More popular Youtubers getting cancer (not my compilation)
(media.scored.co)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Looks like a fairly young group. Not your typical cancer victim.
All that profit for big pharma...
Seems like there should be more people on this list.
I'm a little too disappointed that H3H3 faggot isn't on there.
Oh right, because he is cancer.
Thank God they were vaccinated, otherwise it would've been much worse.
I don't know who any of these people are.
Mouthy Buddha got banned from BitCute last week.
For what
I recognize none of these losers
Are over half of these clickbait bullshit? I know there are just as much things blamed on covid vaccines as there are things blamed on covid. It's pretty much showing we are no better than them -- don't do that. Plus the bigshot youtubers are drama whores anyways.
Also cancer itself is a scam. If you have cancer, the doctors murder you and not the cancer. They accelerate the symptoms and kill you to make a big buck.
This is happening all over the world as I am typing this.
So no treatment is necessary?
Yes.
If you do not treat cancer, it is actually BETTER than letting your doctor make it spread like wildfire.
a) TREAT (to manage) MENT (mind/memory)
b) mind/memory represents response to incoming...both perceivable and suggested.
c) one needs to resist want aka needs to adapt to perceivable, while resisting wanted suggestions by others.
d) the more suggested one consents to take in; the more it internally swells (tumor)...resisting (life) temptation (inception towards death) teaches one the need to let go of wanted.
e) everything "was" (perceivable) before one can suggest what "is" to others. Asking others what is (suggestion) tempts one to ignore what was (perception)...
f) suggested "no" (nothing) tempts one to ignore everything (perceivable)...
This tastes like a youtube conspiracy. I never seek out any of these videos but then randomly one gets recommended to me out of the blue and then the next day it's in a meme...
Feels forced. This is part of the engineered rug pull.
TUBE, noun [Latin tubus.] - "a pipe; a siphon; a canal or conduit"...how can what others are suggesting be used to "tube you"?
What if everything (perceivable) is offered to each one (perceiving); while the recommendations (suggested) from others tempt one to seek (want) more than offered (need)?
Force of resistance (life) within force of velocity (inception towards death) can be tempted with EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] aka feelings can tempt one to ignore resisting.
Lebowski (Hebrew lebab; leb) - "inner man, mind, will, heart"...struggles to get compensation from others for ruining the suggested cover (rug) over perceivable floor (inception towards death)....without it, the dude feels naked.
You Tube refers to cathode ray tube CRT from old TV sets.
You're also a dummy who supports satanic Gnosticism. I can't take your opinions seriously.
Satanic is whatever Christcucks don't like, and the Christians and Vatican Catholics (Jews) burnt Gnostic churches and killed Gnostic scholars (Whites) to establish their one world religion.
Gnostics are welcome at the UN. You guys put lucifer as the good guy in your story, which is what Lucis Trust does, who the UN has welcomed into their organization.
Are you pro UN?
Nope, it is a fact the Lucis Trust are trusted contributors to the UN. The Lucis Trust was originally the Lucifer Trust. And it wasn't atheistic, they are mystic, freemasonic and gnostic in nature.
Could have been worse.
Lel.
One day we will cure people from cancer with sound vibrations. People can also do this on their own now with a great deal of self work but in the future we will have machines that allow the cancer to die from the raised frequency. This has already been proven to be possible. Hidden Tech? Big Pharma?
Wouldn't surprise me if this was their exit strategy. They've got fuck you money already, ratings are falling and youtube ad revenue is getting skimpier on top of that, so they fake their death to get a quick burst of sympathy and cash before retiring.
While the 1990s and early 2000s mrna research did result in 100% mortality for the mice ferrets and other animals, they didn't have access to cancer treatments and medications like we do. I see a lot of people getting cancers but pulling through. I'm optimistic the population decline shouldn't be as extreme as I originally thought.
Why does that make you optimistic?
He means "optimistic" in the Bill Gates way
Because even though the animals died, they died without treatment available like we have. Seeing people beat cancers that would have certainly killed the test animals is good thing
Most people are sterile if they survive cancer. Not because there aren't ways to prevent that, but because insurance won't pay for them. I worked with someone that was working just to stay alive, meaning no money after paying for insurance and cancer treatment.
The reality of this world is harsh.
Cancer treatments are about the same as the 1970s. The fatality rate for cancer has declined only due to earlier and earlier detection due to better imaging technologies.
https://www.econtalk.org/vinay-prasad-on-cancer-drugs-medical-ethics-and-malignant/
I still can't believe this is really happening.
a) believing (want of suggested) vs disbelieving (not want of suggested) tempted each one of the vaccinated to consent...
b) one needs to adapt to perceivable, while resisting to consent (want or not want) to suggested.
Sleight of hand: https://img.gvid.tv/i/4Anhdd2d.jpg (always wanted; never needed).
3.5k views.
"popular"
And of course, nobody that young had cancer before the vaccines, right?
Okay Mr. Skeptic, ever think that the screen capture could have been made before the video got more views, but they may still be popular youtubers? How do you define popular anyway?
And take your strawman and put it in your pumpkin patch. The prevalence of cancer in the young is rare, but an increase is notable, and has been reported elsewhere. Source it yourself.
Franky, I could give a fuck, but you didn't think though your criticisms further than about an inch deep here.
OP claims they are popular. Maybe ask him?
"Here's a baseless claim and I will not provide any evidence".
Hilarious.
OP also said the compilation was not his, so why don't you ask him?
You make a strawman argument, I knock it down, and then you yell "source". Lol, you're high on your soymilk this morning.
I don't mind your naysaying here as a sort of devil's advocate, but you're not doing a very good job of it in this thread.
Ok faggot.
Compelling argument. Jesus would be proud of you.