I’m being honest here. I wouldn’t put it past Jews to create bombs that can eradicate whole cities and make the land infertile because they’re Jews but are nukes actually real? If so why haven’t they been used since Nagasaki?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (53)
sorted by:
the science behind the way nuclear bombs function doesn't add up. Read "Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax" by Akio Nakatani. It's a shortish book and it's available as a free pdf on Libgen and Internet Archive. It details why Nuclear bombs are ridiculous. NOT nuclear energy, that's very real.
Then there's another book "Hiroshima Revisited: The evidence that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed by fire bombing and mustard gas" where the argument is made that the evidence for post nuclear detonation didn't exist in those places. The after effects, on the land and on the injured and dead people, are more realistically attributable to fire bombing (napalm) and mustard gas.
Then there are various videos on the internet exploring the various nuclear detonations propaganda films we are familiar with. They are propaganda films, yet we accept them as genuine without skepticism for some reason. Cast a skeptical eye on them and many flaws become apparent. The most ridiculous is the hilarious South African one. It's so obviously fake. They never had Nukes, but officially we are told they did - no nuclear power denied their claim.
Lol, you think nuclear energy is real but nuclear bombs are not?
They are a pretty similar process, one involves a very low yield of radioactive material, the other needs a high purity which is where I can cue in the uranium enrichment plant in piketon ohio which actually created most of the weapons grade materials during the beginning of the programming. Ironically I didnt know what was going on there, and had no idea they were making weapons grade uranium. There is just a sign on the highway that says "Atomic Plant".
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/what-is-the-difference-between-the-nuclear-material-in-a-bomb-versus-a-reactor
It blows my mind you believe in one, but think the other is fake.
The math showed it was possible, and then after enough experimenting I believe they made it happen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZAFntUFx8I
I also believe things like russia's deadhand system are real as well. I have very little doubt actually.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Hand
Meh anyway, I wont be posting much for a few days, lightning blew up my modem, router, and computer. I seen a spark of electricity jumping cat 5 cables when it happened :(. Posting from phone internet, so say hi to the people tappin my phone.
My sources are years of chemistry and physics. Again have you guys ever cracked open a book ^^.
Oh yeah, or the fact that were using computers to type to each other across metal lines with plastic keyboards says alot too.
Explosions are about the speed at which all the power can be released.
Nuclear reactions, like thermite reactions - likely for analogous reasons, are slow and do not happen all at once.
Like the article said, trillions upon trillions of explosions happen in a m/s. It might as well be at once to the blink of a human eye.
What I dont get, is it would take literal tons and tons and tons of tnt to get the same effect. So how do you guys suggest they did it?
They didn’t. They used cheap camera tricks / television fear porn propaganda and conventional firebombing.
There are large bombs, granted - but there are no “doomsday devices” that can destroy the world (or even cities). No M.A.D. It’s all hollywood.
Please see the documentary “Dr. Strangelove” for more details.
You're a retarded troll.