Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

64
()
posted 3 years ago by Zap_Powerz 3 years ago by Zap_Powerz +69 / -5
24 comments share
24 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (24)
sorted by:
▲ 15 ▼
– Dorktron4Runner 15 points 3 years ago +15 / -0

Sick. They need to pass a law to allow killing the people who propose this satanic garbage.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– StopSmokingPOTFAGGOT 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

It's called Christianity

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– cxivv 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2223

And the no gay crap in preschool legislation is controversial WTF

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– weezkitty 4 points 3 years ago +5 / -1

I couldn't actually find the text that legalizes killing infants after 7 days

But still

(a) Reproductive justice is a framework created by Black women in 1994 to address the intersectional and multifactored issues that women of color and their families face in society.

pregnant person

California is lost

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– aboardthegravyboat 3 points 3 years ago +4 / -1

Yeah, it doesn't say anything about 7 days. I think this is the part:

Notwithstanding any other law, a person shall not be subject to civil or criminal liability or penalty, or otherwise deprived of their rights, based on their actions or omissions with respect to their pregnancy or actual, potential, or alleged pregnancy outcome, including miscarriage, stillbirth, or abortion, or perinatal death.

The critics are hanging on that last line and somehow interpreting that to mean "1 week", and I would interpret the first phrase to mean that other laws like murder still apply.

But I'm curious what a real sober analysis of that would be. The article here didn't actually quote the important part.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– KiloRomeo 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

The perinatal part is the loophole

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Miztivin 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
  1. The performance of an abortion is unauthorized if performed by someone other than the pregnant person and if either of the following is true:

(b) The abortion is performed on a viable fetus, and both of the following are established:

(1) In the good faith medical judgment of the physician, the fetus was viable. (2) In the good faith medical judgment of the physician, continuation of the pregnancy posed no risk to life or health of the individual.

From how understand it, this bill prohibits prosecution of self induced abortions without a physician IF the fetus was already dead and/or posing a risk to the "individual's" *cough* woman's *cough* health.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– dukey 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

jesus christ

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– SallyJ444 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

That is murder of the most vulnerable by a person of trust. This is SICKENING, EVIL, HORRIFIC!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Souleater 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Hmm...

SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the following: (a) Reproductive justice is a framework created by Black women in 1994 to address the intersectional and multifactored issues that women of color and their families face in society.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 3 years ago +2 / -2
▲ 2 ▼
– Sinhasu 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

If you are father, by that law you can kill the woman in defence of your child. Literally she wants to kill your baby. What about that whores?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DrinktheCovfefe 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

Khazarian Baal worshippers

Based and Christian- Identitarian-pilled

Rev 2:9 “I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan."

Rev 3:9 "Indeed I will make those of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but lie—indeed I will make them come and worship before your feet, and to know that I have loved you."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– DrinktheCovfefe 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

They are. I read the other day that ~80% of modern day "jews" are Khazars

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LandoNorris 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

Op provides a source link but it was a dead link for me. I searched California assembly bill 2223 and it comes up with this which has nothing to do with abortions or related topics. Odd

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/15-16/bill/asm/ab_2201-2250/ab_2223_bill_20160328_amended_asm_v98.pdf

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Miztivin 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220AB2223

Click the "text" tab. The site is just set up akwardly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– LandoNorris 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

For whatever reason it’s working now. Thanks

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– repeatoffender 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

That's AB2223 from the 2015-2016 session. I wouldn't be surprised it is completely unrelated to the 2022 bill.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– ZyklonBen -1 points 3 years ago +2 / -3

Imagine being so fucking stupid and believing this bullshit without even making the effort to verify this sensational claim.

spoiler: it's a fucking lie. pure outrage porn.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– TardedButNotDeparted -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

These sensationalized articles are just as ridiculous as CNN.

Can we NOT stoop to their level of false and biased emotional reporting?

There's a clear difference between not being held legally responsible for a negligent death, and being allowed to murder a baby.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– deleted -3 points 3 years ago +1 / -4

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy