"Edited by request of the mod because I accused Primate98 of forum sliding to distract from the Jewish problem in many of his posts by conjuring up circumstantial connections and using them as "proof" when in fact none exist while at the same time turning a blind eye to the obvious Jewish connection."
My new version: Primate98 post has zero evidence or "argument" in his comment. Just stating some random facts that prove nothing. The Jewish criminal Rothschild's connections to royalty is nothing new and is not any evidence that the problem isn't Jewish. Everyone knows Jews have always been "court" Jews and dealt with royalty. AND BTW the Jewish bankers are always secondary to Jewish rabbis. Jewish rabbis always called the shots. Otherwise the bankers would be excommunicated.
I disagree, his posts are not trivialities. Jews don't have a monopoly on corruption and evil, though there are some Jews and 'Jews' that are also involved.
I think infighting/meta stuff is counterproductive. Let's find where we have common ground and agree to disagree if need be.
Delete anything you find that you don't like. You just let me know when you believe my contributions might be better suited to another forum and you desire more of what others have to provide.
You cannot reasonably think any reasonable person would put with this, but if you do, let me know that too.
Your contributions as a whole are well appreciated, the infighting being done between any one here is unnecessary, wouldn't you agree that it divides and keeps up distractions from greater issues at play?
That quote has been asked to be edited, or it'll be removed shortly, as will your meta, call out comments, we're not doing that here anymore. There are 3 simple rules here to prevent community break down and it's not too much to ask everyone.
"Edited by request of the mod because I accused Primate98 of forum sliding to distract from the Jewish problem in many of his posts by conjuring up circumstantial connections and using them as "proof" when in fact none exist while at the same time turning a blind eye to the obvious Jewish connection."
My new version: Primate98 post has zero evidence or "argument" in his comment. Just stating some random facts that prove nothing. The Jewish criminal Rothschild's connections to royalty is nothing new and is not any evidence that the problem isn't Jewish. Everyone knows Jews have always been "court" Jews and dealt with royalty. AND BTW the Jewish bankers are always secondary to Jewish rabbis. Jewish rabbis always called the shots. Otherwise the bankers would be excommunicated.
I disagree, his posts are not trivialities. Jews don't have a monopoly on corruption and evil, though there are some Jews and 'Jews' that are also involved.
I think infighting/meta stuff is counterproductive. Let's find where we have common ground and agree to disagree if need be.
I was already handling the meta call-outedness of this comment. You breaking rule 1 is not helpful, will you edit?
I'm talking to turtlebam to not be infighting too. (The 3 simple rules are here to prevent the breaking of community)
Delete anything you find that you don't like. You just let me know when you believe my contributions might be better suited to another forum and you desire more of what others have to provide.
You cannot reasonably think any reasonable person would put with this, but if you do, let me know that too.
Your contributions as a whole are well appreciated, the infighting being done between any one here is unnecessary, wouldn't you agree that it divides and keeps up distractions from greater issues at play?
Let me know if I'm being unreasonable.
Removed for rule 1. No argument to save.
That quote has now been removed
Thx and all the best of wishes.
That quote has been asked to be edited, or it'll be removed shortly, as will your meta, call out comments, we're not doing that here anymore. There are 3 simple rules here to prevent community break down and it's not too much to ask everyone.
Alright I will edit and delete.