47
posted ago by PyramidsAreCrazyShit ago by PyramidsAreCrazyShit +51 / -4

President banned from Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitch.
https://archive.is/dBxTW
https://archive.is/skCvo
https://archive.is/ZQgFd
Trump Campaign banned from sending emails through their current provider, Campaign Monitor.
https://archive.is/N2QxZ
President was banned and his stores removed from Shopify. https://archive.is/T3gV8
Facebook removed #WalkAway with over half a million members and hundreds of thousands of testimonial videos and stories. They also banned the group owner and his entire team.
https://archive.is/ZWeqo
Facebook removed Joe Biden is Not My President group with 1.7 million members.
https://archive.is/xJAKP
Google Play removes Parler & Gab.
https://archive.is/v9E4R
https://archive.is/CsvxY
Apple Store removes Gab. Apple threatens to remove Parler.
https://archive.is/g4YKY
Sidney Powell banned from Twitter.
https://archive.is/FhLvH
Michael Flynn banned from Twitter.
https://archive.is/FhLvH
Reddit bans r / DonaldTrump.
https://archive.is/7rCOq
Reddit bans mod from this sub.
https://archive.is/7rCOq
TD was banned from Discord.
https://archive.is/ZQgFd
YouTube bans Steve Bannon's War Room.
https://archive.is/HWMcH
Reddit banned The_Donald and several other subs. (This is older but relevant since we're on .WIN.)
https://archive.is/iw67J
YouTube is banning accounts that discuss voter fraud.
https://archive.is/bHdID
This list doesn't include all the "little people" who have censored, suspended, and banned over the last day. There are many. I'm sure there are also some big fish left off this list as well.

EDIT 1: President has been banned from Pinterest and Spotify.
https://archive.is/N6PZk

EDIT 2: Apple has removed Parler from its app store. https://archive.is/25L4P

EDIT 3: Amazon Web Services (AWS) has removed Parler's hosting, effective tomorrow.
https://archive.is/LJabg

EDIT 4: Ben Garrison, political cartoonist, has been suspended from Facebook and Twitter.
https://archive.is/yigwH

EDIT 5: Tom Fitton, CEO of Judicial Watch and Member of D.C. Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure, has been suspended from Twitter.
https://archive.is/wip/uEyww

Comments (43)
sorted by:
18
NotAPengali 18 points ago +18 / -0

Seems more and more obvious to me that the system is practically begging for some deep, deep Streisand effect level push back from all the shenanigans they're playing.

15
PyramidsAreCrazyShit [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's certainly had a reverse effect in that demoralized Trump voters are now galvanized once more. I would hope some classic liberals are also concerned about the breadth of censorship.

5
free-will-of-choice 5 points ago +5 / -0

the system is practically begging for...push back

They condition their subjects to accept having less and less, while creating small push backs to blow off accumulating steam.

2
NotAPengali 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're correct. I wish you weren't, but this is the way they work. More and more of us need to be aware of this.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish...need to be aware

A wish represents hope; represents a want; represents a temptation luring towards death. ONE cannot adhere to ones needs; if one adheres to ones wants.

What lies in-between ones needs and wants? ONEs free will of choice to either adhere to self sustenance (need) or ignore adherence for the temptations luring one towards death (wants).

1
NotAPengali 1 point ago +1 / -0

While I don’t entirely disagree with what you stated here, I’m not sure it isn’t misplaced where it regards the intent of my above statement. My saying “I wish you weren’t” was/is more a figure of speech than an actual wish or desire.

ONE cannot adhere to ones needs; if one adheres to ones wants.

That’s not entirely true if one is aware to the extent that your desires (wants) are sufficiently aligned to your needs.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

My saying “I wish you weren’t” was/is more a figure of speech than an actual wish or desire.

Do you comprehend that nature is the source of all information? If not; try to use your mind to come up with one "new" thought, that isn't inspired by all around you. Afterwards allow yourself to comprehend that nature communicates all information to all existence within itself WITHOUT using words (brands, idols) by using the consequences of actions set into motion as inspiration to our senses.

What you "believe" to be a figure of speech represents your consent (by believing it) to the definition of what reality means; offered to you by other (((ones)) within it. We are being tricked to believe in a substitute (fiction) source of information, while being deceived to consent to ignore reality; nature (the source of all information).

