As most of you know, most of "official" history is a lie. We have been subverted and fed false information since the days of the Roman Empire. What you are about to read is my interpretation of our past, based on extensive research and discernment. Hopefully, I can educate some of you, and welcome constructive criticism and questions! I will NOT humor trolls or pompous faggots that respond with some form of "AcKtYuAlLy".
Following the Great Deluge and the Epic of Gilgamesh, Canaan was home to some of the earliest human civilizations. It was first inhabited by Sumerians, who primarily worshipped a deity called El ("El" also became a title for all future Canaan supreme dieties). This was actually Enki, an Anunnaki king who took a liking to humanity. His subjects prayed to he and his large family for boons, like rain water and fertility. El/Enki is who we now refer to as "God". He was responsible for flooding the earth, which wiped out countless civilizations, including Atlantis. As centuries passed, the Sumerians gradually migrated outward, leaving Canaan to a tribal people known as Phoenicians. It's unclear where Enki went (space/Heaven?), but the Phoenicians (based in Carthage) began worshipping his brother, Enlil, more commonly known as Baal. Unlike El, Baal viewed humanity as critically-flawed vermin, and preferred using it for slave labor. He offered the same boons as El, but demanded animal and child sacrifices in return (Baal is asshoe). Rampant pedophilia was a biproduct of his followers viewing children as nothing but "offerings". This death cult became known as the Tribe of Dan.
As time went on, the Canaanites branched out to Mesopotamia, establishing Babylon as their capitol. There, Baal became Moloch, and his depiction changed from a humanoid to an owl (look up Bohemian Grove). Similarly, Enki was changed to Yahweh. These Babylonian Baalists were what we now refer to as Hebrews (originally called Hyksos). The story of Abraham and Isaac is directly linked to Baalism. In the original story, Abraham actually sacrifices his son. It was altered after the fall of Babylon, and the rise of Judaism. Mesopotamia was also the birthplace of banking ("Money Magick"). However, back then, it was a primitive concept, and wasn't widely used for subversion.
On a quest for expansion, Babylonian Hebrews attempted to invade Egypt. Here, a ton of wild shit happened, including: the Plagues of Egypt, the eruption of Mt. Thera, the Tempest Stele, and the Tablets of the Law ("I am that I am." - El/Yahweh/Jehova/God). Another long-forgotten aspect of Abrahamic (Sumerian) faiths is that God actually has a female polarity, Shekhina. This is what Christians know as the "Holy Spirit", and is responsible for sending us the Tablets of the Law, on Mt. Sinai (Great Pyramid). She isn't a physical organism, but a maternal cosmic entity that embodies God's presence on Earth (remember that these beings are insanely advanced, and have omnipotent properties). Following the 10 Commandments energizes her, resulting in the spread of peace and harmony (high quantum frequencies). After numerous bloody battles, the Hebrews failed to take Egypt, and Pharaoh Ahmose I expelled them from his land. This is what Exodus actually was. The Hebrews were the aggressors.
Abrahamites will be pleased to know that Genesis (Sumerian story of creation) remains almost unaltered, with the only notable differences being that God was (in ORIGINAL Hebrew) described as being both male and female (Enki and Shekhina?), and the names Adam and Eve were retroactively added, based on names of Pharaohs.
Egypt used to be the Japan of the world (technology-wise). Cosmology and numerology were central to Egyptian culture. It's where most famous planetary dieties originated, like: Saturn, Jupiter, Venus, etc... For instance, Saturn and Venus represent Lucifer. This was really the origin of the Occult, which inspired the famous Egyptian gods and goddesses, like Horus and Anubis. A few centuries following Exodus, Pharaoh Tutmosis IV discovered the Sphinx Stele tablet, which literally described Western monotheism (I don't know where in the cinnamon toast fuck it came from). CLEARLY, some weird shit went down in Egypt, and I really can't think of any other explanation outside of alien intervention.
