nuclear power plants profitability?
even if he did oppose them he would have a hard time doing it overtly.
There are no any technical problems, f.e. to kidnap Klaus Schwab and other well-known NWO cheerleaders, put them in some old-style KGB prison and torture until they tell everything about their real masters and their real goals. That confessions alone will change a lot.
Only thing needed is a political will of Russian authorities.
Or he could be acting the part of Eurasian against Oceana.
Only if Eurasia have exactly same real goal as Oceania.
Either way, it doesn't seem to be in his interest to be anything other than an oligarch.
Exactly. It is a big mistake to suppose that he is sovereign ruler of sovereign country who really do everything to make his country and people thrive. It is just like think that US administration somehow concerned about prosperity of US as a country and all Americans.
Obviously one of them. In his "fucking over NWO" you will not find a single real action against any of NWO institutions - UN, WHO, WEF, IMF and so on.
If you want, you could see it like different colors of same NWO to create illusion of choice. In the best case you will be able to choose between
- Western NWO: mandatory praising perversions, satanism, and all other liberal shit, you can criticize public politicians, but can't criticize system.
- Russian NWO : mandatory praising state, your children don't have freak shows and gay lessons at school, you can't criticize politicians but can criticize system.
- China NWO: mandatory priasing collective and uniformity, children don't have freak shows and gay lessons, criticism of both politicians and system is not allowed.
Something like that. All other shit with censorship, propaganda, milking population, property rights denial are the same.
IDK, theoretically, Putin could turn against NWO and even do heavy and irrepairable harm to it, just in second, at least he have access to all necessary resources and power to do that, but I'm in doubt it will happen soon.
Overall, looking at what is unwinding on the West, I think in long run Russian or Chinese NWO is "preferrable", since, at least children will get a chance.
From the point of maximum personal independence from state and not giving a fuck to NWO narratives, Russian NWO is "preferrable". If you are not publicly criticising authorities, many "sins" could be forgiven, so you could have relative personal freedom.
From the point of active resistance Western NWO looks "preferrable", but that will not last long, since most children will be completely lost.
Something like that.
The propagation and amplification of waves in a medium was well known with water and sound a hundred or two years before the laser was theorized
Resonators was known long before too. But nobody before tried to combine that two things and get something completely new. That is the point.
The technology and tools to use this same theory on light simply had not been developed yet.
Nitrogen laser using air (search it, it is simple as fuck device) could have been be made right at the moment when scientists start to experiment with electricity. There is nothing special in technologies of making lasers. Ruby laser could have been made even without electricity at all, just ruby crystal with parallel sides excited with any bright flash.
Out of curiosity, why do you choose the 1970's?
Very short answer - https://conspiracies.win/p/11RNy8tZCy/conspiracy-of-conspiracies/ And it is not only me who noticed that something huge happened around 1970.
interesting how they use bitcoin symbolic to promote their crap. :)
Though, their target audience barely could understand what "cryptocurrency" is, not even talking about differences between BTC and CBDC. So, whatever...
Btw, when we're fiber optic multiplexers invented?
Using of diffractional gratings to mux and demux lights of different colors fall even to 19 century. Fiber optic also used long before networking times, from multifiber flexible image transmitting "cables" to single-fiber applications.
Cellular transmitters?
Transievers of cellular equipment are no different from other transievers. 1G NMT/AMPS and 2G GSM transievers have no specific at all. 2G CDMA / 3G / 4G / 5G transievers was slightly different, due to wide band and channel division technology, but they are no very different from DSSS transievers from late 1940s (yes, it could be hard to accept that digital DSSS is so old, but it is).
every technology is just a refinement or adaptation of previous technology, it is a ladder not a springboard.
No. Back to the laser. There was no any previous device that was somehow similar to the laser at all. There existed separate knowledge of different things that works in laser, but nobody even predicted the properties of laser beams. Same with nuclear reactors, all semiconductor devices, and many other pre-70s inventions and discoveries.
Ladder is what we have now. Only technological improvements, no any new effects, no new principles, nothing. Internal combustion engine in your car use same theory, principles and effects as century ago. All semiconductors "miracle" around is nothing more than miniaturization of pre-70s semiconductor devices. Even in nanometer scale manufacturing process of all that GHz 64bit processors that magnitude orders more powerful than all pre-70s computers nothing new is used.
IDK, if you get the point, but I'm talking about things never existed before. Again with laser - nobody nowhere saw anything like laser beam. And after few scientists mixed some theories, here it is. Same with all other stuff I'm talking about. You will not find anything post-70s that never existed before and come to existence after some scientific work.
I even have an explanation of how that was done - imagine, that some scientists today want to explore some mix of science things that never was explored before. They don't know what they will get eventually (like that laser beam with unusual and unpredicted properties), they even don't know will it work at all. They only suppose that they could find something new and interesting. How do you think, what are their chances to get a grant?
Steam eninges existed since at least Archimedes' time, he made designs for them, yet not until the 18th century did they cause a "breakthrough"
The breakthrough was in using cylinder-piston system to convert steam energy to the movement. Unlike previous designs cylinder-piston system was useable. IIRC it was Huygens at the end of 17 century, who proposed first cylinder-piston design. It was question of only decade when first steam engine that used cylinder-piston design was made and was really useful, unlike that ancient toys.
Interesting that Russia don't have to use nukes to wipe out Queen's funeral. Taking apart the point of such action, I don't think that masters of all that puppets who was at event was there in person. There is no sense in killing puppets because masters will just put another, and there is a large queue of wannabe NWO puppets at the Davos threshold.
The keyword is "nuke", not anything else. Propagandists of both "sides" are obsessed with nukes in approx past month and like to repeat that word again and again. Looks like attempt to shift public opinion to the normalisation of tactic nuke use. You know, they fucked up with virus, fucked up with vaccines, seem to fucking up with starvation, so they looking for other options to fuck up.
So, you realize that precisely describes a telegraph, right!?
Any signal transmitting some data. In the times of telegraph there was no modern concepts of "data" and "digital". Also, information transmitted over telegraph in no way interfere with transmission itself. The concept of data networks managed by transmitted data was created only in 50s.
To me, your definition would suggest that lasers are little more than focused light
No. The main property of laser beam is coherence that gives it all other important properties, including incredibly low divergence you absolutely could not achieve focusing light.
I was thinking additive manufacturing
Additive manufacturing is known from ancient times. Humans build houses with additive manufacturing since the beginning. 3D printer really just automates that process, that is why I mentioned far-stretching. Of course it is not a real breakthrough or discovery, but at least it is some noticeable advance in a technologies of making things. Especially interesting that today 3D printer was perfectly possible with only pre-70s technologies of CNC. But for some unknown reason it was brought to life only in 90s.
Exactly. F.e. beforementioned laser does not exist even in the form of concept or idea before 1954. In mid-60s we already had mass-manufacturing of things that use lasers for one ot another purpose. And that change nearly everything. That is how important inventions or discoveries work. Something that was completely unknown yesterday, change everything around soon after discovery.
You will not find something similar after 70s, despite all technological advances that should make doing such discoveries/inventions much easier. But there is absolutely nothing since 70s. No any device, principle, whatever, that could be named real game changer. No new engines, power sources, tools based on new principles, etc.
Even if you will try hard and allow very far-stretched assumptions, the only thing of similar importance you could find is an idea of 3D-printer. Importance is in that it allowed to create physical parts that was impossible to create using other methods of manufacturing.
The internet is just an evolution of the telegraph
No, internet is evolution of digital data transmission that was invented and developed in 50s-60s.
Quantum Computing?
The proposal is from 60s. Started from "quantum coding" of 1968. All we have now is just techological improvements without any useful results.
F.e. from idea of laser to the mass manufacturing and usage less than a decade passed.
Nano-scale material manufacturing (looking at you graphene).
Humanity using nano-scale materials from the ancient times. Concrete is nano-scale material made with use of cement nano-particles. Artists using pencils create pictures from graphene nano-particles for millenia. And so on. Just there was no need to use that stupid marketing bullshit.
They sure have not stopped but it is nothing like the speed of advances from before.
So name me one that did not yet exist in one or another form before 70s.
Looks like components of regular dust you easily could find everywhere around you.
Why nobody just suppose that manufacturers of not-a-vaccine shit have no any reason to care about quality and purity of the product since they have guaranteed forced purchases with absolutely no liability on? They could just use a water from regular nearby puddle without any consequences at all. As far as I understand the only goal set by those who ordered manufacturing of not-a-vaccines is a delivery of spike protein to subjects. No objective of sterility or purity was set. So no wonder there are a lot of random shit in them.
I am confused, what do you mean no breakthroughs or inventions since the 70's?
Name me a single invention or discovery made after 70s that is similar in significance to, say, laser, semiconductors, nuclear reactors, etc.
In what field, exactly?
In all of them.
Because there have been countless breakthroughs and inventions since then in pretty much every field.
Name me single one that is not just technological improvement of things invented/discoveried before 70s.
But what is the point!?
IDK, but possibly the cutting of further development. Since 1970s there was no any breakthrough inventions and discoveries at all.
but that calculation is a crap. you have to assume the sun is far away for that experiment to make sense...but thats now how science works.
Exactly. It is absolutely scientific to suppose that Sun is very far away since it visible diameter does not change when it travel over your head. Using one scientific and proven assumption you could scientifically use it in another scientific research. That is how science works. Everything should be connected and if something is contradicts with your model, then your model is wrong.
I have looked at things far away with binoculars. then i checked the distances and did the math.
It was windows in a girl, not a guy room in neighbouring house, i hope?
I look at the sun and sunset and use my knowledge of how parallel light vs local light work
Did you ever heard about the thing named "perspective"? You could easily study it on a closest railway. Or you will insist that rails on railway are not parallel and when train moves they became wider closer to the train? And same is with straight highways and other stuff.
Your "understanding" of "observations" is as retarded, as your attempts to make a thing from a nothingburger named "flat earth".
Especially interesting, that for your miserable area of activity, it is really does not matter at all, what model of earth you will use. In your case there are absolutely no any reasons to bother with the shape of earth. Not a single one. So, it is not your own necessity, to discuss a question that absolutely have no any use for you, but somebody else. It's like somebody with total lactose intolerance who are flaiming in threads about nuances of cheese taste. Unlike me, in your life you never met and will never meet the need to somehow account Earth curvature. But for the unknown reason you spend months trolling here about shit you have no any need to care about. :) Name that reason or GTFO.
No one has even been able to measure the curve. You can't, brilliant scientists can't. No possible way.
Nice try, but Earth curvature was measured even B.C.. :)
And if you can detect any curve, I will personally send you $1000.
And how you will do it under current anti-Russia sanctions? You can't send me $, and know it, but make false promise you could not fulfill. :) Nice try again.
And why do you think I need $? Don't you have something more trustful and stable?
(Yes, I have done my own experiments and scientific observations)
You mean reading propaganda papers and watching YouTube? Sorry to disappoint you, but that is not "doing my own experiments and scientific observations".
Thanks, but you should stop believing in photos from space. High altitude planes
Show me a plane that could fly 7.5km/s at alsitude 800km or in case of geostationary at 3km/s at 35000km. And only then come back.
Go ahead, Measure the curve. 8 inches per mile squared, convert to metric or use the trig chart.
I'm fucking with that fucking 8 inches per mile each time when I have to establish long-range radiolink between two points. All that fucking masts and roofs to go above that fucking curvature. Oh, how I want the Earth be flat - put antennas above the trees, and get unlimited range. But no, that fucking Earth is round as fuck, and you have to build high towers and masts for fucking miserable 30km.
So, don't even try to tell me about how you can't measure Earth curvature.
Shut the fuck up, take a laser and go to lake or river and measure your curvature as long as you wish. Also, you could measure distances using any long-range ToF device between 3 distant points and sum the angles of measured triangle. Suddenly, you will inevitably get more than 180°.
Either way, you cant use pictures to prove the globe theory.
I can. It is you who can't find out anything by yourself and continously copypasting dumb shit.
You personally did absolutely nothing to find out the answer on the question you so concerned about. Why?
Take a used satellite dish, $20 RTL-SDR USB dongle, used 3G irradiator, some coaxial cable and any PC you have around. Receive realtime perfectly curved full-globe images of rotating Earth every 15-30 minutes from GOES/FENGYUN/Electro satellites with resolution 4km/px (or even 1km/px) that allow you easily compare cloud pattern over your head with one you see on the fresh image.
You are so concerned about shape of Earth, why don't you do anything to resolve that so inportant to you problem?
Try to do something, instead of dumb copypasting stupud and false statements. Are you so handass, that anything more than Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V is something unachievable for you?
That would be like referring to the ukraine war as a dual country event.
It is mostly US/UK/EU-Russia event. Still local. I'm in doubt that that shit is really touches Brasil, Zimbabve, India or even China.
I think that most things that could seem to be consequences of that war, really was inevitable, war just create a push for them, but was not the cause, even if MSM says so. Especially if MSM says so.
9/11 provoked loss of life and destabilization of multiple middle east countries aswell as policies world wide.
They was already pretty much destabilised. All that Taliban/AlQaeda was created long before 9/11 and US rush to bath Israel in protection and money also was not new thing. Iraq/Iran also was under US interference already. US had clashes on ME long before 9/11.
9/11 was used to screw US population. Most of the Earth population didn't care at all. As I said, terrorist hoax started few years earlier, so staged "terror attacks" on civilians already was all over the world. Even in Russia wave of "terrorist attacks" that was used to screw up the people was conducted in Sep 1999, exactly two years earlier than this was staged in US, Sep 2001.
AFAIK, founder of Flat Earth Society (1956) was, suddenly, also a member of Royal Astronomical and Royal Geographical Societies of Britain. You know, all that strange British aristocratic stuff. I think it was some kind of British psyop, may be developed as an attempt to discredit upcoming USSR space program, may be as a tool of "poisoning a well" against "unwanted" scientific research, or may be as experiment on population conditioning.
IDK, but seems that this shit comes from UK agencies.
That stuff significantly declined in mid-70s, and was nearly dead until sudden reborn in late 90s, as peasants become regular internet users. Authorities meet with a threat of uncontrolled exchange of ideas, knowledge and theories, so they ressurect almost dead "Flat Earth" to mitigate the risks. At that time, I think, it was mostly US agencies job of "poisoning a well".
As far, as I remember, that shit was noticeably deployed for the first time on the scientific boards where Einstein relativity was questioned. In a few days after discussion start (yes, internet discussions lasted months or even years at the time) there appeared few new users without any other posts that began to push flat earth nonsense, ruining discussion. Later, they never post anything even if were not banned.
Interesting, that at the same time conspiracy and UFO boards was not a target for flat-eathers. Only scientific boards. May be their masters thought that conspiracy theories and UFO stuff looked fringe enough to not bother. But today, when nearly every conspiracy theory becomes proven fact in matter of months, they are everywhere.
Some kind of ETH marketing. BTC bad, ETH good. PoW bad, PoS good.
If you throw out all that stupid references to $ from article, then there will be only question of energy left. But choosing between total PoS fraud and relatively working PoW crypto with some energy needed to support network, I'll definitely choose PoW, until new iteration of crypto experiment will evetually roll out. Fuck energy economy. Who the fuck will care about energy like beggars among crypto users?
Yes, of course they could. Then Satoshi is an intelligence agency, so Satishi is definitely exists.
Did you ever been curious about how opensource software created? Single persons, hackers collectives, agencies and corporations write something and sometimes for whatever reason publish code under some nickname. In any case they are exist.
Is Satoshi even real?
Of course. Somebody wrote the concept and code. Whoever did that, he/she/they is/are Satoshi. Concept and code can't appear out of thin air.
As I understand, there is no common country-wide electric system, it is more state-wide separate nets. Also, powerhungry industries that could stabilise energy consumption is closed or relocated abroad.