Because women don't know their place, which is in the home. Why? Because jews and their degenerate puppets sold them feminism and liberation ideology appealing to their pride and created a society and economy where this is the status quo.
But are the women to blame or is it men's fault that we allowed this to happen and we ourselves were led by the same propaganda? Women follow men - this has always been the case and it still is. You'd be amazed how easily women tailor their behavior in strong male presence of a good father or a husband. This applies to society as a whole, which is always patriarchal in nature because that's how God created the world. If women behave like this today, it's because families and the society are not led by strong men.
This is correct and well said. Weak men are to blame for women’s downfall because we’ve shifted away from traditional, Biblical gender roles. Remember, Eve sinned first and God has charged men with leading women to God’s grace. Without men, women are lost, aimless, and will latch on to the latest worldly trend.
God governs men.
Men govern women.
Women govern children.
Children govern animals.
Exactly. The Bible says over and over again that those put in charge are held accountable - be it a father over his children, a man over his woman, a master over their servant, a priest over their flock or a king over his people. Modernism is defined by turning this divinely ordained hierarchy upside-down in a Kabbalistic alchemical fashion. Of course, at it's core this rebellion is satanism and unsurprisingly it was done through Satan's foot soldiers - the jews who exploit human weaknesses, sins and vices.
One can't begin to unravel the complexity of our modern world outside of this paradigm and this is why tptb fights vehemently against traditional Christianity and civilization and against real history and noticing who's behind its downfall.
You don't think, period. It seems to you that thinking is occurring. In fact, there's no "you". What you refer to as "you" are just a bunch of atoms and determined chemical reactions, matter in flux. Everything you do is predetermined by a causal chain extending back to the Big Bang (or some other bs fairy tale). There's no free will and "your" brain is a determined mechanism like a calculator.
That's such a cope. You can literally engage in any degenerate behavior you'd like in modern society and nobody would care. "But we're literally in Handmaiden's tale!" Gtfo dude, at least wait for conservatism to really clamp down on the degenerates like you before screaming victim.
You won't get to clamp down because you'll get hammered in 2026.
It takes a special kind of fucking worthless to make the feminist left look good.
Running on cutting spending and then increasing the already bloated military budget is a good way to do that.
But I just want to pause on one thing. You call it cope that I push back against your delusional ideas. But the deepest form of cope is thinking your ideology is worth a damn when it's enforced at gunpoint.
But the deepest form of cope is thinking your ideology is worth a damn when it's enforced at gunpoint.
Every form of societal order is upheld by force and coercion genius. Even if the force hides behind nice sounding names like democracy and liberty. Whoever has the physical power rules over the rest. This is why women were never on top and never will be. Women can't enforce shit and they always rely on the force of men.
You truly live in a bubble, but if you've been following what's going on, you should know that bubble is about to burst soon and the fake and gay post WWII boomer world is coming to an end. You've lost the culture war and you're about to lose in the realm of politics too.
Women were on top in Nazi Germany. That was a government they voted for in such numbers that nobody could stop them due to the demographic skew in their favor.
The idea that the cannon fodder have power is just hilarious. "force of men" is absolute cope. There will always be traitors who will take the side of women for ideological gain, and no matter how much physical power you have, they have the societal power.
Stormfaggots didn't outmuscle the SPD, they outvoted them by shilling for women.
Societal order is held up by cultural norms, only unwanted ideologies have to have a secret police beating down dissidents.
They weaponized their natural empathy/nurturing and predilection for group cohesion against them. These aspects are features, not bugs. In a normal society, nurturing would be directed at their own families and communities. Group harmony would maintain the culture and keep families and communities united. They delay childbearing and promote hypergamy, so nurturing tendencies go towards outlets TPTB promote. Hypergamy= won't bond with their own partners, won't bond with resulting kids. Probably most are on birth control too, which also changes who you're attracted to. Feminism. And "girl boss" doesn't help either. We're not equal or the same as men. We're helpers to them and charged with creating and nurturing life. THAT is what gives us worth and value. Women are remembered and mourned because they were your mother, grandmother, teacher or nurse. No one will fondly remember Janet Yellen, Hillary Clinton, and other horrible examples of the invasion of men's spheres.
