It's too bad to see this happening at ZeroHedge. I'm sure we've all read a lot of very good reporting there over the years.
I take this as yet another piece of evidence that "They" are getting more desperate. Burning an important asset like ZeroHedge with this kind of nonsense over something like the war in Ukraine? It's also strong evidence that the conflict there is far, far more important to "Them" than is ever recognized, way beyond grift and hiding Hunter's crimes and killing Rooskies.
Everyone is free to use their own judgement as to who and what to trust, but as I read the first couple of paragraphs, my eyes involuntarily and inevitably went up to the byline: Michael (((Rubin))). I like to think of myself as unprejudiced, but there's a point where it becomes willful blindness, does it not?
ZH was given a choice. Allow commenters to continue naming the jew or lose all advertisers. ZH chose to ban truth in order to save their 50 spam ads per page.
It's too bad to see this happening at ZeroHedge. I'm sure we've all read a lot of very good reporting there over the years.
I take this as yet another piece of evidence that "They" are getting more desperate. Burning an important asset like ZeroHedge with this kind of nonsense over something like the war in Ukraine? It's also strong evidence that the conflict there is far, far more important to "Them" than is ever recognized, way beyond grift and hiding Hunter's crimes and killing Rooskies.
Everyone is free to use their own judgement as to who and what to trust, but as I read the first couple of paragraphs, my eyes involuntarily and inevitably went up to the byline: Michael (((Rubin))). I like to think of myself as unprejudiced, but there's a point where it becomes willful blindness, does it not?
ZH was given a choice. Allow commenters to continue naming the jew or lose all advertisers. ZH chose to ban truth in order to save their 50 spam ads per page.
Never, ever, turn off ad blocking on any site.