As most of you know, most of "official" history is a lie. We have been subverted and fed false information since the days of the Roman Empire. What you are about to read is my interpretation of our past, based on extensive research and discernment. Hopefully, I can educate some of you, and welcome constructive criticism and questions! I will NOT humor trolls or pompous faggots that respond with some form of "AcKtYuAlLy".
Following the Great Deluge and the Epic of Gilgamesh, Canaan was home to some of the earliest human civilizations. It was first inhabited by Sumerians, who primarily worshipped a deity called El ("El" also became a title for all future Canaan supreme dieties). This was actually Enki, an Anunnaki king who took a liking to humanity. His subjects prayed to he and his large family for boons, like rain water and fertility. El/Enki is who we now refer to as "God". He was responsible for flooding the earth, which wiped out countless civilizations, including Atlantis. As centuries passed, the Sumerians gradually migrated outward, leaving Canaan to a tribal people known as Phoenicians. It's unclear where Enki went (space/Heaven?), but the Phoenicians (based in Carthage) began worshipping his brother, Enlil, more commonly known as Baal. Unlike El, Baal viewed humanity as critically-flawed vermin, and preferred using it for slave labor. He offered the same boons as El, but demanded animal and child sacrifices in return (Baal is asshoe). Rampant pedophilia was a biproduct of his followers viewing children as nothing but "offerings". This death cult became known as the Tribe of Dan.
As time went on, the Canaanites branched out to Mesopotamia, establishing Babylon as their capitol. There, Baal became Moloch, and his depiction changed from a humanoid to an owl (look up Bohemian Grove). Similarly, Enki was changed to Yahweh. These Babylonian Baalists were what we now refer to as Hebrews (originally called Hyksos). The story of Abraham and Isaac is directly linked to Baalism. In the original story, Abraham actually sacrifices his son. It was altered after the fall of Babylon, and the rise of Judaism. Mesopotamia was also the birthplace of banking ("Money Magick"). However, back then, it was a primitive concept, and wasn't widely used for subversion.
On a quest for expansion, Babylonian Hebrews attempted to invade Egypt. Here, a ton of wild shit happened, including: the Plagues of Egypt, the eruption of Mt. Thera, the Tempest Stele, and the Tablets of the Law ("I am that I am." - El/Yahweh/Jehova/God). Another long-forgotten aspect of Abrahamic (Sumerian) faiths is that God actually has a female polarity, Shekhina. This is what Christians know as the "Holy Spirit", and is responsible for sending us the Tablets of the Law, on Mt. Sinai (Great Pyramid). She isn't a physical organism, but a maternal cosmic entity that embodies God's presence on Earth (remember that these beings are insanely advanced, and have omnipotent properties). Following the 10 Commandments energizes her, resulting in the spread of peace and harmony (high quantum frequencies). After numerous bloody battles, the Hebrews failed to take Egypt, and Pharaoh Ahmose I expelled them from his land. This is what Exodus actually was. The Hebrews were the aggressors.
Abrahamites will be pleased to know that Genesis (Sumerian story of creation) remains almost unaltered, with the only notable differences being that God was (in ORIGINAL Hebrew) described as being both male and female (Enki and Shekhina?), and the names Adam and Eve were retroactively added, based on names of Pharaohs.
Egypt used to be the Japan of the world (technology-wise). Cosmology and numerology were central to Egyptian culture. It's where most famous planetary dieties originated, like: Saturn, Jupiter, Venus, etc... For instance, Saturn and Venus represent Lucifer. This was really the origin of the Occult, which inspired the famous Egyptian gods and goddesses, like Horus and Anubis. A few centuries following Exodus, Pharaoh Tutmosis IV discovered the Sphinx Stele tablet, which literally described Western monotheism (I don't know where in the cinnamon toast fuck it came from). CLEARLY, some weird shit went down in Egypt, and I really can't think of any other explanation outside of alien intervention.
After finally getting their shit together, Babylonians rallied behind King Solomon (AKA King David), who paved the way in establishing Israel. In the ensuing decades, Judaism was born (return of Enki/Yahweh), and the worship of "false idols" (Antichrists), like Moloch/Baal, was outlawed. As one could imagine, this didn't go over well with "traditionalists". Queen Sheba corrupted Solomon, leading to the division of Israel, the contamination of Judaism, and the re-emergence of Baalism. The centuries following this fragile period were when Ezra's Torah was written. It's unclear how much of it is an actual documentation of history, rather than an embezzlement of King Solomon's achievements. Taking advantage of a fractured Israel, Baalists began inbreeding and practicing their faith in secret. During the Second Temple Period in Judea, they masqueraded as devout Jews, and founded the Pharisees, which famously clashed with the Saducess (Hellenized sect of Judaism). Baalists deliberately claimed positions of authority within Synagogues, leading to much of the Rabbonic Priesthood being contaminated. They then used the threat of the growing Roman Empire to subvert their people through Talmudic teachings (ethnic nepotism), weaponizing them against outsiders. This is Biblically known as "The Synagogue of Satan".