That's a very jewy reductionist take promoted by Freud and other degenerate pseudoscience fraudsters, all of them jews of course, who boil the human psyche and behavior to base instincts and sex. They're all running off the naturalistic presupposition that man is not created in the image of God, bound to struggle against his fallen nature to become like God again, but is just another animal that evolved by chance from dumb beasts. Nothing can be more jewish and filled with hatred for man than this idea.
a) Only during reduction (inception towards death) can there be an increase (life).
b) Nature gives freely to being...if a being uses free will of choice to take, then one binds self to another.
jewy reductionist
Reduction-ist implies ones consent to suggested reduction-ism aka "taking" from another, while ignoring given. That's how a jew shapes consensus (-ism) among gentiles by tempting consent (-ist) together.
Freud
His field of expertise was neurological psychoanalysis aka using the analytical process of natural animation (psycho; psyche; animating power) to tempt gentiles into neuro (nerve; drawn by strings) logic (circular thinking).
pseudoscience
Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception...any suggestion by another implies pseudoscience if one consents to it.
all of them jews
Only within all can one shape "them" aka a summation of singular into a plural. Each jew does that to gentiles by suggesting pluralism, hence amassing many (commonwealth) under few (sovereign).
boil the human psyche and behavior to base instincts and sex
a) Only within base (inception towards death) can essence (life) come into being...it's the moving base which internally separates essential matter from one another. A jew inverts this by tempting gentiles together.
b) Human psyche inverts psyche (animating power) generating hu (color) of man.
c) Behavior represents a contradiction in terms...being (potential) having (possession). If a being takes into possession, then it corrupts its potential.
Nature represents the process, which sets each potential being free...a jew shapes suggestions to bind gentile potential into a consensus.
d) Instinct aka in (within) stinct (to stick)...the opposite of instinct implies inability aka in (within) able (allowed), hence nature enabling being.
Word analysis aside...instinct was corrupted from inwardly animated (perception) to outwardly prompted (suggestion).
e) Sex/seco - "to divide" aka the distinction between male and female.
They're all running off the naturalistic presupposition
Nature runs being...a jew tempts gentiles to presuppose aka "to hold as a belief or opinion; make a hypothesis, assume as the basis of argument" before adapting to nature.
Presupposition implies fiction (suggestion) shaped within nature (perception)...the former tempts one to hold onto (information); while the latter moves through one and cannot be held onto (inspiration).
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Nature doesn't create out of nothing, it transforms (transfer of form) everything (cause) into each thing (effect) by internal separation from one another.
in the image of God
God implies moving light; image implies the imagination of those within who ignore moving light for each others shadow-play aka Plato's allegory of the cave. Allegory implies "figurative treatment (suggestion) of an unmentioned subject (perception) under the guise of another similar to it in some way".
bound to struggle
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) wields free will of choice, hence being set free to struggle. It's consenting to any suggestion by another which binds ones free will of choice, while increasing the real struggle with fictitious struggle.
fallen nature
Only while nature falls (inception towards death) can being rise (life)...
to become like God
To become implies coming towards (inception towards death) being (life), hence from all (God) into each one (Christ) aka from same into differential. It's a jew who shapes suggestions to tempt different gentiles into alike consensus, while ignoring the same origin of differentiation.
God cannot be alike...cause there can be only one God. Likeness implies plurality, God implies singularity.
just another animal
Anim-al implies all animation for each one within. Only within animation can one be different from one another aka only within just can one be at odds with one another.
by chance
A chance has to be taken by a given choice. Only within balance can there be choice to take chances from one another, which a jew suggests to gentiles as "gambling".
dumb beast...
...implies BE (being) AST (astute) aka discerning. Ignoring self discernment by consenting to the suggested explanation by another makes one dumber than the other.
Idea
Aka mental ideals and physical idols...both sides of idolatry.
tl;dr: WO(mb)MAN + FE(minine)MALE + S(plit)HE aka one (male) moving through another (female), which allows intercourse in-between one another for off-spring from one another.
As much women have a propensity to follow their master and not bite the hand that feeds.
They do seem to be a motivator for social change and lets not act like its some recent thing. Women have been there right beside the men if not leading the change, supporting the ones who do. Been like that since the dawn of civilization as well, your naive if you think otherwise.
Chatgpt brings up a interesting point, part of it has to do with how men are taught to bottle their emotions and not "cry".
Women often feel socially permitted (or even expected) to express emotion, to seek support, and to “make peace” in conflict situations. These norms give them a “psychological safety net” that men—who are socialized to be stoic and to control their own emotions—may lack. As a result, when the heat of the moment rises, many women feel it is safer or more appropriate to speak out, even if doing so could lead to danger.
Contextual unpredictability: If the other party is emotionally volatile or armed, verbal intervention can unintentionally trigger aggression.
Watching the video of one of the neighbors screaming murderer kinda hit me. They mention they are murdering the neighbors and stealing them out of their homes, people they have lived next to and known for years, not Sinaloa Cartel.
Im not sure how you guys would feel either if you watched karen from next door get blown away because she pissed off some wannabe cop.
There are two theories about this. Both say those women are misguided. Conservative maga side says those women have been brainwashed by mainstream media, immigrants are destroying the union.
Libertarians or leftists are saying those women are being fooled into screaming at ice instead of the elected politicians who send men to war on terror or war on. Regime change. Wars create more refugees such as Libyan German refugee crisis. Note that in this theory men are also get little blame because they are lot more prone to be brainwashed by military propaganda/freedom fries etc.
Nature doesn't guide...it moves any being within from entrance towards outcome, which inspires resistance. Others suggest guidance to tempt one to follow, while ignoring to resist.
The suggestion of guidance represents the carrot on a stick idom.
brainwashed by mainstream
A stream washes away anything within...unless resisted. Others mediate a main stream to tempt one to follow.
regime change
Only within change can a regime be shaped. Few suggest regimes to tempt many into ignoring change.
Wars create
Few suggest creationism to tempt many into a war (new vs old) internally (logic) and externally (reason).
refugee
Aka re (to respond) fuge (masonic joint)...
theory
Aka theo (God) + ory (to orate) aka speaking in the name of God. If one consents to that, then one contradicts "thou shalt have no other gods before me".
a) Meaning implies a measurement taken, while ignoring the all giving God.
b) To look implies "to lock" aka to take into possession, while ignoring process (God) giving potential (Christ).
c) To look at something implies being able to look at something else aka a differentiation...God implies the equality within which differentiation comes into being to be looked at.
That's why each ones perception cannot see all of what God makes perceivable...only one differential; separated; unique; special; particular unit of it aka ones sight.
In simple...one sees the work of God, while being employed within God. Others suggest theory as a mental scheme to trick one into self confinement.
A man acting like these women would have been punched in the face every day of her life until she stopped. But "hitting girls is wrong" while nobody cares if women quietly obey their men, so here we are.
Women are most susceptible to propaganda, which is why jewish feminists lead the fight to the right to vote.
If women couldn't vote, your party would have been an irrelevant footnote of history.
If your mom wasn't a natalist, she wouldn't have had you to abuse your entire life... đź’ˇ
Because women don't know their place, which is in the home. Why? Because jews and their degenerate puppets sold them feminism and liberation ideology appealing to their pride and created a society and economy where this is the status quo.
But are the women to blame or is it men's fault that we allowed this to happen and we ourselves were led by the same propaganda? Women follow men - this has always been the case and it still is. You'd be amazed how easily women tailor their behavior in strong male presence of a good father or a husband. This applies to society as a whole, which is always patriarchal in nature because that's how God created the world. If women behave like this today, it's because families and the society are not led by strong men.
This is correct and well said. Weak men are to blame for women’s downfall because we’ve shifted away from traditional, Biblical gender roles. Remember, Eve sinned first and God has charged men with leading women to God’s grace. Without men, women are lost, aimless, and will latch on to the latest worldly trend.
God governs men. Men govern women. Women govern children. Children govern animals.
Exactly. The Bible says over and over again that those put in charge are held accountable - be it a father over his children, a man over his woman, a master over their servant, a priest over their flock or a king over his people. Modernism is defined by turning this divinely ordained hierarchy upside-down in a Kabbalistic alchemical fashion. Of course, at it's core this rebellion is satanism and unsurprisingly it was done through Satan's foot soldiers - the jews who exploit human weaknesses, sins and vices.
One can't begin to unravel the complexity of our modern world outside of this paradigm and this is why tptb fights vehemently against traditional Christianity and civilization and against real history and noticing who's behind its downfall.
Your sky daddy is irrelevant to real life.
He created what you call real life. Next you'll say that inventors are irrelevant to inventions and coders are irrelevant to coding.
God I hate you people.
What's that? Wasn't it sky daddy? Lol you can't even speak without affirming His existence. God really has a sense of humor.
I thought the irony was funny.
Nope, it just made you look like a God-hating retard. Satan is pleased with you, so good job, I guess.
I don't really care what fictional characters think.
Fictional characters? Like the monkey-thing-whatever that supposedly generated humans? Like gorillions of years? Like life from nonlife?
Can you prove that God and/or Satan are fictional?
You don't think, period. It seems to you that thinking is occurring. In fact, there's no "you". What you refer to as "you" are just a bunch of atoms and determined chemical reactions, matter in flux. Everything you do is predetermined by a causal chain extending back to the Big Bang (or some other bs fairy tale). There's no free will and "your" brain is a determined mechanism like a calculator.
This is what you believe in, isn't it?
Holy strawman.
Your ideology is such a car crash that you believe your sky daddy enabled you to do things that would land you in eternal suffering for...reasons?
Don't weasel away now. I grant you Christianity is false for the sake of the argument. How does that change anything for you?
Billions of Years I dislike your comment.
This is a complete lie, every bit of it. Tradcucks get burned just as much as any other kind of man.
Why do you care about any of this? Weren't you a petty nihilist who doesn't want to further his legacy?
At least enjoy the meaningless life you have left instead of seething about things that don't matter to you.
It would be nice if you worthless cucks let us enjoy our one life instead of ruining society because you can't handle dying.
That's such a cope. You can literally engage in any degenerate behavior you'd like in modern society and nobody would care. "But we're literally in Handmaiden's tale!" Gtfo dude, at least wait for conservatism to really clamp down on the degenerates like you before screaming victim.
You won't get to clamp down because you'll get hammered in 2026.
It takes a special kind of fucking worthless to make the feminist left look good.
Running on cutting spending and then increasing the already bloated military budget is a good way to do that.
But I just want to pause on one thing. You call it cope that I push back against your delusional ideas. But the deepest form of cope is thinking your ideology is worth a damn when it's enforced at gunpoint.
Every form of societal order is upheld by force and coercion genius. Even if the force hides behind nice sounding names like democracy and liberty. Whoever has the physical power rules over the rest. This is why women were never on top and never will be. Women can't enforce shit and they always rely on the force of men.
You truly live in a bubble, but if you've been following what's going on, you should know that bubble is about to burst soon and the fake and gay post WWII boomer world is coming to an end. You've lost the culture war and you're about to lose in the realm of politics too.
Women were on top in Nazi Germany. That was a government they voted for in such numbers that nobody could stop them due to the demographic skew in their favor.
The idea that the cannon fodder have power is just hilarious. "force of men" is absolute cope. There will always be traitors who will take the side of women for ideological gain, and no matter how much physical power you have, they have the societal power.
Stormfaggots didn't outmuscle the SPD, they outvoted them by shilling for women.
Societal order is held up by cultural norms, only unwanted ideologies have to have a secret police beating down dissidents.
Hah, look at little Miss "voting still matters" over here.
LMAO please cope harder, tradcuck. The rope beckons.
