An accumulation of small changes that happen in a short time leads to large changes over a long time.
How is speciation determined
By whether or not the populations can interbreed. If they can interbreed they are the same species. If they can not interbreed they are separate species.
Such sub-speciation definitely happens - that's how we got the variety of animals with different traits within a species (for example all the subspecies of bears or dogs there are).
An accumulation of small changes that happen in a short time leads to large changes over a long time.
That's an assertion. Is there empirical evidence for that? Has anyone observed it? It's one thing to change color and thickness of the coat or the length of the beak, but it doesn't follow big complex changes which require simultaneous mutation of multiple interdependent systems of the organism are possible through the process of adaptation.
By whether or not the populations can interbreed. If they can interbreed they are the same species. If they can not interbreed they are separate species.
Horses and donkeys interbreed. Are they the same species? There are many examples of hybridization.
crazier than flat-earth is Israel. Israel confirms Jewish roots via a DNA test. That is literally an ethno-state. No other country in the world makes use of a DNA test for citizenship. This is why Israel is genocide the Palestinians - Jews want an ethno-state based upon DNA genetics (RACE).
Thats because DNA test's cant tell ethnicity, they dont even use them for native americans.
Israel, again is full of shit.
Ethnicity is a reflection of shared ancestry based on social and cultural practices. Ethnic groups may be linked by a religious affiliation, a shared linguistic heritage or a common geographical origin. Ethnicity cannot be detected by DNA, but there is sometimes an overlap with a person's genetic ancestry.
a) Impossible implies being within (choice) possibility (balance). Few suggest IM/IN as "not" to invert reality with fiction...same trick with "never" (nothing everything).
b) Suggested without tempts one to ignore being (perception) within (perceivable).
c) Latin magice - "sorcery" and magh - "to be able" implies being (life) enabled by source (inception towards death).
Few suggest sorcerer using magic to invert being magic within source...and many bind themselves by consent to such spell-craft.
d) Only nature admits (inception) and ejects (death) those living within. Few tempt many to admit suggestion by consent as to establish the inversion...denial of perception.
Let's do some magic...If I take a handful of EARTH; then I can hold it on the palm of my FLAT hand or in the cusp of my ROUND fist. Free will of choice makes this possible...yet I could also suggest everyone else to ignore earth in my grasp for earth outside of anyone's grasp...earth so large, that those on it can't even fathom its shape.
I can simply suggest them to reason against each other about the shape of earth...instead of them using earth as soil for seeds. Why? To plant impotence among others; which permits potential of self to grow without opposition.
The globe religion is what requires magical fantasy. Living on a spinning sphere where water sticks to it and its flying around at unimaginable speeds. It does not get any stupider than this.
It is. So is evolutionary theory and any origin story of the universe.
Evolution has been replicated in a laboratory. 1 species became 2.
Source?
And how does that prove macro-evolution? How is speciation determined, as how do they determine when they have 2 separate species?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory_experiments_of_speciation
An accumulation of small changes that happen in a short time leads to large changes over a long time.
By whether or not the populations can interbreed. If they can interbreed they are the same species. If they can not interbreed they are separate species.
Such sub-speciation definitely happens - that's how we got the variety of animals with different traits within a species (for example all the subspecies of bears or dogs there are).
That's an assertion. Is there empirical evidence for that? Has anyone observed it? It's one thing to change color and thickness of the coat or the length of the beak, but it doesn't follow big complex changes which require simultaneous mutation of multiple interdependent systems of the organism are possible through the process of adaptation.
Horses and donkeys interbreed. Are they the same species? There are many examples of hybridization.
crazier than flat-earth is Israel. Israel confirms Jewish roots via a DNA test. That is literally an ethno-state. No other country in the world makes use of a DNA test for citizenship. This is why Israel is genocide the Palestinians - Jews want an ethno-state based upon DNA genetics (RACE).
https://www.timesofisrael.com/rabbinate-dna-tests-seek-jewishness-in-the-blood-become-a-bone-of-contention/
How is that crazy? It’s the only way to have a country.
Thats because DNA test's cant tell ethnicity, they dont even use them for native americans.
Israel, again is full of shit.
Your definition is a communist hoax.
a) Impossible implies being within (choice) possibility (balance). Few suggest IM/IN as "not" to invert reality with fiction...same trick with "never" (nothing everything).
b) Suggested without tempts one to ignore being (perception) within (perceivable).
c) Latin magice - "sorcery" and magh - "to be able" implies being (life) enabled by source (inception towards death).
Few suggest sorcerer using magic to invert being magic within source...and many bind themselves by consent to such spell-craft.
d) Only nature admits (inception) and ejects (death) those living within. Few tempt many to admit suggestion by consent as to establish the inversion...denial of perception.
Let's do some magic...If I take a handful of EARTH; then I can hold it on the palm of my FLAT hand or in the cusp of my ROUND fist. Free will of choice makes this possible...yet I could also suggest everyone else to ignore earth in my grasp for earth outside of anyone's grasp...earth so large, that those on it can't even fathom its shape.
I can simply suggest them to reason against each other about the shape of earth...instead of them using earth as soil for seeds. Why? To plant impotence among others; which permits potential of self to grow without opposition.
Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Bay-city-rollers-you-made-me-believe-in-magic-lyrics (look at the cover).
Were talking about god here, he created everything.
Some would say he/she/it is the magic.
When a child opens his/her eyes...wasn't everything that can be seen already there for the child? What hasn't been "created" yet?
How could ones eyes see a creation...when everything already exists before one can see it?
How is nothing created? Where is nothing created? Who creates nothing? Why create nothing?
ABOUT (Greek butan) - "without"...how could anything within be without?
I'm not a F.E. guy, but it's a miracle either way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rlc_uaH-yM
nobody talks about flat earth more than you. maybe you're a closet believer? LOL
The globe religion is what requires magical fantasy. Living on a spinning sphere where water sticks to it and its flying around at unimaginable speeds. It does not get any stupider than this.
What is keeping the Sun in the sky?
Explain it without invoking magic.
You won't because you can't.
That is beyond human intelligence. Anyone who claims they know this is a moron, liar, or both.
So, magic.
Thank for proving my point.
LOL, are you claiming you know everything? If so you are a fool.
So it is a natural process?
No one can go and test it thus no one knows. Are you retarded?
So you admit that magic is a possible option.
Kek
Thanks for admitting you’re too brain damaged to be considered human.