When one says "I wish" then the aim (intent) is towards that which isn't (future), which one can only do if one ignores that which is (present). Meanwhile one is within constant motion; which demands constant adaptation, which one consents to with every breath (SPIR'IT, noun (Latin spiritus, from spiro) - to breathe) one takes.

That’s not entirely true if one is aware to the extent that your desires (wants) are sufficiently aligned to your needs.

Ones needs are defined by self sustenance within motion; everything else is not a need; thereby a want; defined by the pull of motion "tempting" one towards ones end. This is why one has sole authority over ones actions aka ones free will of choice to either adhere to self sustenance (ones needs); or ignore adherence (ones wants).

The choice in between (defined by balance within motion aka momentum) is about ones responsibility about when a need reaches "enough" to sustain self, before it turns into a want of self destruction, and since we are within motion...life is always running out and death unavoidable, so need and want are merely inspiration to teach responsibility to maintain balance; to sustain self within motion, which should teach us to question what exactly the "self" is that we can sustain over the barriers of inception and death...can you guess?

1
NotAPengali 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you comprehend that nature is the source of all information?

Do you comprehend what nature is?

try to use your mind to come up with one "new" thought, that isn't inspired by all around you.

Why? I won’t say it’s impossible, but I don’t think my mind (or almost any human mind for that matter) can do it.

Afterwards allow yourself to comprehend that nature communicates all information to all existence within itself WITHOUT using words (brands, idols) by using the consequences of actions set into motion as inspiration to our senses.

It’s not necessarily exclusive to that. In addition to sensory info, there is information acquired independent of the senses.

What you "believe" to be a figure of speech represents your consent (by believing it) to the definition of what reality means

That’s no small part of the very reason why I make it a specific point to believe very little - almost nothing in fact. If I cannot verify as much as possible, I withhold belief.

We are being tricked to believe in a substitute (fiction) source of information, while being deceived to consent to ignore reality; nature (the source of all information).

What is “reality” and “fiction” appears to be something not too many Earth humans are entirely clear on, however.

When one says "I wish" then the aim (intent) is towards that which isn't (future), which one can only do if one ignores that which is (present).

Depends where your focus is.

Ones needs are defined by self sustenance within motion

While true, the definition of “self” makes the true meaning of this statement variable in ways possibly quite unforeseen.

one has sole authority over ones actions aka ones free will of choice to either adhere to self sustenance (ones needs); or ignore adherence (ones wants).

It appears that A) we are a lot more controlled than many anticipate, however, and that B) free will is a chimera.

can you guess?

To my limited understanding, the self is a holographic projection from the multi-dimensional, multi-cosmic Identity that encompasses all that is, isn’t, and everything in between.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you comprehend what nature is?

Yes. The source of ALL information (potentiality of energy) aka the function of self sustenance through motion (the flow of information). Energy creates motion; motion creates energy. Self sustenance.

Why? I won’t say it’s impossible, but I don’t think my mind (or almost any human mind for that matter) can do it.

That's the point. ALL information is predefined, each of us just lacks comprehension of what it means. We cannot claim nature; we need to adhere to it to increase our potential (our comprehension). All the form you perceive are inspiration for you to adhere to self sustenance.

In addition to sensory info, there is information acquired independent of the senses.

Let me define what "sense " represents...ALL that ONE perceives; not all which one comprehends about what the perceived means. ALL information is energy (potentiality), each ONE within is a potential of that potentiality, and so there cannot be any other source of information.

ONE can only transmute out of ALL that is. Everything you comprehend as an independent source of information is based on you upholding beliefs, and thereby self restricting comprehension to ignore reality, while adhering to fiction (belief which ignores motion).

Give me an example for your independent information and I will try to lay it out.

That’s no small part of the very reason why I make it a specific point to believe very little - almost nothing in fact. If I cannot verify as much as possible, I withhold belief.

Correct. This is a defensive mechanism, based on you believing in "lies", then acknowledging the contradiction to what you now believe to be "truth", which is why you now hold onto your remaining belief based "truths", while self restricting the input of new beliefs, to protect yourself from more trauma by lies.

Been there; done that. You are on the correct path. The problem is that you believe in the state of "truth" and "false", which do not exist in nature, because nature is ever changing information and consequences of actions set into it. Comprehension of motion is the key, which eventually leads you to comprehend that the only thing that cannot change within a system based on motion; are the rules that define how motion operates (the laws of nature).

