Movie high level reveal.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Imagine John Lennon's song of that title, and imagine waking up and there's no such thing as money. Imagine The Will to Power eroding down to cooperation for the sake of the survival of the race. I think this post correctly points out that if all of us – or enough of us – wanted this and could visualize it enough to agree on the details, it would happen.
You correctly point out that such a thing within our current reality is nearly unimaginable. We are a flawed species and letting a few dominant players play us to the detriment of all.
a) Image/imitari - "to copy, imitate" implies the artificial representation of nature.
b) Describing ones imagination implies a division (de) of scripture (scrib)...that's the written artifice distracting from the moving nature. Before one can describe imagination to others; one inscribes images into self by consenting to the suggested information by others.
It's ones consent to John Lennon's suggestion, which permits another to shape ones imagination. John Lennon and the Beatles were directed to enact jewish pop-music for popular appeal among gentile imagination.
Or one takes the "to copy, imitate" a bit more litteral and views the whole "Imagine all thr people" as a way of telling us this is how the peaceful world civilization in being constructed.
They just copy and imagine al the people. Living wonderfull/complacent with each other.
a) Peace/piece implies each partial (one) within whole (all) separated from one another.
b) There cannot be "all the people"...only each one person within all. If one accumulates "all" the people together, there's still the ongoing natural order separating each person from one another before the choice to accumulate together can be made.
c) Imagination implies IMAGE (imagi) of NATIVE (nat) within ACTION (ion).
Action implies all perceivable; native implies each ones perception...image implies the suggestion of another tempting one to ignore perception.
d) One cannot imagine all, because all separates each one from one another, which allows ones sight to see moving differences aka perceivable inspiration.
e) An image/picture implies a "captured moment"...perceivable momentum (inception towards death) cannot be held onto by ones perception (life). Matter cannot hold onto motion...others suggest the image of matter to distract one from being moved.
Example...if one sees ones child, while remembering/imagining the birth of the child, then one ignores the perceivable child (reality) for a suggested image of birth (fiction).
Remembering represents a misappropriation of memory, which the happy merchant of temptation shaped into an embezzlement scheme.