Do you also find it informative that "They" hate Trump so much, the shills will willingly march right out of the treeline? Most of their battle plan is utterly simplistic: repetition.
Yes, I agree and you've outlined compelling evidence of the difference.
A minor point: for whatever kabuki criticism of Bush they had, they never hated him because they never feared him, and they never feared him because he was never a threat. He is as of now, with never a hint of an apology or even recognition of responsibility, completely absolved in the eyes of the Establishment. Well, in their eyes he never sinned anyway, did he?
It's all political theater. Full stop. Two wings of the same bird. Congress does not represent anyone. Simply trustees for the IMF. POTUS is nothing more than a puppet seat. The Federal Reserve own both parties, and all branches. Even own the authority to print our currency.
Us vs. Them programming.
Mark Twain said it best. If voting really mattered, they wouldn't let you do it.
Prince said the two party system is an illusion. He is correct. The illusion of choice.
A documentary was done on the illusion of choice.
Both sides, red vs. blue, play for the same owner.
The theatrical aspect is to get you to suspend any disbelief and go along as if you really have a role in it. In reality ya got none.
Both sides are playing us in the middle like a classic violin.
Creature From Jekyll Island, Secrets Of The Federal Reseve and the London Connection, Federal Reserve Act 1913.
then you don't understand politics.
politics is theater for the slave class.
the illusion of having any input.
ponder the phrase, 'all the world's stage'.
it can't be underestimated.
Exactly. This guy is a qtard that stumbled onto the real conspiracy forum LOL. He is not going to let go of his savior complex they programmed him with.
If you're testing out a new cheating algorithm, wouldn't you like to do it at a time where even if it doesn't work you still get your man in office?
You have to remember, these competitions are for control of gigatons of nuclear missiles, there's no room for "oops we'll get control back again next cycle."
US was a test of the Dominion machines. Upon success, it would roll out across other nations. It didn't succeed: they had to supplement with physical ballots. Now no one wants the Dominion cheating machines, because they didn't work.
To me, the answer to this question is that it comes down to "how much further along would they be if Hillary was president instead of Trump?"
The answer is very far, farther along than they would be having to deal with a four year speed bump. Therefore, I conclude that Trump was a surprise event for them.
Secondly, they did attempt to rig the 2016 election because they thought Trump was unelectable and it would result in a Hillary landslide. He was given a shit-ton of free media coverage, millions and millions of dollars worth of free advertising, and pushed on Republicans; Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz were pissed about it.
Lastly, they stopped counting in the middle of the night in 2016, but didn't have the ballots ready to dump.
How did they cuck and neuter europe?
How did they corral all nationalistic sentiment into a single area, under a single leader, rise them up in order to identify and then destroy them so that it would be impossible or illegal to argue for those ideas again.
if the outcome they want is either elimination of any 'american' or traditional values, give them a false idol that is easy for the other side to demonize. divide and conquer.
then any of those values get branded in the same manner.
take statements he makes and filter them in 2 completely different messages.
if one outcome they are okay with is balkanization, this is all part of the process.
it's maybe possible that biden and trump are from different lodges, and get points to have fun in a fake election. for example if biden was scottish rite and trump lodge of england. ultimately they are aligned in higher goals. look at the vax, that was pure ritual, the right hand (trump) made the vax, the left hand (biden) delivered it. they shook hands and kept on gloves just enough to equally remove the blame from themselves.
It's not impossible to imagine a scenario where, in order to divide the population even further than it already was, TPTB made side B think that the election was stolen by side A (Russia hoax, etc.), and then made side A think the election was stolen by side B the next time. This is divide and conquer 101.
I know what you're thinking, "but the election was actually stolen this time", etc. I also believe the election was stolen, prima facie. But, if we're looking at this critically, the explanation is simple: the left are a bunch of emotionally deranged idiots, so they would have bought anything that CNN told them (Russia, piss gate, etc.), whereas our side needed to figure it out on our own, using logic, in order to buy the scam. This is the real 4D chess: neither election was stolen by the culprits we each think about, but both elections were stolen by the men behind the curtain; those men want each side to hate the other side so that they can pick up all of our belongings while we are out front fighting in the street.
