"This model is weak and it logically led to the disillusionment of that state due to inability to agree to a unified policy when the war with Britain came. You can't have a body with multiple heads (at least by having a temporary appointed leader there's still a head of state present, even if his power is contingent on the system that installed him).
And that's why we have a democratic republic with a president as head, with checks and balances. Little details that escaped your diatribe. You want me to defend pure democracy with no head, but I refuse to play your little game with stupid prizes.
Thanks for admitting that democracy existed without 'kingship' in the past. As for the Scots, the King of England crowing himself over the land of the Scots and attempting to take it was 'the problem', not a confederacy of lords with no king. Later, it went the other direction with my ancestor disappearing the twin dauphin contenders to the throne, in order to place Mary Queen of Scots upon it in retribution. But you know nothing about that until you wiki and snope like a dope.
Your argument slides with the particulars involved. We're a democratic republic, dumbass.
Freemason are a Waterbuffalo organization of watered down understanding and degrees co-opted by blackhats. You don't get that either.
The 'christian worldview' was always a hodgepodge of contention even before it was 'jewish' and later pasted onto 'Christianity'. Roman propaganda is a helluva drug. Paul was called 'The Liar' by the Essenic writings that came before him. But you don't get that, you swallow lies.
You sound like the commies, using a quote of yours, when you say a 'true democracy' can't be pointed out. This 'true democracy' never existed. We're a democratic republic, moron. Now defend despotic dictating Kings who can't be removed by the people except by violence or exposure.
I read Quigley, fuck you very much and knew what Clinton was doing in pretending to support the work like a team. Professors are the number one propagandists at the head. At their head is the Frankfurt School and Situationists International.
How is the fact that every fake election placed a descendant of one of two kings relevant? You'e really just that stupid, huh. It's called 'controlled opposition' or playing both sides. Do I need to school you on everything?
How about Tavistock? You seem to think you know it. Did you know that it became an orphanage that had to be closed due to unspecified issues? lol "Please sir, may I have another?"
Woke Charles Dickens liked to write about the children, same as Hillary liked to run her own "orphanages" as Queen of Voodoo in Haiti.
Tavistock was procurred under interesting circumstances. Then woke theater people joined to create a propaganda machine using plays. (See Situationism) A stage was built with aristocrats as audience to judge the effectiveness of the message. A playwright 'writes what he knows' and gives it a twist. Dickens was known to be enamoured with Queen Victoria, isn't that odd.....who's scion Albert was an insane drug-addled serial ritual killer for the CORRUPTED and CO-OPTED masonic/roisecrucian gang. Prince Albert was 'canned' by his own family, choosing to arrange a death by OD rather than risk his taking the crown. Moron.
Now you have King Charles III as Fabian which is fake communism as their coats of arms of a fucking wolf wearing sheep's clothing screams to idiots to understand but apparently even such hamfisted symbology is lost on some and I laugh along with them at those they fool openly.
Your point like you , is oxymoronic. And you're the one playing wiki history of the status quo written in deception. You can't dig hard truths by using spoonfed histories.
I haven't used Chat GPT in my life and never will. Garbage in (Chat GPT/wiki/snopes et al), Garbage out. (You).
Thanks for allowing me to take the garbage out with redpills for you. You have nothing but conflicting statements about lies you swallow.
Been doing this since before you were born.
The Iroquois (also known as the Haudenosaunee) Confederacy is a democratic union of six nations, bound by a constitution called the Great Law of Peace, that dates back several centuries. The system has been influential for centuries.
Among the Algonquin people, democratic practices included chiefs who ruled by consensus with a council, with some power decentralized to the village or band level. However, the Algonquian political model differed from the system of the rival Iroquois Confederacy, which is more famously noted for its influence on the U.S. government.
After the scam claim that all monarchs rule 'by God', once enlightened to the trick, they suddenly reversed course and claimed they were ruling by leave of the people. But you'd know that if you weren't a sophmoric oxymoron.
