What do you propose for standards of objective proof other than "Joe says so"? Should I start raking you over the coals for the time you thought "sacrificing a kid" (chevre or goat in the source) meant human sacrifice, and doubled down on it? Or should we just agree that the truth is out there and we can infer the most reasonable explanation from the data?
I said I debunked it, and I proved that I debunked it, which was done by inference to the best explanation. I didn't say I had the smoking gun (though a criminal conviction for doing the same thing another time is usually pretty strong evidence).
Well, would you look at that, Joe, the previous debunk was in reply to your use of this same meme earlier this year!
u/Dregan_ya u/SicSemperTyrannis2
They expressed interest. Just being considerate.
What do you propose for standards of objective proof other than "Joe says so"? Should I start raking you over the coals for the time you thought "sacrificing a kid" (chevre or goat in the source) meant human sacrifice, and doubled down on it? Or should we just agree that the truth is out there and we can infer the most reasonable explanation from the data?
Asking for u to prove what you're saying and this is what u reply?
Get help
I said I debunked it, and I proved that I debunked it, which was done by inference to the best explanation. I didn't say I had the smoking gun (though a criminal conviction for doing the same thing another time is usually pretty strong evidence).