How and where? Athiesm is what ruins. See CCP china.
Strawman.
The reason anyone still believes in religion is because they're scared of death.
Like yours? Which claims we are just sentient goobags?
Nope, because they love the One Who made humanity.
They weaponized their natural empathy/nurturing and predilection for group cohesion against them. These aspects are features, not bugs. In a normal society, nurturing would be directed at their own families and communities. Group harmony would maintain the culture and keep families and communities united. They delay childbearing and promote hypergamy, so nurturing tendencies go towards outlets TPTB promote. Hypergamy= won't bond with their own partners, won't bond with resulting kids. Probably most are on birth control too, which also changes who you're attracted to. Feminism. And "girl boss" doesn't help either. We're not equal or the same as men. We're helpers to them and charged with creating and nurturing life. THAT is what gives us worth and value. Women are remembered and mourned because they were your mother, grandmother, teacher or nurse. No one will fondly remember Janet Yellen, Hillary Clinton, and other horrible examples of the invasion of men's spheres.
Afghanistan level female restraint is the only solution. I hear all Afghani men are super happy and the divorse rate is zero.
Lol who upvotes this when it's known they rape prepubescent boys.
Another word to desrcibe hysterical middle aged women...frigid aka cold as ice, which ties to hysteria/hysterikos - "belonging to the womb".
In short..if her oven runs cold; then her emotions run hot.
That's a very jewy reductionist take promoted by Freud and other degenerate pseudoscience fraudsters, all of them jews of course, who boil the human psyche and behavior to base instincts and sex. They're all running off the naturalistic presupposition that man is not created in the image of God, bound to struggle against his fallen nature to become like God again, but is just another animal that evolved by chance from dumb beasts. Nothing can be more jewish and filled with hatred for man than this idea.
a) Only during reduction (inception towards death) can there be an increase (life).
b) Nature gives freely to being...if a being uses free will of choice to take, then one binds self to another.
Reduction-ist implies ones consent to suggested reduction-ism aka "taking" from another, while ignoring given. That's how a jew shapes consensus (-ism) among gentiles by tempting consent (-ist) together.
His field of expertise was neurological psychoanalysis aka using the analytical process of natural animation (psycho; psyche; animating power) to tempt gentiles into neuro (nerve; drawn by strings) logic (circular thinking).
Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception...any suggestion by another implies pseudoscience if one consents to it.
Only within all can one shape "them" aka a summation of singular into a plural. Each jew does that to gentiles by suggesting pluralism, hence amassing many (commonwealth) under few (sovereign).
a) Only within base (inception towards death) can essence (life) come into being...it's the moving base which internally separates essential matter from one another. A jew inverts this by tempting gentiles together.
b) Human psyche inverts psyche (animating power) generating hu (color) of man.
c) Behavior represents a contradiction in terms...being (potential) having (possession). If a being takes into possession, then it corrupts its potential.
Nature represents the process, which sets each potential being free...a jew shapes suggestions to bind gentile potential into a consensus.
d) Instinct aka in (within) stinct (to stick)...the opposite of instinct implies inability aka in (within) able (allowed), hence nature enabling being.
Word analysis aside...instinct was corrupted from inwardly animated (perception) to outwardly prompted (suggestion).
e) Sex/seco - "to divide" aka the distinction between male and female.
Nature runs being...a jew tempts gentiles to presuppose aka "to hold as a belief or opinion; make a hypothesis, assume as the basis of argument" before adapting to nature.
Presupposition implies fiction (suggestion) shaped within nature (perception)...the former tempts one to hold onto (information); while the latter moves through one and cannot be held onto (inspiration).
Both representing jewish fiction aka nothing/nihilo (nihilism) and creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Nature doesn't create out of nothing, it transforms (transfer of form) everything (cause) into each thing (effect) by internal separation from one another.
God implies moving light; image implies the imagination of those within who ignore moving light for each others shadow-play aka Plato's allegory of the cave. Allegory implies "figurative treatment (suggestion) of an unmentioned subject (perception) under the guise of another similar to it in some way".
