Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
NoNewNormal
MillionDollarExtreme
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
Win uses cookies, which are essential for the site to function. We don't want your data, nor do we share it with anyone. I accept.
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

4
()
posted 65 days ago by GynaNumbaZero 65 days ago by GynaNumbaZero +12 / -8
33 comments share
33 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 65 days ago +4 / -2

There is nothing technically or scientifically impossible in colonising Mars.

If some person you don't like declare that he want to do something does not mean that thing he declared is impossible or wrong.

Following that weird logic wiping your ass is stupid shit because Klaus Schwab and Chabad Lubavich rabbies do that.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– alabaster 1 point 65 days ago +1 / -0

While I agree with your first sentence... I think that the real problem is that a society that can even contemplate colonizing Mars will be, like ours, quite decadent. The decadence leads to allowing women into leadership 'roles', which, in turn, destroys any capacity the society has to colonize Mars.

There may be other life forms out there without such a stark male/female divide (I don't believe that, but I'll happily be proven wrong with a real example). But our society's 'great filter' is... chicks -- or (((chicks))), if you're into that sort of thing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– CrazyRussian 2 points 65 days ago +2 / -0

The decadence leads to allowing women into leadership 'roles', which, in turn, destroys any capacity the society has to colonize Mars.

There is nothing wrong with woman in power when the only way to receive that job is merit and total responsibility. When there exist any other ways, then you get decadence, ESG and other degradation.

Decadence is a result, not a reason. Meritocracy solves that, that's why even just an idea of meritocracy so hated by all elite around th world, just like an idea of real responsibility of anybody with any grade of power.

Only way to succeed in meritocracy is to acquire more knowledge than others. And unlike with money, you can't steal someone's knowledge to step higher. Unlike with being "special" pervert you can't declare you have knowledge without really having it. And so on. There is no way decadence will somehow make your life easier or more pleasant in meritocracy.

Degradation you see is just people choosing most easy and most pleasant way to live in current system that is designed to allow and breed degradation as much as possible. But there could be other systems.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Warning: Some describe this as a "fringe" conspiracy forum. If you're afraid of the info you may encounter here, please confine yourself to Win's safe-space conspiracy forum, here.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2023.04.02 - wcgqz (status)

Copyright © Communities, LLC 2023.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy