Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

48
Just to put it all together about Kate Middleton's (turbo) cancer (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 1 year ago by Mad_King_Kalak 1 year ago by Mad_King_Kalak +48 / -0
42 comments download share
42 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (42)
sorted by:
▲ 17 ▼
– deleted 17 points 1 year ago +17 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Possibly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Dps1879 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

When we first wake up from Plato's cave we try to tell everyone it's just a movie. Only awake ones can hear you and they're already painfully aware.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– shillshot 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

This guy doesnt fuck socks

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– freedomlogic 2 points 1 year ago +3 / -1

Yea my thoughts also. Them releasing a photo of two random people and then claiming its will and kate. It has to be intentional.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Jacobin 8 points 1 year ago +10 / -2

I think the reason Charles and Kate are coming out with cancer stories is to make it appear more normal to their ‘subjects’ who are actually suffering from cancer due to the war being waged on them by the likes of the royal family.

If the royal family have cancer then no one will suspect them as being in cahoots with the engineers of cancer

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– llamatr0n 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Not one single British person would say "seems weird I have cancer, but at least Charles has it".

I swear people on here have never met real people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Jacobin 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think your understanding, or at least your description, of the psychological mechanisms of Psy Ops/propaganda is far too rudimentary here and takes no account of the subtlety and imperceptibility of the effects public figures have in shaping the minds of masses.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1075547020960465

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– llamatr0n 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

OK, I accept there might be more nuance

however

Most participants were male (55.2%), and White (79.4%)

The largest proportion of participants (18.5%) resided California.

Most respondents identified as Democrats (46.4%)

Thanks

Elizabeth L Cohen

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It's how people's subconsciousness works. It's not a rational proposition. This is how behaviors and ideas are normalized - by example of well-esteemed individuals in society. Remember when the Royal family all "took" the jabby jabs? Ads work that way too. Read Edward Bernays - Propaganda.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– allAheadFull 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I'm not sure that the "elites" plan on keeping as large of an administrative group as they currently have.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

^ There we go.

But hey wtf kind of shitty username is Jacobin? Are you some kind of communist?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jacobin 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No, my original name was Jacobites but I was banned from GAW forever so just changed it to Jacobin as similar sounding, assuming they were a similar outfit, before I had any idea who or what the jacobins really were

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Ok. Well if I remember correctly they were the original illuminati / commie foot soldiers, before communism was really a thing. There is also a far left magazine named Jacobin.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The Jacobins were the ones responsible for the reign of terror during the French Revolution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Jacobin 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

I have an unexplored pet hypothesis. The Jacobites and Jacobins were around at roughly the same time. Both are clearly named after Jacob (not James as history would have us believe). Jacob became Israel in the Bible so biblically speaking a Jacobite is the same thing as an Israelite, probably the same for jacobins.

The Jacobites went to war against the government to restore the rightful heir to the throne following the Glorious Revolution where Protestant Germanic monarchs were handed the crown of the United Kingdom rather than it being inherited by indigenous royalty. All part of the Protestant Reformation.

I’m sure there’s a much deeper, Jewish meaning to all of this because Christianity is the Jews revenge, but I can’t find the time or impetus to fathom it out

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

For Barruel, the final designs of the coalition of the philosophes, the Freemasons and the Illuminati were achieved by the Jacobins.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memoirs_Illustrating_the_History_of_Jacobinism

Christianity is the Jews revenge,

Wow you've been brainwashed into some nonsense. If it was "revenge" it was revenge against themselves by saying they killed Jesus Christ. That makes such little sense. If Jews were for Christianity, they would not have pushed out the Scofield bible to change it. Nor would they continue to attack true Christianity in all their media.

I don't know you, but I hope you get saved while there is time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That's my go to theory too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It's way too much logistics for that - every major public figure needs to feign a disease as an excuse and make official announcements, this would get ridiculous quickly. They have plenty of time to get to their bunkers without withdrawing from the public eye. They'll just quietly retreat the day before shtf and no one will even know. So I'd apply Occam's razor to that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jacobin 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They can use deepfakes and green screens to make it appear they are still where they claim to be, rather than hidden in their bunkers

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They could but it seems redundant. They need a couple of hours to get to their bunkers - why orchestrating an elaborate ruse adding more steps to the plan? Also, wouldn't having 100 clips of celebrities announcing cancers in a short timespan raise unwanted suspicion? Normies are dumb, but even they'll start asking wtf is going on?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jacobin 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No, I’m saying they could bypass ALL excuses for disappearing (such as fake diseases) because they could make it seem as though they are still here when in actual fact what we are shown on TV is things which are filmed in their bunkers using green screens and deepfakes.

The whole ‘I’ve got an incurable disease’ schtick is there to serve some other purpose, not as a getaway excuse.

I think we’re actually in ultimate agreement about the disease excuse

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– tittysprinkles24 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

Is this video real? Also. What happened to lady Rose pegging William ? Is that story gone now?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

WTF, I am not a royal watcher so that's some crazy shit right there to learn.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ShekelJa 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

we sure she didnt just get the saline shot like all the other kid fuckers?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 4 points 1 year ago +5 / -1

You never can be sure, but even kid fuckers like Gavin Newsom got the shot for real. Only the insiders, I mean the real insiders, which doesn't include royals (by marriage) were warned.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– americathegr888 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

I think this is the actual answer. One thing people often don't understand is that the jew contempt extends not only to people "on their side" but also to other jews as well, the jewish mindset is that if you can pull one over on someone, they're the idiot for being fooled and too trusting.

They don't tell every minion of theirs "Oh yeah this shit is poison we're lying" for multiple reasons, the main two of which are that telling people even if they're on your side is a leak risk, and because having those same "authority figures/celebrities" actually doing the thing that's fucking over everyone helps convince the masses to go along with it.

I'm sure Soros, Rothschilds etc were told not to take the poison gene therapy, but anyone below that rung, not a chance.

Further, some of them are actually ideologues to the point where even if they were warned, they would still take it just because they believe their own bullshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– americathegr888 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

She's basically the political equivalent of a reality TV celebrity, they aren't gonna tell her anything important IMO.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 2 points 1 year ago +3 / -1

I don't believe any eugenics family was dumb enough to take their own poison.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

If the royals were willing to 86 Princess Dianna when she became a liability, they will be more than willing to leave Kate to take the poison of her own devices.

It could just be cancer, but she's rather young really for non vax cancer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Yeah could be they are just not letting every new spouse into the inner circle. They are good at compartmentalizing.

Or it could be they are just normalizing cancer, and Kate will take a magical "anti-cancer" vaccine to cure this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DrMarmot 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

She looks a little clone-ish to me.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1
▲ 2 ▼
– Dps1879 2 points 1 year ago +3 / -1

The therapy made her jaw bone grow???

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– BlokeyMcBlokeFace 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

If she lost weight in the face, then it could appear like that.

Just saying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Dps1879 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Ok maybe flab but not bone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– rentfreeclimateact 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I respect your ability to notice things like this and i am the same, so don't take it the wrong way when i say i see eight (8) stripes.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - ptjlq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy