The Rothschilds are "puppets" of the Chabad Lubavitch doomsday blood cult
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (61)
sorted by:
The Rothschild family is controlled by Lubavitchers to implement Biblical prophecy. German historian Wolfgang Eggert told us 23 years ago that the Rothschilds belong to a fanatical doomsday cult called Chabad Lubavitch which is instigating a world war, to cleanse the world of non-Satanists. Eggert predicted in 2003 a Cabalist plot to exterminate the Goyim. And revealed their plans to implement Biblical prophecy of Armageddon in order to hasten the return of the Messiah and establish Jewish supremacy.
Rothschild family's success is attributed to Rabbi Hershelle Tschortkower, who mentored Anschel Moses Rothschild, the father of the banking founder Mayer Amschel Rothschild, when he served as the Rabbi's assistant.
In a 2008 speech Russia Chief Rabbi Berel Lazar stated that Chabad is sponsored by the Rothschilds and that Putin and Trump are members. At the Oxford University Chabad Society’s second Joseph Graham memorial lecture the guest of Honour was none other than Nathaniel Rothschild. "My only qualification for speaking tonight is that I am very good friends with Rabbi Lazar. I thank Elliot Shear for sponsoring this event and I thank my friend and business partner David Slager for sponsoring this centre and making it a reality." - Nathaniel Rothschild
It is not the whole story. Learn about Lamed Vav. :) It is those who control their puppets - Chabad and almost all other Jewish sects. And even Lamed Vav is not the bottom of that swamp. However, looks like Lamed Vav are those who, in special cases, allowed to have a direct contact with real masters who are not humans at all.
You could be right. Tzadikim Nistarim (36 hidden righteous ones), often abbreviated as Lamed Vav(niks) like you say, refers to 36 righteous people, a notion rooted in the mystical dimensions of Judaism. But, that may the subject of another post on itself.
Belief in Armageddon as solution is the problem, not the solution. Dreaming it into existence, the negative forces congeal. (Daemonic)
Agreed, the Chabad name comes from the three intellectual faculties—Chochmah (Wisdom), Binah (Understanding), and Da'at (Knowledge) from the Kabbalistic Tree of Life. So Chabad per their own definition is Kabbalah. Kabbalah Secrets Christians Need To Know by DeAnne Loper has much details about it.
This is the plan since at least 0 AD. Like Sjabtai Tsvi who declared himself the Jewish messiah in 1666 and then was forcefully converted to Islam and died a few years later.
The Rebbe and Netanyahu openly talked about this in 1990: https://youtu.be/rHBiT6eJaQQ.
The Bible also predicts in Revelation that Jerusalem will be encompassed by gentile armies and will be destroyed. Revelation 11:8, "And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified."
But Netanyahu thinks he can outsmart God on that part of the Bible. A while back he was reading Jews vs Rome and said that "this time we should win" (https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1988724701267628489?s=20); likely referring to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
There is only one problem. They essentially are fulfilling 99% of the Bible, but they think they can rewrite the last pages.
Proverbs 16:18, "Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall."
If Satanists meant "free thinking people", than sure.
Also the fanatical doomsday cult is called the Vatican Church aka the descendants of the Churchfathers and the Knights Templar. And the Rothschilds might only be one of the families.
I would agree with you in as far as there is a criminal Cabal running the World. I believe the real power base of this Cabal are a collection of secret societies that have an eschatological view of the on-going war in Iran. They believe that a war in the Middle East would start a process that would culminate in the end times and return of Jesus, the arrival of the Jewish Messiah, the building of a one world government.
And these secret societies include the Freemasons, which are also called the Rosicrucians and the Knights Templars. They include Jewish organizations called the Sabbatean-Frankists, who are embedded in religious movements called Chabad Lubavitch. And then you have the Jesuits (the Catholic Church, the Vatican). You have a collection of secret societies who run the world. I call it The Cabal.
