Every time it's some middle hysterical middle aged woman shouting or confronting ice officers?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
That's a very jewy reductionist take promoted by Freud and other degenerate pseudoscience fraudsters, all of them jews of course, who boil the human psyche and behavior to base instincts and sex. They're all running off the naturalistic presupposition that man is not created in the image of God, bound to struggle against his fallen nature to become like God again, but is just another animal that evolved by chance from dumb beasts. Nothing can be more jewish and filled with hatred for man than this idea.
a) Only during reduction (inception towards death) can there be an increase (life).
b) Nature gives freely to being...if a being uses free will of choice to take, then one binds self to another.
Reduction-ist implies ones consent to suggested reduction-ism aka "taking" from another, while ignoring given. That's how a jew shapes consensus (-ism) among gentiles by tempting consent (-ist) together.
His field of expertise was neurological psychoanalysis aka using the analytical process of natural animation (psycho; psyche; animating power) to tempt gentiles into neuro (nerve; drawn by strings) logic (circular thinking).
Science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception...any suggestion by another implies pseudoscience if one consents to it.
Only within all can one shape "them" aka a summation of singular into a plural. Each jew does that to gentiles by suggesting pluralism, hence amassing many (commonwealth) under few (sovereign).
a) Only within base (inception towards death) can essence (life) come into being...it's the moving base which internally separates essential matter from one another. A jew inverts this by tempting gentiles together.
b) Human psyche inverts psyche (animating power) generating hu (color) of man.
c) Behavior represents a contradiction in terms...being (potential) having (possession). If a being takes into possession, then it corrupts its potential.
Nature represents the process, which sets each potential being free...a jew shapes suggestions to bind gentile potential into a consensus.
d) Instinct aka in (within) stinct (to stick)...the opposite of instinct implies inability aka in (within) able (allowed), hence nature enabling being.
Word analysis aside...instinct was corrupted from inwardly animated (perception) to outwardly prompted (suggestion).
e) Sex/seco - "to divide" aka the distinction between male and female.
Nature runs being...a jew tempts gentiles to presuppose aka "to hold as a belief or opinion; make a hypothesis, assume as the basis of argument" before adapting to nature.
Presupposition implies fiction (suggestion) shaped within nature (perception)...the former tempts one to hold onto (information); while the latter moves through one and cannot be held onto (inspiration).
Both representing jewish fiction aka nothing/nihilo (nihilism) and creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
"The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Nature doesn't create out of nothing, it transforms (transfer of form) everything (cause) into each thing (effect) by internal separation from one another.
God implies moving light; image implies the imagination of those within who ignore moving light for each others shadow-play aka Plato's allegory of the cave. Allegory implies "figurative treatment (suggestion) of an unmentioned subject (perception) under the guise of another similar to it in some way".
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) wields free will of choice, hence being set free to struggle. It's consenting to any suggestion by another which binds ones free will of choice, while increasing the real struggle with fictitious struggle.
Only while nature falls (inception towards death) can being rise (life)...
To become implies coming towards (inception towards death) being (life), hence from all (God) into each one (Christ) aka from same into differential. It's a jew who shapes suggestions to tempt different gentiles into alike consensus, while ignoring the same origin of differentiation.
God cannot be alike...cause there can be only one God. Likeness implies plurality, God implies singularity.
Anim-al implies all animation for each one within. Only within animation can one be different from one another aka only within just can one be at odds with one another.
A chance has to be taken by a given choice. Only within balance can there be choice to take chances from one another, which a jew suggests to gentiles as "gambling".
...implies BE (being) AST (astute) aka discerning. Ignoring self discernment by consenting to the suggested explanation by another makes one dumber than the other.
Aka mental ideals and physical idols...both sides of idolatry.
tl;dr: WO(mb)MAN + FE(minine)MALE + S(plit)HE aka one (male) moving through another (female), which allows intercourse in-between one another for off-spring from one another.