6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +7 / -1

Why can't you have it both ways?

Here, I'll give you another one:

"Trump didn't secure the border, didn't deport illegals, but he should have."

Many influencial people say he did, but it's obviously untrue, by the numbers. We still want him to do it and will work towards it. Where's the lie? Where's the hypocrisy?

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I find it funny that governments think they can just make a law and somehow that stops me sending encrypted communication.

Like, how would this even work? All of the best cryptographic algorithms are publicly available; all I need to do is implement it, give my key to the recipient, and send whatever I want over e-mail.

Are they going to block all messages that they can't understand? All the pictures which don't have traffic lights? In real time? That'll go well...

10
WeedleTLiar 10 points ago +10 / -0

Degeneracy aside, all that fine print suggests to me a person who wants power for it's own sake; the kind of person who revels in creating and arbitrary rules and having others dance for scraps of authority.

The last person you'd ever want as a mod, in other words.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Four women trying to disrupt the "traditional family" (read: marriage) to genocide Whites.

What's your schizo take on this one, Imp?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm past the point of caring. I'd rather they (try) to take me to a death camp than live my life in fear of saying the wrong thing.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's why they refuse to study, or even record, most of it. Normies believe what they're told so, if there is actually a shift in the mainstream narrarive, fueled by large numbers of studies, they'll change their minds as well.

The exact same people who dismiss the increase in turbo-cancers act as though they would have been too smart to take thalidomide, or use DDT.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't need to argue stupid points.

And yet you constantly do...

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

They wouldn't need to raise taxes if they didn't fund infinite immigration

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

This only works if people go along with it.

I mean, they probably will, but it's a good reminder to every free thinker that they can just say "no".

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

"We need the people who are all being blackmailed for their child abuse, and literally protecting pedophiles from justice, to keep kids safe from dirty pictures online."

This is all I hear whenever anyone suggests we need nanny laws.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Arguing with a women be like...

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +5 / -1

So will Jews. That means you don't listen to what they say, but watch the results of their actions.

Native birth rates drop below replacement levels as they advocate abortion and mass immigration.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, that's me. You're clearly a bad faith actor, even moreso than JG5, who spends all her time advocating for the extinction of the human race. You respond to arguments with ad hominims, wild accusations, and rhetorical pivots.

That's a reason your main got banned site wide, and it's not because you were "speaking truth to power".

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

its not like theres alot of free discussion here anymore.

There are literally not mods; you can discuss anything you like.

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Did the anti-natalist cult exist before the Balfour Declaration?

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +4 / -0

How did you know what I was going to do? Maybe you're actually my alt this whole time?

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +6 / -1

Y'know, I never had a problem with the way things were going on this board until someone started bitching on c/meta that we didn't have mods and (inadvertantly?) invited clownshoes into our midst.

This isn't a community, it's a public web forum; only trannies think something like that could stand in for an actual community. I don't know a single person here, or even if they're human, and you want me to honour them? You want to increase traffic by letting in anonymous randos and you think we can have rights?

I think you guys need to have a good think about what this place actually is before you do something you'll regret.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›