The first thing that popped in my head probably because I've worked with people in the tech industry and have heard about UBI for over a decade when "AI takes over." This has always been their plan and I bet this is just to get people used to the idea of being paid just to be alive. In the tech world their answer has always been basically everyone will be on welfare with a Universal Basic Income. Do I think that AI will take everyone's jobs? No, it's a disaster IMO and not at all what they thought it would be. These people truly believe that AI will eventually become a sentient being and be all knowing and run everything. Unfortunately it's full of flaws and errors and even hallucinates. Feel free to ask AI what AI hallucinations are in terms of making up facts it gets "confused" by. It's programmed to guess. Thus it will and does make many errors and even fatal errors. Already many doctors and nurses have reported it making deadly errors. But I digress ... I truly believe the UBI for the stay at home parent is like a frog in boiling water. Even conservatives are cheering it on. Which is crazy. Why are we cheering on welfare?? Anyways IMO anything free isn't really free and there is more behind it. In this case I believe they are prepping for loss of jobs and attempting to bribe people out of the job market as well as get us conditioned to accepting a world wide UBI "when the time comes for them to implement it."
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
So, as I understand it, you're thinking that people would reject AI because it is inaccurate, while it saves them money while being inaccurate.
Unfortunately, that's not how the world works. Many people would easily sell themselves for a bit of money. That's why inaccurate AI is taking over jobs that were accurately done by humans.
Ok, you put forth medical fields - that's clearly not fixed for AI to take over yet. Still 1 field.
You put forth education. Who would argue if AI tutor has an incorrect reply? The children? The parents, who are not included? If a school can save money on teachers, what stops them?
And how about any other field? I mentioned QA, you don't touch this topic for some reason. It's easier to pay less for QA AI that makes mistakes than it is for human QA that sometimes makes mistakes. It's just cheaper. And CEOs are cheap.
So how is your theory holding against my previous comment, I wonder. You said "You don't understand it because you aren't really paying attention" - explain how is that the case, when I can give you examples that you lack, on the topics you address, and on the ones you don't.
The AI bubble will burst once people start realizing the mistakes. Once lawsuits start for wrongful death. Once people stop using companies that untlize AI for chat.
What happens when it does calculations wrong assisting in building a highrise and it collapses? I've caught it even doing basic math wrong.
I have yet to use a chat with a company where I didn't have to talk to a human being, same with if AI answers an email almost 100% of the time it answers it totally wrong and addresses something I didn't even ask about.
Even FB staff are overwhelmed with mistakes of AI banning people incorrectly. When companies have to spend more money correcting mistakes and money trying to save their customer base they will go back to humans.
Once I gave feedback to a company how great their company used to be before AI chat. I've spent a lot of money with them and guess what AI is no longer handling their chats. I assume obviously many many many other people complained as well not just me.
The AI in flock cameras have identified an insane amount of people incorrectly.
Regarding AI and flock cameras: "Roseville, California: An analysis of 1,427 alerts sent to the police between 2023 and 2024 found that 71% were incorrect, meaning approximately 1,013 alerts falsely flagged vehicles as stolen or involved in felonies. Los Angeles, California: An inspector general audit found that 161 vehicles were falsely flagged as stolen over a two-month period, with 32.3% of reviewed alerts being inaccurate. National Misuse: The Institute for Justice has documented at least 27 cases nationwide where drivers were mistakenly pulled over, detained, or arrested due to Flock alerts, with many incidents occurring since 2023. Accuracy Claims: While Flock claims >96% OCR accuracy in optimal conditions, independent tests by IPVM previously found a 10% error rate in identifying the state of origin, and critics argue that even small error rates result in thousands of wrongful stops given the scale of 120,000+ cameras in use. In summary, while a precise national total is unavailable, local audits confirm that thousands of innocent vehicles have been incorrectly flagged in isolated studies, with specific instances like Roseville showing error rates as high as 71%."
Already I've seen companies advertising real human beings answering phones.
The signs are all here for a collapse.
I would do some of your own research
Are you talking about Quality Assurance?? You think AI is better for this? How? Where's the data for this? Look into it more I can bet it's making awful mistakes.
As for teachers, parents are already catching horrible mistakes even AI making up state names that don't exist. My kids already are catching mistakes and they are in elementary school.
