I was banned from patriots.win for pointing out a political figure's (Jewish) background.
(Jewish) power has such control over the national dialogue AND methods of communication that even referencing a political figure's connections to (Jewish) heritage results in a ban. Think about that. Merely stating facts ends the conversation and results in permanent ban - from right-wing conservatives! NOT from woke liberals!
This is coming from Patriots.win, the SAME group that left reddit.com over censorship - now they enact tyrannical censorship at even the reference or HINT of (Jewish) power.
Why is this? Probably because the MODs are Jewish. Perhaps because Patriots.win is run by Israeli interests. This is telling example of the extend that (Jewish) power reaches to and it's ability to dominate the dialogue.
First time eh? Welcome to the club. The Jews and the their goyim lackeys have managed to worm their way into being moderators.
They ban all these discussions to protect Trump's image but Trump doesn't even acknowledge their existence despite being the #1 Trump hangout on the internet (or #2 now, with Truth.social being #1 since the only reason people would join that is for Trump).
You can't possibly believe OP's claim? You KNOW something else was the cause.
Alright, I'll keep an open mind until evidence of the claims are presented.
That's a start, but OP won't be furnishing the evidence that matters, which is why he was actually banned.
moderators of the whole fucking earth !!
Anywhere where words have more influence than actions, Jews will control
You can always go back to reddit lol
Remember your Jew lore. Three things destroy Jews: garlic, Christianity, and sunlight.
Exposing someone as a Jew is the same as destroying them because, once exposed, they can no longer hide among other people and work their Kabbalah magic. Without any other way to sustain themselves (because they cannot "stoop" to physical labour) they whither and crumble to dust.
You're literally genociding them, you monster.
Same exact reason I was banned over a year ago. The website was taken over closer to two years ago now.
What's the rest of the story, fren? Most of the public ban logs refer to gayness or trollness and don't have your current account name. "Merely" often leaves out details; this is a forum that questions claims of "just minding my own business".
My backstory is wild too, so you don't have to answer, but trust needs to start somewhere.
^ zionist shill, don’t waste your time
See, u/Redsky?
Hey Graph, I thought you considered my position a bit more moderate than that. It's kingdom of Jesus Christ, first and ultimately only, and I've inquired a long time whether either state, Israel or America, will survive until then. No firm answer. Seems like they both might roll into Jesus's kingdom if we're blessed, or either might go into exile for deserved reasons. Where'd you get the idea that I was Zionist? Does "Zionist" mean just that I ask people to follow PDW's "no racism" rule evenly, and so then I end up asking this the most about the races that get raced against the most? I know I can get a more detailed answer from you than from the drive-bys whose minds are made up.
When you told me and others that palestine isn’t a “real” country and you refuse to consider the possibility that israel is genociding them.
When you banned me for calling attention to this reality.
When you told the forum that you’re a Shabbos goy who worships jews, etc etc
See, OP is about there being two sides to accusations.
Palestine wasn't a state of any kind for a long time since Syria Palaestina, 390. Until recently we could talk about it not being a nation just like the Holy See is not a nation but a nonmember observer state; but this year Palestine became a "nonmember observer state with extra condiments". But given that novelty and instability, it's simpler to use shorter words like nonnation.
I told you I was considering the possibility Israel is genociding them. I let you publish maxed-out articles on the subject. I believe I also told you that "genocide" is a weasel word invented by a Jewish lawyer that is doublespeak to mean whatever the speaker wants. One race-based meme counts as genocide. So I don't use the word lightly or really at all.
When I mod, no one is banned for calling attention to realities, facts, truths, or even opinions. They are banned for published behaviors that break the golden rule. Without reviewing the record, it was primarily your illogical misstatement that went far enough beyond the truth, without evidence (such as the above appears to be), plus your overt disrespect for our rights to present you contextualizing evidence. (If you think a mod misbehaved you need to appeal cognizably instead of complain vaporously.) If you keep calling me Zionist without either defining your term or pointing to things I've actually done, that's illogical, and as long as one don't realize and continues doing such at honor-code forums, one gets disciplined.
I tell everyone I worship exactly one Jew. That has shut up everyone; nobody takes that one on directly. If Jesus is Jewish, we worship a Jew; if he isn't, then we have no right to be called real Jews either and other claimants for the title arise.
I never said I was a shabbos goy, I get accused of being Jewish more often than being goyish. What I do (didn't I just say) is to defend the biggest board's big rule "no racism", and then for some reason my defense ends up disproportionately in favor of those races that people are racist against the most. (I could reaffirm No racism against Afrikaners or Zulus! but there's not reason to, is there?) But, having discovered that "racism" is a weasel word coopted and popularized (not invented) by a Jewish doctor that is doublespeak to mean whatever the speaker wants, I am getting away from using that word too. Instead we can speak of not punishing the innocent with the guilty, which has shut up everyone.
TLDR: If you don't have (a) a definition of Zionism and (b) a proof that I have said things that meet the definition, there's more to the story.
He can't.
Just like "genocide." As he uses it it's nothing but a weasel word; there's certainly no intellect involved when he uses either.
He's just upset his family picks fights they lose.
Perfect example of your zionist bias in the first sentence, thanks for making it so easy for me and obvious for everyone else:
The fact that you think this is a valid argument is laughable. Israel didn’t exist until 70 years ago. Whatever you think of Palestinian statehood, their claim to the land is undeniably stronger than some hook nosed European terrorists who only started squatting there yesterday.
You disqualify yourself from being capable of talking about bias, with just these words quoted here.
