What do you propose for standards of objective proof other than "Joe says so"? Should I start raking you over the coals for the time you thought "sacrificing a kid" (chevre or goat in the source) meant human sacrifice, and doubled down on it? Or should we just agree that the truth is out there and we can infer the most reasonable explanation from the data?
They expressed interest. Just being considerate.
What do you propose for standards of objective proof other than "Joe says so"? Should I start raking you over the coals for the time you thought "sacrificing a kid" (chevre or goat in the source) meant human sacrifice, and doubled down on it? Or should we just agree that the truth is out there and we can infer the most reasonable explanation from the data?