Within motion; one can only ever make assumptions about things that are constantly changing, and to function on assumptions; one requires a foundation to build on...the mental comprehension about how motion operates; to then be able to make assumptions about physical consequences of actions set into motion.

What also helps is to question that whenever one proclaims a "truth"; all other ones still have the free will of choice to view it as a lie, so "truth" and "lies" both require consent by choice. How is it truth when one makes it an offer to another ones choice to gain consent? Why is one here the merchant to define reality for another one?

While you give that one a thought...observe all the other lifeforms to ask yourself who's proclaiming "truth" to them?

Also, never believe the information of anyone; instead always use it as inspiration for adaptation to increase comprehension.

What is “reality” and “fiction” appears to be something not too many Earth humans are entirely clear on, however.

ALL is the sole source of reality; while only ONE can make fiction out of it for other ONES, by ignoring reality with self imposed beliefs, which he then proclaims as truth or lies. Within nature; ONE does not need to believe to sustain self.

The act of believing within nature is a temporary response to imminent danger. For example...a young deer experiences his first thunderstorm, and believes; assumes potential doom. That is a protective measure of the survial instinct, defining the value of life over death by assuming death to inspire to protect life. If the deer holds onto that belief, then a predator will exploit the lack of adaptation (mental stagnation). Normally, the deer will get scared, which automatically inspires curiosity about what the fuck is going down, which will lead towards comprehension, when he notices that all the elder deer are chilling in the bushes, and so he learned.

The deer consented to the offer of belief, which create higher awareness of potential danger, after which he consented again to let go of the belief for comprehending that it isn't that much of danger. Holding onto the belief, would make it a fictitious assumption about what could happen; the temptation of fearing death, while ignoring to sustain life.

Depends where your focus is.

That's again lack of self discernment, because the function of all existence is self sustenance, which demands adherence, and so all other intent is by definition ignorance of adherence to self sustenance. That is exactly the fiction over reality problem in action...we are being deceived to build our selfish intent on beliefs (fiction), while ignoring that the only real "intent" (which is a function; not a conscious intent) is adherence to self sustenance.

While true, the definition of “self” makes the true meaning of this statement variable in ways possibly quite unforeseen.

With life is always running out, and death being unavoidable, what indeed is that "self" that we can sustain beyond those barriers of our existence? It's neither the body; nor the mind. The blood is our true identity carrier and it is a "shared" identity from all within a bloodline, with body and mind being merely temporary tools to sustain the bloodline. Within the energy cycles of loss/recharge, that which remains represents the residue created when forward motion meets momentum (resistance to motion), which generates heat, which therefore creates the need for cooling, which is where liquid comes into existence. Liquid btw levels not because we are spinning; but because we are in the momentum (balance within motion) of the flow of information.

It appears that A) we are a lot more controlled than many anticipate, however, and that B) free will is a chimera.

A) we are in motion; so motion governs all existence within. It is the natural "order" of forward motion, that allows the temporary "chaos" within momentum to mimic (resonate) out of the flow of information to establish form.

B) There's only ever two choices for free will...adherence (need) or ignorance (want), which is also why no other life form has any problem with instinctively adhering to it. You exist between inception (life) and death...adherence to life sustains it; ignorance to sustain life leads to death.

What's the 3rd choice between life (lion) and death (goat)? Believing the lies of the snake-head? Nah, that's just ignorance, while justifying it with beliefs (fiction). Btw they are total drama queens about using allegories (chimera) to fuck with our comprehension. Stay away from allegories until you have a sure comprehension about the laws of nature.

To my limited understanding, the self is a holographic projection from the multi-dimensional, multi-cosmic Identity that encompasses all that is, isn’t, and everything in between.

That's pretty much for a limitation; isn't it?

Anyway; HOL'OGRAPH, noun [Gr. whole, and to write.] A deed or testament written wholly by the grantor's or testator's own hand. So the "whole" represents the ALL, and "to write" represents the ONE acting upon ALL offered.

DIMENSION, noun (Latin , to measure). That also represents ONE acting upon ALL offered.

COSMICAL, adjective s as z. [Gr., order, the world.] That represents ALL governing the ONEs within.

