I’m being honest here. I wouldn’t put it past Jews to create bombs that can eradicate whole cities and make the land infertile because they’re Jews but are nukes actually real? If so why haven’t they been used since Nagasaki?
Comments (53)
sorted by:
the science behind the way nuclear bombs function doesn't add up. Read "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax" by Akio Nakatani. It's a shortish book and it's available as a free pdf on Libgen and Internet Archive. It details why Nuclear bombs are ridiculous. NOT nuclear energy, that's very real.
Then there's another book "Hiroshima Revisited: The evidence that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by fire bombing and mustard gas" where the argument is made that the evidence for post nuclear detonation didn't exist in those places. The after effects, on the land and on the injured and dead people, are more realistically attributable to fire bombing (napalm) and mustard gas.
Then there are various videos on the internet exploring the various nuclear detonations propaganda films we are familiar with. They are propaganda films, yet we accept them as genuine without skepticism for some reason. Cast a skeptical eye on them and many flaws become apparent. The most ridiculous is the hilarious South African one. It's so obviously fake. They never had Nukes, but officially we are told they did - no nuclear power denied their claim.
Lol, you think nuclear energy is real but nuclear bombs are not?
They are a pretty similar process, one involves a very low yield of radioactive material, the other needs a high purity which is where I can cue in the uranium enrichment plant in piketon ohio which actually created most of the weapons grade materials during the beginning of the programming. Ironically I didnt know what was going on there, and had no idea they were making weapons grade uranium. There is just a sign on the highway that says "Atomic Plant".
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/what-is-the-difference-between-the-nuclear-material-in-a-bomb-versus-a-reactor
It blows my mind you believe in one, but think the other is fake.
The math showed it was possible, and then after enough experimenting I believe they made it happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZAFntUFx8I
I also believe things like russia's deadhand system are real as well. I have very little doubt actually.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Hand
Meh anyway, I wont be posting much for a few days, lightning blew up my modem, router, and computer. I seen a spark of electricity jumping cat 5 cables when it happened :(. Posting from phone internet, so say hi to the people tappin my phone.
My sources are years of chemistry and physics. Again have you guys ever cracked open a book ^^.
Oh yeah, or the fact that were using computers to type to each other across metal lines with plastic keyboards says alot too.
Explosions are about the speed at which all the power can be released.
Nuclear reactions, like thermite reactions - likely for analogous reasons, are slow and do not happen all at once.
Like the article said, trillions upon trillions of explosions happen in a m/s. It might as well be at once to the blink of a human eye.
What I dont get, is it would take literal tons and tons and tons of tnt to get the same effect. So how do you guys suggest they did it?
They didn’t. They used cheap camera tricks / television fear porn propaganda and conventional firebombing.
There are large bombs, granted - but there are no “doomsday devices” that can destroy the world (or even cities). No M.A.D. It’s all hollywood.
Please see the documentary “Dr. Strangelove” for more details.
You're a retarded troll.
Here's the very strange truth and, strangely, you'll see "conspiracy theorists" only buy into, well, anything else.
On the one hand, nukes are indeed real and have been used many, many times. I'm not talking about any testing, but in actual hostilities. It's happened many dozens of times, maybe hundreds by this point. Four tactical nukes were used between the end of May and the 9th of June in Ukraine.
How could they possibly disguise it? They just tell people they were some type of conventional weapon, or accident (Beirut Port), or just ignored completely. It's been a real eye-opener for me to see how very little people can figure out for themselves when they're not told.
On the flip side, nukes were faked for the first few years. The Trinity test, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Operation Crossroads (the Bikini Atoll tests) were all faked. Somewhere along the line, though, they did actually achieve the necessary tech.
I suspect those first episodes were faked because "They" needed nukes as part of Their Grand Narrative of the end of World War II and the start of the Cold War. People needed to be kept in fear for their very lives.
