Movie high level reveal.
(twitter.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
"What we believe will happen literally determines the future. Trust me bro."
Dude, this is demented. The future is God's providence and nothing else. What anyone does has no bearing on the future of the world. The world will end no matter what and Christ will come to judge all who ever lived.
Pro (forwards) videre (to see) implies a separation of the forwarding God and each being enabled to see within.
Suggested nihil-ism (nihilo, nothing) tempts a consenting nihil-ist to ignore everything forwarding through each ones sight.
Nothing contradicts providence.
Bearing trust implies carrying along bondage; which constricts ones movement, for which one needs to bear the consequences.
a) What if Christ implies matter wielding will?
b) What if christen - "to anoint" implies the coming into being of each anointed one, wielding free will of choice among each other?
c) What if Christ implies each ones living sentence from beginning (inception) towards end (death)? Living in-between origin and outcome requires adaptation by choice, right?
Zzz, how convenient for you.
a) Catchphrase; truther influencer; movie trailer aka hook; line and sinker.
b) Premise: forming a collective consciousness to make a difference. Well...joining a collective destroys each different being, which is called homogenization aka a jewish suggestion mixing gentile consent together to equalize differences aka to heal the world by bringing together (tikkun olam).
c) Notice that the child next to the alleged pederast is operating a ball/baal to manipulate time. That's circular reasoning within the minds of consenting gentiles being freely manipulated, into any which direction, by jewish suggestions from outside.
d) Inception; life; death do not represent past; present; future...but each ones living PRESENCE carried within a moving nature.
Sleight of hand: "time is of the essence"...esse implies being, hence if a being ignores its own presence for suggested states (past; present; future), then those suggesting it can "stem the tide of time" by manipulating all "three" states "one" ignores about time/tīdi/da aka to divide/dwo - "two".
There can be only one, hence the other alleged pederast quote: "energy cannot be created or destroyed"...
And it's not energy. EVERYTHING IS BEING!!!!!
a) Being implies BE-IN...an internal separation.
b) IS implies WAS from the perspective of each being, since if a being IS, then it WAS coming into being before. Aka if life; then inception thereof...an energetic transfer.
Any suggested IS tempts one to ignore all perceivable WAS. Why? Because if a being holds onto suggested; then it ignores that perceivable moves.
c) Notice your use of "not" and "being" aka "to be or not to be"...a Shakespeare play within which Hamlet contemplates suicide, used by few to tempt many into consenting to nihil-ism.
Not contradicts being...contradiction can only exist within one being by turning against (contra) another being.
d) Instead of proclaiming what is not energy...ask yourself what energizes "nothing"?
e) Energy/energos/ergon - "active; work"...only if work was active, can each being react by working.
As for the opposite of work...idle/idol. That's ones ignorance of all working for idolizing employment to another, hence employing ones mind to hold onto a job offer.
Job implies "piece of work; something to be done" aka a partial within whole, not the whole work.
f) Everything aka ever/aiw - "vital force; life" + thing/tenk - "to stretch", hence all stretching (inception towards death) each one (life)...a process of vitalization by animation.
Job was b.c. "behold I make EVERYTHING anew!!!" Ad
Make/magic/mason/match/mingle/mongrel/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit"... it's ones consent taking the suggested "job" which makes the magic happen, hence behold implying "being holding onto".
Everything moves, so if a being holds onto another ones suggestion, then everything (perceivable) is being ignored for nothing (suggested), with nothing representing ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of perceivable for suggested.
In short: to make implies putting together; to be implies as partial within separation of whole.
Welp whatever l,we are all individualized aspects of the Father trying to make our way back to the Garden.
Hint it cannot be done alone. God has thoughts for us that take more than one person to congniz3. And life pro tip. Salvation take a minimum of 12!!!( not always 12 but always in multiples of 12.
Stick that in your computer
I implies one taking possession of self, while ignoring moving potential.
WE implies one joining others by holding onto suggested pluralism, while ignoring that all separates each one from one another.
I and WE cannot be all; since I implies you, and we implies they. One cannot take possession of self (I) or join others (we) without establishing a division (in-divi-dual) aka a conflict of reason (I vs you + we vs them).
Entirety (motion; father) > partition (momentum; mother) > aspect (matter; child).
a) MAKE implies the magic few are utilizing to tempt many together.
b) OUR implies both joining others and taking possession.
c) WAY implies being (life) moved (inception towards death) across the only way, hence in (inception) and out (death) of origin.
d) It's the only way (process of dying) which BACKS each wanderer (living). Motion implies the inspiring foundation at the back of resisting matter, yet also the ongoing temptation to ignore resisting.
e) Garden/gher - "to grasp" implies ones free will of choice gardening whatever one chooses to grow, while struggling with the temptation to hold within ones grasp, and thereby choke the life out it.
To garden implies tending/tendere - "to stretch"...
f) Eden/edhen - "to delight" aka division (momentum) of light (motion), which the gardener (matter) has to tend...
A being implies ray (matter) within visible spectrum (momentum) of light (motion). If one stretches the ray/race/radius, then one feels de-lighted, hence within the garden of eden.
https://genius.com/Frankie-vaughan-the-garden-of-eden-lyrics
A hint implies a suggestion bringing to mind, which tempts one to ignore that all perceivable moves through ones mind, which in return allows ones mind to respond to being brought.
a) All does so that each being can be..."cannot" implies a suggested distraction thereof.
b) Alone implies all(in)one aka all forwarding one, and each one being forwarded within all.
c) Few tempt many together by tricking each to feel "alone", hence feel separated from one another. Many together in return permit few to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
A chosen one stands alone, and each chosen one resists being collectivized together.
To think implies processing input for expression, hence a separation. It's during that perceivable procession that one gets tempted to hold onto suggested input.
Holding onto contradicts thinking; corrupts memory; conceals mind from perceivable input, and confines free will of choice by binding self to suggested input, shaped by another.
a) More than one contradicts God. There can be only one.
b) US implies ones consent to suggested pluralism; TAKE implies ones consent taking a suggestion; COGNIZE implies perceiving (gnoscere) together (co)...a contradiction of all perceivable separating each ones perception from one another.
You are being tricked into trying to puzzle input together aka trying to stick together that which God sets apart. That's tikkun olam, that's you being judaized to destroy yourself and others.
Working together contradicts work (energy) setting apart (force) internally.
If God moves; then movement implies minds being moved apart from one another, hence each one being enabled to mentally process all input.
Having a mind implies "amend" aka to supply (inception towards death) a defect (life).
Salva (to save) tion (action)...action cannot be saved. Action gives (inception) and takes (death) reactions (life).
"Salvation is mine, says the lord" implies action saving reactions, hence no temporary reaction can be wasted within ongoing action.
Save/sol - "whole"...being implies partial within whole. Few suggest many to seek salvation, which tempts partials back into whole.
Think more like the apostles than milk
a) Thinking alike implies homogenization of thought aka consent by many to suggested information by few. Thinking apart implies all perceivable inspiration moving through each ones perception.
b) Apostle/apostellein - "to send away" implies each being send (life) away (inception towards death) through separation.
Few suggest apostles as messengers carrying a message (mess-ianic-age) to many, which in return tempts many to collectivize within church-masses, while ignoring the body of each christened (annointed) being set apart from one another.
Message/messianic/messiah/mashiah - "anointed".
Sleight of hand: "don't shoot the messenger" ...messenger (inception towards death) sending message (life) + shoot (thrust forwards; discharge).
Living within the process of dying requires one to re-charge during dis (inception towards death) charge (life).
In short...apostles artificially tempt masses together (homogenize); nature separates critics from one another.
Based and Law-of-One-Pilled
Your body that manifests your thoughts are made of substance. What is food?
Food changes the type of thinking. If you eat junk food you have junk thinking.
Uh.. no.
I will admit there is something to a self fulfilling prophecy, but not like that. One can sabotage what they have control over ( thus a president can have a greater effect than an average Joe). Enough people of like mind can have a profound effect, but the ones with cool heads can profit greatly from them
Imagine John Lennon's song of that title, and imagine waking up and there's no such thing as money. Imagine The Will to Power eroding down to cooperation for the sake of the survival of the race. I think this post correctly points out that if all of us – or enough of us – wanted this and could visualize it enough to agree on the details, it would happen.
You correctly point out that such a thing within our current reality is nearly unimaginable. We are a flawed species and letting a few dominant players play us to the detriment of all.
a) Image/imitari - "to copy, imitate" implies the artificial representation of nature.
b) Describing ones imagination implies a division (de) of scripture (scrib)...that's the written artifice distracting from the moving nature. Before one can describe imagination to others; one inscribes images into self by consenting to the suggested information by others.
It's ones consent to John Lennon's suggestion, which permits another to shape ones imagination. John Lennon and the Beatles were directed to enact jewish pop-music for popular appeal among gentile imagination.
Or one takes the "to copy, imitate" a bit more litteral and views the whole "Imagine all thr people" as a way of telling us this is how the peaceful world civilization in being constructed.
They just copy and imagine al the people. Living wonderfull/complacent with each other.
a) Peace/piece implies each partial (one) within whole (all) separated from one another.
b) There cannot be "all the people"...only each one person within all. If one accumulates "all" the people together, there's still the ongoing natural order separating each person from one another before the choice to accumulate together can be made.
c) Imagination implies IMAGE (imagi) of NATIVE (nat) within ACTION (ion).
Action implies all perceivable; native implies each ones perception...image implies the suggestion of another tempting one to ignore perception.
d) One cannot imagine all, because all separates each one from one another, which allows ones sight to see moving differences aka perceivable inspiration.
e) An image/picture implies a "captured moment"...perceivable momentum (inception towards death) cannot be held onto by ones perception (life). Matter cannot hold onto motion...others suggest the image of matter to distract one from being moved.
Example...if one sees ones child, while remembering/imagining the birth of the child, then one ignores the perceivable child (reality) for a suggested image of birth (fiction).
Remembering represents a misappropriation of memory, which the happy merchant of temptation shaped into an embezzlement scheme.
Prophecy aka pro (forwards) bha (to speak) implies a) speaking words while being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within sound, and b) that another outside of self suggested the language one uses to speak words forwards.
As for fulfilling...all implies full, each one (life) within implies getting filled (inception) and drained (death). Self implies the intercourse in-between each one being moved forwards and apart from one another.
Control implies "rolled together", hence few gaining control over by sabotaging many to willingly stand under aka letting themselves be controlled.
To preside over implies a submission under by those allowing others to preside over them. In this case...the shirking of response-ability (choice) by voting representative choices aka chosen ones over ones choice.
Nature implies cause; each being within implies effect...each being to one another implies "affection". If one allows self to be affected by another, then one ignores cause, which implies deadly effects for ones living being.
Effect implies "execution or completion of an act" aka nature enacting (inception towards death) the executing completion of each reacting sentence (life).
Tempting enough people together increases the potential for the complete execution of each person within. A like mind implies a hive mind aka a gentile mind used as a jewish toilet for the accumulation of constipation.
Nature sets each mind apart from one another to allow mental expression outwards during spiritual impression inwards.
Holding onto suggested information constipates: adapting to perceivable inspiration releases constipation.