Here, let me put the words into your mouth so two can play your stupid game with stupid prizes. "Installed puppets (fake controlled 'democracy' aka 'deep state' which acts like a monarchy) are bad so all democracy is bad." Back at ya, boomerang.
I read Quigley before you were born I'm guessing. Same with Billington which I schooled you on .....the lying propaganda put out by monarchists who's tit you suck. You'd be shocked to know that Clinton always claimed Quigley as his favorite author.....because the fucker was projecting the programmed future as circuit board. But you don't get that. Why was Bush Sr.'s 'favorite book' "Bonfire of the Vanities"? btw......you know.....Bush who claimed along with many if not most installed puppet dictators that he was one of you.
Most, but not all, U.S. presidents are descendants of King George III, with genealogies tracing their ancestry to British royalty and other European noble houses The claim that all presidents except one are descended from King John of England is a common point in genealogy research
Israel had shitty kings galore.....but then again, they mostly weren't 'kings' in title, but rather fake-ass proconsuls of Greece (Hellenized) or later Rome. Look it up history buff , pronounced with a long 'U'. Lying royalist propaganda is yesterday's wiki snope. I don't peruse books without understanding the author and his agendas. You're like other royalists who are immature babies who need a father they never had. "Help me (become Princess again) Obi-Wan Kenobi."
Trump's admin is hardly a liberal one, now that the scam is revealed and the voter's now 'awake' as opposed to your team's 'woke' who illegally vote and steal for the deep state acting as monarchy. You need to read and learn a LOT of things. You can cry and twist and use borrowed lies all you want. I'm here to kick your shit to the curb along with your team of despotic dictators doing the most dispicable acts in the name of a god they never knew.
Why co-opt democracies as the protocols suggested? Because IT IS THE largest threat. Which side are you on then, with your matching goals with the cabal. They give the illusion of democracy. If you believe TPTB want an enlightened voter, you're an idiot aren't you?
You cry about some 'small group of elite' and equate that with the enlightened. You also defame the word enlightenment as you have none.
King of Kings means No more need for kings. Past histories lay claim that their god demanded sacrifice of animals and bounties of foreskins, but hey....times change and enlightenment brings it. Then suddenly god is said to counter what was claimed to be his command. You misread in your literalist way.
When in history did a free election create the most insane tyrannical satanic government? Free elections. When. Really? I don't think so. The people as tyrant over their self. Babbling oxymoron. Kings are tyrants, and fake elections create falsely elected kings. Again...and again......wise up to stop the steal. Neither a monarchy (see myriad of historic examples) nor a democracy is a guarantee of 'utopia', nor should it attempt any such thing. A wise man would know why.
The people of the United States wised up to the problem with monarchies over 200 years ago.....before that, the Enlightenment era did the same for Europe. Just because the monarchic cabal attempts to co-opt and usurp doesn't mean improvements weren't made and are about to be made again with another raising up of consciousness about sovereignty and freedom from oppression. All fine examples of what you claim has never existed. So you believe every despotic monarch was given power by God, huh? How about the pope instead? The black popes were put there by God too? This is why Napolean crowned himself and why they steal his legacy. Learn things. But then you're a forum-sliding royalist idiot who's on the wrong side of this entire movement. Do you always go to your enemy's camp and shit in their tent? The Deep State acts as royalists by stealing the elections. But then in your book, that gets a pass from your twisted God. If you won't join, then go to the royalist sites and fawn over the next generation of reprobates they will unsuccessfully attempt to foist. Disney has Disneyfied all the little girls into supporting princes and princess as solution like the fairy tale IT is. We the people won't realize our potential until the royalist foot has been removed from our neck. Or as God commanded Moses to tell the Pharoah, aka 'King'...."Let my people go." Find your own people in your own tent and prepare for a losing battle.
Kozak and his wife describe themselves as politically liberal. According to the New York Times, their “living room is decorated with flags for Black Lives Matter, Ukraine, L.G.B.T.Q. rights, with a Star-Spangled Banner hanging among them.”