That's a good reply. I don't trust Trump, but I'm also conflicted. I voted for him because I believed that he was some kind of libertarian based on his original campaign document about flattening tax, etc. I don't think there is any way to excuse any of the anti-gun stuff, butI also can't put my finger on the exact perfect set of explanations that puts him squarely in the Cabal camp. It's possible that he exercised some actual agency in the presidency and that's why they wanted to out him. I wouldn't see him exactly on the fence, but I definitely am not 100% convinced that he is in the Cabal either.
Good cop, bad cop. Same cop. Stoke it, fall back. Has policy changed? Domestics sure. Enough to give voters something else to run with. Convincing them it will change. But what has changed?
Hahaha. Fall back. No. What would they awake too? The greater depression? Civil War? No. You'd sooner be in war abroad. Rather than sounding a bugle, and cascading into civil revolt. But it's another plan B. Because right now where is that grip. Who actually trusts their current government? It means any oppositiomal party is a potential favourite. Can't keep playing that tape when all they offer is a greater collapse into the mounting debts of a larger recession, and partisan politics. More bullshit promises to keep them voting and the price rising. So who are you actually empowering today? It's the competition. Not happening without a? I dunno chuck you tell me where we're at?
Or belief in the unicorns. Because there's nothing but even more shit coming. No matter what you believe in.
Ockham's Razor only applies to the invention of new entities to explain something; it does allow you to discard existing known entities. These include:
varying levels of loyalty to the world order or its plans
tactics like "controlled opposition" or "plan B"
intermediary goals like demoralization or destabilization
A good conspiracy theory must fit existing data and be psychologically realistic. It is actually harder for me to imagine that the cabal did NOT anticipate or prepare for a 2nd Trump landslide. The media puppets and leftards may have been clueless, sure, but conspirators who fancy themselves gods must at least feel like they know what they are doing.
So what happened with Operation Warp Speed bud? He’s not apart of the cabal yet still brags about the vaccines. I would have preferred Trump in the White House but let’s be realistic and not foolish to notice where Trump fell prey to lobbyists, special interests, deepstate whatever. The fact that he still brags about it really should be a splash of cold water to help sober you up.
Only simple ignorance would proclaim there is a single group based entity involved.
Rest assured they are all busy conniving and trying to stab each other in the back and take the reigns.
With that in mind, there are no less than two sides vying for control over any single item.
If it is as you are suggesting, then you would find complete control much different.
Trump wants to push for rfid to track everyone with embedded chips. There is lot's of overlap in everything they do because it is essentially the same playbook, but an entire league of teams.
Well, you are overlooking it a bit, you cannot only chip the incoming, you need everyone chipped so you can differentiate. Otherwise, you are unchipped aka unproven.
Tattoo would have been easier 100 years ago? oh wait, we used those.. been using them since. Chips are an upgrade, it takes time to build acceptance.
Sweden has chipped a bunch already. more on the way.
Bitchute has the video of trump talking about it on stage.
There was a nice movie from the 80's that says all this shit. its old plan new tech.
If voting, then choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; hence the consenting many contractually submitting to the suggestions of the few by free will of choice.
what would happen if "Neither" was a viable vote and the majority chose that option.
a) "neither" aka nothing E'ITHER, adjective - "one of two" ignores being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (all perceivable). Each one (perceiving) represents the free will of choice within everything (perceivable)...."nothing" is being suggested by others.
b) "a viable vote" ignores being responding choice (evaluation of the perceiving) within enacting balance (perceivable value). Others tempt one with suggested values to ignore being the choice of evaluation within all perceivable. If one consent to suggested values; than the choice of those suggesting them can define; redefine and contradict it;which they are going to use to outvalue the choice of evaluation of those consenting to suggested values.
The few suggest values (money); the many consent to allow the few to brand everything perceivable with suggested values (prices); which in return restricts the many from choosing among all perceivable value (inspiration); because they are mentally consenting to suggested values (information aka money; prices; contracts, and the power of others to wield it).
c) the majority choosing with their free will of choice what the few are suggesting with their free will of choice; hence being tricked into choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
d) OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] - "the power of choosing"... desire represents the "want" part of free will of choice; hence falling for temptation. Choice itself represents the response-ability (need) within balance (need/want) to sustain self. "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance implies the coexistence of both...free-dom.
Others exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting "freedom" as a liberty through their suggesting choices. These parasitic few also suggest the many to blame each other for slavery; while ignoring self enslavement to others though choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
Hypothetically
HYPOTHET'ICAL, adjective - "assumed without proof for the purpose of reasoning"
a) there's no such thing as proof within a moving system. Living doesn't represent proof for the process of dying; but the expression thereof aka the temporary reaction (living) to an ongoing, enacting (dying) system.
b) to consent (want or not want) to any suggestion causes the want versus not want conflict of "reason". Both sides are ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction) and are now divided within a fictitious conflict among each other by their consent to a 3rd party suggestion from the few who aren't within the conflict of reason, but who control both sides from outside by defining (idolatry); redefining (revisionism) and contradicting (talmudic reasoning) whatever suggested information the many consent to reason over.
c) instead of using hypothetical as an outsourced battlefield for suggested information; ask yourself if every mental choice shapes physical consequences within the system you exist in?
if only one person voted and EVERYONE ELSE didn't
a) what if ALL represents ONE in energy, and each ones choice within all balance are causing the ever changing circumstances for every other one?
b) you ignore that for one to vote implies consenting to another one suggesting voting.
c) the imbalance (want vs not want) of suggested voting mimics being choice within perceivable balance (need/want), and so the ones suggesting to vote are going to both suggest the need to vote representation and the temptation to want or not want others to have representation. This is how you get reactions like "at least the republicans aren't as evil as the democrats".
d) what the many ignore is being form (life with choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) aka temporary living within the ongoing process of dying; hence struggling as choice to balance until outcome aka temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying). This represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka loss/growth as the internal power of self sustaining energy.
Anyway...individual choice made within collective balance causes individual responses from all other individual choices...they just lack comprehension about that when responding to ever changing circumstances. The few are distracting the many from growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why of their existence.
one guy would have more saying power than
"more" represents the ignorance of being the temporary ONE (perceiving) within the ongoing ALL (perceivable) aka the responding center of all enacting existence has to offer. "more" represents your choice of want (suggested outcomes) over need (adaptation to perceivable origin).
ONE cannot get more than ALL perceivable has to offer...yet the finite ONE can temporarily grow within the infinite ALL. Growing what? Everything. The few benefit tremendously from tempting the many to ignore this; yet they can only keep it from the many if each one of the many chooses willingly to ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information; hence ignoring to grow.
299,999,999
NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
ONE represents the perceivable designation of your unit, and others suggest you numbers (299,999,999) to tempt you to count other ONEs as exponential growth or loss; which in return imbalance ONEs growth (living) within ALL loss (dying).
Does one need to count breathing; stilling thirst; quenching hunger; sheltering from harm or do others tempts one to count like by The Count: "who wants to count with me?" The vampire allegedly asks to be invited... https://pic8.co/sh/fPKwQZ.jpg
Democracy is the tyranny of the minority
DEMOCRACY, noun [Gr. People, and to possess, to govern.]
The many consent to being possessed by what the few are suggesting. The industrialization of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religo) - "to bind anew". That represents the bond of possession; which allows other to GOVERN (control) MENT (mind; memory).
Why can't we vote for no government?
Because "nothing" doesn't exist within everything and choice has to control memory (temporary within ongoing) within balance.
Do you also find it informative that "They" hate Trump so much, the shills will willingly march right out of the treeline? Most of their battle plan is utterly simplistic: repetition.
Yes, I agree and you've outlined compelling evidence of the difference.
A minor point: for whatever kabuki criticism of Bush they had, they never hated him because they never feared him, and they never feared him because he was never a threat. He is as of now, with never a hint of an apology or even recognition of responsibility, completely absolved in the eyes of the Establishment. Well, in their eyes he never sinned anyway, did he?
It's all political theater. Full stop. Two wings of the same bird. Congress does not represent anyone. Simply trustees for the IMF. POTUS is nothing more than a puppet seat. The Federal Reserve own both parties, and all branches. Even own the authority to print our currency.
Us vs. Them programming.
Mark Twain said it best. If voting really mattered, they wouldn't let you do it.
Prince said the two party system is an illusion. He is correct. The illusion of choice.
A documentary was done on the illusion of choice.
Both sides, red vs. blue, play for the same owner.
The theatrical aspect is to get you to suspend any disbelief and go along as if you really have a role in it. In reality ya got none.
Both sides are playing us in the middle like a classic violin.
Creature From Jekyll Island, Secrets Of The Federal Reseve and the London Connection, Federal Reserve Act 1913.
A couple of books and legislation to recommend.
Oh, and Edward Bernay's Propaganda.
In theater drama, tension are elements of the rising law of conflict.
Did not the cheating create tension, conflict? Yes it did.
In that drama we had Biden the protagonist, (I'm not Trump) and Trump the antagonist, (orange man bad).
The "stolen election" element is the third act. The conclusion. Of what?
The point towards the end of the second act where I'm not Trump is furtherst from reaching his goal, say 930ish election night.
Based on the three act structure to story telling.
then you don't understand politics. politics is theater for the slave class. the illusion of having any input. ponder the phrase, 'all the world's stage'. it can't be underestimated.
Exactly. This guy is a qtard that stumbled onto the real conspiracy forum LOL. He is not going to let go of his savior complex they programmed him with.
If you're testing out a new cheating algorithm, wouldn't you like to do it at a time where even if it doesn't work you still get your man in office?
You have to remember, these competitions are for control of gigatons of nuclear missiles, there's no room for "oops we'll get control back again next cycle."
US was a test of the Dominion machines. Upon success, it would roll out across other nations. It didn't succeed: they had to supplement with physical ballots. Now no one wants the Dominion cheating machines, because they didn't work.
To me, the answer to this question is that it comes down to "how much further along would they be if Hillary was president instead of Trump?"
The answer is very far, farther along than they would be having to deal with a four year speed bump. Therefore, I conclude that Trump was a surprise event for them.
Secondly, they did attempt to rig the 2016 election because they thought Trump was unelectable and it would result in a Hillary landslide. He was given a shit-ton of free media coverage, millions and millions of dollars worth of free advertising, and pushed on Republicans; Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz were pissed about it.
Lastly, they stopped counting in the middle of the night in 2016, but didn't have the ballots ready to dump.
Search for him on bitchute. He is long gone, but his reuploads remain.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHxnT5xa9Lw
Just start asking questions.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1eLtWtEZHyie/
If one thing is a lie does this open Pandora's Box of lies?
How did they cuck and neuter europe? How did they corral all nationalistic sentiment into a single area, under a single leader, rise them up in order to identify and then destroy them so that it would be impossible or illegal to argue for those ideas again. if the outcome they want is either elimination of any 'american' or traditional values, give them a false idol that is easy for the other side to demonize. divide and conquer. then any of those values get branded in the same manner. take statements he makes and filter them in 2 completely different messages. if one outcome they are okay with is balkanization, this is all part of the process.
it's maybe possible that biden and trump are from different lodges, and get points to have fun in a fake election. for example if biden was scottish rite and trump lodge of england. ultimately they are aligned in higher goals. look at the vax, that was pure ritual, the right hand (trump) made the vax, the left hand (biden) delivered it. they shook hands and kept on gloves just enough to equally remove the blame from themselves.