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) wields free will of choice, hence being set free to struggle. It's consenting to any suggestion by another which binds ones free will of choice, while increasing the real struggle with fictitious struggle.
Only while nature falls (inception towards death) can being rise (life)...
To become implies coming towards (inception towards death) being (life), hence from all (God) into each one (Christ) aka from same into differential. It's a jew who shapes suggestions to tempt different gentiles into alike consensus, while ignoring the same origin of differentiation.
God cannot be alike...cause there can be only one God. Likeness implies plurality, God implies singularity.
Anim-al implies all animation for each one within. Only within animation can one be different from one another aka only within just can one be at odds with one another.
A chance has to be taken by a given choice. Only within balance can there be choice to take chances from one another, which a jew suggests to gentiles as "gambling".
...implies BE (being) AST (astute) aka discerning. Ignoring self discernment by consenting to the suggested explanation by another makes one dumber than the other.
Aka mental ideals and physical idols...both sides of idolatry.
tl;dr: WO(mb)MAN + FE(minine)MALE + S(plit)HE aka one (male) moving through another (female), which allows intercourse in-between one another for off-spring from one another.
As much women have a propensity to follow their master and not bite the hand that feeds.
They do seem to be a motivator for social change and lets not act like its some recent thing. Women have been there right beside the men if not leading the change, supporting the ones who do. Been like that since the dawn of civilization as well, your naive if you think otherwise.
Chatgpt brings up a interesting point, part of it has to do with how men are taught to bottle their emotions and not "cry".
Watching the video of one of the neighbors screaming murderer kinda hit me. They mention they are murdering the neighbors and stealing them out of their homes, people they have lived next to and known for years, not Sinaloa Cartel.
Im not sure how you guys would feel either if you watched karen from next door get blown away because she pissed off some wannabe cop.
I know I would be fucking upset.
I have a few neighbours I could do without...
There are two theories about this. Both say those women are misguided. Conservative maga side says those women have been brainwashed by mainstream media, immigrants are destroying the union.
Libertarians or leftists are saying those women are being fooled into screaming at ice instead of the elected politicians who send men to war on terror or war on. Regime change. Wars create more refugees such as Libyan German refugee crisis. Note that in this theory men are also get little blame because they are lot more prone to be brainwashed by military propaganda/freedom fries etc.
There can be only one theos (God).
Nature doesn't guide...it moves any being within from entrance towards outcome, which inspires resistance. Others suggest guidance to tempt one to follow, while ignoring to resist.
The suggestion of guidance represents the carrot on a stick idom.
A stream washes away anything within...unless resisted. Others mediate a main stream to tempt one to follow.
Only within change can a regime be shaped. Few suggest regimes to tempt many into ignoring change.
Few suggest creationism to tempt many into a war (new vs old) internally (logic) and externally (reason).
Aka re (to respond) fuge (masonic joint)...
Aka theo (God) + ory (to orate) aka speaking in the name of God. If one consents to that, then one contradicts "thou shalt have no other gods before me".
Theory means looking at God.
a) Meaning implies a measurement taken, while ignoring the all giving God.
b) To look implies "to lock" aka to take into possession, while ignoring process (God) giving potential (Christ).
c) To look at something implies being able to look at something else aka a differentiation...God implies the equality within which differentiation comes into being to be looked at.
That's why each ones perception cannot see all of what God makes perceivable...only one differential; separated; unique; special; particular unit of it aka ones sight.
In simple...one sees the work of God, while being employed within God. Others suggest theory as a mental scheme to trick one into self confinement.
Every time it's some hysterical middle aged woman shouting or confronting ice officers?
They like to eat the low hanging propaganda bait. Simple as.
They probably spend more time watching TV than most demographics--brainwashed.
12 hours on tiktok and 6h on ig everyday. Brainrot.
They think their asses are bulletproof.
A man acting like these women would have been punched in the face every day of her life until she stopped. But "hitting girls is wrong" while nobody cares if women quietly obey their men, so here we are.
Karen