1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

Their assumptions are not flawed! You can see the brutish, slime-covered, anti-vax, neo-nazi zombies shambling all over the country side. Spending even one femtosecond amongst them will override everything science can possibly do.

Stay vaxxed, brother.

/Just wait until we get to climate-science levels of modeling. Not only will we have a surefire cure that moves it's goal posts every time a government wants more power, it will also be utterly impossible to control no matter what we do.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

For email, get Mail Store Home. It'll backup most service providers and let's you keep it portable and you can export to other formats. It's also encrypted so it can't be scanned for violations if you keep a copy in the cloud.

Downside: Windows. I used to run it in wine, but it runs in a vm now.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

What day is today?

4
Ausernamegoeshere 4 points ago +5 / -1

Because it's not something they deal with.

No farmer listened to that "advice" without laughing their heads off. They've used it for generations without problems.

All the city folk, having never had to manage health beyond their next bender, have no clue.

by pkvi
1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's to boil the frog.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

If we were the rodents, we wouldn't know the rules.

Let's say you make a cosmos. Do you make a single planet with life? What about a single planet with intelligent life? If this is your aim, why create the universe as a whole? Surely a single star system would be the most you'd have to put into it (if not just a single world floating on the ether).

We were made in His image and, after tending the garden, we were released. He went to tend other crops and gardens.

You can either go down the hole of Revelatuon and say He's coming back to rain bitter retribution, or you can say that we should live by the basic rules set out for us - before humanity cluttered things up.

Whether you decide that belief is warranted or not, those basic rules of individualism, brotherly companionship, and doing unto others is hard to dismiss as a useful and, at least for humans in general, an apt moral code to guide us.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +3 / -1

A lot of these "accepted wisdom" things you see I trace back to what the burgueoise did 100-150 years ago.

The crib thing was because the rich didnt want to be woken when the nanny cares for their child at night.

Same thing with sleeping for eight hours at once. It was what the rich were doing as they built the industrial revolution, and demanded it of their workers. Soon doctors got on board and ridiculed those that slept the old way.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

Vaccine sounds metaphorical. You can lead the young to darkness while they are unaware. Seems every facet of society tries to do so on a continual basis.

by pkvi
2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +6 / -4

Given: Q is a total psyop.

What is your action plan? Seriously, I see this circle jerk every day on this board, telling all comers that those Qers are larps and in play by the opposition.....

But on that Q board, they are organizing grass roots movements to displace school districts and local elections everywhere they can get traction, providing resources to anyone who presents the idea that they would fight, urging everyone to take action.

These threads always lack that and seem desperate to convince anyone from that board to just give up and await daily covid boosters because it's already lost.

There is a tremendous fountain of information, here. I see thoughtful, useful information and digging and because of this I start my day within these walls to read and learn.

But information is power a an electrical outlet: Its useless if you don't plug it into something that'll perform the work.

So what are we to do? Clutch our monacles as the doom descends upon us, secure that we were smarter than the hoi polloi?

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +3 / -1

Don't forget creating division via bright red lines in the sand to clearly differentiate "us" and "them" through a cognitively easy litmus test.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +2 / -1

Now we know why they are anal probing us today: Retribution!

I'll....see myself out.

0
Ausernamegoeshere 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Dark Matter" as it's originally defined exists. It is, simply, all the stuff we can't directly see (e.g. we see the giant fireballs in a star system, but can't see the planets/comets/etc).

It's a calculation placeholder of how gravity works - mainly because we don't really understand how gravity works, just that it does work somehow and it seems to follow the math we have when we experiment with it on earth.

What "dark matter" has become in popular media and even some of the more esoteric research is what doesn't exist. Dark matter isn't some magical material with special properties, outside of not being on fire and/or emitting some other kind of light.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's your own fault the vaccine isn't working. Now line up for a vaccine that WILL work....unless you screw it up again.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is awfully counterproductive to build a strawman and try to beat him up.

Trump's "ties" to big pharma, I assume you are referring to the ad campaign several years ago from Restore the Public Trust that tried to skewer him for having people in his administration that worked as execs in pharma before joining his administration.

Can you point me to personal ties that would have him personally profiting on these recommendations for the vaccines?

We are talking about a man who walked out into the public space at the beginning of this hoax and went 'This is going to kill two million Americans, we have to do something.' And then tried to do just that.

He fell on his face because he knows nothing about pharmaceuticals and took the word of people like Fauci, who did all of this before with AIDS and profited handsomely from it back then.

I assume, like you do, that he had additional information on the Vax before he left office - but I also know - and saw with my own eyes, and then had people admit to it when he left - just how much misinformation he was fed as President. Never attribute to malice what could be stupidity and all that.