The Times also reported that both Kozak and his wife were raised in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and met as students at Brigham Young University.
This flaky organization of dubious origins, is mobbed-up and the base for Scientology, the religion of Hollyweird. Assassin Charlie Manson was trained in Scientology in prison. Reasons.
You return like a dog to its own vomit.
You're descended from people who've committed all sorts of ridiculous acts. Are you ready to take on the responsibility of their actions? Should you? Or is that moronic? You're dad's calling, he just beat your mom and now you have to pay for it.
What a royal fool you are. You have no clew as to my understanding and it isn't what you guess.
An enlightened public wouldn't have need for kings or be divided between two parties. The goal being enlightenment, not how to best set a ruling class over a 'lower' class of sheeple.
You mistake me for someone who believes that 'democracy', as a voting system for rulers is a guarantee against oppression. It isnt. But until the day that enlightenment reaches its 5:5 as The Optic, liberty is the only way towards that goal.
Yes, the cabal is clever enough to have created a RIGGED democratic republic to give the illusion of choice. But that's illusion based from ignorance, isn't it. Division based on ignorance. Ignorance allows all sorts of control mechanisms. The cabal's hope and understanding is that this false creation will break down until they can re-establish the monarchy they truly want. Until then, they trade children and intermarry and so on, to hide their pedigrees from the public's eye. The original eternal principles were twisted by a later infiltration of luciferian theosophist blackhat magicians. So no, I'm not responsible for stepdad when he beats mom either and he's no father of mine.
A rigged democracy is a fake democracy with the intent to PLACE leaders over the public and the longer they can rig it (by media mind control - wake up), the longer they can rule LIKE KINGS and queen Nancy Pelosi, ruling a lifetime. Again showing their real wish for a monarchy you can't influence.
This concept is continued in the chosen 'Social Influencers' of the internet, who pretend to be one of you little common people voicing opinion, when it isn't. It's directed. The cabal is clever this way. Controlled opposition.
You'll note that once the Great Awakening occurred, the cabal had to STEAL the election...DIDN'T they? They couldn't allow a REAL democracy with REAL vote tallies or the people would become loosed from their grip. This again proves that the cabal has no desire for an ENLIGHTENED public or its vote unless it can be controlled by fakery. Enlightenment is the goal, not voting in division. There is no such choice in kingships. And no chance for enlightenment as then, there would be no need for kings. But that's operating on a higher level, as higher minds understand (like Paine). Lady Liberty holds a book and a torch for reasons, and liberty has no king. Libertarianism as 'no government' will become chaos if implemented to an ignorant public. This false 'government of the people (oops we mean our people governing you people) is a facade for fascism, their current system of choice, where corporations and entities act in the stead of the king, hiding behind the facade of a republic. Anarchy in ignorance is chaos. It's opposite, Philosophical anarchy has no need for kings or chaos. Everything taken to its extreme becomes it's opposite. Things to know. Where is the middle ground? Enlightenment. Until then, it's rule or be ruled and morons continue to take 'sides' in continuation. You hope to wrongly place me on one side in order to 'win' stupid prizes, like belief in monarchism. Prince Andrew has some swampland in England he'd like to sell you.
I espouse their ideas?
I haven't espoused my ideas or the cabal's. I espouse opposition to the wrongheaded ideas posited by you....idiot. Putting words into the mouths of your upbraider to make yourself right won't work here. If an enlightened democratic republic was their idea, who opposed that, and why was secrecy necessary?
Jacobins: The english translation of 'ladder' demeans the orignial essence of the original writing's meaning of the word 'ladder' to mean a 'means by which to raise to a higher level' which the original word meant, and lost in the translation to 'a ladder' for the profane to understand on their lower level. Hence 'Jacobins'. The Great Awakening would be a literal ladder to 'the profane' and 'seekers after smooth things'. You offer erroneous sophomoric assumptions. Raise Up.
These groups were all co-opted and made into systems of black magic. But you'd know that if you'd done a deeper dive. You use a snorkel to see the bottom and hold your breath.