It's not impossible to imagine a scenario where, in order to divide the population even further than it already was, TPTB made side B think that the election was stolen by side A (Russia hoax, etc.), and then made side A think the election was stolen by side B the next time. This is divide and conquer 101.
I know what you're thinking, "but the election was actually stolen this time", etc. I also believe the election was stolen, prima facie. But, if we're looking at this critically, the explanation is simple: the left are a bunch of emotionally deranged idiots, so they would have bought anything that CNN told them (Russia, piss gate, etc.), whereas our side needed to figure it out on our own, using logic, in order to buy the scam. This is the real 4D chess: neither election was stolen by the culprits we each think about, but both elections were stolen by the men behind the curtain; those men want each side to hate the other side so that they can pick up all of our belongings while we are out front fighting in the street.
That's a good reply. I don't trust Trump, but I'm also conflicted. I voted for him because I believed that he was some kind of libertarian based on his original campaign document about flattening tax, etc. I don't think there is any way to excuse any of the anti-gun stuff, butI also can't put my finger on the exact perfect set of explanations that puts him squarely in the Cabal camp. It's possible that he exercised some actual agency in the presidency and that's why they wanted to out him. I wouldn't see him exactly on the fence, but I definitely am not 100% convinced that he is in the Cabal either.
Good cop, bad cop. Same cop. Stoke it, fall back. Has policy changed? Domestics sure. Enough to give voters something else to run with. Convincing them it will change. But what has changed?
It's only gotten edgier.
Hahaha. Fall back. No. What would they awake too? The greater depression? Civil War? No. You'd sooner be in war abroad. Rather than sounding a bugle, and cascading into civil revolt. But it's another plan B. Because right now where is that grip. Who actually trusts their current government? It means any oppositiomal party is a potential favourite. Can't keep playing that tape when all they offer is a greater collapse into the mounting debts of a larger recession, and partisan politics. More bullshit promises to keep them voting and the price rising. So who are you actually empowering today? It's the competition. Not happening without a? I dunno chuck you tell me where we're at?
Or belief in the unicorns. Because there's nothing but even more shit coming. No matter what you believe in.
Ockham's Razor only applies to the invention of new entities to explain something; it does allow you to discard existing known entities. These include:
So what happened with Operation Warp Speed bud? He’s not apart of the cabal yet still brags about the vaccines. I would have preferred Trump in the White House but let’s be realistic and not foolish to notice where Trump fell prey to lobbyists, special interests, deepstate whatever. The fact that he still brags about it really should be a splash of cold water to help sober you up.
To demoralize us. To make it known we are ruled and can’t do anything about it.
The curtains are being pulled back from the illusion of freedom we had. It’s being done in a controlled and systematic way.
But at the same time, exposure of our fake world is also needed for us to fix it at a societal level.
Time will tell how this plays out.
Only simple ignorance would proclaim there is a single group based entity involved. Rest assured they are all busy conniving and trying to stab each other in the back and take the reigns.
With that in mind, there are no less than two sides vying for control over any single item.
If it is as you are suggesting, then you would find complete control much different.
Trump wants to push for rfid to track everyone with embedded chips. There is lot's of overlap in everything they do because it is essentially the same playbook, but an entire league of teams.
Well, you are overlooking it a bit, you cannot only chip the incoming, you need everyone chipped so you can differentiate. Otherwise, you are unchipped aka unproven.
Tattoo would have been easier 100 years ago? oh wait, we used those.. been using them since. Chips are an upgrade, it takes time to build acceptance.
Sweden has chipped a bunch already. more on the way.
Bitchute has the video of trump talking about it on stage. There was a nice movie from the 80's that says all this shit. its old plan new tech.
To sow division.
If voting, then choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; hence the consenting many contractually submitting to the suggestions of the few by free will of choice.
Anything else suggested represents shown tricks aka CABAL, noun - "intrigue".
a) "neither" aka nothing E'ITHER, adjective - "one of two" ignores being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (all perceivable). Each one (perceiving) represents the free will of choice within everything (perceivable)...."nothing" is being suggested by others.
b) "a viable vote" ignores being responding choice (evaluation of the perceiving) within enacting balance (perceivable value). Others tempt one with suggested values to ignore being the choice of evaluation within all perceivable. If one consent to suggested values; than the choice of those suggesting them can define; redefine and contradict it;which they are going to use to outvalue the choice of evaluation of those consenting to suggested values.
The few suggest values (money); the many consent to allow the few to brand everything perceivable with suggested values (prices); which in return restricts the many from choosing among all perceivable value (inspiration); because they are mentally consenting to suggested values (information aka money; prices; contracts, and the power of others to wield it).
c) the majority choosing with their free will of choice what the few are suggesting with their free will of choice; hence being tricked into choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
d) OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] - "the power of choosing"... desire represents the "want" part of free will of choice; hence falling for temptation. Choice itself represents the response-ability (need) within balance (need/want) to sustain self. "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance implies the coexistence of both...free-dom.
Others exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting "freedom" as a liberty through their suggesting choices. These parasitic few also suggest the many to blame each other for slavery; while ignoring self enslavement to others though choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
a) there's no such thing as proof within a moving system. Living doesn't represent proof for the process of dying; but the expression thereof aka the temporary reaction (living) to an ongoing, enacting (dying) system.
b) to consent (want or not want) to any suggestion causes the want versus not want conflict of "reason". Both sides are ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction) and are now divided within a fictitious conflict among each other by their consent to a 3rd party suggestion from the few who aren't within the conflict of reason, but who control both sides from outside by defining (idolatry); redefining (revisionism) and contradicting (talmudic reasoning) whatever suggested information the many consent to reason over.
c) instead of using hypothetical as an outsourced battlefield for suggested information; ask yourself if every mental choice shapes physical consequences within the system you exist in?
a) what if ALL represents ONE in energy, and each ones choice within all balance are causing the ever changing circumstances for every other one?
b) you ignore that for one to vote implies consenting to another one suggesting voting.
c) the imbalance (want vs not want) of suggested voting mimics being choice within perceivable balance (need/want), and so the ones suggesting to vote are going to both suggest the need to vote representation and the temptation to want or not want others to have representation. This is how you get reactions like "at least the republicans aren't as evil as the democrats".
d) what the many ignore is being form (life with choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) aka temporary living within the ongoing process of dying; hence struggling as choice to balance until outcome aka temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying). This represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka loss/growth as the internal power of self sustaining energy.
Anyway...individual choice made within collective balance causes individual responses from all other individual choices...they just lack comprehension about that when responding to ever changing circumstances. The few are distracting the many from growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why of their existence.
"more" represents the ignorance of being the temporary ONE (perceiving) within the ongoing ALL (perceivable) aka the responding center of all enacting existence has to offer. "more" represents your choice of want (suggested outcomes) over need (adaptation to perceivable origin).
ONE cannot get more than ALL perceivable has to offer...yet the finite ONE can temporarily grow within the infinite ALL. Growing what? Everything. The few benefit tremendously from tempting the many to ignore this; yet they can only keep it from the many if each one of the many chooses willingly to ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information; hence ignoring to grow.
ONE represents the perceivable designation of your unit, and others suggest you numbers (299,999,999) to tempt you to count other ONEs as exponential growth or loss; which in return imbalance ONEs growth (living) within ALL loss (dying).
Does one need to count breathing; stilling thirst; quenching hunger; sheltering from harm or do others tempts one to count like by The Count: "who wants to count with me?" The vampire allegedly asks to be invited... https://pic8.co/sh/fPKwQZ.jpg
The many consent to being possessed by what the few are suggesting. The industrialization of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religo) - "to bind anew". That represents the bond of possession; which allows other to GOVERN (control) MENT (mind; memory).
Because "nothing" doesn't exist within everything and choice has to control memory (temporary within ongoing) within balance.