IDEN'TITY, noun Sameness, as distinguished from similitude and diversity. Here we have a contradiction in terms, because ALL is ONE in energy, so it is "sameness" that establishes "diversity", hence nature self segregating differences to inspire senses to adhere to self sustenance.

"all that is, isn’t, and everything in between."...ALL is energy, and there's no "isn't" (nothing) just not transmuted yet (unused potentiality).

As long as you still think in terms of truth and false I advice you to use a mantra I followed "simplicity means truth; complexity hides lies". It's a great tool for whenever someone starts talking about "holographic projections from the multi-dimensional, multi-cosmic Identities"...

That being said; thanks for the inspiration.

1
Mrexreturns 1 point ago +3 / -2

It's not happening, there's no Streisand Effect when the Nazis or Maoists start burning books either.

7
NotAPengali 7 points ago +7 / -0

I disagree. I have a feeling there's going to be a (not too) civil war happening in the not too distant future. I don't revel in this. It's not anything anyone should be looking forward to. However, there's some very nefarious shit happening in this country, and there are enough people who see it that aren't going to stand for it.

3
Mrexreturns 3 points ago +4 / -1

You missed my point. The Russian, Nazi, Chinese (Both Iconoclast and Communists), Cambodian and Rwandan revolutions are unopposed preparations for Genocide. They can burn books, purge dissidents, start mass ethnic cleansings, regress society back to the Stone Age and rally a whole society to kill and eat their own, and nobody will ever bat an eye. If there are anyone who said Stalin or Hitler was a fraud in the US back then, people will treat them like some sort of pro-banker, pro-Jewish blood clown.

If that happens to the USA next, I am seriously not surprised.

4
NotAPengali 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Russian, Nazi, Chinese (Both Iconoclast and Communists), Cambodian and Rwandan revolutions are unopposed preparations for Genocide. They can burn books, purge dissidents, start mass ethnic cleansings, regress society back to the Stone Age and rally a whole society to kill and eat their own, and nobody will ever bat an eye.

Again, I disagree. If people didn't bat an eye, then there wouldn't be as much shit happening over the stolen election as there has been.

0
Mrexreturns 0 points ago +1 / -1

Always remember we are the minority and around 98% of the population all over the world believe in establishment talkpoints. And no I didn't mean America alone, I also included the rest of the world.

And among the most notorious ones are Hitler is our friend and Soviet Russia is a rosy classless utopia before WWII.

3
nc777 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hear the 98% comment.
There were 74-76 million voters for a guy telling them about fake news the last 4 year. How many votes for the other guy?
What do those people think about the deep state, covid, kennedy.. 9/11 I wonder.
I agree most have not ventured down the rabbit hole enough.
Tptb wants to obsolete those people for such outdated ideas like Property, having a job, having a family.
They tried to knock many off with wars, oxycontin, etc.
They won't need that group as much to fight their wars once the bots and war 4.0 is implemented.

0
Mrexreturns 0 points ago +1 / -1

Worldwide people. America isn't the world.

1
NotAPengali 1 point ago +1 / -0

we are the minority and around 98% of the population all over the world believe in establishment talkpoints.

Jesus I wish you weren’t right about this. Fucking kill me already. Unthinking, uncritical sheep everywhere. smh.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

No surprise there. Narrow is the gate to life, and few will find it; broad is the way to destruction, and many will go in by it. What I've been really wondering is that if this is really the beginning of the end, I mean, the tribulation, the cashless society, the 10-state global government, the mandatory covid vaccine laced with the mark of the beast, the whole satanic/communist package, you know. That has always been their long term plan, Trump is just a road bump who halted it for a few years and exposed a lot of them, that's why they had to hasten it with the chinese virus, the BLM riot and the massive fraud to remove him from their way and get back on track.

13
Firesky 13 points ago +13 / -0

Big tech chose a side and did all they could to help their side win.

They only won because those who had the power to stop them decided to sit around and twiddle their thumbs.

6
arjunas1 6 points ago +6 / -0

ive ungoogled my phone, unappled my desktop, deleted all my google data.

switched to...

  • paid email
  • brave browser
  • duckduckgo
  • dropbox
6
carrierlost 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's hard to uncouple from google but I'll be doing my best in the future as well.

1
PyramidsAreCrazyShit [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm working on it myself. I'm skeptical of dropbox. Any reason why you chose it?