You're the one who has no fucking idea and I've been doing this since before you were born, chump. Ivy league profs are the cabal, idiot. So you refer to one as a defender of YOUR wrong opinion, while feigning distance.
The Great Awakening is exactly the attempt to RAISE UP the consciousness of the informed voter in order to make it a truly democratic republic that works of, for and by the people, you royalist scumbag. Why do you come to the land of Trump and Q to shit on the floor of the temple? I knew you were a snake when I first 'met' your lying words.
'Close to Bonneville'.....
He wrote two books on the subject, the "Jesuits Expelled from Masonry", now tell me why......and "Dagger Shattered by the Masons", both in 1788, in which he accuses the Jesuits of having introduced into the symbolic degrees of freemasonry, the myths of the Templars and their doctrine of revenge, based on the "crime" of their destruction, and the four vows of the Templars included in their higher degrees. Earlier, in 1787, the leading Bavarian illuminist and freemason, Johann Joachim Christoph Bode, is said to have converted the German-speaking Bonneville to a faith that combined esoteric symbolism with radical ideas of popular sovereignty bordering on direct democracy.
You mistake the co-opting royalist Jesuits for the cabal. But you're stupid that way.
Now go look at one of my most recent replies concerning ESOTERIC symbolism and how it differs from the profane sophomoric ramblings of oxymorons like yourself.
You project your ignorance onto me. Won't work. You're words are like spittle from a fish stranded on dry land.
Paine's royalist detractors took his staying at a couple's residence while in Paris as opportunity to slander him. You fall prey to their machinations. Have you read his personal letters to his wife? No you have not.
You were stumping for kings last post, and now you praise emancipation, a word that Paine popularized, you 'wide shut' oxymoron. Propaganda is a helluva drug.
The cabal toppled some royals and not others to usurp the power as their own. It was a cabalist who told me they were monarchists, not that I needed him to say it.
Napolean toppled the monarchy and yesterday's jewel theft was an attempt to steal his legacy, just to keep you up with current events and how they pertain to TRUE history you don't get from your propagandists.
I'm of the line of VonHaderschot, who were orignators of the so-called Bavarian Illuminatti (Home base for the cabal of the past) nd know its history well.
Blow it out your ass.
Sounds like you missed the information about this posited by numerous Q posts and confirmed by a cursory view of the current situation. How's Lynn Rothschild doing these days, do you know? Do you know who she is? Thanks for playing.
btw: Who is 'P' (Payseur)? Yeah, you don't know everything or Lucifer would bring you the light.
Interesting how the GOSPEL of Thomas, considered scripture was CUT OUT of the canon used by the Roman Church for the reason that it expounded esoteric understanding, a threat to the control of the Roman extrapolators. "It was never meant to be in Scripture is a statement showing ignorance of the process and history of the formation of the modern hyperdispensational church who has yet again become the whore. There is no 'authentic first-century gospel' as the canon was not yet established. All 'gospels' (good news) are AD forgeries of earlier poorly edited works. Thomas precedes Mark, Luke, Mathew which were written in the 3rd century. All claims of disciples being by the authors of said texts are false as you would know if you truly knew the historical and textual context.
And thusly the Church became the Whore (false imitation of truth/love that we experience today. You identify with this unfortunately.
Take the higher road and Praise God instead by learning what God is and your relative position.
That same Roman Catholic Church cut out the Gospel of Thomas. Pray tell why.
Thomas 113: His disciples said to him: On what day will the kingdom come? <Jesus said:> It will not come while people watch for it; they will not say: Look, here it is, or: Look, there it is; but the kingdom of the father is spread out over the earth, and men do not see it.
What is the disambiguation between son of god, and son of man?
The man of law is above the man of lawlessness. Who is above the 'people of the law'?
Gnosis is waiting for those who seek understanding with pure heart and mind.
I'll save time and wasted effort and refer you to the writings of America's most patriotic writer, Thomas Paine, as well as nearly every founding father to this country, who established the legacy and constitution for a democratic republic of, for, and by the people, contrary to inbred tyrants with no check or balance outside of violent removal which history has proven time and again, speaking of aging like milk.