After finally getting their shit together, Babylonians rallied behind King Solomon (AKA King David), who paved the way in establishing Israel. In the ensuing decades, Judaism was born (return of Enki/Yahweh), and the worship of "false idols" (Antichrists), like Moloch/Baal, was outlawed. As one could imagine, this didn't go over well with "traditionalists". Queen Sheba corrupted Solomon, leading to the division of Israel, the contamination of Judaism, and the re-emergence of Baalism. The centuries following this fragile period were when Ezra's Torah was written. It's unclear how much of it is an actual documentation of history, rather than an embezzlement of King Solomon's achievements. Taking advantage of a fractured Israel, Baalists began inbreeding and practicing their faith in secret. During the Second Temple Period in Judea, they masqueraded as devout Jews, and founded the Pharisees, which famously clashed with the Saducess (Hellenized sect of Judaism). Baalists deliberately claimed positions of authority within Synagogues, leading to much of the Rabbonic Priesthood being contaminated. They then used the threat of the growing Roman Empire to subvert their people through Talmudic teachings (ethnic nepotism), weaponizing them against outsiders. This is Biblically known as "The Synagogue of Satan".
As time went on, Rome began expanding at an incredible pace. The Romans set up proxy governments all over Europe and the Middle-East, subverting foreign citizens everywhere. Strangely though, the polytheistic Roman Empire (religion adopted through Hellenization) was highly tolerant of other cultures, often integrating foreign deities into its official faith. Note that Romans were also warriors, so death and bloodshed were commonplace to them. The Colosseum was literally a stadium where they watched criminals get brutally killed for entertainment. Needless to say, Baalists were in Heaven. Among the many faiths in ancient Rome was Saturnalia. This was practiced by the Cult of Saturn (orgies and human sacrifices), which worshipped "Venus's Bloodline" (lineage of Julius Ceasar and Cleopatra VII). Their god was Lucifer, as they believed he came from Venus, and planted the seeds of life on Earth. The Pharaohs of Egypt (originally ancient Celts) were thought to be descended from the original humans. The fact that Julius Ceasar (leader of Rome) got into Cleopatra's pants was quite the achievement, in their eyes. An important side-note is that Ceasar had his armies torch the Egyptian Library of Alexandria, which is rumored to have held tons of forgotten knowledge.
During this same time period, "Jesus of Nazareth" was born. I'm sure we ALL know the story, but there is an EXTREMELY controversial detail that history points to... Jesus allegedly never proclaimed himself to be the son of God, and may have not been crucified (this is believed among Jews and Muslims). Realize that the Bible has been altered COUNTLESS times to fit the goals of despots. Jesus might have been inspired by Apollonius of Tyana, a Gnostic philosopher with an very similar story. He still spread the word of God across the Roman Empire, but was just a man. The "son sacrifice and resurrection" myth dates all the way back to Ancient Egypt (noticing a trend?), so this isn't all that far-fetched. Jesus wasn't actually declared the the son of God until 325 A.D., by the Council of Nicaea. Note also that his initials match Julius Ceasar's. Similarly, Saint Peter and his inverted crucifixion is thought to be entirely fabricated by the Vatican.
Eventually, the Baalists (and other Pagans in the Roman Empire) merged with the Cult of Saturn, and together devised an insidious plot for world domination. This was the birth of the Cabal and the New World Order agenda. Once Rome fell to the Praetorian Guard, the cult took over and attempted to enslave the population FOUR separate times! Each time, they used monotheism as a catalyst, along with a totalitarian central banking system, forcing people to swear allegiance to one god (them). The population rejected their bullshit the first three times, but took a liking to Christianity. The Luciferians had the Vatican built (Pagan fortress) to act as a base of operations. Did you ever wonder where in the flying fuck Popes come from?? They were never a part of Abrahamic faiths before the Vatican was established. It's almost as if they declared themselves rulers, and had all dissenters mercilessly slaughtered. Oh, and "Holy Communion"? Based on a cannibalistic ritual. How very "Christian"...
The Vatican created Islam as an ethnic cleansing tool, to justify "Christian" imperialism, and the eradication of "infidels". Enter the Crusades... The Vatican's army, the Knights Templar, put nearly all of Europe under the boot of the "Holy Roman Empire" ("The Holy See"); all so a handful of unfathomably evil men could have all of the world's resources to themselves. In the Dark Ages, they worked tirelessly to undermine sovereign nations, using their "CIA", the Jesuits, and establishing the "Papal States" (territory ruled by 13 ancient bloodlines AKA Black Nobility). The Templars went on to establish Switzerland, and then expanded outward into the rest of Europe. They assisted the Papal bloodlines in building a malevolent banking apparatus across Europe. The banking Capitol moved from Florence, Italy, to Hamburg, Germany, and then to Amsterdam, Netherlands. As time went on, Paganism and nature-worship became popularized. Some of the Templars themselves converted, and practiced Hermeticism (Occult philosophy and Black Magick). It's believed that these rogue Templars worshipped Baphomet as a Satanic deity ("As above, so below.").
