I present to you Islam: the most retarded religion of all times. You can't make this shit up.
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Both, both are terrible.
That's what false dialectics do to the brain. Both Islam and Judaism are bad, antichristian and want to destroy you, you idiot. Islam is based on Judaism and I literally wrote that in the comments here. Who do you think Muslims worship? It's a satanic cult for degenerate retarded rock lickers that is promoted in the west by powerful interests as an antithesis to talmudism. Well, it's not.
Those are misquotes, medieval opinions, and distortions. This was the first source I used to get accurate Talmud quotes so its debunks appear in the main post and the actual text appears in those sources that have "1" within the [brackets].
In exactly the same way Christians and Muslims "believe" they are to attain world domination over unbelievers.
Semantic in that Israelis think sexual assault of a noncitizen is a lesser crime than rape of a citizen. While there is a strong moral precedent that all rape is equally horrendous, there is also a valid point that practical prosecution might focus more on the same act being perpetrated against citizens than against noncitizens, and reflecting that in punishment lengths. The fact that the legal semantic sounds incorrect because its language is unhelpful is no different than the practice of any other statutory construction anywhere else.
The post is from Pranaitis, who is a decent source but who here is not quoting the Talmud but medieval sources. It looks like I didn't even include Zohar 1:38b-39a because it was so weak, just an ordinary speech against idolatry that is never said specifically to include or exclude Christianity (Jews are left to judge Christianity for themselves without direct guidance). Similarly, the second source, which is more properly called "Mishneh Torah, Foreign Worship and Customs of the Nations 10", is only against idolatry and is regarded as more egregious for its advice of not putting one's own life at risk to save a known idolator's life. There is no Talmudic passage where Christianity is directly judged by majority rule (as opposed to an individual opinion).
The Talmud passages that state that rape of a girl 3 or under is not publicly prosecuted the same way as for older girls so as to protect her marital status (e.g. Ketubot 11b), that Gentiles are called animals in Scripture (e.g. Yevamot 61a), and that murder of a Gentile is prosecuted under Noah's laws and not Moses's (e.g. Sanhedrin 57a), are handled with accurate quotes.
That is a hoax (#8), there was never a "Reichorn" as chief rabbi of France. The ultimate source is a fictional novel, Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche (pen name John Retcliffe), 1868, indicating what Goedsche wanted people to believe Jews were plotting.
This quick review doesn't comment on the links I didn't check.
I trust you're willing to remove hoax misquotations from your boilerplates and replace them with verified quotations, and to modify characterizations of Talmud and of medieval sources to indicate their proper place in comparative religion. There is plenty of criticism of the Talmud to go around without resorting to misquotation and distortion that doesn't account for the actual historical status of Jewish, Christian, or Roman culture.
Nigga Christianity is the only one of the big three that say to spread the word through peace. They're the only one that doesn't talk about superiority and instead say it's a choice to accept eternal life by laying your sins at the feet of Jesus Christ and doing his will because we can not atone for our sins ourselves through works or worship. You suck at this.
Correct but we're still supposed to follow His law, do works and worship Him. Lot's of modern Christians forget that part and think just declaring you have faith in Christ (faith is work also btw) is enough.
Touche!
Btw, the Quran is based on the Talmud and it's full of arbitrary legalism. Everyone who tells you Islam is closer to Christianity than to Judaism is lying to you. They reject the divine nature of Christ and as Paul says, everyone who does that is of the spirit of the antichrist.
Any religion based on complicated laws which need to be "interpreted" by "learned men" is a scam.
But new age gnosticism, where everything is subjective and interpreted by the individual, isn't. Do as thou wilt, said the devil. There's no bigger slavery than self-worship.
They've developed new app to help Shia men keep track of their booty budget. The 'Mutah Computah', now on sale at Amazon.
Lol if it's not a thing someone should bank on it.
What about "till death do us apart" isn't temporary?
Pro (forward) + stitu (to stand; make or be firm)...being implies forwards (inception towards death) formed (life) aka the offer to indiscriminate sexual intercourse, which is why during natural prostitution; each being represents a John (jehovah has favored) or in German Freier (to be free).
Artificial prostitution is about buying vs selling intercourse, which ignores the natural process of separation by pro-stitu-tion.
Artificial sex is about coming together; natural sex implies sex/seco - "to divide".... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sex
Aka nikāḥ (sexual intercourse) al (all) mutah/mutter (mother)...all of nature giving each being within sexual intercourse.
Nature sets each being free from one another within motion...few suggest wedlock (marriage); contraction and attachment (fix) as an artificial inversion of nature to tempt many into mutual self destruction.
OP is Russian?
It's Bulgarian language on the screenshot.
No, I'm from Eastern Europe though.
Just say Jewkraine.
I said I'm not Russian. My country is half a century older than Russia and people here don't love jews very much and there aren't that many. Why u mad?
I see now I've exposed myself in the image. We gave the Cyrillic alphabet and the slavonic language to the Russians.
It could be even millenia older, taking in account things I saw in Nesebr f.e. It could be even as old, as Ancient Greece.
Yes, there are many ancient sites here - both from Ancient Greek and Roman times and even older Thracian pagan ritual grounds. But Bulgaria was officially founded in 681, so I misspoke when I said it's half a century older than Kievska Rus which came 2c. later.
I think Bulgarians lived there long before official foundation of state. People have to had a history of living in some place before official establishing of state or town, with exception of establishing a state in a colonial manner.
Yes, that's a good point. But it's hard to trace back when a tribe or a union of tribes becomes a meaningful entity and 'a people' and that's why we usually refer to an official founding dynasty. It's like tracing back the origins of a language - the more you go back, the less defined and characteristic it becomes.
St. Andrew preached the gospel in the Black Sea region in Thrace around modern day Varna and Sozopol.
Why don't you just say what country it is then? You seem proud enough.
And don't bother gaslighting me, emotions never come into play.
Unfotunately Bulgaria today is under globohomo occupation, just like it was under Ottoman occupation recently. Nothing to be proud of.
Yeah that's unfortunate. But the majority of people here are against it. We're still getting euro cucked and are about to get on the euro shekels.
I disagree. It's like saying Russia had nothing to be proud of during the Bolshevik regime. It still had its history and tradition and most of all - Holy Orthodoxy.
Моля извинете, I meant just current state of Bulgaria. Love this country and people, been there many times, on vacations and business trips.
Russia also had times with nothing to be proud of, shit happens, especially if you have millenias of history.
Thank you for your honesty, it's a hard thing to come by these days.