If voting, then choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; hence the consenting many contractually submitting to the suggestions of the few by free will of choice.
what would happen if "Neither" was a viable vote and the majority chose that option.
a) "neither" aka nothing E'ITHER, adjective - "one of two" ignores being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (all perceivable). Each one (perceiving) represents the free will of choice within everything (perceivable)...."nothing" is being suggested by others.
b) "a viable vote" ignores being responding choice (evaluation of the perceiving) within enacting balance (perceivable value). Others tempt one with suggested values to ignore being the choice of evaluation within all perceivable. If one consent to suggested values; than the choice of those suggesting them can define; redefine and contradict it;which they are going to use to outvalue the choice of evaluation of those consenting to suggested values.
The few suggest values (money); the many consent to allow the few to brand everything perceivable with suggested values (prices); which in return restricts the many from choosing among all perceivable value (inspiration); because they are mentally consenting to suggested values (information aka money; prices; contracts, and the power of others to wield it).
c) the majority choosing with their free will of choice what the few are suggesting with their free will of choice; hence being tricked into choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
d) OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] - "the power of choosing"... desire represents the "want" part of free will of choice; hence falling for temptation. Choice itself represents the response-ability (need) within balance (need/want) to sustain self. "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance implies the coexistence of both...free-dom.
Others exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting "freedom" as a liberty through their suggesting choices. These parasitic few also suggest the many to blame each other for slavery; while ignoring self enslavement to others though choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
Hypothetically
HYPOTHET'ICAL, adjective - "assumed without proof for the purpose of reasoning"
a) there's no such thing as proof within a moving system. Living doesn't represent proof for the process of dying; but the expression thereof aka the temporary reaction (living) to an ongoing, enacting (dying) system.
b) to consent (want or not want) to any suggestion causes the want versus not want conflict of "reason". Both sides are ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction) and are now divided within a fictitious conflict among each other by their consent to a 3rd party suggestion from the few who aren't within the conflict of reason, but who control both sides from outside by defining (idolatry); redefining (revisionism) and contradicting (talmudic reasoning) whatever suggested information the many consent to reason over.
c) instead of using hypothetical as an outsourced battlefield for suggested information; ask yourself if every mental choice shapes physical consequences within the system you exist in?
if only one person voted and EVERYONE ELSE didn't
a) what if ALL represents ONE in energy, and each ones choice within all balance are causing the ever changing circumstances for every other one?
b) you ignore that for one to vote implies consenting to another one suggesting voting.
c) the imbalance (want vs not want) of suggested voting mimics being choice within perceivable balance (need/want), and so the ones suggesting to vote are going to both suggest the need to vote representation and the temptation to want or not want others to have representation. This is how you get reactions like "at least the republicans aren't as evil as the democrats".
d) what the many ignore is being form (life with choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) aka temporary living within the ongoing process of dying; hence struggling as choice to balance until outcome aka temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying). This represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka loss/growth as the internal power of self sustaining energy.
Anyway...individual choice made within collective balance causes individual responses from all other individual choices...they just lack comprehension about that when responding to ever changing circumstances. The few are distracting the many from growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why of their existence.
one guy would have more saying power than
"more" represents the ignorance of being the temporary ONE (perceiving) within the ongoing ALL (perceivable) aka the responding center of all enacting existence has to offer. "more" represents your choice of want (suggested outcomes) over need (adaptation to perceivable origin).
ONE cannot get more than ALL perceivable has to offer...yet the finite ONE can temporarily grow within the infinite ALL. Growing what? Everything. The few benefit tremendously from tempting the many to ignore this; yet they can only keep it from the many if each one of the many chooses willingly to ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information; hence ignoring to grow.
299,999,999
NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "the state of being one; oneness".
ONE represents the perceivable designation of your unit, and others suggest you numbers (299,999,999) to tempt you to count other ONEs as exponential growth or loss; which in return imbalance ONEs growth (living) within ALL loss (dying).
Does one need to count breathing; stilling thirst; quenching hunger; sheltering from harm or do others tempts one to count like by The Count: "who wants to count with me?" The vampire allegedly asks to be invited... https://pic8.co/sh/fPKwQZ.jpg
Democracy is the tyranny of the minority
DEMOCRACY, noun [Gr. People, and to possess, to govern.]
The many consent to being possessed by what the few are suggesting. The industrialization of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religo) - "to bind anew". That represents the bond of possession; which allows other to GOVERN (control) MENT (mind; memory).
