1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really never heard about that stuff.

Human trafficing in ex-USSR was pretty straight-forward. Some foreigner hire young girls here promising a good job in marketing of fashion agency. After arriving in Europe, they took out girls passports for whatever reason and forced them to be prostitutes. That's all, no any complex conspiracies. In 1990s, many young girls dreamed to move to that West paradise at any cost, so there was no any problems with prey for western human traffickers.

As for pyramids and stones - that could be Ural mountains. There are a lot of legends about strange things around them. From ancient race of slavic people who live in the endless caves of Ural (they are really endless and very deep) to the launch sites of aliens. There even a series of fantasy books about misterious people with supernatural abilities (not like western superheroes, more like spiritualy empowered like Tibet monks) living deep under Ural mountains who are fighting for millenias an endless spiritual war against so called grey race who represented on Earth by jews - "Valkyria Treasuries" by Sergey Alekseev. Also, have to mention "The Mistress of Copper Mountain"/"Malahite Casket" by Pavel Bazhov - ancient legends based fairy-tales - English translated version in PDF https://disk.yandex.ru/d/M9fdvsi48hT5yQ Highly recommend, IDK, it's like a kind of stories from fantasy universe you never heard about. May be you even find some grits about reptiloids and inner Earth. :)

So, large stones, pyramids, memory holes and tons of gold/gems are relatively close to the legends about Ural mountains. It this is the case, than it is more like a positive incident.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are 3 pyramids in Poltava region built in the end of 19 century as burial-vaulds by Russian aristocrats who somehow was connected with Egypt campaigns.

http://kremenchug1.narod.ru/history_piramidy.htm - in Russian. For unknown reason google translate or other online translators was not able to translate that page, IDK, try to use translator addon in browser or https://translate.yandex.ru/translate - it do the job, but a permanent link to translated page does not work, so can't post it here.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

We just rised up against authorities slightly more often than others. That never worked as expected, even in cases when we win. :)

Really, I just don't see any real force in West that could seriously oppose NWO. So, the best strategy is to preserve all those people who could become a seed of that force eventually.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unlike magnetic devices, flash usually don't leave any significant traces of previously recorded data. Writing new data usually is page erase - page write cycle. So, really, it does not matter what data will be written. So, fast urandom is good enough. To be paranoid you could write it twice.

There is another thing in flash-based devices that could be potentially dangerous. Flash devices usually have some spare memory to use instead of failed blocks. And once internal processor finds bad block it just replaces it with spare one. And data recorded in bad block still stay there and can't be erased by usual means. From the other side, if flash begin to fail, than it fails fast and become unuseable. So it makes no any sense to keep such device at all and it could be just crashed or microwaved to destroy all data,

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Shoot them. Because you are already lost anyway. At least you will be somehow useful that way.

You lost when you attracted their attention to you and your house. What is the problem to bribe them to avoid you? Or make a fake IDs that make you a perfect citizen in the eyes of state? Or hack a state database to make your house non-existent for authorities?

I know, it looks like underground, and it really is, but you don't have an army to be able to fight openly. So, if you can't fight, you have to act in underground. And if you fail to do that, you are doomed in any case.

Why do you need to stay in underground? Because there have to be somebody left to unite into army that will defeat them.

12
CrazyRussian 12 points ago +12 / -0

You loose a battle every time you agree to obey stupid laws because "but they are the laws!!!111".

While you give a fuck to all that rulings, orders, treaties and laws, you are fucked.

I didn;t give a fuck to any coronahoax/climatehoax/whatever shit, why should I change my mind now, just because some bastards signed just another shitty paper?

They could sign anything they want, that does not change things really. Your obedience and praising to some papers signed by somebody do.

Don't give a fuck to their stupid laws. Cheat, lie, fake, bribe, hack, whatever, there are endless ways to fuck them and be completely safe, what's the problem? That's all you need to do to break that shit apart.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

JFK. There have been quite a few more, undoubtedly. Lots. Plenty of assassinations by 'terrorists'.

Those "terrorists" are absolutely free to bring anything on the any plane today and they never be checked or subjected to that humiliation procedure of pre-flight search as all other passangers. So, all that fucking air marshalls and pre-flight insanity have no any sense at all to counter that "terrorists". Moreover, fucking marshalls will help them at their first request to oppress the passengers.

Plenty of terrorists who are politically motivated. IRA were. Etc. Modern like Hezbollah.

Both, IRA and Hesbollah are kind of army fighting for some land, they don't try to fly without mask or bring a drink on board.

You're suggesting there's no such thing as terrorism. Wrong.

So, name me one single "terrorist" who was not backed up by government agencies that have unlimited access to planes, unlike regular citizens.

Planes falling out of the Sky. There is literally nothing worse.

They do. Cars and busses crash too. And even trains could have an incident with more corpses than airplane. So what?

Those days when they cooked their own food on airplanes are long over. When they smoked on airplanes.. Remember that, was it in the 70s. They cooked their own food on the plane. They smoked on the airplane.