As time went on, Rome began expanding at an incredible pace. The Romans set up proxy governments all over Europe and the Middle-East, subverting foreign citizens everywhere. Strangely though, the polytheistic Roman Empire (religion adopted through Hellenization) was highly tolerant of other cultures, often integrating foreign deities into its official faith. Note that Romans were also warriors, so death and bloodshed were commonplace to them. The Colosseum was literally a stadium where they watched criminals get brutally killed for entertainment. Needless to say, Baalists were in Heaven. Among the many faiths in ancient Rome was Saturnalia. This was practiced by the Cult of Saturn (orgies and human sacrifices), which worshipped "Venus's Bloodline" (lineage of Julius Ceasar and Cleopatra VII). Their god was Lucifer, as they believed he came from Venus, and planted the seeds of life on Earth. The Pharaohs of Egypt (originally ancient Celts) were thought to be descended from the original humans. The fact that Julius Ceasar (leader of Rome) got into Cleopatra's pants was quite the achievement, in their eyes. An important side-note is that Ceasar had his armies torch the Egyptian Library of Alexandria, which is rumored to have held tons of forgotten knowledge.
During this same time period, "Jesus of Nazareth" was born. I'm sure we ALL know the story, but there is an EXTREMELY controversial detail that history points to... Jesus allegedly never proclaimed himself to be the son of God, and may have not been crucified (this is believed among Jews and Muslims). Realize that the Bible has been altered COUNTLESS times to fit the goals of despots. Jesus might have been inspired by Apollonius of Tyana, a Gnostic philosopher with an very similar story. He still spread the word of God across the Roman Empire, but was just a man. The "son sacrifice and resurrection" myth dates all the way back to Ancient Egypt (noticing a trend?), so this isn't all that far-fetched. Jesus wasn't actually declared the the son of God until 325 A.D., by the Council of Nicaea. Note also that his initials match Julius Ceasar's. Similarly, Saint Peter and his inverted crucifixion is thought to be entirely fabricated by the Vatican.
Eventually, the Baalists (and other Pagans in the Roman Empire) merged with the Cult of Saturn, and together devised an insidious plot for world domination. This was the birth of the Cabal and the New World Order agenda. Once Rome fell to the Praetorian Guard, the cult took over and attempted to enslave the population FOUR separate times! Each time, they used monotheism as a catalyst, along with a totalitarian central banking system, forcing people to swear allegiance to one god (them). The population rejected their bullshit the first three times, but took a liking to Christianity. The Luciferians had the Vatican built (Pagan fortress) to act as a base of operations. Did you ever wonder where in the flying fuck Popes come from?? They were never a part of Abrahamic faiths before the Vatican was established. It's almost as if they declared themselves rulers, and had all dissenters mercilessly slaughtered. Oh, and "Holy Communion"? Based on a cannibalistic ritual. How very "Christian"...
The Vatican created Islam as an ethnic cleansing tool, to justify "Christian" imperialism, and the eradication of "infidels". Enter the Crusades... The Vatican's army, the Knights Templar, put nearly all of Europe under the boot of the "Holy Roman Empire" ("The Holy See"); all so a handful of unfathomably evil men could have all of the world's resources to themselves. In the Dark Ages, they worked tirelessly to undermine sovereign nations, using their "CIA", the Jesuits, and establishing the "Papal States" (territory ruled by 13 ancient bloodlines AKA Black Nobility). The Templars went on to establish Switzerland, and then expanded outward into the rest of Europe. They assisted the Papal bloodlines in building a malevolent banking apparatus across Europe. The banking Capitol moved from Florence, Italy, to Hamburg, Germany, and then to Amsterdam, Netherlands. As time went on, Paganism and nature-worship became popularized. Some of the Templars themselves converted, and practiced Hermeticism (Occult philosophy and Black Magick). It's believed that these rogue Templars worshipped Baphomet as a Satanic deity ("As above, so below.").
In light of the Vatican's rapid expansion, the famous Silk Road enabled new trade routes between Asia and Europe, leading to the rise of the Khazars. The Khazars started out as a relatively innocent Turkic tribe, based in the Eurasia Steppe. They acted as ambassadors between Asia and Europe, and dealt heavily with Radhanites (Jewish merchants). What's fascinating is that the Khazarian ruling class, based in their Capitol, Atil, consisted of Caucasians, which really drives home their geographical significance. In the sixth century, Khazarian Princess Tzitzak (or "Irene") actually married Constantine V, of the Byzantine Empire, putting her people under Roman jurisdiction. Decades later, under Kings Bulan and Obadiah, the Khazars were infiltrated by Jesuits, who forced them to convert to Judaism (not sure why Christianity wasn't chosen). Following turmoil between the Jewish and traditionalist Khazars, the City of Atil collapsed, the Khazars dispersed into Europe. Like the Templars, many Khazars became Pagans, and practiced Black Magick (Kabbalah), which involved summoning demons (aliens?), ritual sodomy (ffs...), necromancy, and other incantations. Pagans often questioned the illusionary nature of reality (perception?), and what is actually tangible.