1
arjunas1 1 point ago +1 / -0

it is choosing the lesser of two evils.

its not google.

theyve developed OS extensions to integrate into the file system.

many apps have dropbox as a remote source to sync to.

what do you recommend?

1
arjunas1 1 point ago +1 / -0

ive done the due-dilligence when picking a new email provider.

FASTMAIL, SON!

all-in-one.

  • great calendar
  • secure notes
  • file storage
  • contacts manager

its paid email. ie, youre not whored out.

good discount if you pay a year up front.

here is 10% off...

https://ref.fm/u25424448

1
kenkra 1 point ago +1 / -0

FastMail is deepstate, shill

1
arjunas1 1 point ago +1 / -0

SOMEONE HOLD ME THE FUCK BACK OR IMMA FUCK DAT KENKRA FUCK.

1
kenkra 1 point ago +1 / -0

FastMail is deepstate, shill

5
Mrexreturns 5 points ago +5 / -0

And then the Google, Twitter, FB, Reddit and other Big Tech Databases etc. are going to send all of info of the "Them People" to NSA and the United Nations.

Have a guess about what happens next.

1
VaccinesCauseSIDS 1 point ago +1 / -0

We get put on another list?

Once you come terms with your own mortality, and lose the fear of death, you cant be controlled by fear of death

3
KennyLiquorbush 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's call it what it is: Globalist censorship of the exposure of their crimes.

3
nc777 3 points ago +3 / -0

Digital Cultural Revolution.
Digital Dark Age 2.0

2
UnidentifiedWhiteMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

gab was banned from the google Play and Apple app stores a long time ago

2
Reikan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dystopian Nightmare

1
Esuomyonana 1 point ago +3 / -2

This harsh reaction by the establishment is something interesting. I wonder if Trump didn’t throw his supporters under the bus so much he’d have had way more support. It may not seem like that to some but it seems like it’s happened many times.

3
PyramidsAreCrazyShit [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

Not sure what you mean by Trump throwing his supporters under the bus. Also, per Rasmussen, he's polling higher after this than before. 48% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance today. That's up from 45% on Dec 31st.

2
Esuomyonana 2 points ago +4 / -2

His deep fake called out his supporters.

-16
MagaPede69 -16 points ago +1 / -17

Well, try to lead an insurrection and that's what happens. Traitors.

3
VaccinesCauseSIDS 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nobody here is falling for your gaslight. If you actually believed your own lies, would you be here?

2
Elsest808 2 points ago +2 / -0

Move to China fag.

2
PyramidsAreCrazyShit [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

“You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about. That's why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that's when civility can start again." -Hillary Clinton

"And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere." -Maxine Waters

"Go to the Hill today. Please, get up in the face of some congresspeople." -Cory Booker

"We owe the American people to be there for them, for their financial security, respecting the dignity and worth of every person in our country, and if there is some collateral damage for some others who do not share our view, well, so be it, but it shouldn’t be our original purpose." -Nancy Pelosi

"Michelle always says, Michelle Obama, I love her. She and my wife are really tight. Which always scares me and Barack. Michelle always says, 'When they go low, we go high.' No. No. When they go low, we kick them." -Eric Holder

"Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House." -Madonna

"I told Jeb Bush after that debate that I thought he should have punched [Trump] in the face." -Nicolle Wallace

"When was the last time an actor assassinated a president? I want to clarify, I am not an actor. I lie for a living. However, it has been a while and maybe it is time." -Johnny Depp

“New details today on the incident that left Senator Rand Paul with six broken ribs – this might be one of my favorite stories.” -Kaisie Hunt

"What we've got to do is fight in Congress, fight in the courts, fight in the streets, fight online, fight at the ballot box, and now there's the momentum to be able to do this." -Tim Kaine

“Anyway, since we’re talking about bigotry, we have to mention Donald Trump. Sorry everyone. I know. I don’t want to give him any more oxygen. That’s not a euphemism, by the way. I mean it literally. Somebody get me the pillow they used to kill Scalia and I’ll do it, okay — I’ll do it." -Larry Wilmore

“How do you resist the temptation to run up and wring [Sarah Huckabee Sanders'] neck?” -Nicolle Wallace

“If the bully [President Trump] gets close, I’ll punch the bully in the mouth.” -Ricardo Rossello