Not even remotely. The source clearly wants to abolish all gods (elohim), but Christianity is about finding the one true God. Child sacrifice is thousands of years older than that, it's not in Judaism, it's what Abraham the father of faith was delivered from, and as usual the satanists use Jews as their human shields.
It is, OP is correct. Mel Gibson did a bit of research and came across the cult of Ba’al. You can call it the cult of Elohim, others call it cult of Moloch, same thing. https://www.bitchute.com/video/kR5YuEuZk2hx/
Baalism is real and has infected religions such as Judaism but is easily distinguished from Rabbinical Judaism. Modern attempts to equate baalism with Yahwism, solely because Yahweh refuses to acknowledge others calling themselves by the title baal instead of him, is complete ignorance of the politics involved, treating opposition parties as a monolith. It's like saying Christians are satanists because satanists use anointing.
As I implied, those Jews and others who misuse Biblical text to practice baalism have their sin on their own heads. The rest are innocent of that and we should not judge the innocent with the guilty.
My previous debunk demonstrated that there is no such Rabbi "Abe Finkelstein" and the tabloid radio show that interviewed someone under this name to obtain quotes like this was clearly using an actor paid to perpetuate a stereotype who had no credentials as tied to any real synagogue or traceable human. Add: You've fallen for such noncriticality repeatedly before, Joe, it's high time you began to pursue Truth Only.
With comparing the alleged resume provided by "Finkelstein" against public records, and with his erratic and ungrammatical neophyte grasp of Hebrew, primarily. Do you want me to look it up? Your link is fiction.
You seem to have no trouble trusting people who agree with you even if they provide lying resumes, so I don't know why you wouldn't trust someone who commits to pursue the truth at all costs. Oh wait, I do know a likely reason. Are you actually interested in evidence that the radio show is fiction starring a paid actor, or would you continue to quote it even if it were proven fictional without doubt? Truth, fren.
What do you propose for standards of objective proof other than "Joe says so"? Should I start raking you over the coals for the time you thought "sacrificing a kid" (chevre or goat in the source) meant human sacrifice, and doubled down on it? Or should we just agree that the truth is out there and we can infer the most reasonable explanation from the data?
I said I debunked it, and I proved that I debunked it, which was done by inference to the best explanation. I didn't say I had the smoking gun (though a criminal conviction for doing the same thing another time is usually pretty strong evidence).
Not even remotely. The source clearly wants to abolish all gods (elohim), but Christianity is about finding the one true God. Child sacrifice is thousands of years older than that, it's not in Judaism, it's what Abraham the father of faith was delivered from, and as usual the satanists use Jews as their human shields.
It is, OP is correct. Mel Gibson did a bit of research and came across the cult of Ba’al. You can call it the cult of Elohim, others call it cult of Moloch, same thing. https://www.bitchute.com/video/kR5YuEuZk2hx/
NOT Judaism.
Yep, is. Run along now, moishe. You think you’re the only ones who can read the Zohar and the Kabbalah?
Lol still not Judaism.
Cool, kill yourself. You’re not even pretending to be a real account.
Baalism is real and has infected religions such as Judaism but is easily distinguished from Rabbinical Judaism. Modern attempts to equate baalism with Yahwism, solely because Yahweh refuses to acknowledge others calling themselves by the title baal instead of him, is complete ignorance of the politics involved, treating opposition parties as a monolith. It's like saying Christians are satanists because satanists use anointing.
As I implied, those Jews and others who misuse Biblical text to practice baalism have their sin on their own heads. The rest are innocent of that and we should not judge the innocent with the guilty.
Removed by “spam filter.” Reword it to bypass.
Mel Gibson is a drunk retard who pandered to Nazis after losing his job.
Bullshit
My previous debunk demonstrated that there is no such Rabbi "Abe Finkelstein" and the tabloid radio show that interviewed someone under this name to obtain quotes like this was clearly using an actor paid to perpetuate a stereotype who had no credentials as tied to any real synagogue or traceable human. Add: You've fallen for such noncriticality repeatedly before, Joe, it's high time you began to pursue Truth Only.
You clearly proved this with... ?
Meanwhile, on the actual radio interview...
With comparing the alleged resume provided by "Finkelstein" against public records, and with his erratic and ungrammatical neophyte grasp of Hebrew, primarily. Do you want me to look it up? Your link is fiction.
You seem to have no trouble trusting people who agree with you even if they provide lying resumes, so I don't know why you wouldn't trust someone who commits to pursue the truth at all costs. Oh wait, I do know a likely reason. Are you actually interested in evidence that the radio show is fiction starring a paid actor, or would you continue to quote it even if it were proven fictional without doubt? Truth, fren.
You speak of truth as if you can offer proof of any, then you flip the script and call it "evidence".
Pix or it didn't happen.
Well, would you look at that, Joe, the previous debunk was in reply to your use of this same meme earlier this year!
u/Dregan_ya u/SicSemperTyrannis2
They expressed interest. Just being considerate.
What do you propose for standards of objective proof other than "Joe says so"? Should I start raking you over the coals for the time you thought "sacrificing a kid" (chevre or goat in the source) meant human sacrifice, and doubled down on it? Or should we just agree that the truth is out there and we can infer the most reasonable explanation from the data?
Asking for u to prove what you're saying and this is what u reply?
Get help
I said I debunked it, and I proved that I debunked it, which was done by inference to the best explanation. I didn't say I had the smoking gun (though a criminal conviction for doing the same thing another time is usually pretty strong evidence).
In addition to the debunk here are all the indexed times the same subject has come up before:
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12jJs8ioFd/can-anyone-tell-me-if-this-is-re/c
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/12jcvUxvpD/pastor-james-wickstrom-and-rabbi/c
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/13zMnQNmmF/rabbi-finkelstein-explains-how-t/c
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/15IETHFoGL/rabbi-abe-finkelstein-interview-/c
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15JAF0NTI0/dr-wickstrom-interviews-zionist-/c
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/16ZqmvxeYZ/1-hr-interview-with-rabi-finkels/c
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16aTQcC34r/the-reason-human-meat-is-found-i/c
https://communities.win/c/conspiracy/p/16an0oDBGn/warning-disturbing-child-confirm/c
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/16an0oDBGo/warning-disturbing-child-confirm/c
https://communities.win/c/SynagogueOfSatan/p/17s5tl2lDM/rabbi-finkelstein-admits-the-hol/c
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/17sibyqgrw/rabbi-abraham-finkelstein-shocki/c
This is peak schizo.
No, not even close. You do not know JG5 if you think this is the extent of how unbelievably stupid he is.
Can you decide what side you're on? You just told me to kill myself.
You’re all faggots, now quit with the low effort spam posts
Cope