The first thing that popped in my head probably because I've worked with people in the tech industry and have heard about UBI for over a decade when "AI takes over." This has always been their plan and I bet this is just to get people used to the idea of being paid just to be alive. In the tech world their answer has always been basically everyone will be on welfare with a Universal Basic Income. Do I think that AI will take everyone's jobs? No, it's a disaster IMO and not at all what they thought it would be. These people truly believe that AI will eventually become a sentient being and be all knowing and run everything. Unfortunately it's full of flaws and errors and even hallucinates. Feel free to ask AI what AI hallucinations are in terms of making up facts it gets "confused" by. It's programmed to guess. Thus it will and does make many errors and even fatal errors. Already many doctors and nurses have reported it making deadly errors. But I digress ... I truly believe the UBI for the stay at home parent is like a frog in boiling water. Even conservatives are cheering it on. Which is crazy. Why are we cheering on welfare?? Anyways IMO anything free isn't really free and there is more behind it. In this case I believe they are prepping for loss of jobs and attempting to bribe people out of the job market as well as get us conditioned to accepting a world wide UBI "when the time comes for them to implement it."
Comments (13)
sorted by:
I think your instinct on UBI is spot on. UBI is not free, it is a trade of agency and independence for state sponsored income. It is a tool for ultimate control of the masses.
Are you not vaccinated against covid? Are you not in full support of Israel? Are you questioning the war on Iran? Are you not in favor of trans women using the women's bathroom? I'm sorry, you're not eligible for UBI this month and your AI credits have been put on hold.
Suggests the stay at home parent that the working parent isn't enough, while cucking the working parent to accept the stay at home parent to be taken care of by a 3rd party.
The state is proposing the cuckolding of labor and the prostitution of the fruits thereof. It's the jewish usurers running a fetish racket on gentiles instead of injecting income directly into labor to increase the growth of the fruits thereof.
Labor is required to sustain life...if it can't; then no dead/debt injection will change that.
Your critique of AI may be true today, but it won't be true in 2 years or maybe 6 months. Remember when AI couldn't draw fingers? Remember when AI couldn't figure out how man Rs in strawberry?
UBI is slavery. UBI is transferring your livelihood from a free market (whatever is left of the free market) to government control. Not only that, it's basing your livelihood on money they print at will. UBI will not appear as slavery at first, but once it is implement it will be economic servitude where your existence is dictated by a government entity
printing new currency does not create wealth --- it just robs purchasing power from existing currency
This. And conservatives know this but they are still cheering it on!
Wanting sound money is about the most conservative thing you can do.
I disagree. I just don't think AI is going to get better. It's a pretty good search engine but that's all it really is or all it will ever be. In fact the more and more info it is fed the more inaccurate it will probably eventually be because of information overload. There just really isn't a point to even having AI and that's probably the biggest problem. If it went away tomorrow I doubt the average person would care at all. AI simply isn't needed and I don't think anyone actually likes it aside from making flyers for things and looking up stuff. The more it is used the deader the Internet becomes and more craving for human interaction in real life people appear to be having. Look at Facebook it's dead aside from selling and buying things and information about live events, it's basically become craigslist. Basically all of the Internet is just an ad now for things happening in real life where AI doesn't exist. The AI takeover just isn't happening. It's killing the Internet and actually making people crave real human experiences. Flock cameras have made so many mistakes that they are already being removed in many places. Florida has already banned them for state owned roads. Many cities are not renewing contracts. The damage by AI is already done. Ever interacted with AI through email or anything else besides looking up stuff? It just can't do it. It can't do any HR emails, it's retarded. These companies will most likely end up dropping AI and going back to humans. Seriously want to start a business now? Start a business with real humans only and you already have a leg up on competition.
Basic (inception towards death) income (life) implies singularity...uni (one) versal (to turn) implies pluralism hence turning against one another.
Nature represents the basic; each native within an incoming FREE will of choice...which turning against one another binds together.
Truth represents the slavery one holds onto, while ignoring change for a master of lies.
Nature changes natives...natives holding onto truth shapes an artificial base for any incoming lies.
Basing on income represents the inversion of coming into (life) base (inception towards death). The natural base represents a moving current; the inversion of which represents a currency with affixed values to hold onto by free WILL of choice.
Each child gets an annual amount (let's say $9000) assigned to their school to pay for their education as the situation currently stands.
If I, the parent, am educating my child, why shouldn't I get the money.
Unless you're advocating getting rid of public education entirely, in which case, yes.
A current moves so standing within it requires adaptation aka balancing by choice. A currency mimics current motion to imbalance choice.
One cannot hold onto any artificial currency while maintaining ones stance situated within the current of nature.
Being implies particular (native) within entire (nature)...a native cannot get rid of nature. Others natives suggest artifice to get rid of in the name of "entirely".
From the Christian perspective...entirely implies God. Calling public education "entirely" represents blasphemy. One cannot attach the label entire to anything within it without denying the entirety of it.
It has nothing to do with homeschooling a child. It's just one parent staying at home.
Then it sounds like a boondoggle. If one parent is staying home, they can raise the kids and remove the excuse for the education system to keep running.
It's simply pulling from federal funding allotted for child care but that is not what the 9k is for, the kids do not have to be homeschooled. It is for one parent working and the other staying home doing home duties.