You have nothing but bias; no rationale, no reason. You lack the sense you were born with. Hopefully that remains confined to just this one issue, of which you have no understanding.
(Yap Emoji)
"States" are relatively easily cognizable entities. Why yes, Israel wasn't a state of any kind for a long time since Judaea Province, 135. But peoples are much harder to cognize, and the chains from Judaea to Israel, and from Palaestina to Palestine, are both hotly contested and so I don't make presumptions about them or their claims as you do.
It may well be that a limited-recognition member state disacknowledged by 28/193 members has certain disadvantages over an observer nonmember state disacknowledged by 47/193 members. A member state can get judged by the ICC, for instance. There's a good case for moral equivalence, which is what I've sought to uphold. I don't know how to judge land claims without both parties agreeing to a mediator or to war.
Two questions again. What is Zionism? How have I met your definition? You seem to be defining Zionism and land claims along lines as subjective as those people, whom I name, who defined "racism" (Hirschfeld) and "genocide" (Lemkin).
Zionism is ethnonationalism for jews (aka Ashke-nazism), and yes you have met the definition because you’ve explicitly supported the ethnic cleansing/genocide of the locals
Thanks; I was going to respond out of good faith; but Jewish Shills / IDF agents do not argue out of good faith.
Well, I too extend good faith, even to folks who agree with an anon who calls out Zionism without evidence, and disagree with an anon who expresses interest in your story (while he admits that trust is complex).
The reason I asked is that if you were truly "banned from patriots.win for pointing out a political figure's (Jewish) background", I would stand with you by writing the mods on your behalf because I don't believe they should do that. I also pointed out that, given the evidence, knowing that many who speak that way have more to the story, I'd be interested in helping unravel additional parts to see if there could be further communal learning about what happened.
It's Conspiracies, so anything can happen. I told you my reasons, if you want to complain without actively seeking remedy then I offered in good faith. Looks like there isn't yet a post saying that The Forward said last year David O. Sacks was "Jewish ... born into a Jewish family", so as a polite background article it seems ripe for posting. Would you like me to do it to prove it can be done, or do you think it should be done in meme language, or would you like something else done with your complaint?
Don’t let me stop you, but I think you’ll find it entirely unsatisfying to discuss zionism with this guy - he’s a walking caricature of the “ jEsUS wAs a JeW” line of distraction
"Is"
Which political figure?
Trump names David Sacks (Jewish) as crypto and AI czar
The people who pay for this site, to astroturf the right, are pro-Jewish.
The fuck? As far as I was aware, this is one of the bigger social media sites that allow anti-Jew social content.
Individual subs have been subverted (like the_donald), but that's different than the whole site being subverted.
There have been threads about it in the past...this place has no advertising, popped up as the replacement for The_Donald once it was banned from Reddit (which is astroturf central). It's some tech oligarchs, and it's not that they are literal Jews as I understand it. I don't have time at the moment to go find the old threads.
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. If it's free, you're the product.
They didn't leave reddit because of censorship.
They left reddit to form their own impervious cult bubble.
PDW is owned by Michael Flynn. AKA: "Q"
Your God is Jewish. When will you hypocrites ever learn.
Your Mom is Jew-ish.
No. She was a Jewish woman. Exactly like Mary. Next logical step?
See, I was right. You’re just another typical Synagouge of Satan clown that will rot in hell for eternity. Don’t talk about things you don’t understand, Jew.
Jesus and I will be looking down on you… laughing. You are the satanist. Learn to appreciate your betters.
Jesus hates Jews, including you. No one takes you seriously and no one will miss you when you die.
Lmao.
Jesus was king of the jews
Faggot
Jesus loves Jews. He hates golem, like the Romans, who killed him. Like you!
The Jew-ish brainlet says I’m like roman! This is why your kind has been kicked out of 109 countries. You’re too retarded to go ((unnoticed)) and your tribe’s end is nigh. Enjoy hell!
YAWN
We know. No one takes you seriously and no one will miss you when you die.
I am not sure why Christians worship a Jewish god. It is perplexing.
Do you think that God could choose His own race? because he literally said that He did
^This is your brain on zionism
Back to the tunnels Shlomo
I didnt downvote you. Here's a way to test if you are cursed for cursing Israel.
God promised to curse all who curse Israel. Would you agree that this is a fact?
9 He couched, he lay down as a lion, and as a great lion: who shall stir him up? Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee. Numbers chapter 24 KJV
13 If Balak would give me his house full of silver and gold, I cannot go beyond the commandment of the Lord, to do either good or bad of mine own mind; but what the Lord saith, that will I speak? KJV
You called me a zionist, i dont care, I'm just trying to save you from being under a curse, because I've been there. My problem is that people i love are under various judgements of the law, to my knowledge.
Sure Israel has not been accepting their King right now, but it doesn't mean that God changed his mind. When we hear from Jesus that God changed his mind, that will be that. As a former atheist, raised very scientifically in America, I know it sounds crazy but who cares. I'd rather tell people the truth.
If it sounds simple, and for the simple minded, that's because it is. You can read in the end of the first chapter of first Corinthians why. Very few intelligent people have been saved in this era we're in, right now.
It's extremely easy to humble yourself, alone and sincerely, and call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and admit that you don't think that He's real, or that he was resurrected; that's what I did. If He does not answer attempts of communication through various ways, then He is a liar, and i'm crazy; no big loss of your time.
You can't think straight.
If you're sincere, we could discuss this.
I'm not sure you're not just edgelord trolling though?