Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

48
Just to put it all together about Kate Middleton's (turbo) cancer (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 1 year ago by Mad_King_Kalak 1 year ago by Mad_King_Kalak +48 / -0
42 comments download share
42 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– Jacobin 8 points 1 year ago +10 / -2

I think the reason Charles and Kate are coming out with cancer stories is to make it appear more normal to their ‘subjects’ who are actually suffering from cancer due to the war being waged on them by the likes of the royal family.

If the royal family have cancer then no one will suspect them as being in cahoots with the engineers of cancer

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– llamatr0n 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

Not one single British person would say "seems weird I have cancer, but at least Charles has it".

I swear people on here have never met real people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Jacobin 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I think your understanding, or at least your description, of the psychological mechanisms of Psy Ops/propaganda is far too rudimentary here and takes no account of the subtlety and imperceptibility of the effects public figures have in shaping the minds of masses.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1075547020960465

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– llamatr0n 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

OK, I accept there might be more nuance

however

Most participants were male (55.2%), and White (79.4%)

The largest proportion of participants (18.5%) resided California.

Most respondents identified as Democrats (46.4%)

Thanks

Elizabeth L Cohen

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It's how people's subconsciousness works. It's not a rational proposition. This is how behaviors and ideas are normalized - by example of well-esteemed individuals in society. Remember when the Royal family all "took" the jabby jabs? Ads work that way too. Read Edward Bernays - Propaganda.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– allAheadFull 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I'm not sure that the "elites" plan on keeping as large of an administrative group as they currently have.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

^ There we go.

But hey wtf kind of shitty username is Jacobin? Are you some kind of communist?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jacobin 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

No, my original name was Jacobites but I was banned from GAW forever so just changed it to Jacobin as similar sounding, assuming they were a similar outfit, before I had any idea who or what the jacobins really were

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TurnToGodNow 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Ok. Well if I remember correctly they were the original illuminati / commie foot soldiers, before communism was really a thing. There is also a far left magazine named Jacobin.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak [S] 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The Jacobins were the ones responsible for the reign of terror during the French Revolution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Jacobin 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

I have an unexplored pet hypothesis. The Jacobites and Jacobins were around at roughly the same time. Both are clearly named after Jacob (not James as history would have us believe). Jacob became Israel in the Bible so biblically speaking a Jacobite is the same thing as an Israelite, probably the same for jacobins.

The Jacobites went to war against the government to restore the rightful heir to the throne following the Glorious Revolution where Protestant Germanic monarchs were handed the crown of the United Kingdom rather than it being inherited by indigenous royalty. All part of the Protestant Reformation.

I’m sure there’s a much deeper, Jewish meaning to all of this because Christianity is the Jews revenge, but I can’t find the time or impetus to fathom it out

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That's my go to theory too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SmithW1984 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

It's way too much logistics for that - every major public figure needs to feign a disease as an excuse and make official announcements, this would get ridiculous quickly. They have plenty of time to get to their bunkers without withdrawing from the public eye. They'll just quietly retreat the day before shtf and no one will even know. So I'd apply Occam's razor to that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jacobin 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

They can use deepfakes and green screens to make it appear they are still where they claim to be, rather than hidden in their bunkers

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy