No this is the reason megacorps changed patents from First To Invent to First To File which means now you can invent something, Intel steals your research and patents it, and then you owe Intel for your invention.
Mostly prior art now is only if the invention was actually in use in public, and even then you have to sue the now-patent holder to invalidate the patent on your own invention.
So AMD could sue over copyright infringement since Intel copied their flow charts 1:1, but unless the chip was produced and available to purchase then they have to pay Intel.
AMD and Hardware mods are really solid. At most they will be waiting for an official word from AMD's lawyers, or for a tech savoy third party to go over the info for them.
Shit did get awkward a month back when one of their less reliable mods vandalized the sub with anti-Putin propaganda. They cleaned it up quick and locked all meta threads on the topic. They do not like politics in the tech subs.
someone made a somewhat plausible explanation of it on hardware
"Some clown on Twitter pointed to an Intel patent and its reference of AMD diagrams and started stirring crap.
But that person didn't understand how patent filings are written, and neither did Ian Cutress (or the others who jumped on the Twitter panic train). People started flailing their arms about until someone told them that that's how patent filings are done. They use language and diagrams, often copy-pastad from various sources, to describe a thing or problem, then describe what they're doing and make their case for why it's unique and patentable in that context.
Then the clown on Twitter who started this tried to come out and say he knew it all along and that this was a "social experiment"."
About patents.
I have come across many examples many were on techdirt.
In theory they might work.
In real-world applications the patent system screws innovation and small companies. In the EU patents are very expensive and requires a prototype. In the US the patent system probably has other problems.
The small companies can not pay the bills, patent-research, reverse engineering and lawyers that are necessary to get paid for innovative inventions.
Besides that most of the inventions are not really innovative. Because they are often just small changes of older tech or new combinations of older tech. Or by improving the production or fabrication process.
A lot of profit is made by producing a product cheaper (like in China) and short lived. And not by making it high quality or durable.
In a war situation the patent systems are relaxed, so in those times we see that companies are "inventing" more stuff.
As an example:
Let's look at this truly innovative technology of the SAFIRE project: The transmutations of atoms by electricity.
It may break down nuclear waste, it can generate energy.
It is an invention that can change our world.
Will a patent be accepted? Probably not, because a lot of nuclear power "experts" will tell us that it is impossible and that this must be a hoax of some kind.
They will need money to research the different ways the power can be generated and extracted. Or how how nuclear waste can be transformed.
It will be 10 to 20 years of research on a small scale.
And during that time big companies will try to steal this tech and claim it as their own. They will also pay some scientists to claim that it is the next step of quantum technology. Most do not understand quantum mechanics anyway.
So even if it works, this product will probably not reach the market soon.
Due to the patent system and due to how science can be stuck in a system.
And if it reaches the market the inventors will still not see much money from it, and big companies will have stolen it from them.
I can tell you first hand, their R&D department was a mess (at least the part I saw) and they are one of the "wokest" affirmative action companies out there. They signaled they don't care about hiring top talent, but hiring to fill quotas.
I agree with everything but the rap music. Music should change and be varied...the type of music is not the problem. It was the production companies, media pyramids and all manner of kickback schemes that defrauded most artists and forced them to put out cheap shit to sell an image. Rapping takes skill - it's not easy to do a good job. It's just as much music as any other genre. Same thing was said about metal before, and punk and all manner of music.
It's the corruption behind the music that's the issue. All music genres have their place. It's when they get watered down, and derivative and focus on cheap repeats...that's when it falls. Pop music is far more the proponents of the NWO and wokisim than rap, but otherwise. I agree.
Man, there was a dude in downtown Baltimore who would follow people around and rap about them (for money of course, but whatever).
Saw him a few times, and he was hilarious and quite intelligent. Rhymed well too.
Don't know if he ever became a real rapper, perhaps he didn't want to. All I know is that his critical thinking and improv skills were quite amazing, and as somebody who likes words and language, even his vocabulary was impressive.
Maybe rap isn't really music...it's just poetry in motion.
I assume they decided the costs of lawsuits, and fines would be worth this unethical behavior.
Ding Ding just like when The sec fines hedge funds a couple of thousands dollars after taking in millions illegally of course its worth it
Proof of prior art is usually a successful patent challenge
No this is the reason megacorps changed patents from First To Invent to First To File which means now you can invent something, Intel steals your research and patents it, and then you owe Intel for your invention.
Mostly prior art now is only if the invention was actually in use in public, and even then you have to sue the now-patent holder to invalidate the patent on your own invention.
