Because a slave is already a slave. Its not going to slave harder.
The purpose is to make everyone dependent on the state to survive, or to die. Your simple observation and associated cognitive dissonance makes it perfectly clear. The reason that you cant ‘Reason’ the situation away, is because it is unreasonable. There is no fairness at play. This is the score.
Exactly cognitive dissonance and normal people trying to reason why this happened. They need to understand psychopaths and narcissism does not reason it wants power and control. They can’t inner stand why this is happening because they don’t understand psychopathy or narcissim. It’s not about reason it’s about power and control
When the older people with pensions/medicaid have no more children or grandchildren to inherit their money...where does it end up?
Where does your money go if you die and have no family?
If none of those relatives can be identified, your assets could go to parents, grandparents, siblings, nephews, nieces—or even the state. "With no will or next of kin, your assets become escheated—which is just a fancy way of saying the state lays claim to them.
The state is taking all their money back while making sure new generations don't have any way of accumulating any. Also see: Bitcoin and FTX scandal. They stole a bunch of people's money who were invested in crypto. Not saying crypto was a scam free world but there were tons of millenials invested in it as the "new stock market" and got completely wiped out.
With the pandemic they were able to eliminate countless mom & pop stores (low to middle class wealth builder), with BlackRock taking ownership of nearly every corporate store.
They're trying to make the middle and lower class poor as heck and totally dependent on government for their next meal.
Who do you think the free donuts and $10 gift cards were for?
They weren't for pilots, doctors, nurses, EMT, etc.
They were for the poor people.
But even there, poor people are typically the largest group of idiots and subsequently the most gullible. They don't require special coercion, they simply need to be told something then hear about/see 1-5 other people do it and that's good enough.
That's literally the basis of how propaganda/idealogies are spread in a civilization. You start wit the lowest common denominator, AKA the biggest group of idiots, then go from there. Why? Because social proof is the most powerful tool a propagandist has against humans.
From there, they drag along the next group with a large percentage of useful idiots, the blue collars. Then so on and so forth. As you get higher up, you require stronger and stronger propaganda, but it's ALWAYS rooted in that original social proof. "look, these 100 people did it, why won't you? Are you afraid of a needle?"
Sorry to hear about your friend. However, she's a great but unfortunate example of the LCD demographic - the Lowest Common Denominators - and how their fear can be used against them... And in turn, against others. Theoretically, it's likely she convinced at least 1-2 other people to get the shots... That person then likely convinced 1-2 more, and so on.
My own mother is firmly planted in the LCD demographic; it took her 3 shots and 1.5 years of me explaining it for her to see the forest for the trees. She was raised privileged and pampered and excelled in school, she's also an RN. On the other hand, my stepfather is cold as ice and grew up hard, he adamantly rejected the shots without my input required.
LCD isn't just about the intelligence quotient either. It really just boils down to lacking general "common sense" and being susceptible to "trust the science" types of rhetoric. In the US, the LCDs are just as prevalent in the "college educated" demographic as they are the "could barely graduate highschool" demographic.
I know lots of rich people (richer than me, which is almost everybody) who got the shot. I didn't. The people who got the shot had to or believed the TV brainwashing machine. I also don't believe that poor people are necessarily stupid. I consider your demographic comparisons pure speculation and somewhat prejudiced.
You've either grossly misunderstood what I said, or you're purposefully being obtuse.
I didn't say poor people are inherently stupid, nor did I say they're the only ones who got the gene therapy. Being poor doesn't equate to lacking education. Similarly, possessing education doesn't equate to possessing financial wealth.
In fact, the correct term isn't "poor people" at all, that's just how OP was framing it and thus how I framed my reply. The proper term is "lowest common denominators". Long story short, the idiots and morons. I was going to be offending people either way so it is what it is.
Regardless, what I said was, "poor people" are the largest social group in the US (this is a fact) and thus have the largest amount of useful idiots (this is a fact) and gullible fools (also a fact) to spread propaganda to the rest of the population - including within their own demographic. AKA, they have the largest distribution of the lowest common denominators.
That's not to say that other demographics don't have their own useful idiots and gullible fools, but we're effectively comparing handfuls to dump truck loads and thus the former is irrelevant. When it comes to effectively spreading propaganda across an entire society, you need a big group of useful idiots to really get it going.
This is the basis of how modern propaganda works. It starts with convincing the largest group which subsequently results in convincing the smallest groups. Eventually, enough people from all the groups believe "it" that the few who don't ultimately won't matter one way or another.
This to say, It doesn't necessarily matter if 1 person believes something, but if you can say "100000 people" do, that 1 person is insurmountably more likely to believe it as well - based entirely on social proof.
Before it's brought up as an "ah-ha!", social proof can also function based on the influence of just a single person if they have a large and obedient following. But that's primarily rooted in the "proof" that stems from the following as they agree without question. Like a shepherd and a flock of sheep. Hence celebrities being used as props and "top doctors" sprouting up everywhere.
If there's still hesitancy, then you shame them; "Hey, you without the bloodclots, those 999 other people got the jab so why haven't you? You're the only one without clots and they all think you're crazy."
It's just how the human brain works. Not EVERY human's, but the majority. We're herd animals after all. If you want to see how easy this is to manipulate, stand downtown when it's busy and stare inquisitively up at the sky. Eventually, 1 other person will. Then 2 more, then 3 more, then all of a sudden 3/4 of everyone on the block is looking up... At nothing. The first couple might have been curious but everyone after is just a sheep following the flock.
You can argue with this all you want, if you want, but you're just arguing against facts. Social proof is the most powerful tool propagandists have and it all starts with the largest group of useful idiots. This group is, almost 100% of the time, considered the "poor people", but more accurately referred to as the LCDs.
They were able to effectively run a gigantic clinical trial. Question is, what are all the things they were testing? One that comes to mind is Neural Link type technology. There are likely so many gaps in knowledge to fill that they needed to fake a pandemic to get the trial participant count as high as possible.
"They" are losing their grip, and fear that the components of power that slip from their control will be turned against them.
Similarly, you will see that when it comes to 2A, they have a special emphasis in disarming veterans. One aspect, soft-pedaled so far, is the line that "veterans are inherently emotionally unstable and prone to self-harm and violence against others." Watch for the volume on thus to increase.
For historical context, research "dekulakization" by the Bolsheviks. They moved quickly to destroy the strongest potential source of resistance and resource base. Of course, we see this already with all Trump supporters being denounced as "far-right domestic violent extremists", "hooite supremacists" or just "nazis".
The vaccine isn't meant to protect you from the covid bioweapon. It is to protect you from the future bioweapon releases that are inevitably coming down the pipe.
They sold you a motorcycle helmet saying it would save you from moto accidents, but really it was to save you from the piano that's about to fall on your head.
And the Welfarian useless eaters, hmm, their heads are hard enough already.
When you as a government know for certain there's a World War coming but don't want your citizens to spill the beans that you know...
Is how I'd read it.
I mean, you can't just say "here, this shot is to protect you from BRIC's current bioweapon arsenal, but don't tell anyone we know they're about to strike." You'd get Antifa calling the Kremlin overnight.
I'm more of the opinion that, in order to preserve infrastructure, there was a simulated war and the vaccines are a way to physically kill in meatspace the virtual casualties in SimSpace.
Because they wanted to kill off or severely cripple those of us who are more apt to care for ourselves, require less government involvement and are more likely to be free thinkers. When you do that, you reduce the likelihood of civil disobedience, can increase government control, and demoralize those who have survived for easier future compliance.
One group was semi self sufficient and able bodied enough to continue working. The other group was completely reliant on government assistance and was one disability or pension/food stamp cheque away from being homeless or starving....right where the government wants them.
a) freemasonry ritual of consenting to a bitter offer while blindfolded, which represents consenting to suggested (fiction), while willingly ignoring perceivable (reality).
b) being within a chain of command implies consensual, hence experiencing the uncomfortable "rattling of the chains" whenever contemplating insubordination.
c) "Wo gehobelt wird da fallen Späne" aka "where planing is done, chips fall"...collateral damage.
Because a slave is already a slave. Its not going to slave harder.
The purpose is to make everyone dependent on the state to survive, or to die. Your simple observation and associated cognitive dissonance makes it perfectly clear. The reason that you cant ‘Reason’ the situation away, is because it is unreasonable. There is no fairness at play. This is the score.
Exactly cognitive dissonance and normal people trying to reason why this happened. They need to understand psychopaths and narcissism does not reason it wants power and control. They can’t inner stand why this is happening because they don’t understand psychopathy or narcissim. It’s not about reason it’s about power and control
When the older people with pensions/medicaid have no more children or grandchildren to inherit their money...where does it end up?
The state is taking all their money back while making sure new generations don't have any way of accumulating any. Also see: Bitcoin and FTX scandal. They stole a bunch of people's money who were invested in crypto. Not saying crypto was a scam free world but there were tons of millenials invested in it as the "new stock market" and got completely wiped out.
With the pandemic they were able to eliminate countless mom & pop stores (low to middle class wealth builder), with BlackRock taking ownership of nearly every corporate store.
They're trying to make the middle and lower class poor as heck and totally dependent on government for their next meal.
"You'll own nothing and be happy"
Who do you think the free donuts and $10 gift cards were for?
They weren't for pilots, doctors, nurses, EMT, etc.
They were for the poor people.
But even there, poor people are typically the largest group of idiots and subsequently the most gullible. They don't require special coercion, they simply need to be told something then hear about/see 1-5 other people do it and that's good enough.
That's literally the basis of how propaganda/idealogies are spread in a civilization. You start wit the lowest common denominator, AKA the biggest group of idiots, then go from there. Why? Because social proof is the most powerful tool a propagandist has against humans.
From there, they drag along the next group with a large percentage of useful idiots, the blue collars. Then so on and so forth. As you get higher up, you require stronger and stronger propaganda, but it's ALWAYS rooted in that original social proof. "look, these 100 people did it, why won't you? Are you afraid of a needle?"
Sorry to hear about your friend. However, she's a great but unfortunate example of the LCD demographic - the Lowest Common Denominators - and how their fear can be used against them... And in turn, against others. Theoretically, it's likely she convinced at least 1-2 other people to get the shots... That person then likely convinced 1-2 more, and so on.
My own mother is firmly planted in the LCD demographic; it took her 3 shots and 1.5 years of me explaining it for her to see the forest for the trees. She was raised privileged and pampered and excelled in school, she's also an RN. On the other hand, my stepfather is cold as ice and grew up hard, he adamantly rejected the shots without my input required.
LCD isn't just about the intelligence quotient either. It really just boils down to lacking general "common sense" and being susceptible to "trust the science" types of rhetoric. In the US, the LCDs are just as prevalent in the "college educated" demographic as they are the "could barely graduate highschool" demographic.
I know lots of rich people (richer than me, which is almost everybody) who got the shot. I didn't. The people who got the shot had to or believed the TV brainwashing machine. I also don't believe that poor people are necessarily stupid. I consider your demographic comparisons pure speculation and somewhat prejudiced.
You've either grossly misunderstood what I said, or you're purposefully being obtuse.
I didn't say poor people are inherently stupid, nor did I say they're the only ones who got the gene therapy. Being poor doesn't equate to lacking education. Similarly, possessing education doesn't equate to possessing financial wealth.
In fact, the correct term isn't "poor people" at all, that's just how OP was framing it and thus how I framed my reply. The proper term is "lowest common denominators". Long story short, the idiots and morons. I was going to be offending people either way so it is what it is.
Regardless, what I said was, "poor people" are the largest social group in the US (this is a fact) and thus have the largest amount of useful idiots (this is a fact) and gullible fools (also a fact) to spread propaganda to the rest of the population - including within their own demographic. AKA, they have the largest distribution of the lowest common denominators.
That's not to say that other demographics don't have their own useful idiots and gullible fools, but we're effectively comparing handfuls to dump truck loads and thus the former is irrelevant. When it comes to effectively spreading propaganda across an entire society, you need a big group of useful idiots to really get it going.
This is the basis of how modern propaganda works. It starts with convincing the largest group which subsequently results in convincing the smallest groups. Eventually, enough people from all the groups believe "it" that the few who don't ultimately won't matter one way or another.