Why can't we vote for no government?
Because "nothing" doesn't exist within everything and choice has to control memory (temporary within ongoing) within balance.
If voting, then choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; hence the consenting many contractually submitting to the suggestions of the few by free will of choice.
Anything else suggested represents shown tricks aka CABAL, noun - "intrigue".
a) "neither" aka nothing E'ITHER, adjective - "one of two" ignores being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (all perceivable). Each one (perceiving) represents the free will of choice within everything (perceivable)...."nothing" is being suggested by others.
b) "a viable vote" ignores being responding choice (evaluation of the perceiving) within enacting balance (perceivable value). Others tempt one with suggested values to ignore being the choice of evaluation within all perceivable. If one consent to suggested values; than the choice of those suggesting them can define; redefine and contradict it;which they are going to use to outvalue the choice of evaluation of those consenting to suggested values.
The few suggest values (money); the many consent to allow the few to brand everything perceivable with suggested values (prices); which in return restricts the many from choosing among all perceivable value (inspiration); because they are mentally consenting to suggested values (information aka money; prices; contracts, and the power of others to wield it).
c) the majority choosing with their free will of choice what the few are suggesting with their free will of choice; hence being tricked into choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
d) OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] - "the power of choosing"... desire represents the "want" part of free will of choice; hence falling for temptation. Choice itself represents the response-ability (need) within balance (need/want) to sustain self. "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance implies the coexistence of both...free-dom.
Others exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting "freedom" as a liberty through their suggesting choices. These parasitic few also suggest the many to blame each other for slavery; while ignoring self enslavement to others though choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
a) there's no such thing as proof within a moving system. Living doesn't represent proof for the process of dying; but the expression thereof aka the temporary reaction (living) to an ongoing, enacting (dying) system.
b) to consent (want or not want) to any suggestion causes the want versus not want conflict of "reason". Both sides are ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction) and are now divided within a fictitious conflict among each other by their consent to a 3rd party suggestion from the few who aren't within the conflict of reason, but who control both sides from outside by defining (idolatry); redefining (revisionism) and contradicting (talmudic reasoning) whatever suggested information the many consent to reason over.
c) instead of using hypothetical as an outsourced battlefield for suggested information; ask yourself if every mental choice shapes physical consequences within the system you exist in?
a) what if ALL represents ONE in energy, and each ones choice within all balance are causing the ever changing circumstances for every other one?
b) you ignore that for one to vote implies consenting to another one suggesting voting.
c) the imbalance (want vs not want) of suggested voting mimics being choice within perceivable balance (need/want), and so the ones suggesting to vote are going to both suggest the need to vote representation and the temptation to want or not want others to have representation. This is how you get reactions like "at least the republicans aren't as evil as the democrats".
d) what the many ignore is being form (life with choice) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death) aka temporary living within the ongoing process of dying; hence struggling as choice to balance until outcome aka temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying). This represents EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" aka loss/growth as the internal power of self sustaining energy.
Anyway...individual choice made within collective balance causes individual responses from all other individual choices...they just lack comprehension about that when responding to ever changing circumstances. The few are distracting the many from growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why of their existence.
"more" represents the ignorance of being the temporary ONE (perceiving) within the ongoing ALL (perceivable) aka the responding center of all enacting existence has to offer. "more" represents your choice of want (suggested outcomes) over need (adaptation to perceivable origin).
ONE cannot get more than ALL perceivable has to offer...yet the finite ONE can temporarily grow within the infinite ALL. Growing what? Everything. The few benefit tremendously from tempting the many to ignore this; yet they can only keep it from the many if each one of the many chooses willingly to ignore perceivable inspiration for suggested information; hence ignoring to grow.
ONE represents the perceivable designation of your unit, and others suggest you numbers (299,999,999) to tempt you to count other ONEs as exponential growth or loss; which in return imbalance ONEs growth (living) within ALL loss (dying).
Does one need to count breathing; stilling thirst; quenching hunger; sheltering from harm or do others tempts one to count like by The Count: "who wants to count with me?" The vampire allegedly asks to be invited... https://pic8.co/sh/fPKwQZ.jpg
The many consent to being possessed by what the few are suggesting. The industrialization of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law is called RELIGION; noun (Latin religo) - "to bind anew". That represents the bond of possession; which allows other to GOVERN (control) MENT (mind; memory).
Because "nothing" doesn't exist within everything and choice has to control memory (temporary within ongoing) within balance.