Pope in Vatican has no power, he is a puppet and a figurehead. The 13 Jesuit/Papal Bloodlines, headed by the gray pope, have the power. The gray pope Pepe Orsini is considered the most powerful man in the world.
Bloodlines run and own the world, not the Roman Catholic Church. Both Black Pope and the White Pope aren't of Papal Bloodline, they are both commoners. The real Pope the Grey Pope, Pepe Orsini, is hidden. He is one of ancient Maximums clan of Rome. There is no one more powerful than him. But, did you also know the Rothschilds are Orsinis? the Rothschilds were Jesuits, Sabbatian Frankist (named after the Black Pope’s baptized Jacob Frank) and that became the Jewish House of Rothschild.
I would submit that the Jewishness of the Rothschilds is essentially unimportant, a red herring to keep everyone off the trail. But how could anyone think that?
The Rothschilds were just some nobody Heebs living in the Jewish ghetto of Frankfurt, but then we find this in the wiki of the progenitor, Mayer Amschel Rothschild:
I suggest the key lies in Frankfurt, although exact names still elude me. To wrap it back around, Samuel Oppenheimer was born in Heidelberg, less than 50 mi south of Frankfurt.
I will have to disagree with you here. I believe the Rothschilds used their Jewishness and their connections with other Jews to control and influence the governments all over Europe. Let me give you an example: The purchase of Suez Canal shares by the British Government, this happened around 1875. The Suez Canal Company (Compagnie Universelle du Canal Maritime de Suez) came into being on 15 December 1858, a French project, and over the next 11 years the canal was built. Officially it opened in 1869 and by 1875 the Egyptian government was in severe financial difficulty, and sold all its shares of the canal company to Britain. Well, the Jews in Britain. The London banking house of N M Rothschild & Sons advanced the Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, acting for the British Government, the vast sum of £4million (several billions in today's money) to purchase the Suez Canal shares. Disraeli was a close personal friend of Lionel de Rothschild, and this was transacted on a gentleman’s agreement, with no documentation, a technically unsecured loan for a sum of several £billion today.
Imagine that, a non-Jew trying to negotiate an unsecured loan for a sum of several £billion. Anyway, the funds were repaid within five months, despite Disraeli being accused of undermining Britain's constitutional system, due to his lack of reference or consent from the British Parliament when purchasing the shares with funding from the Rothschilds. So, you can see multi-billion unsecured loans between Jewish friends were common then, as they are common today.
Just so everyone notes clearly how well it works, preventing people from following the trail even to the end of a sentence.
Is part 2 of your argument coming out soon or is that it?
Revelation 2:9, "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
And compare that verse to the Satan Summoning His Legions that Baron Rothschild and Satanists Abramovic posed in front of.
Wikipedia? I assume by "we" here you mean you. It is not my goto-source for just about anything.
Be as ignorant as "you" like and go-to any source that flatters your ego.
Removed for rule 1: attack the argument, not the person
Can be approved upon edit
What 😱 you removed my comment which said "You hear that? It’s the sound of me not caring."? are you serious?
Censorship hurts everyone. Go ahead and remove this as well.
No, I didn't remove that one
I'm only removing rule violations
No one cares what you think
You hear that? It’s the sound of me not caring.
"Edited by request of the mod because I accused Primate98 of forum sliding to distract from the Jewish problem in many of his posts by conjuring up circumstantial connections and using them as "proof" when in fact none exist while at the same time turning a blind eye to the obvious Jewish connection."
My new version: Primate98 post has zero evidence or "argument" in his comment. Just stating some random facts that prove nothing. The Jewish criminal Rothschild's connections to royalty is nothing new and is not any evidence that the problem isn't Jewish. Everyone knows Jews have always been "court" Jews and dealt with royalty. AND BTW the Jewish bankers are always secondary to Jewish rabbis. Jewish rabbis always called the shots. Otherwise the bankers would be excommunicated.
I disagree, his posts are not trivialities. Jews don't have a monopoly on corruption and evil, though there are some Jews and 'Jews' that are also involved.