It worked, of course, and here we are 3/4 of a century later and people are still shitting their pants over "WW3 going nuclear". Zero percent have any recognition that it already has. If you're wondering, the answer is yes, the world does seem very surreal to me.
Do any of you guys actually read or anything lol?
Before I get to snarky, ill give your video a shot, if buddy starts saying dumb shit im out.
Well I can tell you the video you linked is bunk. A video by what sounds like a 20 year old who hasnt learned enough about anything to really know.
Made it past buddy trying to say that because the city looked like it was carpet bombed, it must have been.
Gave up when he tried to use the fact that they may have overplayed the bombs destructive power, that may be true. But no one said it was fake...
Doesnt mention the shadows, doesnt mention the people who died from radiation other than saying they may have "over exaggerated" how many people died. At least he does mention the fact they detonated the bombs mid air, doesnt mention they did it assuming most of the nuclear fallout would go into the atmosphere, it didnt.
https://www.hiroshimapeacemedia.jp/?p=83796
Again I point out as i did in a comment a min ago.
That was mostly because of the package. The actual amount of nuclear material in there was far less.
So what they are using special tnt or something? How can they pack such huge fucking explosions into such little material if it wasnt ripping the basic forces of the universe apart. Are you guys going to tell me thats fake too when they can literally smash these particles in gel and we can see the patterns that are left behind. Its hard for me to look at that and think that some higher power doesnt exist, but it sure as fuck aint a Abrahamic god.
https://archive.is/20230620141513/https://medium.com/swlh/particle-detectors-calorimetry-b7d9c3998dd9
Have you guys seen nuclear explosions before?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWQ5KnP2W3k
These are not normal explosions.
This was a giant waste of time for me lol. If the math didnt check out that would be one thing, but let alone the hundreds of thousands of people involved in creating and experimenting with them. Like jesus christ T_T.
Crrow777 ep507 - The Radioactive Wastelands that Never Were. No Radiation nor Cancer In Survivors Nagasaki. Plant Life Thriving In Chernobyl. https://scored.co/c/Conspiracies/p/16bPH0ovDP/crrow777-ep507--the-radioactive-/c
It is awesome that people can critically think and scrutinize the government indoctrination shoved down our throat from a young age. And make their own conclusions without taking a corrupt scientist's word for it. We gotta reexamine everything. FE is one. Satellites are in the atmosphere on balloons is another. Mars landing (fake). Holocaust. Etc... History is not what we are told.
I hear it may be worms or something parasitic. That's why medicine doesn't really work and ivermectin or something similar kills the parasites. Excellent to bring up germ theory, there are so many lies, I think our early ancestors were way smarter than modern man. Not sure but the accuracy of the pyramids, megolathic structures, aviation (before the wright brothers), harvesting electricity from atmosphere, etc. So many things suppressed, intentionally destroyed, or rewritten to keep the narrative.
Actually the Germans invented it (They actually invented a whole lot of things during WW2). The Jews just put a Jewish name on its invention. Like they always do.
Also, I second Primate98. He is 100% spot on.
The same reason we havent been to the moon since then. It didnt happen to begin with.
A “doomsday device” which can destroy the entire world?
Does that sound real to you, or rather like bad scifi tripe from a 50’s serial?
The only place nuclear weapons have ever existed is on television.
See the documentary “Dr. Strangelove” for more details.
I am sure in the 1600's they thought radio tv and electronics was impossible and the work of satan too.
Perhaps they are (the work of satan). They are primarily used to deceive/lie en masse, after all.
As for me, i don’t favor superstition and am of the “jack sparrow philosophy” camp. There is what a man can do, and what a man can’t do. What he can do, he does. That’s the reason we don’t ever see nuclear weapons used except on television (in preposterously hokey and obviously fake clips).
If it were possible - we would do it ... frequently! It isn’t possible, which is why we don’t!
I think they are trying to keep people away from the Gospel. Saying man can destroy the world with a bomb demeans the revelation that God will pour out his wrath in the end, which is the real destruction of the world. Older I get, the more I realize that evil is perverting God's word and deceiving the masses.
Also Hiroshima and Nagasaki
They were simply firebombed to (partial) oblivion.
One single firebomb?
No. A great many.
America bombed the absolute shit out of japan, and generally american students are not well educated on the breadth of mass murder and savagery employed.
How many bombs were dropped on Hiroshima? On Nagasaki? What day?
War is easier dumbass. It would be so easy to roll into Russia and regime change. They've done it everywhere else without nukes.
Hahaha. No, but that's the point. They cannot fight Russia directly because of nukes. So they escalate it. Until who knows?
At what point do you doubt if nukes are real. It's autism.
If nukes weren't real why not war directly? It's at that stage. Except there are nukes.
How do you explain the shadows that happened at ground zero?
https://www.livescience.com/nuclear-bomb-wwii-shadows.html
Can someone actually show me shadows made from non nuclear explosions? Doesnt sound like its possible, but i could always be wrong.
I tried to google.
Shadows left by explosions, but typical explosions dont get hot enough to bleach everything in its path with ionized gamma radiation.
:Shrugs:
Asking someone else if they can find one, and that would definitely help your case. But dont. I dont care.
Nuclear holocaust doesnt scare me.
But I know enough of human nature to understand this is what happens when hate and logic rule law and order, and not human love or emotion.
Yeah I believe both sides are ready to pull the trigger if they think the end is near if they truly have that capability lmao.
hahahha
You made an ad homo attack. It was full of glowie nigger talk. Nukes aren't for real, because you don't believe in them. Absurd.
We aren't at war right now. Why? Seriously why. It would be easier than your bullshit conjecture. Where lot's of people write fantasy and fiction. They get paid to oppose any narrative. But you've got to be stupid if you think they are simply a what if.
Simple fact this warfare currently, it would be easier to destroy Russia's army directly rather than getting idiots killed. Why aren't they. It would be much simpler to fight that war conventionally. They want too, could. What's stopping them eliminating Russia's troops in the Ukraine, and destroying its military? You fucking spud. Who cares about WW2. Right now. The argument look.
Well it triggers a chain of events, where China could enter and a few others. But it would be a conventional war, according to yourself. Why not, if nukes aren't real? Come on. It would be easier, much easier.
So yea monkey you're full of shit. Completely retarded. They obviously exist, no questions.
The simple fact we aren't in a direct war with Russia proves it. Proves undeniably, there are nukes not bullshit. It would be simpler as Nato and collation to fight that war if nukes weren't involved. It would be the gulf war, Iraq the first time, it invaded Kuwait. That war would be simple. Tactically destroy military. Except you dumb idiot, there are nukes.
I don't read about niggers. They write fallacies. Once upon a time when civilization was hunter gathers, when it all came out of Africa. Before it had the nukes, and reminisce; Nukes aren't real.
Your argument is conjecture. Mine on the other hand is obvious.
So in your opinion Japanese people are too stupid to know if they were hit with 1 bomb of multiple bombs? Seems rather retarded.
lol you do all the disinfo dontcha?
Ask a Japanese person.
Nuclear bombs are real, but not the way they are portrayed.
They release an incredible amount of energy, but very little pressure (relatively speaking). The pressure exerted by the explosion is proportional to 1/Radius^3, which means that the pressure in the first few inches of the explosion very rapidly dissipates. The explosion is more akin to a lightening strike than rapidly expanding gasses from TNT.
Dynamite or a thermobaric bomb exerts a magnitude more force than a nuclear explosion does, just a short distance from the center of the explosion.
The reality is that precision guided munitions have made nuclear weapons obsolete.
a) BOMB (explosive projectile) + NUCLEUS (nut) aka seed.
b) Fat Man & Little Boy aka pedophilia; sodomy.