In the past, tech companies outspent rivals to have a show on the books that would give them an optical advantage (for more loans of course) that they hoped to claw back eventually or unload on a later buyer of debt.
A little ploy that went unreported by 'Business News' for some strange reason.
Maybe it's because 'Business News' wasn't investigative or news, it was cheerleading bad business practices.
Remember the scrolling ticker tape at the bottom of CNN newscasts when tech stocks took off? I predicted they'd stop just before the crash. Where did they go?
There's nothing like good Business News.
Cue to fake confession rants:
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2017/08/03/watch-the-full-rant-cramers-they-know-nothing.html
One curious question: How would whitehats quietly destroy Blackrock and their co-whores,...... using their own fist in the face?
The top individual shareholders of Nvidia are Jen-Hsun ("Jensen") Huang, Colette M. Kress, and Mark A. Stevens, and the top institutional shareholders are Vanguard Group Inc., BlackRock Inc. (BLK), and FMR LLC.
You might want to tell the martyrs that Rome didn't attempt to define Christianity. It would be news to them.
I made a mixing of wine analogy. I didn't refer to the biblical example. But this is exactly what accepting literalist teachings as 'scripture' and therefore infallible is doing. (mixing in poor wine).
Saving Israel for last means pulling the literalist (satanic) snake from the tree yet agian. From belief in false teachings to knowledge of deep truths.
No the bible doesn't identify America.
You can't prove a thing by itself. You can't prove or disprove by 'belief' in something. I'm not attempting to do either. You are.
Go ahead and show me some example of my 'believing in gnostic fanfiction'.
I'll wait.
If you mean belief in the existence in a historic 'Judaic' gnostic movement, I'd be a fool not to. I'd be a fool, after studying it, not to see that it was that movement that brought the messianic message, and that it was their so-called messiah that was co-opted by Flavian Rome and perpetrated by the later so-called church it created through misrepresentation of dogmatic principles.
I didn't reluctantly come to the truth as i understand it. I sought it with every fiber of my being.
I don't 'identify' as gnostic, agnostic or a 'believer'. I seek truth and leave name calling to lesser individuals.
This isn't about me in any case, and it isn't about preaching dogma. You hoist theosophists up as proof of your search and then cast it aside, saying there was nothing there.
I found something there. The things that attract them and fool them in it. I see the half that is correct and the parts that their methods won't allow to be seen. Because two are taken up on a high place, but only one looks at the source.
You show your position whether you know it or not. And your style is as offensive as it is sophomoric.
I did the same from an early age. I won't give you a list of books, I spent my whole long life doing it. How are you on comparative religions east and west?
I'm not extremely confused about how extremely confused people are about the history of Christianity. I'm extremely aware of it and how much a person can confess to know and not show it by act or word.
The Catholic Flavian Christianity defines modern Christianity. It's YOU who mixes the wines together not I. You're simply evangelizing and attempt to degrade with false characterization of my understanding to make it easier. it won't work and is an ugly way to converse. So....
I don't let Rome define shit. I just told you that Rome defined modern Christianity.
Funny, you told me that you were reluctant to come to the teachings, yet I was supposed to start with the bible. Actually i did. I was reluctant to come to false teachings, still am, and always will be.
Here's more fun; There was a REASON that anons were put onto Reddit, then 8 chan/4chan and then over to the goats at VOAT.
It was for the two thieves to 'butt heads' and let Divine Inspiration reign in the end.
Orthodox literalist beliefs masquerading as deep truths are the next thing to be exposed and the final piece to recovery. Saving Israel for last.
You will always be correct in half a sense due to the duelist nature of words. You're performing a sematic trick, but it still serves a long-winded (to you a wall) purpose. While it does show deeper insight than most will give a word, it also unintentionally shows the limitation of words. Words are not an infinite offer. That would be the inspiration behind the words. Infinite is a non-understandable term in reference to things that exist.
Consider that Inspiration precedes expression.
It's written that In the beginning was 'the' word.....not one word, even tetragrammatron, lol, but that which inspires all subsequent (distinguishing/dividing/defining) words. Every one, every angel and daemon who have names, dancing on the head of finite pins.
I can read the writing on this wall plainly. I do understand the motive and context, given your name, and your consistent if not repetitive method to fit every statement as evidence of a theory that i 'get' but don't exactly share.
I've broken it down to the letter and number, fren, and understand that the 'map is not the territory'. https://instituteofclinicalhypnosis.com/nlp/map-is-not-the-territory-nlp/
Are you trying to bring us together through an understanding? Words would be only the spoken vehicle for this inspiration, not the inspiration itself. Until then, they would tend to divide and con-fuse.
Con/against fusion/bringing together
Choices.
I will not downdoot you, because of the half that is always 'right'. kek
You stated: You are incorporating a lot of non-scriptural teachings and trying to apply them to what is stated in the Bible.
