3
tmz88 3 points ago +3 / -0

whoever said it was a jogging injury never went jogging...

by DrLeaks
5
tmz88 5 points ago +5 / -0

0:22 the FDA not being pressured will look hard at that

1:36 the FDA will make a good job of that despite the pressure

1
tmz88 1 point ago +1 / -0

It has been trained on tons of existing text written by humans, and so a large enough neural network can learn all kinds of low-level and high-level patterns that exist in it, from groups of words all the way to abstract concepts. When given a new input it basically fills in what an response would look like based on the patterns it learned. Basically there it goes the other way, from abstract concepts back to individual words, which is similar to how a human would think of something and then formulate a sentence. But its concepts are based only on all the texts it that it has been trained with, and not on anything else. So it only ever reinforces existing memes or consensus.

3
tmz88 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's obvious since the beginning that the whole thing is organized top-down, and the goal is to give everyone mandatory RNA shots every few month in the future, for whatever purpose. It's kind of an "unknown known", something you know from common sense, but you're not supposed to think about.

1
tmz88 1 point ago +1 / -0

And Belgium will soon mandate vaccines for all citizens (all the news sites talking about it). Which would maybe mean the police come to your home to take you to get vaccinated by force, or something similar...

Even though the great majority is already fully vaccinated (75% in all of Belgium, 81% Flanders), they are blaming the coming fourth wave on the unvaccinated. And saying that if people were not vaccinated, the wave would be much worse than the earlier ones for some reason.

And it you look on any forum, 99% of people are completely for it.

5
tmz88 5 points ago +5 / -0

The personal home pages or websites people made using web hosting services like Geosites, Angelfire, etc were mostly a fad of the 90s, and most are offline now. So most of the internet today is commercial web sites, social media, wikipedia, scientific papers, and maybe some blogs. And a lot of this is fake or censored by Google or by the hosts.

Google filters the results to show what is most relevant to your location, or anything else it knows about you (based on the whole profile it build of you about your interests, connections, etc.)

When you enter the URL as https://www.google.com/search?q=pizza&start=1234 (start is the argument that gets increased when you go to next results page), it openly says "Sorry, Google does not serve more than 1000 results for any query.")

It seems that the "About 1.060.000.000 results (0,65 seconds)" is mostly a marketing bluff to give the impression that there are very many results, and Google is very good at finding them. It may mostly be an inside joke at this point. Or at best, a rough statistical estimate of how many pages there may in total be containing the query.

Even if google knows that many pages containing the word "pizza", it would be computationally almost impossible to list and sort them all that fast.

4
tmz88 4 points ago +4 / -0

"To start off I'm gonna say this video is not telling anyone to get it" says everything

6
tmz88 6 points ago +6 / -0

no he's just a german with an elongated skull

1
tmz88 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the majority of people are vaccinated, it is logical that also a (lesser) majority of those who die from COVID were vaccinated. Even if the vaccine reduces the probability that someone dies from COVID.

1
tmz88 1 point ago +1 / -0

IQ is defined such that 100 is average, so this can't be accurate

-1
tmz88 -1 points ago +1 / -2

The model assumes that 95% of people will be vaccinated by the time the second spike of hospitalizations and death occurs. (on page 23). So logically the percentage of vaccinated people in that spike if much higher. In the hospital admissions graph, the unvaccinated make up almost half or the total number, even though in that model they are only 5% of the population, meaning that vaccinated people are less likely to get sick. The graph does not imply that vaccines cause the hospitalizations and deaths, only that they are not 100% effective in preventing it.

1
tmz88 1 point ago +1 / -0

"and he's playing entirely of his of own volition"

2
tmz88 2 points ago +2 / -0

same image (from nasa website) after doing "auto color" in photoshop and adjusting saturation: https://imgur.com/zduu9Aw

2
tmz88 2 points ago +2 / -0

from the way they talk it is obvious that they are just mocking people. you can even see the rainbow colors, even if the image was tinted yellow

by pkvi
2
tmz88 2 points ago +2 / -0

masks are missing in the new normal pic