Looks like wrong country was named "Land of freedom". I remember that up to early 2000s. They cooked food on board and there was nothing wrong in bringing own alcohol. I smoked without problems on the airplane in 2001. The only thing they check before allowing you to board was your ticket and size of bag you want to take in cabin. You could also ask stewardess to show the cockpit view to your daughter and that was perfectly normal and welcomed. Was highly facscinated about air travel rules and restrictions in Europe at the same time. They didn't allow me to take a fucking can of beer on board in 1995 in Amsterdam. May be that was the moment I finally got that all that western "democracy and freedom" was a complete lie. All the hell break after that shitty governments spectacle all over the world with the "war" on non-existing terrorism after few false-flag operations made by those who still are not required to pass any pre-flight checks and all that insane and useless crap and could bring anything they want on board.

So fuck all that stupid safety trolling in airports and aviaton. It is all complete unnecessary crap that will be prohibited as soon as humanity will exterminate elite.

Plane is just a flying bus. If you agree with all that insane search and humiliation for the plane, than you will be inevitably obliged to the same shit on the bus too. Then, it will be groceries and going for a walk outside your house. And you 100% deserve that.

10
CrazyRussian 10 points ago +10 / -0

There is no such thing as "terrorism". There is only elite false flags to impose more restrictions on people.

Terrorism, by definition, is violent extermination of rival political leaders. Name me one western political leader that was exterminated by opposing political party.

All that "antiterrorist" shit should be thrown out from airports and planes without any discussion. Travelling by plane should not differ from bus travel or taxi. Pay, take a seat, travel. No ID's no searches, no nothing. It's just a fucking plane, flying bus, nothing more.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

/dev/urandom is a source of pseudorandom sequence, /dev/random is "true" random so /dev/random could be slower.

I think for erasing flash-based devices like SSD, USB-sticks or flash cards you could use /dev/urandom with same efficiency.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be just cat /dev/random > /dev/sda

But better approach is to use shred -v /dev/sda adding whatever options you think you need to carefully erase all data. This command is part of coreutils and every single linux distribution have it out of the box.

Also, some disks have internal "secure erase" command, but I would not depend on it since nobody except manufacturer knows what that command really do.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was always a huge mistery for me why anybody would use any Apple crap at all.

Every single Apple device I ever played with is a total crap from all possible angle from useability to repairability. That things are unuseable. Every single one, from that insane single-button mouse to all that modern iPhones and iPods. Even relatively conventional MacBooks have permanent and irrepaireable design flaws that make them not the best choice even if you wipe out that shitty macOS and install Linux. Moreover, even if you need to use some software that exist only for macOS it is easier to run that piece of shit in VM on any PC or, say as a second system on old "hackintoshed" ThinkPad T450 from garbage bin.

How people who fall to using that crap can't see it is a total crap? And I'm not talking about total vendorlock and incompatibility of Apple products with anything else.

Does marketing have so much control over not only minds, but over such unconscious thing like ergonomics?

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

As agents what oathes did they break,

I'm in no way a big specialist in US agencies, but doesn't agents give an oath to protect US constitution? If so, breaking that oath (at least about 1st amendment) could be named "treason", at least logically.

7
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

IDK, but this guy is dressed like a LARPer.

Why do you think real evil will dress evil or attract attention like this? Because of Hollywood with that strange obsession with mostly uninteresting, boring and childish superheroes/supervillains narratives?

Real evil don't need that stuff at all.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fear is instinct. When it is logical decision it can't be a fear.

You still don't getting the difference and the point.

Those who own guns, in overhelming majority use logic to decide what to do and when to use them.

All that psychological jewish bullshit about "excuses for feelings" and "subconscious emotions" you could leave for some woke audience, they like that senseless and non-scientific crap a lot.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Common sense and fear is different things, if you are not aware.

You don't put your hand into the boiling water not because of fear, but because of common sense.

Attempt to start a battle with government without organisation, backup, support, supply, having a clear goal and doing it alone is the same as putiing hand into boiling water, independent on your gun skills and experience.

There are no conditions in US for starting rebellion. May be yet. And spending a life of potential future rebel for nothing is not a courage, but complete stupidity.

The first sign that situation is changed is when you, and many others will suddenly find out that you have at least several close friends who undoubtedly without a word will help you to hide the corpse of, say, some CDC Vaccine Enforcement Unit worker who was too pesky and didn't want to fuck out alive, and will provide a 100% cover for you.

However, even that is not how it probably will begin in US. For US I bet on some active actions to destroy FRS and stock market in its essence, not ruining some stocks or like that, but destroying fundamental possibility for the elites to play that fucking game that destroys US in the first hand.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

9/11 looks like 9/11 only in US and may be in very few other coutries. Most world use DD/MM/YYYY date format.

There are no 911 phone number in other countries too. Mainly 112.

Do you understand, that there are no any "9/11" for the whole world? It exists only in US. In all other world it is 11 September or 11/9?

So, your numerology autism is a failed shit from the very beginning. If a theory depends only on some totally local traditions that looks weird to the other world, this is insane even to suppose that this numerology shit have any sense.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

The decadence leads to allowing women into leadership 'roles', which, in turn, destroys any capacity the society has to colonize Mars.