This is the wrong direction. Instead, you need to start with the Bible and work outward as it is the foundation of Truth. You need to let the Bible define itself and not apply foreign definitions to biblical symbols. Doing so is considered a form of idolatry.
Reply:
I've done both. You need to do both. This word 'scripture' is tossed around loosely and always was, especially within the neo roman churches. You need to deep dive christian history in establishing 'scriptural teachings'.
The cause of idolatry is most often anthropromorphism. I'm careful to avoid such pitfalls as idolatry as it is said to be 'the only thing that angers God', with that itself being an anthropromorphic statement.
You say: When I say God has nothing to do with it, I am saying that God has nothing to do with death. This is stated clearly by scripture. He is the God of the living. He is a God of creation and light. He is perfect and there is no darkness or sin in Him. As a created being, you are made with the capacity to stay in creation or leave it because you have free will. To choose the teachings of man and the world, to choose sin, is to pursue a path that cannot lead to God. Instead, you are only lead to a path that results in death as you are willingly separating yourself from the very thing that sustains existence.
The religion of Rome, however, has everything to do with death. The life within the symbol of the cross has been turned into an instrument of torture/death, Christ is a man who died and that 'fact' is to be 'confessed' or you'll be eternally tortured and so on.
This will thing is never free and doing what thou wilt isn't it, and neither is doing something based from fear. Fear and desire are the mind killers and this is what the Heaven/Hell dichotomy of the Roman religion rests upon. The ancient truths it hides are another thing altogether.
The god of creation and light is the Demiurge, akin to Lucifer, the god of the material world. Gnostic Christians schooled Roman Christians on the difference, were not understood, were killed, and the esoteric line went underground.
It waits to be discovered by those who know how and where to look.
Roman Christianity is nothing BUT the mixing of pagan traditions with their own.
The word 'pagan' meant simply commoner or peasant as it was meant to be a derogatory statement for those deplorables who weren't ready to accept the new head placed on the old body.
The problem here is that you attempt to measure something without the proper training and the issue is the very same in reverse of what you accuse.
You need to get outside your box. It isn't even yours.
The Trilateral Commission's charter involves the idea of a triumvirate of world powers.
You guess correctly with your concept. A little Epcot Center of seperated races for 'Globalism' singing the praises of unity while projecting an evironmental image that exists only as a facade as they sell overpriced trinkets to the onlookers. Like the song, "It's a Small World Afterall"..........the reality is a nightmare that you can't get out of your head.
See Magnum Opus or The Great Work by Albert Pike for details.
I was speaking from an esoteric side and you went real world on me. kek
Sorry I don't mean to minimalize your concern about the issues of Antarctica. At first I took it as a possible flat earth reference until you provided more detail. You're probably aware of the nazi presence during WW II and the Admiral Byrd story. I'm sure you know there are DUMBs there and a seed bank for reasons.
Yes it's a bunker for some bad guys no doubt and it does have to be cleaned out if it hasn't been already. I am wondering about the sovereignty of bases there.
You do serve an important purpose here. That's my belief.
But you, I and we need to use words, which both divide by defintion and unite by spirit. Don't we. You and I as seperate, yet identifying as we?
If the de-fining is moving away from the uniting spirit of words, then why sharpen your teeth with that aspect of language?
a,b,c,d,e - that's five de-finings of one point, that's pretty 'sharp'.
But it waffles on it's own point, going back and forth between A and not A....as is the nature of words that de-fine or 'make a point' out of the whole. You and I. We.
Here's one: "How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?"
Why choose the DE-fining, when REfining the spirit might work to better effect.
Refining by definiton here, as removing impurities.
Try a different kind of exercise. If A, then not A.
If one, then two as not one, then three as observer of two. What would be four? Each as a new dimension............. And so on.
Learning to spell and the spirit behind.
It's a start.
You know masons. Or freemasons. Some might tell you some things. They won't be killed for it. Times have changed and what was 'dangerous' information has leaked out. The esoteric is taught as history lessons, and symbolic stories. Much like Sunday School.
There are truths. Some seem deeper and harder won than others.
Only Anubis/The Cherubim guard it.
Learn what that means and you find a key that opens the knowledge in all degrees. The whole Golden Circle and then some. The Mason squares the circle.
Next: What is a MAGA?
They aren't Hegel's stratagems exactly......Hegelian, yes. ..Hegel made observations, about the dialectic. Dividers use it to accomplish their goals. It wasn't invented, or 'created' except as a by-product of dualist nature coming into being.
This was known as Zeno's Paradox in western history.
The "Middle" of the cross, between it's arms, the two thieves at the opposites, who actually represent the dichotomy of nature. The 'middle arm' represents the quiet still fulcrum between the extremes. The base from which they deviate.
It represents the chrism and one who accepts as the christ.
The study of dualism in nature, in Asia produced Taoism aka 'The Middle Way'.
Darkness, being not a thing, but absent of a thing, it makes little sense to say God has 'nothing to do with it'. It's saying he has nothing to do with nothing.
You seem to misunderstand what is meant by 'middle' here. The fulcrum has equal parts to either side...........but isn't either.
The hub of a wheel is comparable in other traditions.
The problem is dualism and stressing the opposite sides as mere opposites, not paired concepts and this perpetuates the dichotomy that some know how to take to their advantage.
In Egypt, the heart is laid on a scale upon death to gauge both it's 'weight' and 'balance'. Reasons.
Everything in it's extreme becomes it's opposite. Explain.
You lay too much import on the 33rd degree. More than the Water Buffaloes do now apparently. (Freemasons).
Yes I have met some pretty powerful people.
The secrecy is more about being in a non-orthodox cabal.
My father joined and quit when he learned certain things.
I studied the materials both they and others provide. It's a guild controlling guilds.
Controlling Workers, and bosses, where real power lies.
Have you noticed the state of building construction these days?
Our floors need leveled.
You know me then?
'What' is past Antarctica. Is exoteric knowledge. And a moot question besides.
I've known 33rd degree masons and higher. Higher? Of course. One told me he bought it. Because that's how it works now as the magick is weak.
Wings of my family on all sides are OG cabalists with deep secrets in history. I've met many others whom made it quite clear that they operate on a 'side'. Some were big name people you would recognize. Because of my 'inside' understanding during conversation, they often made the mistake of divulging things in confidence.
If you were to understand what the degrees are about.....or what a degree even is in the fullest sense, you 'd have no need to enter into lessons about it. Masons teach a sunday school version (exoteric) of the world until the last couple of degrees where forces are suddenly introduced. Yet the ultimate secrets of these forces are not within the degrees, I can tell you that with assurance as it's a bar that has to be reached through a burning of the midnight oil. 'They' use those people as 'they' are too busy to do themselves........hence 'magical' substitutes.
Snakes can be feared or swallowed.
I don't identify with the 'we' who you say 'don't get to know what we are or how we got here.' That too, can be divided as exoteric and esoteric.
Their knowledge is mostly exoteric, with the addition of badly understood magick and bad science with an agenda. Especially now in the age of science/technology.
Attempts to touch on the Divine Within are always tainted by the warlock's selfish agenda. Theo-sophists without theo....and so replace with things to rule by. These are also secrets, but lesser ones.
If they have all the answers, then seek them out. It's all been done in that regard.
The alchemists, philosophers and theosophists lay it out.............have you read their body of work? Can you critique it, or is it taboo or too difficult as it is for 'everyone else'?
I've had experience with mucky mucks in the cabal. They really aren't 'all that' individually I can tell you. Two are on a high place, and one looks down in lesser understanding. That is they. The 'we' you mention would be the 'profane' on the plain.
You seek exoteric knowledge of who/what/where/when in history.
Esoteric is guarded by Anubis in Egypt, and flaming cherubim in Judaic/Christian.
The jackal imitator of the Lion scholar.....guarding the 'secrets of the ark/arc'. Not literally of course. That would be exoteric and one would never be 'allowed' to enter.
His parents named him after a science fiction character.
His mother wants to be Cruella DeVille. Connected to Hollyweird.
Remember, Elon was Amber Heard's moneybagman 'fixer'.
Elon creates ZIP inexplicably. Cashes in. Creates 'Xpay' that becomes PayPal, a finger in every pie sold over the internet. How? His supposed genious didn't translate educationally. Where's his thesis? What was it?
He began tunneling about the same time as Tesla. Who's money is buying/paying?
He marries a voodoo doll and names child a number-letter sequence.
He avoids lawsuits like teflon and buys Twitter.....with who's money again?
Forms 'Space X' as eye in the sky, and wants to hook your brain to it. And your electric car that you won't own but are so happy you could just shit.
Neo Howard Hughes........that's what he is.........and that story wasn't anything like most think it was either.
TELL me about it. ___ Jacob
https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053
Who knows how to lay the four corners? Two are on a high place. One builds. One destroys under illusion of building.
Lineating and delineating..........the laying or leying of lines brings Time and Distance and dimension into being. Being of matter, they are 'ruled' by its laws under Lucifer, so to speak. Entering into dualism....two extreme 'points' and all in between.
The dichotomy it presents ......known variously as Zeno's Paradox or more modern take, Hegel's Dialectic.....it is used to control opposing forces.
Hence, always going 'to and fro'........back and forth in cycles that give the appearance of balance when it is not. The method of 'influence' and now influenza :)
These people are sick.
The middle way of the cross..........the fulcrum between 'two thieves'....the horizontal 'to and fro' of materialism......is the verticle androgynous christ of the chrism.
And we'll all go 'back and forth' until we 'settle' this. :)
yes, that
Are you compelled by the disruption?
Was that a yes or a no? A re-definition doesn't provide answer.
To file the point.