This to say, It doesn't necessarily matter if 1 person believes something, but if you can say "100000 people" do, that 1 person is insurmountably more likely to believe it as well - based entirely on social proof.
Before it's brought up as an "ah-ha!", social proof can also function based on the influence of just a single person if they have a large and obedient following. But that's primarily rooted in the "proof" that stems from the following as they agree without question. Like a shepherd and a flock of sheep. Hence celebrities being used as props and "top doctors" sprouting up everywhere.
If there's still hesitancy, then you shame them; "Hey, you without the bloodclots, those 999 other people got the jab so why haven't you? You're the only one without clots and they all think you're crazy."
It's just how the human brain works. Not EVERY human's, but the majority. We're herd animals after all. If you want to see how easy this is to manipulate, stand downtown when it's busy and stare inquisitively up at the sky. Eventually, 1 other person will. Then 2 more, then 3 more, then all of a sudden 3/4 of everyone on the block is looking up... At nothing. The first couple might have been curious but everyone after is just a sheep following the flock.
You can argue with this all you want, if you want, but you're just arguing against facts. Social proof is the most powerful tool propagandists have and it all starts with the largest group of useful idiots. This group is, almost 100% of the time, considered the "poor people", but more accurately referred to as the LCDs.
It's also not necessarily accurate. In Behold a Pale Horse it is said that the propaganda goes for women first, social class is a lesser factor.
Also many many rich people are just NPCs good at playing the game or doing whatever the system wants. I have worked with many of them
They were able to effectively run a gigantic clinical trial. Question is, what are all the things they were testing? One that comes to mind is Neural Link type technology. There are likely so many gaps in knowledge to fill that they needed to fake a pandemic to get the trial participant count as high as possible.
"They" are losing their grip, and fear that the components of power that slip from their control will be turned against them.
Similarly, you will see that when it comes to 2A, they have a special emphasis in disarming veterans. One aspect, soft-pedaled so far, is the line that "veterans are inherently emotionally unstable and prone to self-harm and violence against others." Watch for the volume on thus to increase.
For historical context, research "dekulakization" by the Bolsheviks. They moved quickly to destroy the strongest potential source of resistance and resource base. Of course, we see this already with all Trump supporters being denounced as "far-right domestic violent extremists", "hooite supremacists" or just "nazis".
One hypothesis I don't really believe:
The vaccine isn't meant to protect you from the covid bioweapon. It is to protect you from the future bioweapon releases that are inevitably coming down the pipe.
They sold you a motorcycle helmet saying it would save you from moto accidents, but really it was to save you from the piano that's about to fall on your head.
And the Welfarian useless eaters, hmm, their heads are hard enough already.
When you as a government know for certain there's a World War coming but don't want your citizens to spill the beans that you know...
Is how I'd read it.
I mean, you can't just say "here, this shot is to protect you from BRIC's current bioweapon arsenal, but don't tell anyone we know they're about to strike." You'd get Antifa calling the Kremlin overnight.
I'm more of the opinion that, in order to preserve infrastructure, there was a simulated war and the vaccines are a way to physically kill in meatspace the virtual casualties in SimSpace.
they dont want people in the middle. they want them (tptb) and they want slaves to there automated system. everyone else has got to go
Because they wanted to kill off or severely cripple those of us who are more apt to care for ourselves, require less government involvement and are more likely to be free thinkers. When you do that, you reduce the likelihood of civil disobedience, can increase government control, and demoralize those who have survived for easier future compliance.
One group was semi self sufficient and able bodied enough to continue working. The other group was completely reliant on government assistance and was one disability or pension/food stamp cheque away from being homeless or starving....right where the government wants them.
...because if "work will set you free", then welfare keeps you enslaved. Independence demands resisting to take; dependence tempts one to hold onto.
I think those pensioners took them without much need for coercion.
The younger and smarter ones needed more incentive.
a) freemasonry ritual of consenting to a bitter offer while blindfolded, which represents consenting to suggested (fiction), while willingly ignoring perceivable (reality).
b) being within a chain of command implies consensual, hence experiencing the uncomfortable "rattling of the chains" whenever contemplating insubordination.
c) "Wo gehobelt wird da fallen Späne" aka "where planing is done, chips fall"...collateral damage.