There is nothing wrong with woman in power when the only way to receive that job is merit and total responsibility. When there exist any other ways, then you get decadence, ESG and other degradation.

Decadence is a result, not a reason. Meritocracy solves that, that's why even just an idea of meritocracy so hated by all elite around th world, just like an idea of real responsibility of anybody with any grade of power.

Only way to succeed in meritocracy is to acquire more knowledge than others. And unlike with money, you can't steal someone's knowledge to step higher. Unlike with being "special" pervert you can't declare you have knowledge without really having it. And so on. There is no way decadence will somehow make your life easier or more pleasant in meritocracy.

Degradation you see is just people choosing most easy and most pleasant way to live in current system that is designed to allow and breed degradation as much as possible. But there could be other systems.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Much less retarded than spend same resources to build military shit to be destroyed, drain them into endless pit of sensless "green energy" or play deadly games on stock exchanges.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was a significantly later story and Musk again was too greedy to buy RD-180 engines like other US space companies did.

No, I'm talking about times when there was no SpaceX and Musk even not sold PayPal yet.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you remeber that NASA is not the only space agency in the world? Others fled to Mars too, and radiation is not even in top 10 problems that had to be solved.

That's really insane how people who have to question everything just blindly believe in all that crap about "deadly" VanAllen belts and "unstoppable" space radiation. Fuck, the problem (perfectly solveable) of artificial gravity during flight to avoid need for long recreation after landing on Mars is much more important than that "space radiation" which is a question of just using something better than thin aluminium sheet that is used to save fucking fuel.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't even touch the story you should find very impressive - how Elon Musk visited Russia to buy few ballistic missiles

And he did it twice. Dig it on Russian resources, if you want really interesting rabbit hole nearly unknown to western public. Not that shit from western book about Elon Musk, but real sources. Coolest story about how that nasty Musk begged Russian orcs to sell some outdated space crap.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was possible since 1970, independent from who and what says. Musk can't change that.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is nothing technically or scientifically impossible in colonising Mars.

If some person you don't like declare that he want to do something does not mean that thing he declared is impossible or wrong.

Following that weird logic wiping your ass is stupid shit because Klaus Schwab and Chabad Lubavich rabbies do that.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

May be you should bother to find some oldschool book about chemistry and read it?

Elemental aluminium, especially in powder form, quickly oxidizes to Al2O3 in atmosphere environment.

Aluminium is very active metal. The only way aluminium thing stay "untouched" is a relatively thick film of Al2O3 that is cover aluminium thing immidiately. If you scratch it, aluminium immidiately oxidises and recover that film. This process is only thing that allow us to make aluminium things and use them. What will happen with aluminium without that oxide film you could easily see with a help of tiny drop of mercury that prevents creation of that film. Very interesting process, take a look if you are really interested in how things work.

If you suppose that aluminium particles is used to create chemtrails that stay in air for hours, then, they should be so tiny, that this layer of oxide should be already significant part of that particle. And they will turn into Al2O3 completely very quickly in atmoshpere conditions, many even before they finally reach surface. There is no any sense to spray aluminium powder into air, because it will just turn into Al2O3 very quickly.

Aluminium is very active metal, and in nature you will find any possible compositions of aluminium in gigantic amounts. Many different aluminium compositions and complexes is huge and integral part of Earth crust and so soil. Some are gems, some are regular minerals and you have to try hard to create aluminium composition that does not exist in nature in amounts that magnitude orders larger than anything that all planes on Earth could take into air. And they are all in the air constanlry, because of erosion and winds. That cloud of dust behind a vehicle on the rural road is your scary ALUMINIUM!!!111 in concentrations no chemtrail could create near the surface. Meanwhile planes themselves are aluminium particles too, just big ones.

Switching attention from non-existent threat of aluminium from real and significant threat of blocking the sun and changing earth albedo you just make the job of those who want to hide the truth about chemtrails easier.

It is idea of interference with Sun energy that feed our Earth for millenias to "prevent climate change" is a threat to humanity, not aluminium. Climatehoaxers with their insane idea that "climate change" should be prevented are the threat to humanity, not aluminium.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just a reminder that regular clay is 40% Al2O3, so any loamy soil is very aluminium rich. And nearly all plants could perfectly grow on such soils. Moreover, aluminium compositions are very important in soil to be fertile, because they are what allow mineral part of soil to hold water and be sticky enough to hold organic components of soil.

Do you understand that aluminum is a huge and integral part of any normal soil and you have a lot of aluminium oxide in air just when it's dry and windy? Humanity constantly breath aluminium compositions from the very beginning just because humans live on the planet that have soil in big part made from aluminium. When there are no aluminium compositions in soil, it is just a sand.

Seriously, the interesting and serious question of chemtrails instantly ruined by dumbfucks who began to shout about awful ALUMINIUM!!!111.

Whatever, I think somwhere already exist dunbfucks who afraid of hydrogen oxide and other awful substances. Thanks to modern education ruined by that Bologna Process, "math is racist", "most students don't need chemistry" and other very harmful for humanity shit.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›