That is not part of the globalist "sustainability". They want zero-carbon, and no useful energy. Even when you can produce it from the land. That is because they want Technocratic control over all energy, without freedom for their slaves.
We can already make biodiesel from vegetable fat. And hydrogen from nuclear energy. Storage of hydrogen is difficult though. Do you see an increase in investments in those existing projects?
Here are the evolutionary steps (gain-of-function) that were taken to make the virus according to A. Jones:
Lab CoV 2nd Generation - Allison Jones
Fake. Because you need to create the correct RNA strands. Not mix some virus components. This text just is a mixture of buzzwords.
To get the correct RNA strands, they use an evolutionary procedure, with different generations that slowly get more features attached to the RNA. Usually called "gain-of-function". This RNA also has to produce functional proteins, and a functional virus, which is hard.
Then there is the RNA printing. You put the code in the machine and it prints the RNA directly. Then you have to put this RNA into the cells to produce viruses. To get the RNA in the cells you use a "vector-virus" or a Lipid Nano Particle, or inject it directly via a small needle.
This latter method still has to work out the stability of the proteins. Misfolding is very common as we see with the injections.
Ryan Cole had studied these clots, and pulled some out. They are mainly immune system cells sticking to each other with cell-glue. The cell glue can be detected with markers. Probably because these cells think that there is some wound.
About patents.
I have come across many examples many were on techdirt.
In theory they might work.
In real-world applications the patent system screws innovation and small companies. In the EU patents are very expensive and requires a prototype. In the US the patent system probably has other problems.
The small companies can not pay the bills, patent-research, reverse engineering and lawyers that are necessary to get paid for innovative inventions.
Besides that most of the inventions are not really innovative. Because they are often just small changes of older tech or new combinations of older tech. Or by improving the production or fabrication process.
A lot of profit is made by producing a product cheaper (like in China) and short lived. And not by making it high quality or durable.
In a war situation the patent systems are relaxed, so in those times we see that companies are "inventing" more stuff.
As an example:
Let's look at this truly innovative technology of the SAFIRE project:
The transmutations of atoms by electricity.
It may break down nuclear waste, it can generate energy.
It is an invention that can change our world.
Will a patent be accepted? Probably not, because a lot of nuclear power "experts" will tell us that it is impossible and that this must be a hoax of some kind.
They will need money to research the different ways the power can be generated and extracted. Or how how nuclear waste can be transformed.
It will be 10 to 20 years of research on a small scale.
And during that time big companies will try to steal this tech and claim it as their own. They will also pay some scientists to claim that it is the next step of quantum technology. Most do not understand quantum mechanics anyway.
So even if it works, this product will probably not reach the market soon.
Due to the patent system and due to how science can be stuck in a system.
And if it reaches the market the inventors will still not see much money from it, and big companies will have stolen it from them.
Thanks.
Via a Fuellmich interview I learned that the PCR has 3 different RNA codes that are each amplified to produce the "positive" outcome.
I think that each of these RNA codes are related to something common, and never were intended to produce real test results.
The 42000 seems the number of reported cases with side-effects.
What is the total?
If the total is 1,000,000, it is close the 4% of those reported by the German insurance. And 1.2/1000 chance of death.
But more realistically would be >50% side-effects, based on the D-dimer tests and immunity system tests. But they will not get reported unless tested. Most victims report it as fatigue or head-aches.
Is it a military drone-plane or a civilian plane?
Still hard to see, but I do not see the bright color bands of a civilian plane nor the ID-numbers. Even though they can just paint them over.
There was some clear evidence of a switch going on. The engines are also running very high for a civilian jet. The found engines from the wrecks were also from military planes. But no bodies found and black box disappeared. Most of this info can be found on Pilots for 9/11 truth.
Check out the YT channel "New Thinking Allowed"
Here is the debunk of Einstein's model of the photo-electric effect:
https://thescienceanalyst.substack.com/p/quantum-physics-has-been-falsified (There is never any photon.)
The general relativity has the following problem: If gravity is acceleration, one would see the effect of acceleration on electric charges (induction). But we don't see that effect. So gravity is not acceleration (for electric charge).