It's too bad to see this happening at ZeroHedge. I'm sure we've all read a lot of very good reporting there over the years.
I take this as yet another piece of evidence that "They" are getting more desperate. Burning an important asset like ZeroHedge with this kind of nonsense over something like the war in Ukraine? It's also strong evidence that the conflict there is far, far more important to "Them" than is ever recognized, way beyond grift and hiding Hunter's crimes and killing Rooskies.
Everyone is free to use their own judgement as to who and what to trust, but as I read the first couple of paragraphs, my eyes involuntarily and inevitably went up to the byline: Michael (((Rubin))). I like to think of myself as unprejudiced, but there's a point where it becomes willful blindness, does it not?
ZH was given a choice. Allow commenters to continue naming the jew or lose all advertisers. ZH chose to ban truth in order to save their 50 spam ads per page.
Looks more like somebody wet dreaming of somehow forcing Russia to use nukes. There are tons of conventional shit in Russia powerful enough to do the job without any problems. More interesting question is why that shit is not used in that war. Do Masters not allow? Then why they will allow nukes?
I have questioned why they haven't up until now. Much easier victory. If Kiev doesn't even call itself it. What point is there of it. It has been called Kiev since there was chicken, and it goes back a very long time. Up until some millennials recently went and nuked the chicken. Now it's called some other pronoun and gender neutral word, and it doesn't go by Kiev.
But it's because they largely won't, and it will lose them far more support both at home, and the territory they're invading, and internationally. But this speculation is false. It could increase the sale of nukes and their development globally, while bringing truce and terms back to the table, tactically, if it doesn't draw more into it.
But I'm still guessing they won't, otherwise the nuclear plant wouldn't have inspectors. They still seek to show another image internationally.
Nuclear meltdown apparently lasts for much longer. Historically, in the Ukraine with Chernobyl. Although this is quite unclear with Fukushima. The produce and surrounding crops were still being eaten immediately despite supposed contamination. The nuclear water being released into the Ocean. The biggest loss is seemingly the meltdown in a battle zone with nobody credible on site to prevent it. It could lead to greater catastrophe. Addressed now with inspectors.
Nukes historically are also questionable. But within disaster and fall out.
A tactical nuke and a nuclear meltdown. A tactical nuke seemingly affects far less people. But it all depends on the scale of denotation and the area being affected.
Although we're both speculating on if it occurs. Despite of the irradiated chicken.
Nah I highly doubt this. It would give NATO what they want: an excuse due to human rights and treaty violations. More likely a strategic repositioning ahead of Winter. All they have to do is wait after all they have then surrounded on 3 sides.
But they don’t need an excuse. They’ve been doing it for decades and will continue to do it no matter what anyone else does. Russia needs to simply cut off all exports to NATO, permanently.
The Ukraine "elites" and various NATO personalities are all living a peaceful and comfortable life in Kiev and are not yet experiencing the downsides of war time.
Pretty much every russian move in this war has had people confused from the start.
Why change now?
I would propose they are falling back to lure them in and smash them, these posts were hardly manned, given the length of the front line, it makes no sense to assume they are shoulder to shoulder here.
The strategic bombers flying around and removing power from so much of ukraine is an interesting step, Except that selensky did again yesterday reiterate how russia leaving ukraine and paying for invasion was not enough and that the west and him were gonna demilitarize russia* and decolonize em too.
Also the sale of electricity beginning to europe today, makes it a fun time to zip the zap.
Retreating from Kharkiv, yawn. That memo got sent a few months ago. I guess they retook some more of it, and now they're retreating again. What, so they can missile it. Wouldn't that be funner if they just used the nukes instead? Counter offensive, nope, gone. Unfortunately Kharkiv is a worse place to nuke, it's largely a Russian speaking populace, and on the border. But you'd never know about Kiev?
What onslaught? What weapons? How do you know how well Ukraine is doing? How do you know how many weapons Russia has left? How has Putin lost control of anything? How do you know any of the information you claim to know?
“Early in life I have noticed that no event is ever correctly reported in a newspaper, but in Spain, for the first time, I saw newspaper reports which did not bear any relation to the facts–not even the relationship which is implied in an ordinary lie. I saw great battles reported where there had been no fighting, and complete silence where hundreds of men had been killed. I saw troops who had fought bravely denounced as cowards and traitors, and others who had never seen a shot fired hailed as the heroes of imaginary victories; and I saw newspapers in London retailing these lies and eager intellectuals building emotional superstructures over events that had never happened. I saw, in fact, history being written not in terms of what happened but of what ought to have happened according to various ‘party lines.’” ~ George Orwell; Looking Back on the Spanish War; 1943
It's too bad to see this happening at ZeroHedge. I'm sure we've all read a lot of very good reporting there over the years.
I take this as yet another piece of evidence that "They" are getting more desperate. Burning an important asset like ZeroHedge with this kind of nonsense over something like the war in Ukraine? It's also strong evidence that the conflict there is far, far more important to "Them" than is ever recognized, way beyond grift and hiding Hunter's crimes and killing Rooskies.
Everyone is free to use their own judgement as to who and what to trust, but as I read the first couple of paragraphs, my eyes involuntarily and inevitably went up to the byline: Michael (((Rubin))). I like to think of myself as unprejudiced, but there's a point where it becomes willful blindness, does it not?
ZH was given a choice. Allow commenters to continue naming the jew or lose all advertisers. ZH chose to ban truth in order to save their 50 spam ads per page.
Never, ever, turn off ad blocking on any site.
Looks more like somebody wet dreaming of somehow forcing Russia to use nukes. There are tons of conventional shit in Russia powerful enough to do the job without any problems. More interesting question is why that shit is not used in that war. Do Masters not allow? Then why they will allow nukes?
I have questioned why they haven't up until now. Much easier victory. If Kiev doesn't even call itself it. What point is there of it. It has been called Kiev since there was chicken, and it goes back a very long time. Up until some millennials recently went and nuked the chicken. Now it's called some other pronoun and gender neutral word, and it doesn't go by Kiev.
But it's because they largely won't, and it will lose them far more support both at home, and the territory they're invading, and internationally. But this speculation is false. It could increase the sale of nukes and their development globally, while bringing truce and terms back to the table, tactically, if it doesn't draw more into it.
But I'm still guessing they won't, otherwise the nuclear plant wouldn't have inspectors. They still seek to show another image internationally.
Nuclear meltdown apparently lasts for much longer. Historically, in the Ukraine with Chernobyl. Although this is quite unclear with Fukushima. The produce and surrounding crops were still being eaten immediately despite supposed contamination. The nuclear water being released into the Ocean. The biggest loss is seemingly the meltdown in a battle zone with nobody credible on site to prevent it. It could lead to greater catastrophe. Addressed now with inspectors.
Nukes historically are also questionable. But within disaster and fall out.
A tactical nuke and a nuclear meltdown. A tactical nuke seemingly affects far less people. But it all depends on the scale of denotation and the area being affected.
Although we're both speculating on if it occurs. Despite of the irradiated chicken.
Nah I highly doubt this. It would give NATO what they want: an excuse due to human rights and treaty violations. More likely a strategic repositioning ahead of Winter. All they have to do is wait after all they have then surrounded on 3 sides.
But they don’t need an excuse. They’ve been doing it for decades and will continue to do it no matter what anyone else does. Russia needs to simply cut off all exports to NATO, permanently.
It's a feint. Feint weakness. Draw the enemy in.
Once the enemy is in, flank, close their rear. Becomes a cauldron of shelling and missile strikes.
Rinse. Repeat the meat grinder.
On Kiev.
The Ukraine "elites" and various NATO personalities are all living a peaceful and comfortable life in Kiev and are not yet experiencing the downsides of war time.
Pretty much every russian move in this war has had people confused from the start. Why change now?
I would propose they are falling back to lure them in and smash them, these posts were hardly manned, given the length of the front line, it makes no sense to assume they are shoulder to shoulder here.
The strategic bombers flying around and removing power from so much of ukraine is an interesting step, Except that selensky did again yesterday reiterate how russia leaving ukraine and paying for invasion was not enough and that the west and him were gonna demilitarize russia* and decolonize em too.
Also the sale of electricity beginning to europe today, makes it a fun time to zip the zap.
still speculation
This is similar to "calling me out on my bullshit only means I'm right" aka "over target."
Retreating from Kharkiv, yawn. That memo got sent a few months ago. I guess they retook some more of it, and now they're retreating again. What, so they can missile it. Wouldn't that be funner if they just used the nukes instead? Counter offensive, nope, gone. Unfortunately Kharkiv is a worse place to nuke, it's largely a Russian speaking populace, and on the border. But you'd never know about Kiev?
The word "may" was used 5 times, and "might" 6 times. You ain't called shit.
They literally won’t; this is just neocon propaganda.
What onslaught? What weapons? How do you know how well Ukraine is doing? How do you know how many weapons Russia has left? How has Putin lost control of anything? How do you know any of the information you claim to know?