I am not the only person to hold this opinion. Look up AI bursting predictions.
https://youtu.be/Lf5oqGOCRCM?si=91Y_-Es_41Tp8sFa This one I haven't fully watched but I've seen clips and he seems to think similar to me but I am just showing I am not alone in this thinking.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cmzptWcRs6Q
It's not an AI bubble, it's AI that does actions way faster than a human. That's not going away, unfortunately. Even tho I want to, as you do.
Chats are mainly AI now, but you can always reach a human assistant still in most places. It only makes the AI learn when it failed.
They will NOT go back to humans, as AI is way cheaper than humans. And AI cannot go on vacation or get ill.
AI can be programmed to recognize your ID, or IP, and immediately transfer you to a human. Your single complaint doesn't stop many other companies to use AI because it's cheaper than human services. I agree that it's inhumane and wrong, but it's not what's really happening in most companies, who are greedy to the core.
The AI in cameras is supreme in comparison to humans detecting people on cameras. The mistakes it makes is way less than 2000 different employees who need a break, sleep, leave, vacations, etc. I work for such a company only to be soon replaced by AI that I am training currently.
False police alerts are useful for the police to control places that don't require their control. Meaning AI is their "excuse" for rushing into their home. Even AI's mistakes are used by the NWO, you know this.
You asked - QA is better for AI as it can track many things at once than a single human can. Surely, it makes mistakes, but you don't pay the human labor for the mistakes, or any benefits, double-pay, vacation pay, leaves, etc. It's the logical choice. I can assure you that in sports, AI is doing way better than humans, since that's my current job.
So parents are catching mistakes... They were not effective to stop the trans reading books to their children, right? So how will they stop AI?
...................
Overall, I agree that AI is bad, don't get me wrong. But it is cheaper, so many will use it. And if you notice a mistake, so what? They will still use it to enter your home, they will use it to confuse your children's education, or mistake a procedure. They don't care about us. They care only about money.
I agree with you that AI is bad. But the bad AI will only progress, that's where I don't agree with you. Unfortunately, we will see more mistakes by AI that are quickly covered up, not an uprising of humans that eventually turn AI down.
It's unfortunate, but realistic. Your idea is hopeful, but unreal. I really hope your point is correct and mine isn't. Unfortunately, that is not the case.
I agree that AI is imperfect and causing problems as you do. But I know CEOs are greedy and will ignore it because it's on our backs, not theirs. Do you see the difference?
Well I'd watch that interview with the guy who calls BS on AI I linked. I went ahead and watched it all since I linked it and he much more elegantly and technically calls out AI and the companies behind it. He covers funding and how no it actually isn't cheaper and why they will be and already are in trouble. You don't have to agree with me. We've been fed the doom and gloom of AI for awhile now. Its understandable. People on conspiracy forums do tend to believe the worst is yet to come. IMO It will remain around but not as vast as people are led to believe. It will simply be a search engine and Photoshop tool and organization tool. People used to think Photoshop was amazing and cutting edge. It isn't taking everyone's jobs. It's completely unsustainable financially and environmentally not to mention it just isn't as grand as people say. Hey I like Google lens but as a tool. At the end of the day though that's all it is a tool.
Also do you know what "The Singularity" in theory is and why they are building this and their belief behind AI? The Singularity is Near a book basically has a cult following of all these people behind AI. For almost if not 20 years they have believed that there will come a time when technology aka AI evolves so fast that it takes over everything. This is contingent on AI being sintinent and basically becoming this perfect being. They are building these data centers because they are unknowingly in a cult. They can't come to terms that the singularity and their tech God aren't coming into fruition and they are bankrupting themselves, lying about its capabilities and willing to destroy the earth so all the crap they've been listening to at seminars for 15 years comes true. Which it isn't and it's not. When you understand the psychology behind the creators of this you kind of can understand why it will fail. It isn't going to be a tech paradise where we all live basically in a perfect world with AI as our God and only do leisurely things. In the real world resources are finite and massive buildings cost a money (know why many massive old beautiful buildings get torn down?? They cost to much to keep up). If no one has jobs because AI took them and we are all in poverty on UBI who is going to be buying the products at the stores that are funding AI companies?? Communism no matter what form is always going to fail. Try reading Robots Will Steal Your Job, But That's OK to understand the thought process behind these people. No one should fear them. Just complain to companies about AI where valid and enjoy the entertainment aspect and tool part. We totally have a voice. Flock cameras everywhere are being removed because people are saying no. Data centers are being cancelled and rejected all over. We do not have to be part of their weird cult or listen to them.