How about Nancy Pelosi as your king? How about King Biden, drooling on the throne? What a joke.
Had Prince Albert become king, England would have been dominated and ruined by a serial killing psycho. But you'd be okay with that. Tell us who is to remove the despotic monarch. We the people that you don't believe in, or someone else?
The cabal are monarchists. You're obviously simp-pathetic to their cause and are a glow-worm who doesn't belong here.
The Hapsburgian of the Old World Order empire had the dual eagled monarchy as it's symbol and monarchy as its way.
I spoke with an individual who wrote books for academia and was considered the premiere authority on the Balkans. He considered Germany/Austria his true homeland. He confided to me that he was a dyed in the wool monarchist an opinion shared secretly by many of his colleagues. A monarchist will nearly always find a need to control the church and religions or vice-versa, as occurred in both world wars, as well as countless times in prior history. Our founding fathers knew better than to attempt to weld two powers that were impossible to remove, hence the 'separation of church and state' and 'freedom of religion' that stipulates a ban on both oppression of religion and the establishing of a state religion. The founding fathers had an array of beliefs, many considered 'deist', rather than given a specific denomination for reasons that need to be investigated to understand. Sharia law or an equivalent is the very thing we as a democracy now fight. Interesting that the Christian hero, Jesus, was accused of breaking both religious and political laws. The fleur-dis-leurs of the monarchy adds the military as a three-pronged weapon (spearhead)....against whom exactly? An unremovable principality is absolute power and complete power corrupts absolutely. Look at the churches divide and fight today. If free speech isn't allowed for free minds to find they the people's solution to their problems, then you didn't learn from history, nor understand the solution posited by the founding fathers, and are doomed to repeat.
Re: So the question is.. why would they have their kids, be these counter-culture, "hippies"
The Catchers in the Rye used their own offspring as weapon in the propaganda war rather than let them ruin the dynasty in their own lifeplans. 'They thought you'd follow the stars," said Q who knew that it already happened. Most were naval or airforce scions due to those branches controlling psyops which is what the movement largely was. See John Tate, father of Sharon Tate, from Presidio Air Force base, with Michael Aquino. Google him.
I had correspondence with McGowen while he was writing his series, giving him additional insight and tips. He was the first I'd seen who had done the research it takes to see the 40 ft view.
Within buddhist tradition there is the saying, "If you see the buddha on the road, kill him."
The meaning is that the buddha is NOT a man but an understanding. Only literalists believe in buddha as person, and to do so is to misrepresent and will accomplish nothing.
Another story has a monk and a priest sharing a cabin in the woods in the winter and freezing. To survive, the priest takes a statue of the buddha and throws it into the fireplace, making a fire. The ignorant monk yells, 'You can't do that!' in protest. When the fire is done, the priest takes a poker and stirs the ashes, causing the monk to ask, "Why are you doing that?" The priest replies, to find the ashes of the buddha." That was meant as a lesson to the monk about the difference between literalist thinking and the use of symbols vs understanding the reality.
Exoteric vs esoteric understanding. What is the difference? It's lost on the literalist.
You don't get to misrepresent something you misunderstand and then critique it from that misrepresentation. The same is true with gnostic vs orthodox christianity. One is a lesser literalistic perversion of the deepest tenets.
Now do Zen.
Can't wait to see the sophomoric slant given to that with half understanding.
The Scots, with their confederation of lords had no need for a King until the King of England got all heady with power and decided he ruled Scotland also. Then Robert the Bruce took a large lead in fighting them off. This eventually came to a head with an ancestor of mine eliminating the would-be contending dauphin twins and placing Mary Queen of Scots on the throne. Good ol' Bloody Mary as one-sided history likesto record. Murdered in turn by 'nobles'. Wonder why.
Put a crown on, King of false history, and Prince of Propaganda and I'll knock it off with facts that remain secrets to shallow divers.