I believe some points are mistaken.
For instance, shekinah is an essence that would be akin saying someone "walks with God" today - more based on the home (e.g. "God dwells there" etc) and not a person as was the old focus. It's similarity to the holy spirit was from the Rabbinical literature where it became more of a discrete if ephemeral concept.
The female companion to El is Ashearah. It was El and his Ashearah that were given offerings before El became Yahweh. And Ashearah was worshipped separately from Yahweh for many generations before it was stamped out in, iirc, Elijah's time preceeding Solomon.
Many points are mistaken. Ashearah (not the most accurate spelling, Asherah is closer) was, as I implied in reply to OP, a porn star who culturally appropriated the facade and worship of the various gods (elohim) of the day. Her followers left lots of evidence of their perversions, while followers of Yahweh were instructed to leave none; thus archaeologists discount the latter and act as if the former were fully representative.
Her worship was rejected multiple times; Elijah came after Solomon, but Samuel came before. Redates don't accord with new evidences placing David right at 1000 BC. Your take on Shekinah is very close but you'll note that that concept is essentially positive so should be allied with other positive views of elohim.
The question is: which traditions include the true worship of the only el worthy of it, given that truth exists and deception tries to counterfeit it to claim its virtue for itself? There are elohim but there is "One Elohim", so the concept of el is not limited to one entity only. You must discern the true el for yourself, the evidence suffices for each moment, and more is available for the next moment.
What evidence of a whore cult do you have? When did El instruct His followers to leave nothing, given that El worship preceeded the revelation of Yahweh? How is our understanding of Yahweh and His rules and instruction clouded by a power hungry priest caste that rooted at the beginning?
Which parts of the Torah are correct, considering that research has shown at least four authors were merged together, probably over multiple revisions?
I will accept alternate explanations and evidence, but my understanding has come through a long period of research via multiple sources and there are many, many puzzle pieces that must get jostled for them to fit together.
My research has shown, and I believe, that all parts of the Torah are correct and were written as one and that the JEDP hypothesis (4-author merger) is the fiction. The primary evidence giving rise to JEDP is better explained by the fact that the compiler (Moshe ben Amram) advisedly used oral traditions and that in many cases he attributed those traditions to their original older content creators. It is not well-explained by a cabal of anon voices creating and modifying a Moshe. If you can start a new JEDP thread in any applicable forum (ad: c/Christianity) I'd be interested in interacting with the data again; at the moment I have occasional leisure to handle many puzzle pieces I receive.
Given that assumption, corollaries are obvious. El instructed his followers to leave no idols, passim, e.g. Exodus 20:3-4 (ad: see c/Christianity sidebar). Evidence that followers left this instruction for whore cults is also passim; I don't think we need to list all temple prostitute and Asherah references in the Tanakh.
According to JEDP (which doesn't say "power hungry") the caste did not root at the beginning but well after 1000 BC, so your idea contradicts the hypothesis. The Biblical narrative speaks of regular rise and fall among competing religious practices and how each in turn took political power and undid the work of another and planted its own seeds. No early anti-Elohim Yahwism that then insidiously maintained its grip over centuries.
When you look at who's doing good and who's doing evil, it's amazing that the doing of good survives at all. While on occasion this can be connected with superior political maneuvers, like those attributed to Mordecai, the fact of its survival and exponential growth indicates there is a superior spirit at work, and there is more to good than just the antithesis of evil. No need to take the whole Torah at once (it's preached every weekend) if you start by committing to align yourself only with good, truth, and right. Then it becomes obvious that there is one Creator and it's safe to call him Yahweh (the Self-Existent).
I don't ascribe to JEDP, but that the Torah was written down multiple times and possibly through multiple sects combining their writings. JEDP is as unsubstantiated as the opposing view that one person took it upon himself to compile from multiple sects and/or sources a unified theory, as it were, that simply lasted.
My source is, quite literally, all of Human history. It took scarcely 200 years for the wording of the 2nd amendment to fall so far behind the vernacular that people don't immediately understand what is being said. And even then, there is so much misunderstanding that many must resort to reading what those authors discussed outside of the document itself to understand what they are getting at.
A sacrosanct document is a modern indulgence. Documents and history were fluid until the vanity of the Romans chased us through the ages
As for the priests, they started with Moses and his brother and continued along blood lines for centuries, rooted in the heart of the rise of Yahweh.
The good that survives all of this is clear, I agree, but to simply cast a stone against a concept or person is not evidence of their evil.