As for the worst case, we as a society can't be lead around by the nose by anyone - not rando Hollywoods or people like Trump. Everyone can be wrong. And every once in a while, we will need to water the forests - not that I support or condone violence.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

He did a lot, most of it calculated for a broader impact. He spent five years tearing apart the MSM and every opposition in the Federal Gov, while at the same time giving a breath of fresh air to the middle class.

I don't approve of his message on the Vax, but until he starts talking against his previous positions, I don't feel that he's compromised, just that he's wrong on a topic that's well outside his wheel house.

If you want the world to get better, we can't make perfect the enemy of the good and burn everyone that isn't perfect to the ground.

As the Word points out: judge not lest ye be judged.

3
Ausernamegoeshere 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's an intentional dilution of the term GMO. A natural process that alters genetics (husbandry, bacteria, fish etc) is not a genetically modified organism.

A GMO specifically refers to the human-modification of genes via external process.

The difference is that nature has ways to reduce issues of cross species mixing, but not of humans, say, deciding that food should glow. On top of this, many of the changes introduce things that have never existed in the human food supply. -- How does a human process that glow protein, to continue the example?

This is so that people start mixing "natural" and man-made modifications to organisms in their minds and start accepting them as two sides of the same coin.

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Bible itself speaks of the multiple sects and slowly draws the line between the biblical "us" and then "them" through the course of the books from oldest to newest, slowly banni g that which is bad over time. In the eldest texts, it speaks of marriage to others outside of the group, warning of comingling with the others that don't follow the religion. This would be when the "sect" following El was small, admonishing adherents to stay the course.

The chains of transmissions are poorly preserved and fragmentary. We've identified some very close and some very distant relatives of texts, with a lot of references being lost. There is also some supposition that there was a time when the history went from written to oral and back to written. That would have excessively distorted time framing, if there is more evidence found for it.

Christianity claims that about it self several times, e.g. the formation of the catholic Bible, the several protestant bibles, and so forth

I apologize for the delay, I've had much going on.

5
Ausernamegoeshere 5 points ago +5 / -0

There is a virus going around. There always is.

The theater and rhetoric that is patently unscientific surrounding this particular year's virus is what's not real.

There are thousands of examples. UK saying that even if everyone is vaccinated, mask wearing will continue 'because everyone is used to it.' Fauci co-writing a paper about wearing masks being a way to cause more deaths during a pandemic and initially supporting that and then flip flopping to supporting a mask even after a vaccine. WHO changing the definitions of a vaccine and herd immunity with dictionaries following suit.

'Vaccines' being released that aren't thoroughly vetted using a brand new method involving tRNA, followed by an aggressive ad campaign saying that its "Approved" and ignoring - in some cases outright suppressing- all of the counter-evidence that there's problems with the 'vaccine.

This entire political circus has been one transparent lie after another.

3
Ausernamegoeshere 3 points ago +3 / -0

The cause of suffering is desire and pride goeth before a fall. You can be happy without drugs, women, power, or money.

You should enjoy the time spent with another, a completed task is an accomplishment. It sounds simple because it is, and a simple existence makes most people happy. To combat, war, struggle, argue or otherwise introduces desire and leads back to suffering.

1
Ausernamegoeshere 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you sure they are robbing us of magic? Of agency, to be sure, but aren't they only causing us to continually expend effort and thought in defense of their own?

2
Ausernamegoeshere 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't ascribe to JEDP, but that the Torah was written down multiple times and possibly through multiple sects combining their writings. JEDP is as unsubstantiated as the opposing view that one person took it upon himself to compile from multiple sects and/or sources a unified theory, as it were, that simply lasted.

My source is, quite literally, all of Human history. It took scarcely 200 years for the wording of the 2nd amendment to fall so far behind the vernacular that people don't immediately understand what is being said. And even then, there is so much misunderstanding that many must resort to reading what those authors discussed outside of the document itself to understand what they are getting at.

A sacrosanct document is a modern indulgence. Documents and history were fluid until the vanity of the Romans chased us through the ages

As for the priests, they started with Moses and his brother and continued along blood lines for centuries, rooted in the heart of the rise of Yahweh.

The good that survives all of this is clear, I agree, but to simply cast a stone against a concept or person is not evidence of their evil.

3
Ausernamegoeshere 3 points ago +3 / -0

What evidence of a whore cult do you have? When did El instruct His followers to leave nothing, given that El worship preceeded the revelation of Yahweh? How is our understanding of Yahweh and His rules and instruction clouded by a power hungry priest caste that rooted at the beginning?

Which parts of the Torah are correct, considering that research has shown at least four authors were merged together, probably over multiple revisions?

I will accept alternate explanations and evidence, but my understanding has come through a long period of research via multiple sources and there are many, many puzzle pieces that must get jostled for them to fit together.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›