The real terror tunnels
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
You seem to have no trouble trusting people who agree with you even if they provide lying resumes, so I don't know why you wouldn't trust someone who commits to pursue the truth at all costs. Oh wait, I do know a likely reason. Are you actually interested in evidence that the radio show is fiction starring a paid actor, or would you continue to quote it even if it were proven fictional without doubt? Truth, fren.
You speak of truth as if you can offer proof of any, then you flip the script and call it "evidence".
Pix or it didn't happen.
If you want me to search the archive and provide the debunk, which is obviously evidence in the category of inference to best explanation because a matter like this can't be proven fictional without doubt unless there is a confession or serious investigative work, then I will be happy to do so at my leisure. I don't keep a thumb-index file on this very silly subject. It might help me if you stop spamming the boards.
Conspiracies is a forum for pursuit of Truth. I routinely ask people if they are willing to pursue Truth at all costs. Those who do not answer are easily classified as uninterested. Students of Truth respect inference to the best explanation; the uninterested are usually illogical about it.
I said proof, not evidence. It can't be a debunk without proof, otherwise it's just heresay.
By what proof did you buy the actor's lies in the first place? I will be happy to meet the same standard of proof you use for the people you agree with.
Actor: "I'm Rabbi Abe Finkelstein with this resume."
Me: "There's no evidence a Rabbi Abe Finkelstein exists with his resume."
Same standard of proof applies to both.
You don't understand what any of the words you use mean.