I think infighting/meta stuff is counterproductive. Let's find where we have common ground and agree to disagree if need be.
I was already handling the meta call-outedness of this comment. You breaking rule 1 is not helpful, will you edit?
I'm talking to turtlebam to not be infighting too. (The 3 simple rules are here to prevent the breaking of community)
Delete anything you find that you don't like. You just let me know when you believe my contributions might be better suited to another forum and you desire more of what others have to provide.
You cannot reasonably think any reasonable person would put with this, but if you do, let me know that too.
Your contributions as a whole are well appreciated, the infighting being done between any one here is unnecessary, wouldn't you agree that it divides and keeps up distractions from greater issues at play?
Let me know if I'm being unreasonable.
Let me be right up front: what I have to say drives some people crazy in exactly the same way your Grandma would be driven crazy if she turned on "The View" and one of the hosts kept talking every day about how the Moon landings were fake and 911 wasn't just some Arabs with box cutters, etc, etc.
Tell me, would she ever be able to settle down and engage with that material in any reasonable way? Or would she just get angrier and more disturbed because of the extreme psychic anxiety caused by the world turning to quicksand under her feet every time she heard that host saying things that cracked and melted her worldview?
If you think the solution to that is that hosts on "The View" should follow rules about avoiding material that upsets people excessively, I'm not entirely certain I would agree that's practical or even sensible.
To be brutally frank in a way few are ready to accept, seeing people spin out of control over what they read on a screen is itself a valuable lesson in how human consciousness actually works.
Let's be honest: no one objects to what I write because it's nonsense or bullshit, they object because it's true and they have no idea how to handle it. As I've said before many times, far from searching for it, most people hate the truth and reject it because of the internal stress it causes them.
Think of it this way: suppose I started posting all Jew-bashing all the time. I'd get way more upvotes and none of these problems would exist. Does that really seem like a move in a positive direction? Should it?
I'll reiterate: I never go looking for any of this, nor do I bother reporting this annoying/harassing bullshit. It's others who just cannot--and I believe will not ever--be able to handle my material. Think up a rule that solves that.
If you want me to start blocking people without ever responding, that's fine. Seems juvenile to me, but juveniles is what we seem to have on our hands. We haven't come far from the schoolyard. And I mean, is that really going to put a dent in the three people that ever bother reading my posts in the first place?
I very much appreciate your well thought out response and I also want to make it clear that I appreciate your research and contributions. The only thing I am asking everyone in this forum is to treat eachother better, rule 1 is simple tho not easy. We should be able to find some kind of common ground and agree to disagree at an impasse, there is no need to resort to our baser instincts of attacking people instead of arguments. Do you agree?
Removed for rule 1. No argument to save.
That quote has now been removed
Thx and all the best of wishes.
And to you.
That quote has been asked to be edited, or it'll be removed shortly, as will your meta, call out comments, we're not doing that here anymore. There are 3 simple rules here to prevent community break down and it's not too much to ask everyone.
Alright I will edit and delete.
Thank you.
Nature separates being...a jew tempts gentiles together with a deed (transaction). This deed represents a gentiles consent to a jewish suggestion, which shapes a consensus among gentiles into a stronghold (furt;fort) for each jewish free (frank) will of choice.
As for Frankfurt in the Bundesrepublik Deutschland...
The BRD represents the stronghold (fort) for each free (frank) jew. Also check out France aka Frankreich...
It is all jews, everywhere, because they are jewish. You won’t escape by trying to throw a fraction of your number under the bus.
Only through willing consent can a string be attached to ones mind.
Chabad aka CHA (chochmah; wisdom) B (binah; understanding) AD (da'at; knowledge)...knowledge implies nature moving through being; wisdom implies the discernment of each being within nature; understanding implies a beings submission to another, while ignoring knowledge.
It's foolish to seek understanding because doing so corrupts wisdom given aka dom (all perceivable) giving wis (ones perception).