So AMD could sue over copyright infringement since Intel copied their flow charts 1:1, but unless the chip was produced and available to purchase then they have to pay Intel.
First-to-file is stupid.
It seems the AMD sub-reddit has yet to realized what has just happened. If anyone has a reddit account, feel free to inform them.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/
https://www.reddit.com/r/hardware/
It is not news I would expect them to take lightly.
Did you check removed threads too?
AMD and Hardware mods are really solid. At most they will be waiting for an official word from AMD's lawyers, or for a tech savoy third party to go over the info for them.
Shit did get awkward a month back when one of their less reliable mods vandalized the sub with anti-Putin propaganda. They cleaned it up quick and locked all meta threads on the topic. They do not like politics in the tech subs.
someone made a somewhat plausible explanation of it on hardware
"Some clown on Twitter pointed to an Intel patent and its reference of AMD diagrams and started stirring crap.
But that person didn't understand how patent filings are written, and neither did Ian Cutress (or the others who jumped on the Twitter panic train). People started flailing their arms about until someone told them that that's how patent filings are done. They use language and diagrams, often copy-pastad from various sources, to describe a thing or problem, then describe what they're doing and make their case for why it's unique and patentable in that context.
Then the clown on Twitter who started this tried to come out and say he knew it all along and that this was a "social experiment"."
Patents are made for scams. They do not help to improve innovation.
They are there to create monopolies.
About patents.
I have come across many examples many were on techdirt.
In theory they might work.
In real-world applications the patent system screws innovation and small companies. In the EU patents are very expensive and requires a prototype. In the US the patent system probably has other problems.
The small companies can not pay the bills, patent-research, reverse engineering and lawyers that are necessary to get paid for innovative inventions.
Besides that most of the inventions are not really innovative. Because they are often just small changes of older tech or new combinations of older tech. Or by improving the production or fabrication process.
A lot of profit is made by producing a product cheaper (like in China) and short lived. And not by making it high quality or durable.
In a war situation the patent systems are relaxed, so in those times we see that companies are "inventing" more stuff.
As an example:
Let's look at this truly innovative technology of the SAFIRE project:
The transmutations of atoms by electricity.
It may break down nuclear waste, it can generate energy.
It is an invention that can change our world.
Will a patent be accepted? Probably not, because a lot of nuclear power "experts" will tell us that it is impossible and that this must be a hoax of some kind.
They will need money to research the different ways the power can be generated and extracted. Or how how nuclear waste can be transformed.
It will be 10 to 20 years of research on a small scale.
And during that time big companies will try to steal this tech and claim it as their own. They will also pay some scientists to claim that it is the next step of quantum technology. Most do not understand quantum mechanics anyway.
So even if it works, this product will probably not reach the market soon.
Due to the patent system and due to how science can be stuck in a system.
And if it reaches the market the inventors will still not see much money from it, and big companies will have stolen it from them.
I can tell you first hand, their R&D department was a mess (at least the part I saw) and they are one of the "wokest" affirmative action companies out there. They signaled they don't care about hiring top talent, but hiring to fill quotas.
There is a reason they ended up behind AMD, same is happening to google and microsoft.
I wish I could updoot you to the moon!
Amen, brother.
I agree with everything but the rap music. Music should change and be varied...the type of music is not the problem. It was the production companies, media pyramids and all manner of kickback schemes that defrauded most artists and forced them to put out cheap shit to sell an image. Rapping takes skill - it's not easy to do a good job. It's just as much music as any other genre. Same thing was said about metal before, and punk and all manner of music.
It's the corruption behind the music that's the issue. All music genres have their place. It's when they get watered down, and derivative and focus on cheap repeats...that's when it falls. Pop music is far more the proponents of the NWO and wokisim than rap, but otherwise. I agree.
Man, there was a dude in downtown Baltimore who would follow people around and rap about them (for money of course, but whatever).
Saw him a few times, and he was hilarious and quite intelligent. Rhymed well too.
Don't know if he ever became a real rapper, perhaps he didn't want to. All I know is that his critical thinking and improv skills were quite amazing, and as somebody who likes words and language, even his vocabulary was impressive.
Maybe rap isn't really music...it's just poetry in motion.
AMD or Intel?
My hypothesis is that corporations that cooperate fully with those agencies need not worry about competition.
The one stealing intellectual property.
Intel is crucial to US military and Intelligence and all their major designs for almost a decade have come out of Israel.
So yes.
How are you a leading tech company and doing tech demos before pat pending?
the world of industrial espionage is ruthless