In light of the Vatican's rapid expansion, the famous Silk Road enabled new trade routes between Asia and Europe, leading to the rise of the Khazars. The Khazars started out as a relatively innocent Turkic tribe, based in the Eurasia Steppe. They acted as ambassadors between Asia and Europe, and dealt heavily with Radhanites (Jewish merchants). What's fascinating is that the Khazarian ruling class, based in their Capitol, Atil, consisted of Caucasians, which really drives home their geographical significance. In the sixth century, Khazarian Princess Tzitzak (or "Irene") actually married Constantine V, of the Byzantine Empire, putting her people under Roman jurisdiction. Decades later, under Kings Bulan and Obadiah, the Khazars were infiltrated by Jesuits, who forced them to convert to Judaism (not sure why Christianity wasn't chosen). Following turmoil between the Jewish and traditionalist Khazars, the City of Atil collapsed, the Khazars dispersed into Europe. Like the Templars, many Khazars became Pagans, and practiced Black Magick (Kabbalah), which involved summoning demons (aliens?), ritual sodomy (ffs...), necromancy, and other incantations. Pagans often questioned the illusionary nature of reality (perception?), and what is actually tangible.
I don't ascribe to JEDP, but that the Torah was written down multiple times and possibly through multiple sects combining their writings. JEDP is as unsubstantiated as the opposing view that one person took it upon himself to compile from multiple sects and/or sources a unified theory, as it were, that simply lasted.
My source is, quite literally, all of Human history. It took scarcely 200 years for the wording of the 2nd amendment to fall so far behind the vernacular that people don't immediately understand what is being said. And even then, there is so much misunderstanding that many must resort to reading what those authors discussed outside of the document itself to understand what they are getting at.
A sacrosanct document is a modern indulgence. Documents and history were fluid until the vanity of the Romans chased us through the ages
As for the priests, they started with Moses and his brother and continued along blood lines for centuries, rooted in the heart of the rise of Yahweh.
The good that survives all of this is clear, I agree, but to simply cast a stone against a concept or person is not evidence of their evil.
Thanks for clarifying, as in this forum it's important to keep cautious. Usually acceptance of Moses and acceptance of early well-established multiple sects are regarded as conflicted, so I didn't anticipate that you held both.
If people used to live much longer, and committed important texts to tablets, it would be understandable for original documentary history to be less fluid than the freedom to paraphrase that we see later. Paraphrases used to be trustworthy too for related reasons. A chain of transmission (genealogy) provided authority and indicated originality, in Sumer and Egypt as well. But what's amazing is that we see so little textual variation during the centuries that Hebrew speakers became Aramaic speakers, and that implies not just clever bloodline politics but supernatural preservation as well. Nowadays breakdown of language and disrespect for authority are sold together.
Certainly Moses and others used primary sources in compiling their material. Christianity claims that at certain times in history, recognized by the authors and their audience, the composite writing of a single author (or close group) was so inspired by God's thought as to be an authoritative community document indefinitely. Again, amazingly, by the rebirth of the language of Hebrew from the dead, I am able to enjoy these 4000-year-old documents as they were intended, in my modern thought; yet I still need extensive footnotes and glossary to read Shakespeare as he intended me to. There must be something about the thoughts of these authors that, overall, transcends Shakespeare.
So I return to: Question everything! Hold fast to what is good. Reject what is rotten. Every mainstream has its utility and its error in differing quantities. Every hidden reflection too. We judge not on suppression or politics or defamation or convenience, but on our ever-growing experience of Truth.
The Bible itself speaks of the multiple sects and slowly draws the line between the biblical "us" and then "them" through the course of the books from oldest to newest, slowly banni g that which is bad over time. In the eldest texts, it speaks of marriage to others outside of the group, warning of comingling with the others that don't follow the religion. This would be when the "sect" following El was small, admonishing adherents to stay the course.
The chains of transmissions are poorly preserved and fragmentary. We've identified some very close and some very distant relatives of texts, with a lot of references being lost. There is also some supposition that there was a time when the history went from written to oral and back to written. That would have excessively distorted time framing, if there is more evidence found for it.
Christianity claims that about it self several times, e.g. the formation of the catholic Bible, the several protestant bibles, and so forth
I apologize for the delay, I've had much going on.